Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device Angio-Seal

A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization

PURPOSES

The primary objective of this study (STEP trial) was to compare the efficacy of the polymer-based FemoSeal® vascular closure device (VCD) and the suture-based ProGlide® VCD in achieving hemostasis at the femoral access site after lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

STEP was a multicenter randomized clinical trial including patients undergoing lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization. The primary endpoint was technical success 5 h after the VCD intervention, defined as achievement of hemostasis without the need for a follow-up intervention at the access site and without a 2-g/dL drop in hemoglobin.

RESULTS

Between December 2017 and April 2019, 113 patients were assigned to the FemoSeal® group (FS) and 117 to the ProGlide® group (PG). VCD interventions were technically successful for 90 FS patients (80%) and 58 PG patients (50%) (odds ratio, 3.98; 95% CI, 2.22 to 7.14; p < 0.0001). This difference in success rates between FS and PG is partly explained by more frequent recourse to manual compression (FS: n = 19; PG: n = 45) and an additional VCD (FS: n = 0; PG: n = 23) in the latter group. After 5 h, 87% of FS patients and 69% of PG patients resumed ambulation (odds ratio: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.93 to 6.15; p = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization, FemoSeal® was superior to ProGlide® in terms of technical success.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Step trial was registered on http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03192033).

Endovascular therapy for Angio-sealTM -related acute limb ischemia: Perioperative and long-term results

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for Angio-seal^TM -related acute limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Currently, limited data are available on the optimal treatment strategy for Angio-seal^TM -related acute lower limb ischemia.

METHODS

The prospectively maintained patient database of our institution was retrospectively searched to identify all patients who developed acute lower limb ischemia after use of the Angio-Seal^TM and received endovascular treatment from January 2010 to February 2016. The clinical and follow-up data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with Angio-Seal^TM -related acute limb ischemia underwent endovascular therapy, resulting in an approximated incidence of 0.29% of all implanted devices. The overall procedural success rate was 96.9%. With regard to the patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment, the culprit lesion was located in the common femoral artery in 22 (71.0%) cases, the femoral artery bifurcation in 3 (9.7%) cases and the superficial femoral artery in 6 (19.4%) cases. Ten (31.3%) patients had thrombosis in other distal lower limb arteries ipsilateral to Angio-seal^TM use. Eighteen (58.1%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty alone, while nine (29.0%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis, and four (12.9%) patients underwent stent implantation. One patient suffered from minor bleeding at the site of application of the Angio-seal^TM . During an average of 43.5 ± 22.9 months of follow-up, three patients with symptomatic restenosis underwent a second successful balloon angioplasty and remained asymptomatic until the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon angioplasty with selective thrombolysis or stent placement was safe and effective, with a low incidence of complication and restenosis. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treatment of Angio-Seal® Vascular Closure Device-Induced Acute Femoral Artery Occlusion with SilverHawk® Directional Atherectomy

Vascular closure devices provide a safe and cost-effective method to achieve rapid hemostasis and early ambulation after angiographic procedures. Rarely, they can result in arterial injury with resultant stenosis or acute arterial closure requiring open surgical intervention. We report an Angio-Seal® vascular closure device-induced acute arterial closure successfully treated percutaneously with the SilverHawk® plaque excision system. This report discusses the possible mechanisms of Angio-Seal® induced arterial occlusion and various percutaneous options for treatment.

Clinical and Subclinical Femoral Vascular Complications after Deployment of two Different Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression in the Setting of Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

In the past two decades vascular closure devices (VCD) have been increasingly utilized as an alternative to manual compression after percutaneous femoral artery access. However, there is a lack of data confirming a significant reduction of vascular complication in a routine interventional setting. Systematic assessment of puncture sites with ultrasound was hardly performed.

METHODS

620 consecutive patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated to either Angioseal (AS; n = 210), or Starclose (SC; n = 196) or manual compression (MC; n = 214). As an adjunct to clinical evaluation vascular ultrasonography was used to assess the safety of each hemostatic method in terms of major and minor vascular complications. The efficacy of VCDs was assessed by achievement of puncture site hemostasis.

