A clustering of unfavourable common genetic mutations in stroke cases

Factor V Leiden does not have a role in cryptogenic ischemic stroke among Iranian young adults

BACKGROUND

Different risk factors have been suggested for ischemic stroke in young adults. In a group of these patients despite of extensive diagnostic work-up, the primary cause remains unknown. Coagulation tendency is accounted as a possible cause in these patients. Previous studies on factor V Leiden (FVL) as the main cause of inherited thrombophilia for clarifying the role of FVL in stroke have resulted in controversial findings. The current study investigates the role of this factor in ischemic stroke among Iranians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case-control study was performed between September 2007 and December 2008 in Isfahan, Iran. The case group comprised of 22 patients of which 15 were males and 7 were females with age range of ≤50 years, diagnosed as ischemic stroke without classic risk factors and the control group consisted of 54 healthy young adults. After filling consent form, venous blood samples were obtained and sent to the laboratory for genetic examination.

RESULTS

No FVL mutation was found in the case group. There was one carrier of the mutation as heterozygous in the control group (relative frequency = 1.85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our study, FVL might not be considered as an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke in Iranian individuals who are not suffering from other risk factors of ischemic stroke.

Evaluation of the modifying effects of unfavourable genotypes on classical clinical risk factors for ischaemic stroke

OBJECTIVES

Ischaemic stroke is a frequent heterogeneous multifactorial disease that is affected by a number of genetic mutations and environmental factors. We hypothesised the clinical importance of the interactions between common, unfavourable genetic mutations and clinical risk factors in the development of ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

The Factor V Leiden G1691A (Leiden V), the prothrombin G20210A, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR C677T) mutations, the angiotensin converting enzyme I/D (ACE I/D), and apolipoprotein allele e4 (APO e4) genotypes were examined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique in 867 ischaemic stroke patients and 743 healthy controls. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the roles of the co-occurrences of the clinical risk factors and common genetic mutations in ischaemic stroke.

RESULTS

The Leiden V mutation in combination with hypertension or diabetes mellitus increased the risk of ischaemic stroke. We found synergistic effects between the ACE D/D and MTHFR 677TT genotypes and drinking or smoking. The presence of the APO e4 greatly facilitated the unfavourable effects of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, or drinking on the incidence of ischaemic stroke.

CONCLUSION

In certain combinations, pairing of common unfavourable genetic factors, which alone confer only minor or non-significant risk, with clinical risk factors can greatly increase the susceptibility to ischaemic stroke.

Evaluation of the roles of common genetic mutations in leukoaraiosis

OBJECTIVES

Leukoaraiosis, a relatively frequent neuroimaging entity, is presumed to be primarily a vascular problem. However, it can be explained only in part by vascular risk factors. With the assumption of genetic susceptibility, the roles of common genetic polymorphisms and mutations in leukoaraiosis were examined in this study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A detailed clinical scrutiny of 843 Hungarian neurological patients with mild cognitive-like complaints revealed 229 subjects with leukoaraiosis that was probably vascular in origin: 143 with leukoaraiosis alone (group 1), and 86 with leukoaraiosis plus cerebral infarction (group 2). In all 229 patients, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR C677T) mutation and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE I/D) polymorphism were examined by means of the PCR technique. The prevalences of the different genotypes for the examined mutations in the 2 groups were analysed in comparison with the data on 362 neuroimaging alteration-free subjects as controls.

RESULTS

The ACE D/D genotype (38.37%, P<0.0005; OR 2.46, 95% CI, 1.49-4.08) and ACE D allele (61%; P<0.001) were more frequent in group 2 than in the control group (20.17%; 47%). Neither the homozygous nor the heterozygous MTHFR C677T mutation alone was found to be a risk factor for leukoaraiosis. The homozygous MTHFR C677T mutation combined with the ACE D/D genotype was significantly more frequent in group 1 (11.89%, P<0.0005; OR 4.75, 95% CI, 2.12-10.65), in group 2 (12.79%, P<0.0005; OR 5.16, 95% CI, 2.12-12.6) and in combined group 1+2 (12.23%, P<0.0005; OR 4.9, 95% CI, 2.33-10.3) than in the control group (2.76%).

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the contributions of the ACE D/D genotype and the homozygous MTHFR C677T mutation to leukoaraiosis should be taken into consideration not as major, but as additive factors. These findings draw attention to the fact that genetic polymorphisms that alone are insignificant can be risk factors for leukoaraiosis if they cluster in the same subjects.