Enhancing patient navigation with contingent financial incentives for substance use abatement in persons with HIV and substance use

Prize-Based Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among People With HIV: A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

Contingency management (CM) is an incentive-based approach that has demonstrated efficacy for smoking cessation in various populations. There is an unmet need for feasible and effective smoking cessation interventions in people with HIV (PWH). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prize-based CM for smoking cessation in PWH using a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomization Trial (SMART) design selected to tailor intervention intensity based on early treatment response.

METHODS

During phase I, 129 participants were randomly assigned to high-magnitude prize CM (HM-CM) or standard of care (SoC) for 4 weeks. Participants who did not reduce smoking were randomized in phase II to continued counseling with HM-CM plus monitoring support or only continued monitoring support for 8 weeks. Participants who reduced smoking were randomized to booster monitoring with low-magnitude CM or no additional care. Outcomes were biochemically verified smoking reduction and 7-day abstinence prevalence at posttreatment, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Phase I responders (based on biochemical indicators of smoking reduction) were significantly less likely to return to smoking (during treatment and at 6 and 12 months) if they received low-magnitude incentives. Notably, initial exposure to CM versus SoC did not increase the rate of phase I response, and high-magnitude incentives later in treatment did not lead to greater smoking cessation for early-treatment nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly CM sessions in the first 4 weeks of smoking cessation intervention did not perform significantly better than SoC. However, brief booster CM sessions aimed at maintaining early smoking cessation hold clinical promise and warrant further investigation.

IMPLICATIONS

This represents the first trial to examine the use of CM for smoking cessation among PWH within the context of a SMART design. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01965405 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01965405).

Adjunctive Medication Management and Contingency Management to enhance adherence to acamprosate for alcohol dependence: the ADAM trial RCT

Background

Acamprosate is an effective and cost-effective medication for alcohol relapse prevention but poor adherence can limit its full benefit. Effective interventions to support adherence to acamprosate are therefore needed.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of Medication Management, with and without Contingency Management, compared to Standard Support alone in enhancing adherence to acamprosate and the impact of adherence to acamprosate on abstinence and reduced alcohol consumption.

Design

Multicentre, three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Setting

Specialist alcohol treatment services in five regions of England (South East London, Central and North West London, Wessex, Yorkshire and Humber and West Midlands).

Participants

Adults (aged 18 years or more), an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, diagnosis of alcohol dependence, abstinent from alcohol at baseline assessment, in receipt of a prescription for acamprosate.

Interventions

(1) Standard Support, (2) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management provided by pharmacists via a clinical contact centre (12 sessions over 6 months), (3) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management plus Contingency Management that consisted of vouchers (up to £120) to reinforce participation in Medication Management. Consenting participants were randomised in a 2 : 1 : 1 ratio to one of the three groups using a stratified random permuted block method using a remote system. Participants and researchers were not blind to treatment allocation.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome: self-reported percentage of medication taken in the previous 28 days at 6 months post randomisation. Economic outcome: EuroQol-5 Dimensions, a five-level version, used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years, with costs estimated using the Adult Service Use Schedule.

Results

Of the 1459 potential participants approached, 1019 (70%) were assessed and 739 (73 consented to participate in the study, 372 (50%) were allocated to Standard Support, 182 (25%) to Standard Support with Medication Management and 185 (25%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. Data were available for 518 (70%) of participants at 6-month follow-up, 255 (68.5%) allocated to Standard Support, 122 (67.0%) to Standard Support and Medication Management and 141 (76.2%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. The mean difference of per cent adherence to acamprosate was higher for those who received Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management (10.6%, 95% confidence interval 19.6% to 1.6%) compared to Standard Support alone, at the primary end point (6-month follow-up). There was no significant difference in per cent days adherent when comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support alone 3.1% (95% confidence interval 12.8% to -6.5%) or comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management 7.9% (95% confidence interval 18.7% to -2.8%). The primary economic analysis at 6 months found that Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management was cost-effective compared to Standard Support alone, achieving small gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a lower cost per participant. Cost-effectiveness was not observed for adjunctive Medication Management compared to Standard Support alone. There were no serious adverse events related to the trial interventions reported.

Limitations

The trial's primary outcome measure changed substantially due to data collection difficulties and therefore relied on a measure of self-reported adherence. A lower than anticipated follow-up rate at 12 months may have lowered the statistical power to detect differences in the secondary analyses, although the primary analysis was not impacted.

Conclusions

Medication Management enhanced with Contingency Management is beneficial to patients for supporting them to take acamprosate.

Future work

Given our findings in relation to Contingency Management enhancing Medication Management adherence, future trials should be developed to explore its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness with other alcohol interventions where there is evidence of poor adherence.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN17083622 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17083622.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 22. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Feasibility, Engagement, and Usability of a Remote, Smartphone-Based Contingency Management Program as a Treatment Add-On for Patients Who Use Methamphetamine: Single-Arm Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

In the United States, methamphetamine-related overdoses have tripled from 2015 to 2020 and continue to rise. However, efficacious treatments such as contingency management (CM) are often unavailable in health systems.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a single-arm pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, engagement, and usability of a fully remotely delivered mobile health CM program offered to adult outpatients who used methamphetamine and were receiving health care within a large university health system.