RESULTS

No major complications needing transfusion or vascular surgery were observed. Furthermore, the overall incidence of clinical and subclinical minor complications was similar among the three groups. There was no differences in the occurrence of pseudoaneurysmata (AS = 10; SC = 6; MC = 10), arteriovenous fistula (AS = 1; SC = 4; MC = 2) and large hematoma (AS = 11; SC = 10; MC = 14). The choice of access site treatment had no impact in the duration of hospital stay (AS = 6.7; SC = 7.4; MS = 6.4 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of routine coronary intervention AS and SC provide a similar efficacy and safety as manual compression. Subclinical vascular injuries are rare and not related to VCD use.

Incidence, predictors, and treatment options of critical limb ischaemia after use of collagen plug-based vascular closure devices

AIMS

Limited data are available on the frequency and predictors of vascular closure device (VCD) failure with subsequent vascular complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and treatment options in patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) after use of a collagen plug-based VCD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A high-volume, single-centre prospectively maintained database was retrospectively interrogated, and cases of collagen plug-based VCD-related CLI were identified between June 2006 and December 2013. CLI was defined as acute onset of rest pain after VCD application requiring endovascular or surgical treatment. Among 13,595 coronary procedures, 43 patients (0.3%) were identified with an Angio-Seal-related CLI. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, peripheral artery disease and renal insufficiency were identified as independent predictors for CLI after Angio-Seal application. Treatment was performed in 27 patients (63%) by surgery and in 16 patients (37%) with endovascular angioplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

CLI after use of a collagen plug-based VCD is rare. Peripheral artery disease was identified as an independent predictor of CLI. Interventional cardiologists should be aware of potentially high-risk patients and complications after use of a VCD to provide prompt and adequate therapy.

Comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures: The boomerang™ wire vascular access management trial II

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of the Boomerang™ Wire as an adjunct to manual compression (MC) in patients requiring diagnostic (Dx) or interventional (Ix) percutaneous procedures.

BACKGROUND

MC remains the standard of care for closure of femoral artery access sites. Adjunctive use of a device to facilitate closure, reduce time to hemostasis (TTH) and ambulation (TTA) without increasing complication rates could reduce costs and hospital resource demands.

METHODS

The Boomerang™ Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing use of the Boomerang™ wire, (Cardiva Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) in conjunction with MC versus MC alone to achieve hemostasis in Dx and Ix patients undergoing percutaneous procedures requiring femoral artery access. Endpoints included TTH, TTA, major, and minor access-site related complications. Subjects were randomized 3:1, Boomerang versus MC.

RESULTS

No minor or major device-related adverse events were reported. Nondevice related complication rates were 3 (0.9%) in the Boomerang arm (n = 327) and 1 (0.8%) in MC arm (n = 123). Mean TTH for Boomerang vs. MC was 11.2 ± 4.3 vs. 23.2 ± 11 min for Dx (P < 0.0001) and 13.9 ± 5.4 vs. 38.4 ± 57.3 min for Ix patients (P < 0.0001). Mean TTA for Boomerang vs. MC was 3.3 ± 3.0 vs. 4.5 ± 2.0 hr (P < 0.0001)for Dx and 5.4 ± 3.3 vs. 6.8 ± 3.2 hr (P < 0.0001) for Ix patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Boomerang™ use, in conjunction with MC, was associated with low rates of complications and demonstrated that Boomerang™ as an adjunct to MC can significantly decrease TTH and TTA after both Dx and Ix procedures. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Obesity and coronary artery disease: evaluation and treatment

With the increasing prevalence of obesity, clinicians are now facing a growing population of patients with specific features of clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and interventional, medical, and surgical management. After briefly discussing the effect of obesity on atherosclerotic burden in this review, we will focus on strategies clinicians might use to ensure better outcomes when performing revascularization in obese and severely obese patients. These patients tend to present comorbidities at a younger age, and their anthropometric features might limit the use of traditional cardiovascular risk stratification approaches for ischemic disease. Alternative techniques have emerged, especially in nuclear medicine. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography might be the diagnostic imaging technique of choice. When revascularization is considered, features associated with obesity must be considered to guide therapeutic strategies. In percutaneous coronary intervention, a radial approach should be favoured, and adequate antiplatelet therapy with new and more potent agents should be initiated. Weight-based anticoagulation should be contemplated if needed, with the use of drug-eluting stents. An "off-pump" approach for coronary artery bypass grafting might be preferable to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. For patients who undergo bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, harvesting using skeletonization might prevent deep sternal wound infections. In contrast to percutaneous coronary intervention, lower surgical bleeding has been observed when lean body mass is used for perioperative heparin dose determination.

