In vivo evaluation of an intravascular receiver coil for MRI at 1.0 Tesla

Identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques

There has been great interest in the possibility of identifying plaques that might be the site of future acute coronary events. These plaques are termed vulnerable and the majority are lipid-rich with an abundance of inflammatory cells and a thin fibrous cap. Several techniques developed to identify these plaques are in various stages of development and in the near future, one might employ a strategy to potentially identify and therapeutically modify such lesions during percutaneous intervention to avoid future acute events. Although this approach of identifying the vulnerable plaque seems promising, there are significant potential limitations. The natural history of a vulnerable plaque is unknown and clinical trials utilizing this strategy of identification and therapeutic intervention are lacking. Moreover, in any given patient, multiple vulnerable plaques are likely to be present. This article reviews some of the techniques for identifying a vulnerable plaque and discusses the potential advantages and limitations of this strategy.

A novel nonobstructive intravascular MRI coil: in vivo imaging of experimental atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

MRI is being used to characterize the composition of atherosclerotic plaques. However, the resolution achievable using surface radiofrequency coils is limited by the signal to noise ratio. We studied the utility of a new intravascular (IV) MRI probe for high-resolution in vivo imaging of atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Balloon-injured Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits served as the experimental model of atherosclerosis. The newly developed IV MRI probe is 1.3 mm in diameter and can be positioned over a guidewire. MRI was performed with both an external phased-array coil and the IV MR coil. MR observations were correlated with histopathology. After MRI, the animals were killed and analysis of agreement between MR and histopathology was performed. The IV MR coil allows aortic images to be obtained with 156x156 micro m(2) in-plane resolution versus 352x352 micro m(2) when used with the external phased-array coil. No significant motion artifacts were noted, despite the continuation of arterial blood flow during image acquisition around the IV probe. The different components of the atherosclerotic lesions (lipid core and fibrous cap) were easily identified. There was an excellent agreement between MRI with the IV coil and histopathology by simple linear regression for both the mean wall thickness (r=0.88, slope 0.82, P<0.0001) and vessel wall area (r=0.86, slope 1.08, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The new nonobstructive design for this intravascular coil provides great promise for additional work in high-resolution MRI characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo. The ability to position the probe with a guidewire allows its placement under fluoroscopic or MRI guidance, whereas its size is compatible with human coronary arteries.