1
|
Mutsaers JHAM, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Peters R, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. Recovery expectations of neck pain patients do not predict treatments outcome in manual therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18518. [PMID: 33116233 PMCID: PMC7595084 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74962-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient recovery expectations can predict treatment outcome. Little is known about the association of patient recovery expectations on treatment outcome in patients with neck pain consulting a manual therapist. This study evaluates the predictive value of recovery expectations in neck pain patients consulting manual therapists in the Netherlands. The primary outcome measure 'recovery' is defined as 'reduction in pain and perceived improvement'. A prospective cohort study a total of 1195 neck pain patients. Patients completed the Patient Expectancies List (PEL) at baseline (3 item questionnaire, score range from 3 to 12), functional status (NDI), the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) for recovery (7-points Likert scale) post treatment and pain scores (NRS) at baseline and post treatment. The relationship between recovery expectancy and recovery (dichotomized GPE scores) was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Patients generally reported high recovery expectations on all three questions of the PEL (mean sumscores ranging from 11.3 to 11.6). When adjusted for covariates the PEL sum-score did not predict recovery (explained variance was 0.10 for the total PEL). Separately, the first question of the PEL showed predictive potential (OR 3.7; 95%CI 0.19-73.74) for recovery, but failed to reach statistical significance. In this study patient recovery expectations did not predict treatment outcome. Variables predicting recovery were recurrence and duration of pain. The precise relationship between patient recovery expectations and outcome is complex and still inconclusive. Research on patient expectancy would benefit from more consistent use of theoretical expectancy and outcome models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-H A M Mutsaers
- Institute for Master Education in Manual Therapy, SOMT, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Avans Hogeschool, University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 90116, 4800 RA, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - A L Pool-Goudzwaard
- Institute for Master Education in Manual Therapy, SOMT, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat, 9, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Peters
- Institute for Master Education in Manual Therapy, SOMT, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - A P Verhagen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Björsenius V, Löfgren M, Stålnacke BM. One-Year Follow-Up after Multimodal Rehabilitation for Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E4784. [PMID: 32635189 PMCID: PMC7369994 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Long-term symptoms after whiplash injury often comprise neck pain, headache, anxiety, depression, functional impairment and low quality of life. In an observational cohort study, we examined physical and mental health effects in patients with subacute to chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) after participation in a multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) program. MMR is a team-based multi-professional method based on a bio-psycho-social model with a cognitive focus to reach an individualized and common goal for the team and patient together. Standardized self-report questionnaires were filled in three times: before MMR, after MMR, and one year after MMR. A total of 322 participants completed the program, 161 of whom responded in full and were further analyzed. At one-year follow-up after MMR, a significant improvement was seen in the evaluation of the primary outcomes (physical and mental health) and secondary outcomes (anxiety, depression, pain intensity and interference with life). Women improved on all outcomes while men did not improve on the psychological measures (mental health, depression and anxiety). This study indicates that a MMR program could be beneficial for patients with subacute to chronic WAD, at least for women, since the outcomes at one-year follow-up were positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktor Björsenius
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, SE-905 87 Umeå, Sweden;
| | - Monika Löfgren
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd University Hospital, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Britt-Marie Stålnacke
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine, Umeå University, SE-905 87 Umeå, Sweden;
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd University Hospital, SE-182 88 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kayembe MT, Jolani S, Tan FES, van Breukelen GJP. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results. Pharm Stat 2020; 19:840-860. [PMID: 32510791 PMCID: PMC7687108 DOI: 10.1002/pst.2041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we first review the literature on dealing with missing values on a covariate in randomized studies and summarize what has been done and what is lacking to date. We then investigate the situation with a continuous outcome and a missing binary covariate in more details through simulations, comparing the performance of multiple imputation (MI) with various simple alternative methods. This is finally extended to the case of time‐to‐event outcome. The simulations consider five different missingness scenarios: missing completely at random (MCAR), at random (MAR) with missingness depending only on the treatment, and missing not at random (MNAR) with missingness depending on the covariate itself (MNAR1), missingness depending on both the treatment and covariate (MNAR2), and missingness depending on the treatment, covariate and their interaction (MNAR3). Here, we distinguish two different cases: (1) when the covariate is measured before randomization (best practice), where only MCAR and MNAR1 are plausible, and (2) when it is measured after randomization but before treatment (which sometimes occurs in nonpharmaceutical research), where the other three missingness mechanisms can also occur. The proposed methods are compared based on the treatment effect estimate and its standard error. The simulation results suggest that the patterns of results are very similar for all missingness scenarios in case (1) and also in case (2) except for MNAR3. Furthermore, in each scenario for continuous outcome, there is at least one simple method that performs at least as well as MI, while for time‐to‐event outcome MI is best.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutamba T Kayembe
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Shahab Jolani
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Frans E S Tan
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard J P van Breukelen
