The GraftConnector experience. Long-term patency and histological work up in an animal model

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of distal coronary artery anastomotic devices

Interest in minimally invasive and off-pump cardiac surgical techniques has promoted the development of automated distal anastomotic devices (DADs) to facilitate construction of coronary artery anastomosis. Several DADs have been proposed for potential use in coronary surgery. However, a number of technical failures and uncertainty around both short-term morbidity and long-term patency have limited the generalized uptake of these devices. A systematic literature search identified 28 studies, incorporating 970 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using a DAD. Eight different devices were identified including Heartflo, St Jude, U-clip, vessel closure system, C-port, magnetic vascular positioner and coronary anastomosis coupler. Thirty-day mortality, cardiac-specific mortality and myocardial infarction were equal between DADs and hand-sewn cases (1.3, 0.3 and 0.8%, respectively). The overall proportion of postoperative haemorrhage was higher in the anastomotic device group (2.3%) than in the group with hand-sewn anastomoses (1.5%) although not statistically significant. Overall graft patency was 97.2% at <1 month, 94.6% at 1-3 months and 92.3% at >3 months. Of the currently available systems, the U-clip device was found to provide the best overall postoperative outcomes, which included a patency of 96.1% at >3months. The current literature is limited by its predominantly observational study design and lack of directly comparative studies. Furthermore, inter-study variation in patient selection, anticoagulation strategies and follow-up periods prevents quantitative comparison. Future research necessitates multicentre randomized, controlled studies to provide a direct comparison of current and future anastomotic device systems with established hand-sewn techniques in both the short and long term.

Future technology for off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)

Over the past 5 years, many coronary artery surgeons have embraced technology and advanced the field of beating heart surgery to the point where off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is becoming a mature procedure. Enabling technologies are now available for all stages of the procedure, including cardiac positioning, coronary artery stabilization, coronary artery visualization, and performance of the proximal and distal anastomoses. Despite these successes, only a minority of cardiac surgeons performs this procedure routinely. Proponents of OPCAB and the medical device industry will need to continue to develop new technologies to make OPCAB less technically challenging and more widely accepted. Progress towards routine single-vessel off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass has been slow. Translating the benefits of multivessel OPCAB to an endoscopic setting remains a formidable challenge that will require further technologic breakthroughs.