Monitoring arterial blood pressure during whole body hyperthermia

Hyperthermia: How Can It Be Used?

Hyperthermia (HT) is a method used to treat tumors by increasing the temperature of the cells. The treatment can be applied in combination with other verified cancer treatments using several different procedures. We sought to present an overview of the different HT tumor treatment, recent advances in the field, and combinational treatment sequences and outcomes. We used a computer-aided search to identify articles that contained the keywords hyperthermia, cancer treatment, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, nanoparticle, and cisplatin. There are three types of HT treatment, which each need the use of applicators that are in contact with or in the proximity of the patient for the purpose of heating. Heating can be achieved using different types of energy (including microwaves, radio waves, and ultrasound). However, the source of energy will depend on the cancer type and location. The temperature used will also vary. HT is rarely used alone, and can be combined with other cancer treatments. When used in combination with other treatments, improved survival rates have been observed. However, despite in vitro and in vivo studies that support the use of concurrent hypothermia treatments, contradictory results suggest there is a need for more studies to identify other hidden effects of HT.

Whole Body Hyperthermia by Extracorporeal Circulation in Spontaneously Breathing Sarcoma Patients: Hemodynamics and Oxygen Metabolism

Purpose

This phase I study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of a new method of extracorporeal perfusion-induced whole body hyperthermia (WBHT) in patients with advanced sarcoma avoiding the need of intubation and general anesthesia.

Methods

One double-lumen femoral venous access was inserted by Seldinger's technique to obtain WBHT (41.8°C for 120 minutes) via an extracorporeal circuit. No concomitant chemotherapy was applied. Up to 4 treatments of WBHT were performed under moderate sedation in 6 spontaneously breathing patients. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring was performed by use of a pulmonary artery catheter.

Results

After their first WBHT session, 2 patients were excluded from further treatment due to transient liver toxicity or catheter-related complication, so a total of 12 cycles remained for analyses. In all patients, conscious sedation resulted in sufficient spontaneous respiration without the need for mandatory ventilation. Median time to reach the target temperature was 84 minutes (range 60–142). Hemodynamic changes revealed the expected hyperdynamic state: heart rate, cardiac index, and stroke volume index significantly increased (p<0.05), whereas blood pressure and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance index significantly decreased (p<0.05). A net fluid balance of 5822+1766 mL as well as norepinephrine (mean; 0.062 μg·kg1·min−1) were necessary to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure >60 mmHg.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate the feasibility of this method of extracorporeal WBHT without mandatory ventilation. Hemodynamic side effects in spontaneously breathing patients during perfusion-induced WBHT seem less severe than those observed in radiant heat WBHT.

Goal-directed therapy of cardiac preload in induced whole-body hyperthermia

OBJECTIVES

To optimize volume therapy during induced whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) < or = 42.2 degrees C, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) were compared as goal parameters.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

ICU at university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three patients with metastatic cancers.

INTERVENTIONS

Radiant WBH in combination with induced hyperglycemia, hyperoxemia, and chemotherapy was applied. Volume therapy was directed to the PCWP (group A, 8 to 12 mm Hg [20 treatments]), or to ITBVI (group B, 800 to 1,100 mL/m2 [19 treatments]) following a standardized protocol. Goals other than PCWP and ITBVI were cardiac index of > 3.5 L/min/m2 and mean arterial pressure of > 55 mm Hg.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In addition to the primary goals PCWP and ITBVI, at defined temperatures, central venous pressure (CVP), extravascular lung water index, the number of infusions, and packed RBCs, as well as serum lactate level, norepinephrine dosage, and levels of liver enzymes, bilirubin, creatinine, and urea were measured. Patients in group A received a significantly greater mean (+/- SD) amount of crystalloids compared to those in group B (6,175 +/- 656 vs 3,947 +/- 375 mL, respectively) and required significantly lower dosages of vasoconstrictors compared with patients in group B. Except for the lower values of CVP in patients in group A during hyperthermia, all of the other hemodynamic and laboratory parameters showed no significant differences between the groups or stayed in a normal range.

CONCLUSION

PCWP and ITBVI are useful parameters to assess preload in induced WBH. Differences in crystalloids and vasopressor dosages may suggest an appropriate ITBVI of > 1,100 mL/m2 for patients with good cardiopulmonary health under such extremely hypercirculatory conditions.

Whole-body hyperthermia in the scope of von Ardenne's systemic cancer multistep therapy (sCMT) combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study

This phase I/II study evaluated the feasibility, toxicity and response rates of von Ardenne's systemic cancer multistep therapy (sCMT) when applied as an adjunct to cytostatic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. sCMT consists of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) at 41.8-42.1 degrees C, hyperglycaemia and hyperoxaemia. All patients who entered the trial first received three monthly courses of chemotherapy (folinic acid, 50 mg, days 1-5; 5-fluorouracil, 425 mg/m2, days 1-5; mitomycin 8 mg/m2, day 1), followed by response evaluation according World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Responders (partial/complete remission) were assigned to three further courses of chemotherapy, whereas non-responders (stable/progressive disease) were allocated to additional sCMT on day 1 of every subsequent chemotherapy course. The WBH procedure was administered under general anaesthesia employing the Iratherm-2000 radiant heat device. Of 28 patients enrolled, 19 received more than three treatment courses. Eight of these 19 patients had responded to chemotherapy (PR) and thus obtained three further courses of chemotherapy alone. In 10 of 19 patients who had not responded (SD, PD), three additional courses of chemotherapy were combined with sCMT (with 25 sCMT applications). One patient who did not respond to initial treatment declined sCMT and was continued with chemotherapy alone. It was found that sCMT was feasible, but associated with a specific spectrum of grade III/IV toxicity (skin 20%, pain 16%, peripheral nerves 8% of treatment courses). The fact that three patients who did not respond to initial chemotherapy achieved a PR after additional sCMT suggests that sCMT may enhance the effect of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.