Long-term persisting interferon beta-1b neutralizing antibodies after discontinuation of treatment

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.

Persistence of neutralizing antibodies after discontinuation of IFNβ therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Objective The main objective was to follow serum levels of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) against interferon-beta (IFNβ) after discontinuation of IFNβ therapy.

Background A large proportion of patients treated with recombinant IFNβ for multiple sclerosis (MS) develop therapy-induced NABs. Knowledge of persistence of NABs after discontinuation of therapy is limited. Design/patients: A retrospective follow-up study of patients treated in Denmark for relapsing-remitting (RR) MS with IFNβ for at least 12 months. NAB-positive patients, who discontinued therapy, were followed up with measurements of NABs.

Methods We measured NAB-neutralizing capacity and NAB titres a.m. Kawade using a clinically validated cytopathic effect assay.

Results Thirty-seven patients were included. Mean follow-up time was 22 months. Of the 29 patients with a NAB titre at or above 25 prior to termination of therapy, only three patients reverted to a titre below 25. Of these, two had a titre below 200 and one patient a titre of 600 at the last examination before treatment stop. The longest post-treatment follow-up during which a patient maintained NAB positivity was 59 months.

Conclusion NABs against IFNβ, especially with high titres, tend to persist for a long time after discontinuation of IFNβ therapy. NABs should always be measured before reinstitution of IFNβ treatment in NAB-positive patients.

Development of interferon beta-neutralising antibodies in multiple sclerosis--a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Interferon beta (IFN-β) is the drug of choice for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis and is known to reduce the frequency and severity of relapses. This systematic review determines the occurrence of neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against different formulations of IFN-β: IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™ and IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™.

METHODS

The databases used in the review included MEDLINE Ovid (from 1950 to March 2015), Embase Ovid (from 1980 to March 2015), CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 4) and ClinicalTrials.gov (from 1997 to March 2015). All studies that compared the efficacy of the different formulations of IFN-β in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis including IFN-β-1a Avonex™, IFN-β-1a Rebif™, IFN-β-1b Betaferon/Betaseron™ and IFN-β-1b Extavia™ were included.

RESULTS

Assessment of randomised controlled trials demonstrated that Avonex™ was 76% less likely than Rebif™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Avonex™ was 88% less likely than Betaferon/Betaseron™ to lead to the formation of NAbs. Similar findings were also observed in the non-randomised controlled studies, with Avonex™ having the lowest risk. The formation of NAbs was dose dependent: Avonex™ at 30 μg was 64% less risky than Avonex™ at 60 μg.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that 2.0-18.9% of patients developed NAbs to Avonex™, 16.5-35.4% of patients developed NAbs to Rebif™ and 27.3-53.3% of patients developed NAbs to Betaferon/Betaseron™.

Pharmacogenomics of IFN-beta in multiple sclerosis: towards a personalized medicine approach

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the CNS. The clinical presentation of MS is heterogeneous. Interferons (IFNs) were the first agents to show clinical efficacy in the treatment of MS and prolonged treatment is still the best available therapy. Although IFN treatment ameliorates immune dysfunction, the response is partial. Clinical experience indicates that there are responders and nonresponders. This distinction suggests that a subset of patients are insensitive or resistant to the action of IFN. This implies that pharmacodynamic responses may differ between patients, leading to interindividual differences in clinical response. Understanding of the factors that underlie the therapeutic response is key to the identification of predictive markers. Here, we describe novel developments in pharmacogenomics research to improve the understanding of the pharmacological effects of IFN therapy, and the identification of biomarkers that allow stratification of MS patients for their response to IFN-beta. Ultimately, this information will lead to a personalized form of medicine, whereby a specific therapy will be applied that is best suited to an individual patient.

Interferon-beta treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Recombinant forms of IFN-beta were the first therapeutic intervention found to be effective at interfering with the course of multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic and debilitating disease affecting the CNS in young adults.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

To examine the application of IFN-beta to MS treatment by a review of relevant literature.

RESULTS

The different IFN-beta products available are similar in their clinical effects. However, the response to IFN-beta therapy is only partial and the most efficient individual-specific dose, route and frequency of administration are not elucidated fully. The mechanism of action of IFN-beta in MS is also not understood fully but its immunomodulatory effects are probably more important than its anti-proliferative and antiviral activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although new therapeutic approaches are being sought to better treat MS, IFN-beta remains one of the most recognized and approved worldwide therapeutic options for this disease.

