Semen cryoconservation in men with AZFc microdeletion

Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: prevalence, phenotypes and screening markers for the Indian population

PURPOSE

Yq microdeletions are the leading genetic cause of male infertility and its detection is clinically relevant for appropriate genetic counseling. We aimed to determine the prevalence and type of Yq microdeletions, the associated seminal phenotypes and the STS markers that are relevant for its testing in Indian population.

METHODS

Yq microdeletion analysis was carried out in 1,636 infertile cases in our centers. Additional data was collected from published studies in Indian population leading to a total of 3,647 cases.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 3.4 % (56/1,636) of infertile men had Yq microdeletions. Combining the data from other published studies identified 215/3,647 (5.8 %) infertile individuals to harbor Yq microdeletions; with 6.4 % in azoopsermia, 5.8 % in oligozoospermia and 3.2 % in oligoasthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia cases. No significant differences in the deletion frequencies were observed between idiopathic vs non idiopathic cases (5.8 vs 8.6 % respectively). Deletions of AZFc were at highest frequency (46.6 %) with double deletions most commonly observed in azoospermic subjects. With respect to the STS markers, screening with the six European Academy of Andrology (EAA) markers would miss 3.1 % of cases; additional non EAA markers that would contribute significantly to screening are sY746, sY82, sY121, sY128, sY130, sY143, sY145 & sY160.

INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of Yq microdeletions is lower in Indian population as compared to Western counterparts. There is no major association of Yq microdeletions with seminal parameters or cause of infertility. Clinically it will be necessary to offer Yq microdeletion testing to all the classes of infertile men. The EAA markers may not be adequate to detect microdeletions in Indian infertile men.

Genetic and epigenetic factors: Role in male infertility

Genetic factors contribute upto 15%-30% cases of male infertility. Formation of spermatozoa occurs in a sequential manner with mitotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic differentiation phases each of which is controlled by an intricate genetic program. Genes control a variety of physiologic processes, such as hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, germ cell development, and differentiation. In the era of assisted reproduction technology, it is important to understand the genetic basis of infertility to provide maximum adapted therapeutics and counseling to the couple.

Role of genetics in azoospermia

OBJECTIVE

To review established genetic causes of azoospermia, the most severe form of male infertility, and help clinicians, scientists, and infertile couples considering assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to understand the complexity of the disorder and to maximize the chances of having a healthy infant through proper counseling and treatment.

METHOD

An initial literature search was performed on PubMed using the key words "azoospermia" "oligospermia," and "genetics." The results were limited to the studies on humans and written in English, which were written within last 10 years. Although preliminary query results showed more than 900 articles, further queries using key words, such as "Y chromosome," "monogenics," "aneuploidy," "mitochondrial DNA," and "epigenetics," along with "azoospermia," narrowed the results to 30 papers, which were included in the present study.

RESULTS

Genetic defects causing azoospermia were categorized into two large categories: chromosomal and nonchromosomal. Chromosomal defects were further categorized into (1) structural abnormalities, such as Y chromosome micro/macrodeletions, chromosomal inversions, and translocations; and (2) numerical abnormalities, also known as aneuploidy. Nonchromosomal defects included sperm mitochondrial genome defects and epigenetic alterations of genome.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of advancements in ART, understanding the potential implications of genetic disorders for infertile couples is critical. Analysis of a potential genetic role in azoospermia holds promise to expand our knowledge to evaluate male infertility and to guide treatments.