Occupational contact sensitization to 1,2-diaminocyclohexane

Pressure regulated basis for gene transcription by delta-cell micro-compliance modeled in silico: Biphenyl, bisphenol and small molecule ligand models of cell contraction-expansion

Molecular diameter, lipophilicity and hydrophilicity exclusion affinity limits exist for small molecule carrier-mediated diffusion or transport through channel pores or interaction with the cell surface glycocalyx. The molecular structure lipophilicity limit for non-specific carrier-mediated transmembrane diffusion through polarity-selective transport channels of the cell membrane is L_{external structure} ∙ H_{polar group}^-1 of ≥ 1.07. The cell membrane channel pore size is > 0.752 and < 0.758 nm based on a 3-D ellipsoid model (biphenyl), and within the molecular diameter size range 0.744 and 0.762 nm based on a 2-D elliptical model (alkanol). The adjusted van der Waals diameter (vdWD, adj; nm) for the subset of halogenated vapors is predictive of the required MAC for anesthetic potency at an initial (-) Δ C_micro effect. The molecular structure L ∙ H_{polar group}^-1 for Neu5Ac is 0.080, and the L ∙ H_{polar group}^-1 interval range for the cell surface glycocalyx hydrophilicity barrier interaction is 0.101 (Saxitoxin, Stx; L_{internal structure} ∙ H_{polar group}^-1) - 0.092 (m-xylenediamine, L_{external structure} · H_{polar group}). Differential predictive effective pressure mapping of gene activation or repression reveals that p-dioxin exposure results in activation of AhR-Erβ (Arnt)/Nrf-2, Pparδ, Errγ (LxRα), Dio3 (Dio2) and Trα limbs, and due to high affinity Dio2 and Dio3 (OH-TriCDD, L_ext · H^-1: 1.91–4.31) exothermy-antagonism (Δ contraction) with high affinity T₄/rT₃-TRα-mediated agonism (Δ expansion). co-planar PCB metabolite exposure (L_ext · H^-1: 1.95–3.91) results in activation of AhR (Erα/β)/Nrf2, Rev-Erbβ, Errα, Dio3 (Dio2) and Trα limbs with a Δ C_micro contraction of 0.89 and Δ C_micro expansion of 1.05 as compared to p-dioxin. co-, ortho-planar PCB metabolite exposure results in activation of Car/PxR, Pparα (Srebf1,—Lxrβ), Arnt (AhR-Erβ), AR, Dio1 (Dio2) and Trβ limbs with a Δ C_micro contraction of 0.73 and Δ C_micro expansion of 1.18 (as compared to p-dioxin). Bisphenol A exposure (L_{ext struct} ∙ H^-1: 1.08–1.12, BPA–BPE, Errγ; BPAF, L_{ext struct} ∙ H^-1: 1.23, CM Erα, β) results in increased duration at P_eff for Timm8b (P_eff 0.247) transcription and in indirect activation of the AhR/Nrf-2 hybrid pathway with decreased duration at P_eff 0.200 (Nrf1) and increased duration at P_eff 0.257 (Dffa). The Bpa/Bpaf convergent pathway C_micro contraction-expansion response increase in the lower P_eff interval is 0.040; in comparison, small molecule hormone Δ C_micro contraction-expansion response increases in the lower P_eff intervals for gene expression ≤ 0.168 (Dex· GR) ≥ 0.156 (Dht · AR), with grade of duration at P_eff (min·count) of 1.33x10⁵ (Dex/Cort) and 1.8–2.53x10⁵ (Dht/R1881) as compared to the (-) coupled (+) Δ C_microP_eff to 0.136 (Wnt5a, Esr2) with applied DES (1.86x10⁶). The subtype of trans-differentiated cell as a result of an applied toxin or toxicant is predictable by delta-C_micro determined by P_eff mapping. Study findings offer additional perspective on the basis for pressure regulated gene transcription by alterations in cell micro-compliance (Δ contraction-expansion, C_micro), and are applicable for the further predictive modeling of gene to gene transcription interactions, and small molecule modulation of cell effective pressure (P_eff) and its potential.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis Secondary to Moisturizers

Background: Moisturizers are cosmetic products used routinely to manage various skin conditions. Even though moisturizers are often thought to have minimal or no adverse reactions, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to these products can develop in some cases. Methods: We studied ingredients included in 3 of the most commonly used moisturizer brands, identified their presence in standard patch testing series, and evaluated their allergenic potential, categorizing the allergens as frequent or infrequent. The standard patch testing series used as reference were the Thin-layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous patch test (T.R.U.E. test), the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) screening standard series, and the American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) core allergen series. Results: Aveeno, Cetaphil, and Cerave products had a total of 12, 14, and 9 potential allergens, respectively, the majority of which were infrequent and not included in standard patch testing series. Conclusion: Being aware of the allergenic potential of commonly used moisturizers may help healthcare providers when evaluating patients with ACD. Further testing is recommended in a targeted manner when suspecting ACD with negative standard patch testing series or when ACD is refractory to treatment.

An update on airborne contact dermatitis: 2001-2006

Reports on airborne dermatoses are mainly published in the context of occupational settings. Hence, in recent years, dermatologists and also occupational physicians have become increasingly aware of the airborne source of contact dermatitis, resulting mainly from exposure to irritants or allergens. However, their occurrence is still underestimated, because reports often omit the term 'airborne' in relation to dust or volatile allergens. For the present update, we screened the journals 'Contact Dermatitis' (July 2000 to December 2006); 'Dermatitis', formerly named 'American Journal of Contact Dermatitis'; 'La Lettre du Gerda' (January 2000 to December 2006); and also included relevant articles from other journals published during the same period. This resulted in an updated list of airborne dermatitis causes.