Pharmacogenomics of interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis: baseline IFN signature determines pharmacological differences between patients

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disease. In order to understand the partial responsiveness to IFNbeta in Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS) we studied the pharmacological effects of IFNbeta therapy.

METHODOLOGY

Large scale gene expression profiling was performed on peripheral blood of 16 RRMS patients at baseline and one month after the start of IFNbeta therapy. Differential gene expression was analyzed by Significance Analysis of Microarrays. Subsequent expression analyses on specific genes were performed after three and six months of treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated and stimulated in vitro with IFNbeta. Genes of interest were measured and validated by quantitative realtime PCR. An independent group of 30 RRMS patients was used for validation.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Pharmacogenomics revealed a marked variation in the pharmacological response to IFNbeta between patients. A total of 126 genes were upregulated in a subset of patients whereas in other patients these genes were downregulated or unchanged after one month of IFNbeta therapy. Most interestingly, we observed that the extent of the pharmacological response correlates negatively with the baseline expression of a specific set of 15 IFN response genes (R = -0.7208; p = 0.0016). The negative correlation was maintained after three (R = -0.7363; p = 0.0027) and six (R = -0.8154; p = 0.0004) months of treatment, as determined by gene expression levels of the most significant correlating gene. Similar results were obtained in an independent group of patients (n = 30; R = -0.4719; p = 0.0085). Moreover, the ex vivo results could be confirmed by in vitro stimulation of purified PBMCs at baseline with IFNbeta indicating that differential responsiveness to IFNbeta is an intrinsic feature of peripheral blood cells at baseline.

CONCLUSION

These data imply that the expression levels of IFN response genes in the peripheral blood of MS patients prior to treatment could serve a role as biomarker for the differential clinical response to IFNbeta.

A case study on the effect of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta 1b in multiple sclerosis patients followed for 3 years with monthly imaging

Interferon beta (IFN-beta) is among the first-line treatment options for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). A potential caveat of therapy, however, is the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and/or neutralizing activity (NA) non-antibody mediated, although debate is still ongoing as to whether NAb significantly hampers the efficacy of the drug or rather represents an immunologically irrelevant epiphenomenon. In the present study, we describe the effect of NAb on IFN-beta-1b through clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome measures of five relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who were treated with 250 mug of subcutaneously administered IFN-beta-1b every other day and developed NAb at varying titres and times during the course of therapy. Despite the small number of NAb(+) patients, heterogeneity in MRI/clinical response to IFN-beta-1b was identified. Response to IFN-beta-1b therapy was observed in the absence or presence of NAb. Also observed was failure to IFN-beta-1b coincident with high and sustained NAb titres, but also before NAb development or in the presence of low NAb titres. Multiple MRI and NAb measurements performed within the same individual allow for a better description of the complex heterogeneous response to IFN-beta-1b with respect to NAb occurrence.

Neutralising antibodies to IFN-β in patients with multiple sclerosis

The development of neutralising antibodies (NABs), or neutralising activity in the absence of NABs, is a potential complication of therapy with interferon (IFN)-beta for patients with multiple sclerosis, limiting therapeutic efficacy. Discontinuation of IFN-beta therapy in patients found to have sustained titres of NABs > 1:100 over an interval of 3 - 6 months has been recently proposed as a Level A recommendation. The extent to which NABs are causative, rather than an epiphenomenon, in determining drug failure has been a matter of numerous investigations and is still controversial. Thus, further studies are warranted for determining the role that NABs may play in reducing the response to the drug. In particular, the effects of NABs in reducing the efficacy of IFN-beta therapy beyond clinical relapse rate and lesion load on conventional imaging are not as yet fully understood.

