Therapists' perceptions of interpersonally challenging patients in generalized anxiety disorder

OBJECTIVE

This study explores in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) to what degree therapists' perceptions of their patients as interpersonally challenging (IC) is explained by the therapist or patient effects, if baseline patients' characteristics predict IC, and if IC is related to outcome.

METHOD

Eighty patients diagnosed with GAD and treated by 20 therapists with 16 sessions of CBT were randomized to two different implementation conditions. Patients completed baseline measures of depression, anxiety, interpersonal problems, and interpersonal strengths. The therapists completed a single-item assessing IC session-by-session. As an outcome, patients completed a worry measure at baseline, session 5, session 10, and posttreatment.

RESULTS

Multilevel models showed meaningful therapist effects, explaining 18% of IC variance. Interpersonal strengths were the only baseline predictor significantly and negatively associated with IC during treatment. Structural equation models showed significant negative IC effects on subsequent patient worry during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

IC might represent a risk factor for psychotherapy outcome. Patient interpersonal strengths at baseline may buffer therapists perceiving their patients as ICs. The therapist effects on IC suggest that CBT clinicians treating GAD might benefit from identifying cases that are interpersonally challenging for them and reflecting about what might trigger that perception.

Change in Interpersonal and Metacognitive Skills During Treatment With Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy and Metacognitive Therapy: Results From an Observational Study

Background: Interpersonal skills deficits and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs have been implicated in the etiology and maintenance of depression. This study aimed to investigate the association between changes in these skills deficits and change in depressive symptoms over the course of treatment with Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). Methods: In this prospective, parallel group observational study, data was collected at baseline and after 8 weeks of an intensive day clinic psychotherapy program. Based on a shared decision between patients and clinicians, patients received either CBASP or MCT. Ninety patients were included in the analyses (CBASP: age M = 38.7, 40.5% female, MCT: age M = 44.7, 43.3% female). Interpersonal deficits were assessed with the short-form of the Luebeck Questionnaire for Recording Preoperational Thinking (LQPT-SF) and the Impact Message Inventory (IMI-R). Metacognitive beliefs were assessed with the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30). The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) was utilized to assess depressive symptoms. A regression analysis was conducted to assess variables associated with outcome. ANCOVAs were utilized to investigate whether improvement in skills deficits is dependent on type of treatment received. Results: Improvements in preoperational thinking and increases in friendly-dominant behavior were associated with change in depressive symptoms. There was no association between reductions in dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and a decrease in depressive symptoms. While both treatment groups showed significant improvements in interpersonal and metacognitive skills, there was no significant between-group difference in the change scores for either of these skills. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that changes in interpersonal skills seem to be of particular relevance in the treatment of depression. These results have to be replicated in a randomized-controlled design before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Negative Effects of a Multimodal Inpatient CBASP Program: Rate of Occurrence and Their Impact on Treatment Outcome in Chronic and Treatment-Resistant Depression

Background: A growing number of studies indicate that the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is effective in treating chronic depression. However, there is no systematic research into possible negative effects. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to investigate the rate of occurrence of negative effects of an inpatient CBASP program and their impact on treatment response. Methods: Patients with chronic depression and treatment resistance who completed the 12-week multimodal inpatient CBASP treatment program in an open trial (N = 52) retrospectively completed the Inventory for the Assessment of Negative Effects of Psychotherapy (INEP) during follow-up data collection. Severity of depressive symptoms was assessed self- and observer-rated at admission, discharge, and 6 months follow-up. Rates of occurrence of negative effects were calculated and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the relationship to treatment outcome. Results: The results indicate that 92.3% of patients reported having experienced at least one negative effect and 45.2% indicated dependence on their therapist. Stigmatization and financial concerns as well as intrapersonal changes were reported by about one-third. Only dependence on the therapist negatively impacted treatment outcome in both outcome measures. Conclusions: While almost all patients reported at least one negative effect of a multimodal inpatient CBASP treatment program, most of the reported negative effects appear to be benign. However, dependence on the therapist seems to have a negative impact on treatment outcome. If these results can be replicated in future large-scale, randomized controlled prospective studies, CBASP therapists should be aware of possible dependence and consciously address it during treatment.

