Safety and effectiveness of Phoenix atherectomy for endovascular treatment in calcified common femoral artery lesions

Safety and effectiveness of the phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial

Background: This study aimed to assess the peri- and postprocedural outcomes of atherectomy-assisted endovascular treatment of the common femoral (CFA) and popliteal arteries. Methods: Phoenix atherectomy was used for the treatment of 73 and 53 de novo CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, in 122 consecutive patients. Safety endpoints encompassed perforation and peripheral embolization. Postprocedural endpoints included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and clinical success (an improvement of ⩾ 2 Rutherford category [RC]). In addition, 531 patients treated for popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion without atherectomy were used as a comparator group. Results: Procedural success (residual stenosis < 30% after treatment) was 99.2%. The need for bail-out stenting was 2 (2.7%) and 3 (5.7%) in CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively. Only one (1.4%) embolization occurred in the CFA, which was treated by catheter aspiration. No perforations occurred. After 1.50 (IQR = 1.17-2.20) years, CD-TLR occurred in seven (9.2%) and six (14.6%) patients with CFA and popliteal artery lesions, respectively, whereas clinical success was achieved in 62 (91.2%) and 31 (75.6%), respectively. Patients treated with atherectomy and DCB in the popliteal artery after matching for baseline RC, lesion calcification, length, and the presence of chronic total occlusion, exhibited higher freedom from CD-TLR compared to the nondebulking group (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.1-8.5, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Atherectomy can be used safely and is associated with low rates of bail-out stenting in CFA and popliteal arteries. CD-TLR and clinical success rates are clinically acceptable. In addition, for the popliteal artery, atherectomy combined with DCB demonstrates lower CD-TLR rates compared to a DCB alone strategy. (German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708).

Use of Rotational Atherectomy-Assisted Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Isolated Below-the-Knee Atherosclerotic Lesions in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rotational atherectomy-assisted balloon angioplasty (BTK-RA) for the treatment of isolated below the knee (BTK) atherosclerotic lesions and to compare the outcomes to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Between January 2020 and September 2023, 96 consecutive patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CTLI) and isolated BTK-lesions underwent POBA (group A) or BTK-RA (group B). The primary outcome measures were: periprocedural technical success, primary patency, postoperative increase of the ankle branchial index (ABI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb salvage, minor amputation and death. Both techniques had similar technical success, operative time, intraprocedural complications and bailout stent implantations, independently of the operator's experience. Group B had significantly higher primary patency rates (93.5% vs. 72.0%, respectively, p = 0.006), TLR (2.1% vs. 24%, p = 0.057), lower in-hospital stay (2.0-3.0 vs. 4.0-6.0 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and higher postoperative ABI (0.8-0.2 vs. 0.7-0.1, respectively, p = 0.008), compared to group A. Significant differences (POBA n: 20, 40%, BTK-RA n = 3, 6.5%) were found in minor amputation rates between the two groups (p < 0.001), while the respective limb salvage rates were similar in both groups (94.0% vs. 97.8%, p = 0.35). The use of BTK-RA for the treatment of BTK-lesions in patients with CTLI showed significant clinical advantages in comparison to POBA.

Stand-Alone Rotational Atherectomy Versus Combination With Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Endovascular Treatment of Heavily-Calcified Femoropopliteal and Popliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Despite major technical advances in the endovascular treatment for peripheral artery disease (PAD), heavy calcification still represents a major obstacle to overcome both due to the high number of periprocedural complications (dissections, embolization, etc) and the limited long-term durability. A promising tool to overcome these obstacles is debulking calcified lesions with atherectomy. Since vessel preparation with atherectomy might even improve the diffusion of antiproliferative substances, we wanted to evaluate the impact of atherectomy±DCB in lower extremity PAD.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety, efficacy, and long-term durability on treatment of rotational atherectomy in heavily-calcified complex femoropopliteal and isolated popliteal lesions. In addition, we wanted to investigate whether advanced debulking strategies where atherectomy is followed by a drug-coated angioplasty bear an additional advantage over atherectomy and standard percutaneous angioplasty alone in terms of clinical success and freedom from target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