METHODS

Participants were referred by primary care or behavioral health clinicians between September 2021 and July 2022. Eligibility criteria screening was conducted by telephone and included self-reported methamphetamine use on ≥5 out of the past 30 days and a goal of reducing or abstaining from methamphetamine use. Eligible participants who agreed to take part then completed an initial welcome phase that included 2 videoconference calls to register for and learn about the CM program and 2 "practice" saliva-based substance tests prompted by a smartphone app. Participants who completed these welcome phase activities could then receive the remotely delivered CM intervention for 12 consecutive weeks. The intervention included approximately 24 randomly scheduled smartphone alerts requesting a video recording of themselves taking a saliva-based substance test to verify recent methamphetamine abstinence, 12 weekly calls with a CM guide, 35 self-paced cognitive behavioral therapy modules, and multiple surveys. Financial incentives were disbursed via reloadable debit cards. An intervention usability questionnaire was completed at the midpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 patients completed telephone screenings, with 28 (76%) meeting the eligibility criteria and consenting to participate. Most participants who completed a baseline questionnaire (21/24, 88%) self-reported symptoms consistent with severe methamphetamine use disorder, and most had other co-occurring non-methamphetamine substance use disorders (22/28, 79%) and co-occurring mental health disorders (25/28, 89%) according to existing electronic health records. Overall, 54% (15/28) of participants successfully completed the welcome phase and were able to receive the CM intervention. Among these participants, engagement with substance testing, calls with CM guides, and cognitive behavioral therapy modules varied. Rates of verified methamphetamine abstinence in substance testing were generally low but varied considerably across participants. Participants reported positive opinions about the intervention's ease of use and satisfaction with the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Fully remote CM can be feasibly delivered within health care settings lacking existing CM programs. Although remote delivery may help reduce barriers to treatment access, many patients who use methamphetamine may struggle to engage with initial onboarding. High rates of co-occurring psychiatric conditions in the patient population may also contribute to uptake and engagement challenges. Future efforts could leverage greater human-to-human connection, more streamlined onboarding procedures, larger incentives, longer durations, and the incentivization of non-abstinence-based recovery goals to increase uptake and engagement with fully remote mobile health-based CM.

Adolescent Substance Use Disorder Diagnosis Correlates With Hospitalization After an Emergency Department Visit

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of hospitalization after an emergency department (ED) visit at an urban safety net hospital for youth with and without a substance use disorder.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective cohort design of adolescents (aged 15-21 y; n = 14,852) treated in the ED and compared the risk of hospitalization within 90 days.

RESULTS

A substance use disorder diagnosis in the ED more than doubled the risk of 90-day hospitalization (5.4% vs 2.38%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with youth without a substance use disorder, youth with substance use disorders are likely to require additional services after an ED visit.

Applying Behavioural Insights to HIV Prevention and Management: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This scoping review summarises the literature on HIV prevention and management interventions utilizing behavioural economic principles encapsulated in the MINDSPACE framework.

RECENT FINDINGS

MINDSPACE is an acronym developed by the UK's behavioural insights team to summarise nine key influences on human behaviour: Messenger, Incentives, Norms, Default, Salience, Priming, Affect, Commitment, and Ego. These effects have been used in various settings to design interventions that encourage positive behaviours. Currently, over 200 institutionalised behavioural insight teams exist internationally, which may draw upon the MINDSPACE framework to inform policy and improve public services. To date, it is not clear how behavioural insights have been applied to HIV prevention and management interventions. After screening 899 studies for eligibility, 124 were included in the final review. We identified examples of interventions that utilised all the MINDSPACE effects in a variety of settings and among various populations. Studies from high-income countries were most common (n = 54) and incentives were the most frequently applied effect (n = 100). The MINDSPACE framework is a useful tool to consider how behavioural science principles can be applied in future HIV prevention and management interventions. Creating nudges to enhance the design of HIV prevention and management interventions can help people make better choices as we strive to end the HIV/AIDS pandemic by 2030.

Challenges to Conducting Contingency Management Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Practice Recommendations for Clinicians

A growing empirical literature supports contingency management (CM) as an efficacious treatment for substance use disorders, especially when reinforcers are immediate, frequent, and of sufficient magnitude on escalating schedules. However, in real world-practice, CM is often conducted in ways that are inconsistent with research protocols. One reason for these inconsistencies may be due to pragmatic challenges inherent in conducting CM. In this article, we described an outpatient CM treatment program for drug use disorders and several specific challenges associated with adherence to CM parameters from research protocols. Finally, we propose possible solutions for these challenges and discuss implications for practice.

Behavior-Analytic Approaches to the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Current Status and Future Directions

Diabetes mellitus is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States, requiring a series of complex behavior changes that must be sustained for a lifetime (e.g., counting carbohydrates, self-monitoring blood glucose, adjusting insulin). Although complex, all of these tasks involve behavior, making them amenable targets for behavior analysts. In this article, the authors describe interventions that have focused on antecedent, consequent, multicomponent, and alternate procedures for the management of diabetes, highlighting ways in which technology has been used to overcome common barriers to the use of these intensive, evidence-based interventions. Additional variables relevant to poorly managed diabetes (e.g., delay discounting) are also discussed. Future research and practice should focus on harnessing continued advances in information technology while also considering underexplored behavioral technologies for the effective treatment of diabetes, with a focus on identifying sustainable, long-term solutions for maintaining proper diabetes management. Practical implementation of these interventions will depend on having qualified behavior analysts working in integrated primary care settings where the interventions are most likely to be used, which will require interdisciplinary training and collaboration.