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henschke N, Ostelo RWJG, van Tulder MW, Vlaeyen JWS, Morley S, Assendelft WJJ, Main CJ. Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2010:CD002014. [PMID: 20614428 PMCID: PMC7065591 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002014.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural treatment is commonly used in the management of chronic low-back pain (CLBP) to reduce disability through modification of maladaptive pain behaviours and cognitive processes. Three behavioural approaches are generally distinguished: operant, cognitive, and respondent; but are often combined as a treatment package. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of behavioural therapy for CLBP and the most effective behavioural approach. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Back Review Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched up to February 2009. Reference lists and citations of identified trials and relevant systematic reviews were screened. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials on behavioural treatments for non-specific CLBP were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias in each study and extracted the data. If sufficient homogeneity existed among studies in the pre-defined comparisons, a meta-analysis was performed. We determined the quality of the evidence for each comparison with the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 30 randomised trials (3438 participants) in this review, up 11 from the previous version. Fourteen trials (47%) had low risk of bias. For most comparisons, there was only low or very low quality evidence to support the results. There was moderate quality evidence that:i) operant therapy was more effective than waiting list (SMD -0.43; 95%CI -0.75 to -0.11) for short-term pain relief;ii) little or no difference exists between operant, cognitive, or combined behavioural therapy for short- to intermediate-term pain relief;iii) behavioural treatment was more effective than usual care for short-term pain relief (MD -5.18; 95%CI -9.79 to -0.57), but there were no differences in the intermediate- to long-term, or on functional status;iv) there was little or no difference between behavioural treatment and group exercise for pain relief or depressive symptoms over the intermediate- to long-term;v) adding behavioural therapy to inpatient rehabilitation was no more effective than inpatient rehabilitation alone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For patients with CLBP, there is moderate quality evidence that in the short-term, operant therapy is more effective than waiting list and behavioural therapy is more effective than usual care for pain relief, but no specific type of behavioural therapy is more effective than another. In the intermediate- to long-term, there is little or no difference between behavioural therapy and group exercises for pain or depressive symptoms. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimates of effect and may change the estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Henschke
- The George Institute for International HealthLevel 7, 341 George StreetSydneyNSWAustralia2000
| | - Raymond WJG Ostelo
- VU UniversityDepartment of Health Sciences, EMGO Institute for Health and Care ResearchPO Box 7057AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- VU UniversityDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life SciencesPO Box 7057Room U454AmsterdamNetherlands1007 MB
| | - Johan WS Vlaeyen
- University of MaastrichtDepartment of Clinical PsychologyPeter Debyeplein 23MaastrichtNetherlands6229 HX
| | - Stephen Morley
- University of LeedsLeeds Institute of Health SciencesCharles Thackrah Building101 Clarendon RoadLeedsUKLS2 9LJ
| | - Willem JJ Assendelft
- Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Public Health and Primary CarePO Box 9600LeidenNetherlands2300 RC
| | - Chris J. Main
- Keele UniversityPrimary Care SciencesStaffordshireUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huijbregts MPJ, Kay T, Klinck B. Theory-based programme development and evaluation in physiotherapy. Physiother Can 2008; 60:40-50. [PMID: 20145741 DOI: 10.3138/physio/60/1/40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Programme evaluation has been defined as "the systematic process of collecting credible information for timely decision making about a particular program." Where possible, findings are used to develop, revise, and improve programmes. Theory-based programme development and evaluation provides a comprehensive approach to programme evaluation. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS In order to obtain meaningful information from evaluation activities, relevant programme components need to be understood. Theory-based programme development and evaluation starts with a comprehensive description of the programme. A useful tool to describe a programme is the Sidani and Braden Model of Program Theory, consisting of six programme components: problem definition, critical inputs, mediating factors, expected outcomes, extraneous factors, and implementation issues. Articulation of these key components may guide physiotherapy programme implementation and delivery and assist in the development of key evaluation questions and methodologies. Using this approach leads to a better understanding of client needs, programme processes, and programme outcomes and can help to identify barriers to and enablers of successful implementation. Two specific examples, representing public and private sectors, will illustrate the application of this approach to clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Theory-based programme development helps clinicians, administrators, and researchers develop an understanding of who benefits the most from which types of programmes and facilitates the implementation of processes to improve programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P J Huijbregts
- Maria P.J. Huijbregts , BScPT, PhD: Director of Clinical Evaluation, Baycrest, Toronto; Assistant Professor (status only), Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Adjunct Professor, Master of Public Health Department, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lamb SE, Lall R, Hansen Z, Withers EJ, Griffiths FE, Szczepura A, Barlow J, Underwood MR. Design considerations in a clinical trial of a cognitive behavioural intervention for the management of low back pain in primary care: Back Skills Training Trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8:14. [PMID: 17316434 PMCID: PMC2147057 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2006] [Accepted: 02/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem. Risk factors for the development and persistence of LBP include physical and psychological factors. However, most research activity has focused on physical solutions including manipulation, exercise training and activity promotion. METHODS/DESIGN This randomised controlled trial will establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a group programme, based on cognitive behavioural principles, for the management of sub-acute and chronic LBP in primary care. Our primary outcomes are disease specific measures of pain and function. Secondary outcomes include back beliefs, generic health related quality of life and resource use. All outcomes are measured over 12 months. Participants randomised to the intervention arm are invited to attend up to six weekly sessions each of 90 minutes; each group has 6-8 participants. A parallel qualitative study will aid the evaluation of the intervention. DISCUSSION In this paper we describe the rationale and design of a randomised evaluation of a group based cognitive behavioural intervention for low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lamb
