Synthesis and binding potencies of cyclic hexapeptide analogs of somatostatin incorporating acidic and basic peptoid residues

Peptides and proteins as a continuing exciting source of inspiration for peptidomimetics

Despite their enormous diversity in biological function and structure, peptides and proteins are endowed with properties that have induced and stimulated the development of peptidomimetics. Clearly, peptides can be considered as the "stem" of a phylogenetic molecular development tree from which branches of oligomeric peptidomimetics such as peptoids, peptidosulfonamides, urea peptidomimetics, as well as β-peptides have sprouted. It is still a challenge to efficiently synthesize these oligomeric species, and study their structural and biological properties. Combining peptides and peptidomimetics led to the emergence of peptide-peptidomimetic hybrids in which one or more (proteinogenic) amino acid residues have been replaced with these mimetic residues. In scan-like approaches, the influence of these replacements on biological activity can then be studied, to evaluate to what extent a peptide can be transformed into a peptidomimetic structure while maintaining, or even improving, its biological properties. A central issue, especially with the smaller peptides, is the lack of secondary structure. Important approaches to control secondary structure include the introduction of α,α-disubstituted amino acids, or (di)peptidomimetic structures such as the Freidinger lactam. Apart from intra-amino acid constraints, inter-amino acid constraints for formation of a diversity of cyclic peptides have shaped a thick branch. Apart from the classical disulfide bridges, the repertoire has been extended to include sulfide and triazole bridges as well as the single-, double- and even triple-bond replacements, accessible by the extremely versatile ring-closing alkene/alkyne metathesis approaches. The latter approach is now the method of choice for the secondary structure that presents the greatest challenge for structural stabilization: the α-helix.

Somatostatin analogs

Somatostatin is a hypothalamic peptide hormone that inhibits the secretion of growth hormone, glucagon, insulin, gastrin and secretin, and also plays a role in neural transmission. Because of its wide range of possible clinical applications hundreds of somatostatin analogs have been synthesized and bioassayed to date. This review gives a historical perspective, summarizing approximately 30 years of research on somatostatin. The main focus is on the structure-activity relationships and conformational studies of the last generation of somatostatin agonists and their selectivity for five somatostatin receptor subtypes. Achievements in the synthesis of nonpeptide somatostatin analogs, as well as the first somatostatin antagonists, are also discussed. Finally, the use of a cyclic somatostatin scaffold to design ligands for other G-protein-coupled receptors, such as opioid and melanocortin receptors, is mentioned.

Conformational analyses by 1H NMR and computer simulations of cyclic hexapeptides related to somatostatin containing acidic and basic peptoid residues

We report the conformational analysis by 1H NMR in DMSO and computer simulations involving distance geometry and molecular dynamics simulations at 300K of peptoid analogs of the cyclic hexapeptide c-[Phe11-Pro6-Phe7-D-Trp8-Lys9-Thr10]. The analogs c-[Phe11-Nasp6-Phe7-D-Trp8-Lys9-Thr10](1), c-[Phe11-Ndab6Phe7-D-Trp8-Lys9-Thr10] (2) and c-[Phen11-Nlys6-Phe7-D-Trp8-Lys9-Thr10](3) where Nasp denotes N-(2-carboxyethyl) glycine, Ndab N-(2-aminoethyl) glycine and Nlys N-(4-aminobutyl) glycine are subject to conformational studies. The results of free and restrained molecular dynamics simulations at 300K are reported and give insight into the conformational behaviour of these analogs. The compounds show two sets of nuclear magnetic resonance signals corresponding to the cis and trans orientations of the peptide bond between residues 11 and 6. The backbone conformation of the cis isomers that we believe are the bioactive isomers of the three compounds are very similar to each other while there are larger variations amongst the trans isomers. The binding data to the isolated receptors show that the introduction of the Nlys residue in analog 3 leads to an enhancement of binding potency to the hsst5 receptor compared with analog 2 while maintaining identical binding potency to the hsst2 receptor. The Nasp6 analog 1 binds weakly to the hsst2 and is essentially inactive towards the other receptors. Comparison of the conformations and binding activities of these three analogs indicates that the Nlys residue extends sufficiently far to allow binding to a negatively charged binding domain on the hsst5 receptor. According to this model, the Ndab analog 2 cannot extend far enough to allow for binding to the receptor pocket. The loss of activity observed for the Nasp6 compound 1 indicates that the presence of a negatively charged residue in position 6 is unfavorable for binding to the hsst receptors.