Differentielle Beziehungsgestaltung in der Verhaltenstherapie: Auf dem Weg zu einer evidenzbasierten individualisierten Beziehungsgestaltung

Im Zuge der Anfänge der Verhaltenstherapie (VT) und der “kognitiven Wende” wurde der aktiven Beziehungsgestaltung und damit verbundenen Faktoren zunächst nur zweitrangig Beachtung geschenkt, obwohl die Bedeutung der Beziehung zwischen Therapeut und Patient auch in der VT bereits relativ früh erkannt wurde. Seitdem hat sich die VT substanziell weiterentwickelt. Insbesondere die aktive Gestaltung der therapeutischen Beziehung in Abhängigkeit verschiedener Variablen ist mittlerweile fester Bestandteil einer jeden VT. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden Konzepte der Beziehungsgestaltung dargestellt, welche der VT zugerechnet und im Rahmen der Ausbildung im deutschsprachigen Raum gelehrt werden. Fokussiert wird auf folgende drei Ansatzpunkte: Die Ausrichtung der Beziehung an (1) Therapiephasen, (2) Bedürfnissen, Motiven und Erwartungen sowie (3) frühen traumatisierenden Bezie­hungserfahrungen. Die aktuelle Studienlage legt nahe, dass pauschalisierte Handlungsempfehlungen zur aktiven Gestaltung der therapeutischen Beziehung zu kurz greifen. Ausgehend von der individuellen Problematik des einzelnen Patienten wird die Realisierung der therapeutischen Beziehung im Sinne einer differentiellen Beziehungsgestaltung beschrieben und diskutiert.

Interpersonal clarification effects in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for depression and how they are moderated by the therapeutic alliance

BACKGROUND

Although a wide body of research links depression to interpersonal deficits, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), considered the gold standard in the treatment of this condition, has not been developed to specifically address interpersonal difficulties. However, cognitive changes on a relational level occurring during CBT might play an important role in the treatment of depression. Interpersonal clarification refers to the process of better understanding the nature of one's interpersonal patterns during therapy. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of interpersonal clarification in CBT and how they are moderated by the therapeutic alliance.

METHODS

A sample of 621 patients diagnosed with depression were treated with CBT by 126 therapists in a university outpatient clinic. Patients completed measures of interpersonal problems and depression severity at baseline, measures of symptomatic evolution before each session and process measures (assessing interpersonal clarification and alliance) after each session. Multilevel models separating between-patient (BP) and within-patient (WP) effects of interpersonal clarification, and including BP and WP alliance effects as covariates and moderators of the interpersonal clarification effects were conducted.

RESULTS

Analyses showed both significant BP and WP effects interpersonal clarification, even when adjusting for alliance effects. Furthermore, significant interactive effects were found between outcome of WP interpersonal clarification with both BP alliance and WP alliance.

LIMITATIONS

Interpersonal clarification was measured with one single-item and adherence to CBT was not explicitly measured.

CONCLUSIONS

The results present preliminary evidence for considering interpersonal clarification a meaningful change process in CBT for depression, especially in the context of a stronger therapeutic alliance.

Interpersonal Change During Inpatient CBASP Treatment: Focus on Group Therapy

Background: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has been tailored specifically to the demands of patients with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). According to the CBASP model, PDD patients are supposed to live perceptually disconnected from their social environment, which consequently maintains depression. While initially developed as an individual treatment modality, the adaptation for group therapy yields an important interpersonal space. However, little is known about the specific factors that contribute to patients' benefit from the CBASP group modality. Methods: The analyzed sample comprised N = 87 PDD patients who completed a 12 week multimodal inpatient treatment including 2 weekly CBASP-specific individual and group sessions, respectively, as well as CBASP-unspecific medical contacts, pharmacotherapy and complementary therapies. Group sessions included trainings in situational analysis and interpersonal skills. Interpersonal change over therapy was examined based on the patients' self-perceived interpersonal problems (IIP) and the impact messages as perceived by their individual therapists (IMI). Pre and post-treatment data were compared using within-sample t-tests. Additionally, patients evaluated CBASP group therapy on a feedback form. They were invited to reflect on individual benefits and its helpful and unhelpful aspects. Qualitative content analysis with inductive category development was used to analyze feedback. Inter-rater reliability was computed to confirm categories before summarizing the frequencies of reported factors. Results: Self-perceived interpersonal distress significantly decreased over therapy. Patients reported reduced interpersonal problems and therapists reported more friendly and dominant impact messages. Interestingly, patients who showed a significant depressive symptom reduction described higher change scores. Regarding qualitative data, patients reported five main benefits from group therapy: Gain in social competence, self-confidence, self-reflection, interpersonal dynamics, and optimism/universality. Patients responding to CBASP identified significantly more factors than non-responders. Conclusions: Compared to studies with individual CBASP only, the present findings suggest that CBASP group therapy may contribute to the improvement of interpersonal behavior. Group therapy is discussed as a potential boosting effect for individual CBASP. However, as the present data were collected in a multimodal inpatient setting without competitor, randomized controlled trials are warranted that investigate the specific benefits of the group modality or the combined individual and group therapy over individual CBASP only.

