[Assessment of generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments in peripheral arterial disease]

A Comparison of Health Status and Quality of Life in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

BACKGROUND

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as health status (HS) and quality of life (QOL) are frequently used interchangeably while they represent different outcomes. Whether a discrepancy exists in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) in changes over time between HS and QOL is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the strength and the direction of the association between HS and QOL over time in patients with IC that underwent supervised exercise therapy (SET).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were part of the ELECT multi-center prospective cohort study. One goal of this study was to obtain data on HS and QOL at different time intervals of patients with IC that underwent SET. HS (VascuQOL-6) and QOL (WHOQOL-BREF) were completed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow up. Pearson's correlation coefficients and the associated common variances (R²) were calculated to measure the strength and the direction of the association between HS and QOL in changes between baseline and follow-up moments.

RESULTS

In total, 177 patients were included in data analyses. Only changes in physical QOL and overall QOL had a small correlation with changes over time in HS, at both 3- and 6 months follow up (respectively R²=.14; P < 0.001 and R² = 0.12; P < 0.001 for physical QOL and R² = 0.18; P < 0.001 and R² = 0.13; P < 0.001 for overall QOL).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that HS and QOL provide different outcomes in patients with IC that underwent SET. Future studies should be aware of these differences before PROMs are being incorporated as an outcome measure in clinical studies.

Quality of Life and not Health Status Improves After Major Amputation in the Elderly Critical Limb Ischaemia Patient

OBJECTIVES

A patient-oriented appraisal of treatment has become extremely important, particularly in elderly patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). Quality of life (QoL) is an important patient-reported outcome in vascular surgery. Frequently, the physical domain of QoL questionnaires represents an 'objective' evaluation of performing activities, which is expected to be impaired after major limb amputation. However, an objective appraisal of physical function is an assessment of health status (HS) and not of QoL. Little is known about the subjective appraisal of physical health (QoL). The goal of this study was to evaluate, prospectively, QoL in relation to HS in elderly CLI patients undergoing major limb amputation.

METHODS

Patients suffering from CLI aged 70 years or older were included in a prospective observational cohort study with a follow-up period of 1 year. Patients were divided according to having had an amputation or not. The World Health Organization Quality Of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to asses QoL. The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) was used to measure HS. These self-reported questionnaires were completed five times during follow-up.

RESULTS

Two-hundred patients were included of whom 46 underwent a major limb amputation within one year. Amputees had a statistically significant improvement of their physical QoL after six months (14.0 vs. 9.0 (95% CI -7.84;-1.45),p = 0.005) and after a one-year follow-up (14.0 vs. 9.0 (95% CI -9.58;-1.46),p = 0.008). They did not however show any statistically significant difference in HS. For non-amputees, both physical QoL and HS improved. An instant statistically significant improvement of the physical QoL appeared 1 week after inclusion (12.0 vs. 10.9 (95% CI -1.57;-0.63),p<0.001). Similarly, statistically significant improvement in the physical HS first occurred at 1 week follow-up (29.0 vs. 28.9 (95% CI -5.78; -2.23),p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear difference between patients' functioning (HS) and the patients' appraisal of functioning (QoL). In elderly CLI patients, this study clearly suggests a discrepancy between the physical QoL (WHOQOL-BREF) and HS (SF-12) measurements in vascular amputees. This raises the question, which outcome measurement is the most relevant for elderly CLI patients. Individual treatment goals should be kept in mind when assessing the HS or QoL outcome of patients undergoing hospital care. With respect to shared decision making, distinctive and subjective QoL questionnaires, like the WHOQOL-BREF, provide a very important outcome measurement and should be used in future research.

Domains that Determine Quality of Life in Vascular Amputees

BACKGROUND

Although patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) commonly undergo major limb amputation, the quality of life (QOL) of this group remains poorly described. Therefore, we sought to describe which domains vascular amputees consider important in determining their health-related QOL.

METHODS

We performed 4 focus groups in patients who had major lower extremity amputations resulting from CLI. They were conducted at 4 distinct centers across the United States to ensure broad geographic, socioeconomic, and ethnic representation.

RESULTS

Of 26 patients (mean age, 64 years), 19 (73%) were Caucasian, 6 (23%) were African American, and 1 (4%) was Native American. Nearly, three-quarter of patients were men (n = 19, 73%) and had a high-school education or more (n = 19, 73%). Overall, 8 (31%) were double amputees and 17 (65%) had diabetes. Time since amputation varied across patients and ranged from 3 months to more than 27 years (mean, 4.3 years). Patients stated that their current QOL was determined by impaired mobility (65%), pain (60%), progression of disease in the remaining limb (55%), and depression/frustration (54%). Across 26 patients, more than half (n = 16, 62%) described multiple prior revascularization procedures. Although most felt that their physician did his/her best to salvage the affected leg (85%), a sizable minority would have preferred an amputation earlier in their CLI treatment course (27%). Furthermore, when asked how their care might have been improved, patients reported that facilitating peer support (88%), more extensive rehabilitation and prosthetist involvement (71%), earlier mention of amputation as a possible outcome (54%), and the early discontinuation of narcotics (54%) were potential areas of improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although QOL in vascular amputees seems primarily determined by mobility impairment, pain, and emotional perturbation, our focus groups identified that physician-controlled factors such as the timing of amputation, informed decision making, and postamputation support may also play an important role. The assessment of patient preferences regarding maintenance of mobility at the cost of increased pain versus relief of pain with amputation at a cost of diminished mobility is central to shared decision making in CLI treatment.