1
|
Pedersen ER, Davis JP, Hummer JF, Bouskill K, Buch KD, Shute IM, Fitzke RE, Tran DD, Neighbors C, Saba S. Reducing Alcohol Misuse and Promoting Treatment Initiation Among Veterans Through a Brief Internet-Based Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e59993. [PMID: 39173142 PMCID: PMC11377908 DOI: 10.2196/59993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adult veterans who served after the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001 (ie, post-9/11) are at heightened risk for experiencing behavioral health distress and disorders including hazardous drinking, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression. These veterans often face significant barriers to behavioral health treatment, and reaching them through brief mobile phone-based interventions may help reduce drinking and promote treatment engagement. OBJECTIVE Following a successful pilot study, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to further test the efficacy of a brief (ie, single session) mobile phone-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention enhanced with content to promote treatment engagement. METHODS We will conduct an RCT with 800 post-9/11 young adult veterans (aged 18 to 40 years) with potentially hazardous drinking and who have not recently received treatment for any behavioral health problems. Participants will be randomly assigned to the personalized intervention or a control condition with resources for seeking care. The personalized normative feedback module in the intervention focuses on the correction of misperceived norms of peer alcohol use and uses empirically informed approaches to increase motivation to address alcohol use and co-occurring behavioral health problems. Past 30-day drinking, alcohol-related consequences, and treatment-seeking behaviors will be assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post intervention. Sex, barriers to care, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and severity of alcohol use disorder symptoms will be explored as potential moderators of outcomes. RESULTS We expect recruitment to be completed within 6 months, with data collection taking 12 months for each enrolled participant. Analyses will begin within 3 months of the final data collection point (ie, 12 months follow-up). CONCLUSIONS This RCT will evaluate the efficacy of a novel intervention for non-treatment-seeking veterans who struggle with hazardous drinking and possible co-occurring behavioral health problems. This intervention has the potential to improve veteran health outcomes and overcome significant barriers to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04244461; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04244461. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/59993.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric R Pedersen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Keegan D Buch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ireland M Shute
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Reagan E Fitzke
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, United States
| | - Denise D Tran
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Clayton Neighbors
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shaddy Saba
- Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Osilla KC, Manuel JK, Becker K, Nameth K, Burgette L, Ober AJ, DeYoreo M, Lodge BS, Hurley B, Watkins KE. It takes a village: A pilot study of a group telehealth intervention for support persons affected by opioid use disorder. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 161:209290. [PMID: 38272117 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid use disorder (OUD) has devastating effects on individuals, families, and communities. The Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) is a Support Person (SP)-focused intervention that aims to increase SPs' communication strategies, positive reinforcement/rewards, and social support. This pilot study, called eINSPIRE (INtegrating Support Persons Into REcovery), adapted CRAFT for delivery via group telehealth. The aims were to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of this intervention on patient buprenorphine retention and SP mental health. METHODS The study recruited patients receiving buprenorphine treatment in a primary care setting across five community health centers with their SP (N = 100 dyads). SP participants were randomly assigned to receive usual care (UC) or the eINSPIRE intervention. We interviewed Patients and SPs at baseline and three months later. The study collected patient buprenorphine retention data from the electronic medical record three months post-baseline. RESULTS About 88 % (656/742) of potentially eligible patients were able to nominate a SP and 69 % (100/145) of nominated SPs were eligible and consented to the study. eINSPIRE groups had low reach (25 % of SPs attended), but high exposure (M = 7 of 10 sessions attended) and acceptability (classes helped them with their patient's OUD). The proportion of eINSPIRE patients (68 %) and UC patients (53 %) retained on buprenorphine at follow-up were similar (p = 0.203). SPs in both conditions reported similar reductions in their depression, anxiety, and impairment symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary data suggest that eINSPIRE groups may not be feasible in primary care without further adaptations for this population. A future study with a larger sample size is needed to elucidate the observed distribution differences in buprenorphine retention. Future research should also explore methods to reduce barriers to SP session attendance to improve the reach of this evidence-based intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Chan Osilla
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
| | - Jennifer K Manuel
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 675 18th St, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States; San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121, United States
| | - Kirsten Becker
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, United States