In total, 218 femoropopliteal and 46 popliteal predominantly heavily-calcified lesions have been investigated. Of 264 cases, in a total of 53 cases, atherectomy treatment was followed by a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty (43 in the femoropopliteal and 10 in the popliteal lesions). The lesions were characterized by a significant length (17.3±12.1 cm) and complexity (TASC C in 48.4% and TASC D in 19.7%). During a mean follow-up of 19 (±11) months, a total of 12 patients (4.5%) died. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was performed in 32 (14.7%) femoropopliteal and 11 isolated popliteal (23.9%) lesions and did not differ significantly between stand-alone atherectomy and atherectomy followed by a DEB. Mean ABI was improved from 0.57±0.22 immediately before intervention to 0.86±0.23 on intervention and remained stable: 0.83±0.16 at follow-up. During follow-up, a mean Rutherford category was reduced from 3.64±1.0 to 2.38±0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-life study provides evidence that atherectomy in combination with DEB is safe and effective but did not have a significant impact on the freedom from target lesion revascularization in our population. Additional large-scale randomized trials are needed to verify these findings.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of combining rotational atherectomy with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for treating heavily calcified femoropopliteal and isolated popliteal lesions in peripheral artery disease (PAD). The retrospective analysis of 264 patients highlights the potential of this combination in improving procedural success and reducing periinterventional complications. While demonstrating an excellent procedural and clinical success rate over an average 19-month follow-up, the study finds no significant long-term benefit in freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to atherectomy alone. These findings suggest the need for further research to optimize treatment strategies for complex PAD cases, particularly in evaluating the long-term clinical benefits of such combined interventions.

Revascularization with BYCROSS atherectomy device- protocol of a prospective multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

The BYCROSS™ device is a novel device intended for use in atherectomy of the peripheral arterial disease (PAD). With the BYCROSS™ atherectomy system, also prolonged calcifying lesions can be treated in a minimally invasive manner, which was previously reserved for bypass surgery. The aim of this study is to collect additional clinical data on safety and performance of the BYCROSS™ from patients undergoing revascularization of severely stenotic or occluded peripheral arterial vessels with the BYCROSS™.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is an investigator-initiated national prospective multicenter observational study in patients with PAD. Sixty patients (20 per center) with PAD with stenosis higher than 80% or complete occlusion (de novo or recurrent stenosis) of vessels below the aortic bifurcation (min 3 mm vessel diameter) will be recruited. Three vascular surgery centers are participating in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint is procedural success, defined as passage of the occlusion through the BYCROSS device, and safety outcomes, explicated as freedom from device-related serious adverse events (SADEs). Secondary endpoints include primary and secondary patency rates, change in Rutherford classification, and freedom from amputation at 3 and 12 months.

DISCUSSION

The BYCROSS atherectomy system may be a novel device for the minimally invasive treatment of prolonged calcified lesions previously reserved for bypass surgery. This national prospective multicenter observational study could represent another step in demonstrating the efficancy and safety of this device for treatment of PAD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

#DRKS00029947 (who.int). PROTOCOL APPROVAL ID: #22-0047(Ethics Committee at Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich).

Surgical Versus Interventional Treatment of Major Access Site Complications During Transfemoral TAVI Procedures at a Large Volume Center

PURPOSE

Access-related vascular complications in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be treated endovascularly or surgically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment compared with surgical repair for access-related vascular complications.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. All transfemorally treated TAVI patients in whom a surgical or endovascular treatment for an access site complication was needed were included. The primary outcome was the need for any related vascular re-operation.

RESULTS

In total, 1219 transfemoral TAVI procedures were conducted during the study period. 19 patients suffered an access complication requiring endovascular treatment, while 54 patients required surgical repair. No differences were seen with regard to re-operations (endovascular 15.8% vs surgical 14.8%; p=0.919), wound infections (endovascular 0% vs surgical. 11.1%; p=0.129), and wound healing disorders (endovascular 15.8% vs surgical 29.6%; p=0.237). Patients undergoing endovascular treatment were discharged earlier (endovascular 11.2 vs surgical 14.9 days; p=0.028). After surgical repair, patients received significantly more blood transfusions than endovascularly treated patients (endovascular 1.00 vs surgical 3.1 red blood cell concentrate bags; p<0.001). No differences were found regarding the new onset of walking pain, rest pain, and ischemic ulcers during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort, endovascular treatment of access-related vascular complications of transfemoral TAVI procedures was safe and feasible. During the hospital stay, endovascularly treated patients received fewer blood transfusions and were discharged faster than surgically treated patients. No differences regarding clinical outcomes and re-intervention rates were seen during the follow-up.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Given the in this retrospective study demonstrated safety and feasibility of endovascular treatment for major access-related vascular complications, along with the in-hospital benefits and absence of follow-up disadvantages compared to surgical treatment, endovascular treatment should be considered in cases of major access-related vascular complications in transfemoral TAVI patients.