Review of dysthymia and persistent depressive disorder: history, correlates, and clinical implications

Persistent depressive disorder is a chronic mood disorder that is common and often more disabling than episodic major depression. In DSM-5, the term subsumes several chronic depressive presentations, including dysthymia with or without superimposed major depressive episodes, chronic major depression, and recurrent major depression without recovery between episodes. Dysthymia can be difficult to detect in psychiatric and primary care settings until it intensifies in the form of a superimposed major depressive episode. Although information is scarce concerning the cause of persistent depressive disorder including dysthymia, the causation is likely to be multifactorial. In this narrative Review, we discuss current knowledge about the nosology and neurobiological basis of dysthymia and persistent depressive disorder, emphasising a dimensional perspective based on course for further research. We also review new developments in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for persistent depressive disorder, and propose a tailored, modular approach to accommodate its multifaceted nature.

Patients' interpersonal problems as moderators of depression outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and a group version of the cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy in chronic depression

OBJECTIVES

Interpersonal problems were examined as moderators of depression outcomes between mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) in patients with chronic depression.

METHODS

Patients received treatment-as-usual and, in addition, were randomized to 8-weeks of MBCT (n = 34) or 8-weeks of CBASP (n = 34). MBCT and CBASP were given in a group format. The Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D) was the primary and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) the secondary outcome. The subscales of the Inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP-32) were moderators. Multilevel models were performed.

RESULTS

Higher scores on the "vindictive/self-centered" subscale were associated with a better outcome in MBCT than in CBASP (HAM-D: p < .01; BDI-II: p < .01). Higher scores on the "nonassertive" subscale were associated with a better outcome in CBASP than in MBCT (HAM-D: p < .01; BDI-II: p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

If these results can be replicated in larger trials, MBCT should be preferred to CBASP in chronically depressed patients being vindictive/self-centered, whereas CBASP should be preferred to MBCT in chronically depressed patients being nonassertive.

Do interpersonal fears mediate the association between childhood maltreatment and interpersonal skills deficits? A matched cross-sectional analysis

Objective: Childhood maltreatment, interpersonal fear and a specific kind of interpersonal skills deficit (preoperational thinking) have all been associated with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). We hypothesize that interpersonal fears mediate the association between childhood maltreatment and preoperational thinking.Method: A total of 108 matched participants have been examined cross-sectionally (31 healthy controls, 30 patients with episodic depression and 47 patients with PDD) with the following instruments: the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF), a measure of interpersonal fear (CBASP Interpersonal Questionnaire) and the Lübeck Questionnaire of Preoperational Thinking.Results: Patients with PDD reported significantly more childhood maltreatment than patients with episodic depression (d = 0.65) and healthy controls (d = 1.29). They also had more interpersonal fears (d = 0.71 and d = 2.11 respectively) and higher levels of preoperational thinking (d = 0.90 and d = 2.78 respectively). The association between childhood maltreatment and preoperational thinking was mediated through interpersonal fears.Conclusions: Our findings might have important implications for psychotherapy of PDD because they demonstrate how specific problems in social interactions can be associated with interpersonal fears that arise secondary to childhood maltreatment.

Therapeutic agency, in-session behavior, and patient-therapist interaction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate associations between patients' subjective agency, their observable in-session behavior, and the patient-therapist interaction during the early phase of psychotherapy.

METHODS

The sample included 52 depressed patients in psychodynamic psychotherapy. After Session 5, the patients' agency and the quality of the therapeutic alliance were assessed. Based on session recordings, two independent observers rated the patients' involvement, their interpersonal behavior, and the therapists' directiveness.

RESULTS

Higher agency was associated with stronger therapeutic alliances. Patients who indicated higher agency in their therapy participated more actively in the session and showed less hostile impact messages. Patients' agency was not related to therapists' directiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' sense of agency in psychotherapy was associated with more active involvement and affiliative interaction. The findings support the idea that patients need to feel capable of acting within and having an influence on their therapy to benefit from it.