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Health Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
- Kadoorie Critical Care Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Ranjit Lall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Health Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Zara Hansen
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Health Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Emma J Withers
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Health Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Frances E Griffiths
- Primary Health Care Studies, Health Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Ala Szczepura
- Clinical Sciences Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Julie Barlow
- Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Coventry University CV1 5FB, Coventry, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soegaard R, Christensen FB, Lauerberg I, Lauersen I, Bünger CE. Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2005; 15:648-56. [PMID: 15937676 PMCID: PMC3489345 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0884-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2004] [Revised: 12/20/2004] [Accepted: 01/04/2005] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Very few studies have investigated the effects or costs of rehabilitation regimens following lumbar spinal fusion. The effectiveness of in-hospital rehabilitation regimens has substantial impact on patients' demands in the primary health care sector. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-articulated demands to the primary health care sector following lumbar spinal fusion and three different in-hospital rehabilitation regimens in a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Ninety patients were randomized 3 months post lumbar spinal fusion to either a 'video' group (one-time oral instruction by a physiotherapist and patients were then issued a video for home exercise), or a 'café' group (video regimen with the addition of three café meetings with other fusion-operated patients) or a 'training' group (exercise therapy; physiotherapist-guided; two times a week for 8 weeks). Register data of service utilization in the primary health care sector were collected from the time of randomization through 24 months postsurgery. Costs of in-hospital protocols were estimated and the service utilization in the primary health care sector and its cost were analyzed. A significant difference (P=0.023) in number of contacts was found among groups at 2-year follow-up. Within the periods of 3-6 months and 7-12 months postoperatively, the experimental groups required less than half the amount of care within the primary health care sector as compared to the video group (P=0.001 and P=0.008). The incremental costs of the café regimen respectively, the training regimen were compensated by cost savings in the primary health care sector, at ratios of 4.70 (95% CI 4.64; 4.77) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.68; 1.72). This study concludes that a low-cost biopsychosocial rehabilitation regimen significantly reduces service utilization in the primary health care sector as compared to the usual regimen and a training exercise regimen. The results stress the importance of a cognitive element of coping in a rehabilitation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Soegaard
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Hospital of Aarhus, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hestbaek L, Larsen K, Weidick F, Leboeuf-Yde C. Low back pain in military recruits in relation to social background and previous low back pain. A cross-sectional and prospective observational survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6:25. [PMID: 15918894 PMCID: PMC1180830 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2004] [Accepted: 05/26/2005] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, studies on the etiology of low back pain have been carried out in adult populations. However, since low back pain often appears early in life, more research on young populations is needed. This study focuses on the importance of social background factors and previous low back pain in the development of low back pain in military recruits. Methods During a three-month period, Danish military recruits with different social backgrounds live and work under the same conditions. Thus, there is an opportunity to investigate the influence of social background on the development of low back pain, when persons are removed from their usual environment and submitted to a number of new stressors. In addition, the importance of the recruits' previous low back pain history in relation to low back pain during military service was studied. This was done by means of questionnaires to 1,711 recruits before and after this three-month period. Results Sedentary occupation was negatively associated with long-lasting low back pain (>30 days during the past year) at baseline with an odds ratios of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.33–0.90). This effect vanished during service. Having parents with higher education increased the risk of low back pain during service (OR: 1.9;1.2–3.0, for the highest educated group), but not of the consequences (leg pain and exemption from duty), whereas high IQ decreased the risk of these consequences (odds ratios as low as 0.2;0.1–0.8 for exemption from duty in the group with highest IQ). Long-lasting low back pain prior to service increased the risk of long-lasting low back pain (OR: 4.8;2.1–10.8), leg pain (OR: 3.3;1.3–8.3) and exemption from duty during service (OR: 5.9;2.4–14.8). Conclusion Sedentary occupation is negatively associated with low back pain at baseline. This protective effect disappears, when the person becomes physically active. For predicting trouble related to the low back during service, the duration of low back pain prior to service and IQ-level are the most important factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Hestbaek
- The Back Research Center, University of Southern Denmark and Hospital of Fynen, Lindevej 5, 5750 Ringe, Denmark
| | - Kristian Larsen
- The Medical Research Unit, County of Ringkjøbing, Amtsrådhuset, Torvet, 6950 Ringkøbing, Denmark
| | | | - Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
- The Back Research Center, University of Southern Denmark and Hospital of Fynen Lindevej 5, 5750 Ringe, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|