Surgical, Endovascular, and Multimodal Approaches to the Management of Atherosclerotic Common Femoral Artery Disease

Common femoral artery disease is at the heart of nearly all treatment algorithms and decisions for patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Surgical endarterectomy has been the mainstay of common femoral treatment with a wealth of data supporting its safety, efficacy, and durability. Advances in endovascular technology and techniques for the management of iliac and superficial femoral artery disease has resulted in a paradigm shift in management. The common femoral artery has been aptly named a "no stent zone" due to anatomic and disease-specific challenges that have limited the role for endovascular techniques. New technology and techniques in the endovascular management of common femoral disease seek to change our treatment strategies. A multimodal approach utilizing a combination of angioplasty, atherectomy, and stenting has been shown most beneficial, although limited long-term data leave durability an unanswered question. While surgical treatment remains the gold standard, advances in the endovascular approach will certainly continue to improve outcomes. As truly isolated common femoral disease is a rarity, a collaborative approach combining all benefits of open and endovascular techniques in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease is essential.

Mechanical atherothrombectomy improves endothelial function through plaque burden reduction in PAD

Summary: Background: Endothelial dysfunction defines outcomes and serves as a surrogate parameter for the progression of cardiovascular disease. For symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) endovascular treatment is the primary revascularization strategy, which affects endothelial function. Interventional mechanical atherothrombectomy (MATH) provides advantages when treating complex atherosclerotic and thrombotic lesions. We now aimed to determine the impact and mechanisms of MATH on endothelial function. Patients and methods: Endothelial function was determined using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after lower limb intervention with a six-month follow-up in the target and control vessel in 15 PAD MATH+DCB treated patients and compared to 15 non-Math controls. In a further cohort of 20 patients the impact of MATH and DCB on vascular structure and virtual histology was assessed through intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and compared to DCB treatment alone. Results: Improved endothelial function after 6 months was observed in both groups for the target and nontarget vessel. When comparing the changes from baseline endothelial function, treatment with MATH+DCB was superior to DCB treatment in the target vessel. IVUS revealed a greater improvement in luminal area and plaque burden reduction after MATH treatment. Virtual histology disclosed MATH-associated changes in plaque composition evidenced by alterations in fibrous volume and reductions in superficial calcium. Conclusions: We demonstrate an improved endothelial function after MATH treatment as compared to DCB treatment. The improved vessel function is evidenced by MATH-related plaque burden reduction, improved luminal gain and a decrease in superficial calcification. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04092972.

Open Surgical Thrombendarterectomy Versus Endovascular Treatment in Occlusive Processes of the Femoral Artery Bifurcation

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation is thrombendarterectomy (TEA). Endovascular techniques (ENDO) have recently been put forward as a potential alternative. It is unclear so far which modality yields better outcomes with respect to long-term revascularization and periprocedural complications. Method: Multiple databases were systematically searched for pertinent publications (publication date November 1965 to February 2022). From the included studies, individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Aggregate data (AD) were used when no IPD were available. Primary and secondary patency (PP and SP), perioperative morbidity/mortality, and further endpoints were determined separately for TEA and ENDO and compared with each other. AD for each modality were summarized in meta-analyses. Time-to-event analyses and comparative meta-analyses with PP as primary endpoint were carried out using IPD. Results: 42 studies (3 IPD, 39 AD; 27 TEA, 12 ENDO, 3 comparisons of TEA versus ENDO) were included. In the combined meta-analysis of IPD and AD, PP for TEA was 97% at 6 months and 92% at 12 months, while PP for ENDO was 84% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The differences were not statistically significant. The comparative meta-analysis regarding PP did not reveal any significant differences either (TEA versus ENDO: HR 0.30 [0.06; 1.48]). SP at 12 months was 97% (TEA) and 93% (ENDO). The periprocedural morbidity was 16% for TEA and 9% for ENDO. Conclusion: In light of a higher PP, even without formal statistical proof of superiority, TEA can still be considered the standard treatment for occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation.

METHODS

Multiple databases were systematically searched for pertinent publications (publication date November 1965 to February 2022). From the included studies, individual patient data (IPD) were requested. Aggregate data (AD) were used when no IPD were available. Primary and secondary patency (PP and SP), perioperative morbidity/mortality, and further endpoints were determined separately for TEA and ENDO and compared with each other. AD for each modality were summarized in meta-analyses. Time-to-event analyses and comparative meta-analyses with PP as primary endpoint were carried out using IPD.