Therapeutic Agency Inventory: Development and psychometric validation of a patient self-report

Objectives: Therapeutic agency is defined as a patient's intentional influence over the process of psychotherapeutic change. However, there is a lack of conceptually sound self-report measures with adequate psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate the patient-rated Therapeutic Agency Inventory (TAI).Method: Based on the literature, we developed items related to therapeutic agency and investigated their psychometric properties in a naturalistic study with a sample of 334 psychotherapy participants. We assessed changes in TAI scores in a subsample of 58 patients over the course of inpatient psychotherapy and related TAI scores to therapeutic improvement.Results: The TAI consists of 15 items. We performed exploratory factor analyses, and the following three factors were extracted: In-session activity, therapy-related processing, and therapist-oriented passivity. Internal consistency was .84 for the total score and ranged between .73 and .80 for each of the factors. The TAI was significantly associated with other psychotherapy process factors, self-efficacy expectations, control beliefs, lower overall psychological distress, and lower depression scores. Changes in agency during psychotherapy predicted therapy outcome, even after controlling for baseline distress.Conclusions: The TAI is a reliable, valid, and change-sensitive self-report instrument that can be used to assess agency in psychotherapy.

Oxytocin plasma levels predict the outcome of psychotherapy: A pilot study in chronic depression

BACKGROUND

Oxytocin is associated with bonding and social deficits in psychiatric disorders and has also been discussed as a potential therapeutic intervention to augment psychotherapy. The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is a specific form of psychotherapy for chronic depression, an illness in which interpersonal deficits play a major role. In this pilot study, we investigated whether Oxytocin plasma levels predict the clinical outcome of chronic depressive patients after CBASP.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with chronic depression participated in a 10-week CBASP inpatient program. Oxytocin plasma levels were measured before and after participants played a virtual ball-tossing game (Cyberball) that mimics social exclusion. Clinical outcome after CBASP was evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24).

RESULTS

After CBASP, depressive symptoms decreased significantly: the response rates were 44% (BDI-II) and 50% (HAMD-24); and the remission rates, 38% (BDI-II) and 44% (HAMD-24). Lower oxytocin plasma levels at baseline correlated with smaller changes in BDI-II scores, but not with the change in HAMD-24 scores.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of our study were the small sample size, concomitant and non-standardized pharmacotherapy, and lack of a controlled design and a follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides first evidence that oxytocin plasma levels may predict the outcome of psychotherapy in chronic depression. These findings need to be replicated in larger randomized, controlled trials.

Emotion Regulation and Social Cognition as Functional Targets of Mechanism-Based Psychotherapy in Major Depression With Comorbid Personality Pathology

This article characterizes functional systems as targets of integrated modular psychotherapy for episodes of major depression (MD) with a comorbid condition of borderline personality disorder (BPD) or chronic depression (CD). Both types of comorbidities to MD are conceptualized as a trait-like concept dominated by impairments in interpersonal functioning. Despite differences in psychopathology, existing data show significant similarities in impairments of emotion regulation and social cognition in BPD and CD, thought to reflect common disease mechanisms linked to early-life adversity. The preexistence of BPD and CD and related functional impairments inhibits the remission of episodic MD and calls for mechanism-based interventions that complement existing treatments of MD by targeting these dysfunctions. Contemporary methods of psychotherapy already provide interventions to address such complicated states of comorbidity by specifically improving dysfunctions of emotion regulation and social cognition. We suggest a layout of modular interventions that can address identified dysfunctions in comorbid MD.

Therapeutic Self-Disclosure within DBT, Schema Therapy, and CBASP: Opportunities and Challenges

In recent years, various therapeutic interventions have been established that extended behavior and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) by so-called “third-wave” strategies. In order to address specific therapeutic challenges in certain subgroups of patients who do not sufficiently respond to “classical CBT,” some of these third-wave strategies put particular emphasis on therapist self-disclosure. This article highlights therapeutic self-disclosure as a means to address interpersonal problems by comparing three third-wave strategies: (a) acceptance and change strategies as used in Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), (b) the concept of “limited reparenting” as used in Schema Therapy (ST), and (c) disciplined personal involvement as used in the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP). On the basis of a critical discussion on opportunities and challenges within these three concepts, self-disclosure is proposed to be a promising therapeutic tool that is worth to be investigated in more depth in future studies.