An Analysis of East Asian American Inpatient Psychiatric Data from the Hawai'i Health Information Corporation Database

Past research has examined the complex reasons for the apparent reluctance of East Asian Americans (ie, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) to seek mental health services when needed. The current study analyzed East Asian American (EAA) mental health, utilizing inpatient hospitalization data from the Hawai'i Health Information Corporation (HHIC) database. Frequency of inpatient hospitalizations for specific mental health diagnoses (depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and suicide attempts/ideation) in EAA patients was examined. White, Native Hawaiian, and Filipino patients were included for comparative purposes. Retrospective data on adult (18 years and over) inpatient visits in Hawai'i from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Variables available for analysis were detailed race/ethnicity, age, sex, island, and insurance type as well as readmission rates, severity of illness (SOI), and initial length of stay (LOS). Overall, there were no significant differences between race/ethnicity groups in regards to readmission, SOI, or LOS for a majority of the diagnoses. However, for depression, even when adjusting for other demographics, Japanese and Chinese patients had significantly higher initial LOS and SOI than White patients, though the strength of this association was weak (R Squared model fits being less than .1 for both outcomes). The reason for these findings requires further examination, including whether EAAs may be reticent to seek help and/or whether healthcare providers are not recognizing the need for assistance.

Behavioral Health Integration and Outcomes that Matter to Patients: a Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Observational Study

Research on behavioral health integration (BHI) often explores outcomes for quality and cost, but less is known about impacts of integration work on key patient experience outcomes. A mixed-methods longitudinal study of BHI was conducted in 12 primary care clinics in Oregon to assess how adoption of key integration practices including integrated staffing models, integrated care trainings for providers, and integrated data sharing impacted a set of patient experience outcomes selected and prioritized by an advisory panel of active patients. Results showed that adopting key aspects of integration was not associated with improved patient experience outcomes over time. Patient interviews highlighted several potential reasons why, including an overemphasis by health systems on the structural aspects of integration versus the experiential components and potential concerns among patients about stigma and discrimination in the primary care settings where integration is focused.

Developing empirically based, culturally grounded drug prevention interventions for indigenous youth populations

This article describes the relevance of a culturally grounded approach toward drug prevention development for indigenous youth populations. This approach builds drug prevention from the "ground up" (i.e., from the values, beliefs, and worldviews of the youth that are the intended consumers of the program) and is contrasted with efforts that focus on adapting existing drug prevention interventions to fit the norms of different youth ethnocultural groups. The development of an empirically based drug prevention program focused on rural Native Hawaiian youth is described as a case example of culturally grounded drug prevention development for indigenous youth; the impact of this effort on the validity of the intervention and on community engagement and investment in the development of the program are discussed. Finally, implications of this approach for behavioral health services and the development of an indigenous prevention science are discussed.