| | - Katherine Nameth
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States
| | - Lane Burgette
- RAND Corporation, 1200 S Hayes St, Arlington, VA 22202, United States
| | - Allison J Ober
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, United States
| | - Maria DeYoreo
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, United States
| | | | - Brian Hurley
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Family Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States; County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health, Bureau of Substance Abuse Prevention and Control 1000 S. Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91803, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osilla KC, Gore KL, Pedersen ER, Hummer JF, DeYoreo M, Manuel JK, McKay JR, Kim JP, Nameth K. Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to reduce risky drinking among service members and their partners. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 133:107324. [PMID: 37652360 PMCID: PMC10591961 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Military spouses and partners in relationships with a heavy drinking service member report high levels of mental health concerns and consequences, which are compounded when both partners drink heavily. Military spouses and partners -termed "concerned partners" (CPs)-may be an important gateway for motivating service members (SMs) to seek care. However, CPs may first need to reduce their own drinking and improve their communication to effectively support and encourage changes for their service member partner. Partners Connect is a web-based intervention aimed at improving communication and relationship quality and increasing SM help-seeking. METHODS The current study design is a two-stage Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) to develop an adaptive CP intervention to decrease CP drinking and increase SM help-seeking. CPs aged 18 and older (n = 408) will be recruited via social media and followed for six months. In stage one, we will randomize CPs to either a 4-session web-based intervention (Partners Connect) or to receive communication resources from the Gottman Institute website. The goal is to have CPs invite their SM to complete an online personalized normative feedback (PNF) session. If their SM completes the PNF at stage one, CPs will be considered "responders," if the SM does not complete, CPs who are "non-responders" will be re-randomized during stage two to receive either (1) a CRAFT workbook or (2) phone-based CRAFT if in Partners Connect; or (1) Partners Connect or (2) a CRAFT workbook if in Gottman. DISCUSSION By first intervening with the service member's CP, we aim to better equip them to engage their service member partner in treatment services. In doing so, we develop a model that increases treatment accessibility and appeal among a group that may not otherwise seek care. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT05619185.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Chan Osilla
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Kristie L Gore
- RAND Corporation, 1200 S Hayes St, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | - Eric R Pedersen
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2250 Alcazar Street, Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Justin F Hummer
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2136, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA
| | - Maria DeYoreo
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2136, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA
| | - Jennifer K Manuel
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA; University of California San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - James R McKay
- Center for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jane P Kim
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Katherine Nameth
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1070 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Merkouris SS, Rodda SN, Aarsman SR, Hodgins DC, Dowling NA. Effective behaviour change techniques for family and close friends: A systematic review and meta-analysis across the addictions. Clin Psychol Rev 2023; 100:102251. [PMID: 36716584 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to determine whether the use of specific behaviour change technique (BCT) groups are associated with greater effectiveness for psychosocial interventions delivered to family and close friends (FCFs) impacted by addiction. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature published until August 2021 identified 32 studies in 38 articles. An established BCT taxonomy (93 BCTs clustered into 16 groups) was adapted (inclusion of seven additional BCT groups) and applied to 57 interventions. The meta-analyses indicated that some, but not all, FCF outcomes were improved by the exclusion of BCTs within several groups (Reward and Threat, Scheduled Consequences, Confrontation of the Addicted Person to Engage in Treatment, and Goals and Planning) and inclusion of BCTs within the Restoring a Balanced Lifestyle group. Addicted person outcomes were improved by the inclusion of some BCTs within several groups (Repetition and Substitution, Reward and Threat, Scheduled Consequences, and Restoring a Balanced Lifestyle). Relationship functioning outcomes were improved by the inclusion of BCTs within the Confrontation of the Addicted Person to Engage in Treatment group. Future research involving the development and evaluation of numerous interventions or comprehensive multi-component interventions that can address the various needs of FCFs, without counteracting them, is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Merkouris
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia.
| | - S N Rodda
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - S R Aarsman
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
| | - D C Hodgins
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - N A Dowling
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia; Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|