Critical lower limb ischemia from an embolized Angio-Seal closure device

Vascular closure devices were introduced in the early 1990s in an effort to reduce time to hemostasis, enable early ambulation, and improve the comfort of patients undergoing femoral artery access for endovascular procedures. Many of these devices leave a foreign component in or around the artery, which can lead to complications such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, infection, or limb ischemia. Here we present a case where device embolization led to arterial occlusion and critical limb ischemia.

Radioembolization complicated by dissection of the common femoral artery

The common femoral artery is the most frequently used access site for angiographic procedures in interventional radiology. Potential complications of common femoral arteriotomy include hematoma formation, pseudoaneurysm, uncontrolled groin or retroperitoneal bleeding, acute arterial occlusion, dissection, and arteriovenous fistula formation. In a case such as the one described here, with a common femoral artery dissection with intraluminal thrombus and vessel occlusion, the complication may have occurred at the time of access or at the time of closure, with both procedure-associated and patient-specific risk factors affecting the overall risk of complications. Though some studies have shown an increased risk of complications with the use of arterial closure devices, others have found no increase. In any patient with symptoms following a femoral arteriotomy, rapid diagnosis and treatment is necessary to avoid further complications. Both patient-specific and procedure-associated risk factors should be considered prior to arteriotomy and usage of an arterial closure device.

Arterial thrombosis after using Angio-Seal

Percutaneous closure systems of arterial puncture sites are being used more and more in modern endovascular practice. In this article, we report five cases of thrombotic complications following Angio-Seal deployment which required to be treated in our department between June 2004 and January 2006. We carried out a computerized literature review using "vascular closure" as a keyword and elected 106 articles published between 1992 and 2007. The analysis of this literature review showed that the rate of percutaneous closure complications was similar to the rate of manual compression complications, which is still the reference method. The complications associated with the use of these systems were more complex and more often required surgical repair. The severity and frequency of these complications differ based on the type of closure systems. The vascular surgeon in charge must have a good knowledge of these systems and of the complications each of them entails to be able to treat them in the most appropriate way.

CIRSE vascular closure device registry

PURPOSE

Vascular closure devices are routinely used after many vascular interventional radiology procedures. However, there have been no major multicenter studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the routine use of closure devices in interventional radiology.

METHODS

The CIRSE registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug started in January 2009 and ended in August 2009. A total of 1,107 patients were included in the registry.

RESULTS

Deployment success was 97.2%. Deployment failure specified to access type was 8.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.0-14.5] for antegrade access and 1.8% (95% CI 1.1-2.9) for retrograde access (P = 0.001). There was no difference in deployment failure related to local PVD at the access site. Calcification was a reason for deployment failure in only <0.5% of patients. Postdeployment bleeding occurred in 6.4%, and most these (51.5%) could be managed with light manual compression. During follow-up, other device-related complications were reported in 1.3%: seven false aneurysms, three hematoma >5.9 cm, and two vessel occlusions.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug is that the use of this device in interventional radiology procedures is safe, with a low incidence of serious access site complications. There seems to be no difference in complications between antegrade and retrograde access and other parameters.

Carotid stenting and bivalirudin with and without vascular closure: 3-year analysis of procedural outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of carotid stenting using bivalirudin and the influence of vascular closure devices (VCD) on the incidence and severity of peri-procedural hypotension.

BACKGROUND

Bivalirudin, a short-acting direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown to be an effective anticoagulant in coronary interventions, with less risk of bleeding compared with heparin. Routine use of VCD has become the standard of care, facilitating patient ambulation after percutaneous carotid and coronary interventions. The combined use of these two therapies (bivalirudin and VCD) may improve outcomes in carotid interventions where prolonged patient immobilization may exacerbate hypotension following stenting.

