Relative Wellbeing of Women Maltreated as Children

This study explores and analyzes how adult women in Sweden exposed to childhood maltreatment describe wellbeing, by using a thematic analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with women maltreated as children. The results show that wellbeing was described as relative to both social norms and the childhood experiences and constituted four dimensions: Material and/or economic; Social and relational;Emotional; and Physical and/or mental. This study concludes that it is important to consider the relative and multiple ways wellbeing can be experienced and understood and to problematize norms of wellbeing, acknowledging the various ways people appraise their lives.

The effects of social comparisons on subjective age and self-rated health

Older adults consistently report young subjective age and provide high ratings of their subjective health. The current research examined which social comparisons older adults make when they assess their subjective age and health, as well as the effects of experimentally manipulated social comparisons on these assessments. In Study 1, 146 participants (aged 60 and over) reported to whom they compared themselves when assessing their subjective age or health. In Study 2, 100 participants (aged 60 and over) reported their subjective age and health after receiving feedback that compared them to younger adults or to their peers. Study 1 shows that participants compared themselves primarily to their peer group. Yet, individuals who selected a younger comparison group when assessing subjective age reported a younger subjective age, better self-rated health and more positive expectations regarding ageing relative to those who selected their peers as a comparison group. No equivalent differences emerged in any of the measures when participants were divided by their selection of comparison group after providing their self-rated health ratings. In Study 2, feedback that emphasised the performance of younger people led to reports of younger subjective age relative to feedback that emphasised peer performance, with no equivalent difference for self-rated health. These findings help explain why older adults feel younger and healthier than they actually are. We suggest that older adults use social comparisons as a strategy that protects them from the negative effects of ageing on self-perception.

Subjective well-being of geriatric patients during and after inpatient geriatric rehabilitation: a biopsychosocial prediction model

PURPOSE

The study focused on indicators of subjective well-being (SWB) and how they developed during and after geriatric rehabilitation. Furthermore, a biopsychosocial prediction model for longer-term SWB was tested.

METHODS

Patients of an inpatient geriatric rehabilitation unit were assessed at admission, discharge and a three-month follow-up. Indicators of SWB comprised affect, life satisfaction, valuation of life and autonomy. Further, biomedical and psychosocial variables assessed upon admission were used to predict SWB at follow-up. Statistical analysis included repeated-measures (M)ANOVA depicting SWB development over time with Cohen's d for effect size, along with canonical correlation analyses used to test the biopsychosocial prediction model.

RESULTS

78 out of 122 patients were assessed three times. Across all measurement points, different change patterns among SWB indicators were detected: Positive affect was significantly higher at follow-up than at admission (mean difference (MD) = .28, p < .01, Cohen's d = .37). Negative affect declined during rehabilitation (MD = - .29, p < .01, Cohen's d = .40) but increased again until follow-up (MD = .31, p < .01, Cohen's d = .42). Life satisfaction and valuation of life showed no change over time, while experience of autonomy gradually worsened from admission until follow-up (MD = - .29, p < .05, Cohen's d  = .32). The biopsychosocial model revealed that personality traits and control beliefs best predicted SWB at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although geriatric rehabilitation has a positive effect on affect, it does not consistently improve other SWB indicators. Moreover, paying attention to psychological parameters such as personality in the daily geriatric routine could help to identify patients for whom longer-term SWB is particularly at risk.