Structure−Function Engineering of Interferon-β-1b for Improving Stability, Solubility, Potency, Immunogenicity, and Pharmacokinetic Properties by Site-Selective Mono-PEGylation

Recombinant interferon-beta-1b (IFN-beta-1b) is used clinically in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. In common with many biological ligands, IFN-beta-1b exhibits a relatively short serum half-life, and bioavailability may be further diminished by neutralizing antibodies. While PEGylation is an approach commonly employed to increase the blood residency time of protein therapeutics, there is a further requisite for molecular engineering approaches to also address the stability, solubility, aggregation, immunogenicity and in vivo exposure of therapeutic proteins. We investigated these five parameters of recombinant human IFN-beta-1b in over 20 site-selective mono-PEGylated or multi-PEGylated IFN-beta-1b bioconjugates. Primary amines were modified by single or multiple attachments of poly(ethylene glycol), either site-specifically at the N-terminus, or randomly on the 11 lysines. In two alternate approaches, site-directed mutagenesis was independently employed in the construction of designed IFN-beta-1b variants containing either a single free cysteine or lysine for site-specific PEGylation. Optimization of conjugate preparation with 12 kDa, 20 kDa, 30 kDa, and 40 kDa amine-selective PEG polymers was achieved, and a comparison of the structural and functional properties of the IFN-beta-1b proteins and their PEGylated counterparts was conducted. Peptide mapping and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis confirmed the attachment sites of the PEG polymer. Independent biochemical and bioactivity analyses, including antiviral and antiproliferation bioassays, circular dichroism, capillary electrophoresis, flow cytometric profiling, reversed phase and size exclusion HPLC, and immunoassays demonstrated that the functional activities of the designed IFN-beta-1b conjugates were maintained, while the formation of soluble or insoluble aggregates of IFN-beta-1b was ameliorated. Immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic studies of selected PEGylated IFN-beta-1b compounds in mice and rats demonstrated both diminished IgG responses, and over 100-fold expanded AUC exposure relative to the unmodified protein. The results demonstrate the capacity of this macromolecular engineering strategy to address both pharmacological and formulation challenges for a highly hydrophobic, aggregation-prone protein. The properties of a lead mono-PEGylated candidate, 40 kDa PEG2-IFN-beta-1b, were further investigated in formulation optimization and biological studies.

Therapeutic role of beta-interferons in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). In the last 12 years, there has been a proliferation of studies elucidating the immune mechanisms that mediate tissue damage in MS. Interferons (IFNs) have an important role in regulating innate and adaptive immune responses. They decrease pro-inflammatory responses such as the autoimmunity in MS, but other autoimmune responses such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be exacerbated. This review offers a general overview of the biological properties of IFNs, effects on immune cells, and clinical effectiveness in MS treatment. IFN signaling is complex, from receptor binding events to the generation of effector mechanisms that dampen inflammation. Immune cell function is altered in MS. IFN treatment of MS patients ameliorates immune dysfunction, but not completely. The incomplete resolution of immune dysfunction by IFNs partly explains their significant, but modest therapeutic effects. This observation also suggests that there are immune mechanisms in MS that are resistant to IFN therapy. In MS, abnormalities may exist at several points along the IFN signaling pathway, including molecular defects in the IFN second messenger system. Currently, several studies are ongoing evaluating ways of potentiating IFN effects. IFNs were the first agents to show clinical efficacy in treatment of MS. More than a decade of experience with IFNs has showed continued clinical efficacy over time. In the near future, IFNs will continue to play a major role in MS.

Increased disability and MRI lesions after discontinuation of IFN-beta-1a in secondary progressive MS

OBJECTIVE

To examine neurological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes following discontinuation of interferon (IFN)-beta-1a treatment in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS).

METHODS

The study involved 21 SPMS patients who received subcutaneous (s.c.) IFN-beta-1a 44 microg three times weekly (t.i.w.) for 12 months and were thereafter followed up without treatment for a further 12 months. The number of relapses, disability on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and MRI were recorded at baseline, at 12 months of IFN-beta-1a 44 microg t.i.w. and 1 year after discontinuation of treatment.

RESULTS

During the 12-month treatment EDSS score and volumes of brain T2- and T1-weighted lesions remained without significant progression, but at 12 months after treatment discontinuation both EDSS score and the volumes of cerebral lesions increased significantly. Cerebrospinal fluid fraction increased significantly both during the treatment and during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of IFN-beta-1a 44 microg t.i.w. in SPMS may be associated with an increase in neurological disability and brain lesions on MRI.