METHODS

A total of 514 patients underwent 536 carotid stenting procedures in the 3-year period from September 2004 to September 2007. All patients received adjunctive bivalirudin, with and without VCD. This cohort was analyzed for peri-procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Thirty-day stroke and death rate was 1.7%. A total of 83 patients (15.4%) experienced intra- or post-procedural hypotension (systolic BP < 80 mm Hg). There were four (0.7%) major bleeding complications requiring transfusion, and length of stay was delayed more than 24 hr in five patients (0.93%), all of whom were in the manual compression group.

CONCLUSIONS

This was a negative study, with no significant difference on prolonged hypotensive events in patients with vascular closure device and bivalirudin, compared with those with manual compression and bivalirudin. Vascular closure devices were safe and effective with a low incidence of complications. In carotid artery stenting, bivalirudin is safe with low incidence of major bleeding and acceptable 30-day adverse event rates (stroke and death).

Endovascular treatment of Angio-Seal-related limb ischemia--primary results and long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To investigate primary success rates and long term follow-up of endovascular treatment of AngioSeal-related limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge on optimal therapy of ischemic complications following application of AngioSeal is limited.

METHODS

A single-center prospectively maintained database was retrospectively interrogated and AngioSeal-related complications requiring endovascular treatment over an 8-year-time period was identified.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified, resulting in an approximated incidence of 0.26% of all devices implanted at our institution. In all cases, the complication was managed successfully in the absence of complications. Eleven patients were treated with balloon angioplasty (PTA) and four with stent implantation because of suboptimal PTA results. Twelve patients were available for noninvasive vascular follow-up examination for a median time of 40 months postinterventionally. Only two patients needed a second intervention consisting of balloon angioplasty due to symptomatic restenosis. At final follow-up all patients were asymptomatic with no relevant restenosis.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment for AngioSeal-related limb ischemia with or without stent implantation results in an excellent immediate and long-term clinical and hemodynamic outcome.

Complications associated with the arterial puncture closure device--Angio-Seal

BACKGROUND

Arterial puncture closure devices (APCD) are frequently used after cardiac catheterization. Here, the diagnosis and therapy of femoral artery complications after the use of the Angio-Seal APCD is reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Angio-Seal APCD was deployed in 1600 patients undergoing transfemoral catheterization.

RESULTS

In 7 of 1600 cases (0.4%) vascular complications occurred following Angio-Seal deployment. Diagnosis was made by duplex sonography. Intraoperative findings consisted of a complete occlusion with dissection of the femoral artery in all patients. In 6 cases, the femoral bifurcation had to be reconstructed after endarterectomy. Follow-up is complete with a mean of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The Angio-Seal device should not be used for closure of the superficial femoral artery and in patients with severe arteriosclerosis. The application of arteriography as well as the use of ultrasound-guided puncture is advisable. In all cases, surgical intervention was successful and an adequate therapy for management of complications.

[Vascular approaches and closure devices for percutaneous coronary intervention]

The choice of a transradial or transfemoral approach remains a pivotal decision in percutaneous coronary angioplasty. We discuss here the varying criteria leading to a rational choice in the arterial access choice. Since the emergent transradial approach in France has led to a dramatic reduction in local vascular complications, we also discuss the remaining place of femoral approach and the usefulness of femoral percutaneous closure devices.

Ischemic complications of percutaneous femoral artery catheterization

Ischemic injuries following percutaneous femoral artery catheterization are uncommon but have been associated with vascular closure devices (VCDs). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of femoral artery catheterization and to identify factors associated with ischemic injuries. The operative registries of the attending vascular surgeons at one academic and two community hospitals were retrospectively reviewed to identify all complications of femoral artery catheterization requiring operative intervention. Demographic, clinical, procedural, operative, and outcome data were compared between patients who sustained ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. From January 2001 to December 2006, 95 patients required operative management of complications related to femoral artery catheterization including 40 patients who experienced ischemic (group 1) and 55 patients who experienced hemorrhagic (group 2) complications. Compared to those sustaining hemorrhagic complications, ischemic complications were more frequently associated with younger age, smoking, VCD deployment, and, when controlling for VCD use, female gender. Time to presentation was also significantly longer in patients experiencing ischemic complications. Ischemic complications are increasingly recognized following femoral artery catheterization. Vascular surgeons should anticipate a new pattern of injury following femoral artery catheterization, one that often requires complex arterial reconstruction.