RESULTS

42 studies (3 IPD, 39 AD; 27 TEA, 12 ENDO, 3 comparisons of TEA versus ENDO) were included. In the combined meta-analysis of IPD and AD, PP for TEA was 97% at 6 months and 92% at 12 months, while PP for ENDO was 84% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The differences were not statistically significant. The comparative meta-analysis regarding PP did not reveal any significant differences either (TEA versus ENDO: HR 0.30 [0.06; 1.48]). SP at 12 months was 97% (TEA) and 93% (ENDO). The periprocedural morbidity was 16% for TEA and 9% for ENDO.

CONCLUSION

In light of a higher PP, even without formal statistical proof of superiority, TEA can still be considered the standard treatment for occlusive processes of the femoral artery bifurcation.

Phoenix atherectomy for patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular atherectomy enables minimally invasive plaque removal in peripheral artery disease (PAD).

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the safety and the long-term effectiveness of the Phoenix atherectomy for the treatment of complex and calcified lesions in PAD patients.

METHODS

Consecutive all-comer patients with PAD underwent the Phoenix atherectomy. Device safety in terms of perforation and distal embolisation were evaluated. Lesion calcifications were categorised by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and lesion complexity was assessed by the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 558 lesions were treated in 402 consecutive patients. Clinical follow-up was available at 15.7±10.2 months for 365 (91%) patients. Of 402 patients, 135 (33.6%) had claudication, 37 (9.2%) had ischaemic rest pain and 230 (57%) exhibited ischaemic ulcerations. Lesions were mostly identified in the femoropopliteal segments (55%), followed by below-the-knee (BTK) segments (32%). Complex TASC C/D lesions and moderate to severe calcifications (PACSS score ≥2) were present in 331 (82%) and 323 (80%) patients, respectively. The mean lesion length was 20.6±14.3 cm. Five (1%) perforations and 10 (2%) asymptomatic embolisations occurred. Bail-out stenting was performed in 4%, 16% and 3% of patients with common femoral artery, femoropopliteal and BTK lesions, respectively. During follow-up, 5 (3.9%) patients with claudication and 52 (21.9%) patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) died (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7; p<0.001). Freedom from TLR was 87.5% (112 of 128) in patients with claudication and 82.3% (195 of 237) in patients with CLTI, respectively (HR 1.8; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The Phoenix atherectomy can be safely performed in patients with complex lesions with a relatively low rate of bail-out stenting and clinically acceptable TLR rates.

GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER

DRKS00016708.

Systematic review of atherectomy of inguinal arteries for atherosclerotic lesions

INTRODUCTION

Surgical endarterectomy represents the gold standard for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of the groin vessels. Endovascular treatment such as atherectomy with or without drug coated angioplasty (DCA) of the so called no stenting zones, i.e. inguinal and popliteal vessels, is gaining growing acceptance as alternative option to open surgery. This systematic review aims to scrutiny the current clinical evidence regarding atherectomy and DCA for the common artery (CFA).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted an exhaustive research in multiple platforms (Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase) on studies over atherectomy and angioplasty for inguinal atherosclerotic lesions published between 2000 and 2021. As search strategy we used a wide list of MeSH items, words, synonyms. Bibliographies of review articles were checked for further relating studies regarding atherectomy of CFA. A qualitative and quantitative data analysis was carried out.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative review. Not all studies were focused only on atherectomy of inguinal vessels, despite including such treatment. Hence, data regarding this treatment were not exhaustive. A fairly homogeneous data analysis was possible in 7 of 15 studies. The remaining 8 studies were qualitatively analyzed but not included in the statistical analysis. In all 7 included studies directional atherectomy and DCA under filter protection were carried out. In this subgroup, overall, 497 patients were treated with atherectomy. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were males. Rutherford class from 1-3 dominated against 4-6 (63% vs. 37%). Mean technical success rate was 96%, with a primary and secondary patency rate of 92% and 98% respectively at one year. Procedure related vascular complications ranged from 1% to 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature about atherectomy for inguinal arteries is scant, data are inhomogeneous and so are treatment modalities. Nevertheless, the results of this systematic review suggest that this endovascular strategy is feasible with good short and midterm results. Prospective trials with larger patient cohorts are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.