Impact of different therapeutic alternatives in treatment of severe limb ischemia: experiences on 190 consecutive patients at a department of medical angiology

Long-term outcomes after medical and interventional therapy of critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of clinical guidelines for the treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) are based on randomized controlled trials. Recent data from clinical practice are however lacking. Therefore a prospective observational study in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) in 3 hospitals with a specialized vascular medicine department was conducted to document the clinical course and outcome of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) in clinical practice.

METHODS

155 patients were stratified: 56 received endovascular intervention, 82 prostanoids and 17 antibiotic treatment. Patients with surgical revascularisation and primary amputation were excluded. All patients received structured wound treatment, analgesia and vascular risk factor treatment during hospital stay.

RESULTS

Age 72.0+/-12.7 years, hospitalisation 23.2+/-20.3 days. 56.1% had Diabetes, 9.7% multiresistant staphylococcus aureus infection. 40% patients had rest pain, 60% ischemic tissue loss. At discharge 40.0% had no ulcers, 48.4% ongoing trophic alterations, 10.3% received major amputation and 4.5% had stable necrosis. After 18 month rate of major amputation was 6.3% (prostanoids), 14.5% (endovascular treatment; p=n.s. vs. prostanoids) and 26.7% (antibiotics; p=0.0323 vs. prostanoids). Major amputations were not different in logistic regression analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics. Wound healing and mortality rate was not different between groups (26.8, 25.0 and 23.5%).

CONCLUSION

Structured therapy at specialized vascular centres in combination with interventional or conservative treatment is beneficial in patients with critical limb ischemia. Survival without amputation is higher than expected over 18 months.

Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, technical effectiveness and limb salvage potential of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), particularly infrapopliteal, in diabetic subjects with ischaemic foot ulcer.

DESIGN

Intervention study with PTA in consecutive series.

SETTING

Six Diabetology Foot Centres and one Cardiovascular Catheterization Laboratory in Italy.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred and twenty-one consecutive diabetic subjects hospitalized for ischaemic foot ulcer.

INTERVENTION

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) was investigated by means of foot pulses assessment, ankle-brachial-index (ABI), transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) and duplex scanning. If non-invasive parameters suggested PAOD, angiography was performed and a PTA was carried out during the same session.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PTA feasibility, improvement of ABI and TcPO2, limb salvage rate, clinical recurrence.

RESULTS

On angiography, two patients had stenoses which were <50% of the vessel diameter. PTA was performed in 191 (85.3%) of the 219 subjects with stenoses >50%, even when longer than 10 cm and/or multiple/calcified. In 11 patients (5.8%) PTA was performed in the proximal axis exclusively, in 81 (42.4%) patients in the infrapopliteal axis exclusively and in 99 (51.8%) in both the femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal axis. Both ABI and TcPO2 improved significantly after PTA (P < 0.0001). Clinical recurrence occurred in 14 subjects: 10 of whom underwent a second successful PTA. Of the 191 patients who underwent PTA, 10 (5.2%) underwent an above-the-ankle amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

PTA, including infrapopliteal, is feasible in most diabetic subjects with ischaemic foot ulcer and is effective for foot revascularization. Clinical recurrence was infrequent and the procedure could successfully be repeated in most cases. In subjects treated successfully with PTA the above-the-ankle amputation rate was low. PTA should be considered as the revascularization treatment of first choice in all diabetic subjects with foot ulcer and PAOD.

The final outcome of primary infrainguinal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 100 consecutive patients with chronic critical limb ischemia

PURPOSE

This study was performed to determine final outcomes in patients treated with infrainguinal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 100 consecutive patients (mean age, 72 y; range, 38-90 y; 40 men and 60 women) with 116 treated limbs. CLI was defined as rest pain or ischemic tissue defect combined with an ankle systolic pressure < or = 50 mm Hg. Indication for treatment was rest pain in 23 limbs (20%), ischemic ulcer in 50 (43%), and gangrene in 43 (37%). All patients were followed until they had met the study endpoints: major amputation or death. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (1-119 mo). Limb salvage, survival, and life with limb rates were determined along with their determinants.

RESULTS

On average, 1.9 invasive procedures were required during the lifespan of a critically ischemic limb, including primary PTA and 32 repeat PTA procedures, 11 surgical revascularizations, and 51 amputations. The major amputation rate was 32% (n = 37). Limb salvage for endovascular treatments at 3, 5, and 8 years was 65%, 60%, and 60%, respectively (SE of estimate [SEE] <or = 0.06), and the corresponding life with limb rates were 29%, 18%, and 6% (SEE < or = 0.05). A greater number of diseased vessels in the treated limb was associated with poorer limb salvage (P =.004). Survival rates were 41%, 26%, and 14% (SEE < or = 0.05) at 3, 5, and 10 years. The 10-year survival rate was markedly poorer than that in the age- and sex-matched control population. Coronary artery disease (P =.001) and poor peripheral runoff (P =.02) were associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Infrainguinal PTA in patients with CLI results in acceptable limb salvage with a low number of additional revascularization treatments, but patient survival is poor.