Contemporary management of acute lower extremity ischemia following percutaneous coronary and cardiac interventional procedures using femoral access--a case series and discussion

New onset of acute lower extremity ischemia following percutaneous coronary and cardiac interventional procedures using femoral access is an important clinical entity that requires emergent assessment to determine the precise etiology and institute appropriate therapy. We report four cases of this clinical event from our catheterization laboratories that serve to highlight the most frequent etiologies, the importance of immediate diagnostic angiography, and the potential for endovascular techniques to effectively manage this complication.

StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice

The StarClose device (Abbott Vascular Devices; Abbott Laboratories, Redwood City, CA) utilizes an externally placed Nitinol clip to achieve arterial closure following femoral artery puncture. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and complications of the StarClose device in patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures. Preprocedural clotting status, pulse and blood pressure, severity of vessel calcification, sheath size, and time to deployment were recorded. Postdeployment complications immediately postprocedure, at 1 h, at 2 h, and at 1 week were recorded. A duplex scan was performed in the first 10 patients to assess any immediate vascular complications. Deployments were successful in 96% achieving immediate hemostasis. Mean deployment time was 48 s. There were no major complications. The StarClose device was found to have a high technical and clinical efficacy.

Angio-Seal in Antegrade Endovascular Interventions: Technical Success and Complications in a 55-Patient Series

PURPOSE

To assess the technical success and complications of Angio-Seal vascular closure device in antegrade common femoral artery (CFA) punctures.

METHODS

Over a 14-month period, 55 patients (37 men; age range 37-94 years) underwent antegrade CFA Angio-Seal placement at a single center; the clinical data and angiograms were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 56 antegrade CFA punctures were made for hemostasis; 6-F Angio-Seal devices (40 model STS and 12 model VIP) were deployed in 52 CFAs, and 8-F Angio-Seal devices were deployed in 4.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 98.2% (55/56). Two (3.6%) patients developed small, non-expanding hematomas (<5 cm) during deployment of the device. There was 1 episode of device/operator failure, presumably due to extravascular deployment within soft tissue. None of the patients developed pseudoaneurysm, arterial injury, or large hematomas requiring transfusion. Small calcified plaques at the puncture site did not influence the outcome.

CONCLUSION

This series suggests that Angio-Seal may be a safe and effective device for hemostasis in antegrade CFA punctures. Further randomized trials testing its risk-benefit balance in comparison to standard manual compression are warranted.

Subclavian artery puncture repair with Angio-Seal deployment

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent placement of a port-a-catheter in an artery during central venous cannulation is rare and can result in devastating complications. Although traditional closure devices have been employed as prompt and adequate treatment, more innovative devices such as collagen plugs are being studied for their efficacy.

CASE

We report a case involving a 63-year-old woman who was treated with chemotherapy for recurrent metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. During port-a-catheter placement, puncture of the subclavian artery occurred. Vascular surgery and interventional radiology consultation was obtained, wherein an Angio-Seal device was used to seal the exit from the subclavian artery. Angio-Seal placement was successful and the patient has since become clinically stable and was then discharged.

CONCLUSION

Subclavian artery puncture is rare but can occur due to the close proximity between the subclavian artery and vein. Prompt vascular surgery and radiology consultation is necessary. Although traditional manual compression and closure devices have been effective at restoring hemostasis, collagen seals or plugs may be more viable to treat this precarious situation.

Lower Limb Ischemic Complications after the Use of Arterial Puncture Closure Devices

We report three cases of lower limb ischemia occurring after the use of arterial puncture closure devices (APCDs). In two patients, who have undergone percutaneous angioplasty of lower limb arteries, the Angio-Seal APCD led to thrombosis of the common femoral artery. In another patient who has undergone coronary angiography, this device has led to dissection of the common femoral artery. Since these observations seem to not be merely sporadic, radiologists and cardiologists as well as vascular surgeons should be aware of their possible occurrence in order to avoid these complications and to provide promptly an adequate treatment.

Stent-Grafts in the Management of Hemorrhagic Complications Related to Hemostatic Closure Devices: Report of Two Cases

We report 2 cases of hemorrhagic complications related to use of the Angio-Seal hemostatic closure device that were successfully managed with stent-grafts. Two patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage were referred to our departments for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The treatment was performed through a femoral access; the sheaths were removed immediately after the procedures, and the punctures sites closed by Angio-Seals. Both patients presented clinical signs of hypovolemic shock after treatment. The diagnosis of active bleeding through the puncture site was made by emergency digital subtraction angiography. The lesions were managed with stent-grafts. The use of stent-grafts proved to be efficient in the management of these life-threatening hemorrhagic complications following the use of the Angio-Seal hemostatic closure device.

The safety and efficacy of the StarClose® vascular closure system: The ultrasound substudy of the CLIP study

BACKGROUND

The StarClose Vascular Closure System (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, CA) features a nitinol clip that is designed to achieve closure of the femoral arteriotomy access site. The CLIP Study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of StarClose when compared with standard manual compression following 5-6 French diagnostic or interventional percutaneous procedures. A substudy of this trial was designed to assess the utility of duplex ultrasonography to assess patency of the femoral artery and to determine access site complications (pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, hematoma, deep vein thrombosis) in a multicenter prospective trial. This is the report of the duplex ultrasound (DUS) substudy of the CLIP trial.

METHODS

A total of 17 U.S. sites enrolled 596 subjects with 483 subjects randomized at a 2:1 ratio to receive StarClose or manual compression of the arteriotomy after a percutaneous procedure. The study included roll-in (n = 113), diagnostic (n = 208), and interventional (n = 275) arms with a primary safety endpoint of major vascular complications through 30 days and a primary efficacy endpoint of postprocedure time to hemostasis. A substudy of the CLIP interventional arm evaluated DUS images of the closure site at five study sites, targeting 100 subjects at day 30 following hemostasis. The DUS protocol was devised and implemented by an independent vascular ultrasound core laboratory with extensive experience in vascular device trials. DUS inguinal region from 6 cm proximal to 6 cm distal to the arteriotomy puncture was performed. A qualitative examination was performed to determine the presence of iatrogenic vascular injuries: hematoma, pseudoaneurysm (PSA), arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and arterial/venous thrombosis or stenosis using 2-dimensional gray scale, color, and focused Doppler images.

RESULTS

DUS of 96 subjects randomized to StarClose (n = 71) and compression (n = 25) were performed and evaluated. There was no evidence of hematoma, PSA, or AVF observed in the StarClose group. No StarClose subjects in the substudy had a PSA or AVF. All patients in the substudy demonstrated patency of the access site artery and vein without thrombosis or stenosis. Finally, in the entire study cohort, no clinically-driven DUS studies demonstrated iatrogenic vascular injury or vessel thrombosis in the StarClose treated patients.

CONCLUSION

DUS, a safe and reliable method for determining the safety and efficacy of access site closure devices, is a reliable, safe, inexpensive and accurate method of assessing vascular access site complications in multicenter trials. In this substudy of the CLIP study, DUS found no statistical difference in access site complications between the StarClose and manual compression groups. Both groups maintained vessel patency without stenosis, thrombosis, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or AV fistula.

Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture

AIM

Although arterial closure devices are in use for over a decade, there have been no specific study to assess the use of the same in antegrade puncture.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Consecutive patients undergoing antegrade puncture for peripheral vascular disease in a single centre performed by a single operator were included in this study. The notes and the angiograms were reviewed retrospectively for possible complications and the severity of disease.

RESULT

Over a 25-month period, 21 patients with antegrade puncture had Angioseal deployed for haemostasis. Post-procedure complications recorded from the case notes showed one episode of haematoma formation and one case of worsening ischaemia. The severity of the disease at the puncture site did not influence the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Use of Angioseal is safe and effective in antegrade punctures for peripheral vascular disease. The result is independent of the severity of disease at the puncture site.

Arterial puncture closure using a collagen plug, I. (Angio-Seal)

Closure devices can generally be categorized by their mechanism of obtaining hemostasis. Currently, devices are either suture-based, collagen-based, or utilize a combination of technologies. They can also be classified on the basis of whether or not they have an intravascular component or exclusively extra-vascular components. The devices that are currently available differ markedly in their mechanism of action, deployment, advantages, and disadvantages. In this article, we will review in detail the Angio-Seal closure device, review some of the current literature regarding this device, and assess its complications, advantages, and disadvantages.