Differences in visual naming performance between patients with temporal lobe epilepsy associated with temporopolar lesions versus hippocampal sclerosis

Naming ability assessment in neurocognitive disorders: a clinician's perspective

BACKGROUND

Detecting impaired naming capacity is valuable in diagnosing neurocognitive disorders (ND). A. clinical practice- oriented overview of naming tests validated in ND is not available yet. Here, features of naming tests with validated utility in ND which are open access or available for purchase are succinctly presented and compared.

METHODS

Searches were carried out across Pubmed, Medline and Google Scholar. Additional studies were identified by searching reference lists. Only peer-reviewed journal articles were eligible. A narrative- and tabullar synthesis was used to summarize different aspects of the naming assessment instruments used in patients with ND such as stimuli type, administration time, assessment parameters and accessibility. Based on computational word frequency calculations, the tests were compared in terms of the average frequency of their linguistic content.

RESULTS

Twelve naming tests, relying either on visual or auditory stimuli have been validated in ND. Their content and administration time vary between three and 60 items and one and 20 minutes, respectively. The average frequency of the words of each considered test was two or lower, pointing to low frequency of most items. In all but one test, scoring systems are exclusively based on correctly named items. Seven instruments are open access and four are available in more than one language.

CONCLUSIONS

Gaining insights into naming tests' characteristics may catalyze the wide incorporation of those with short administration time but high diagnostic accuracy into the diagnostic workup of ND at primary healthcare and of extensive, visual or auditory ones into the diagnostic endeavors of memory clinics, as well as of secondary and tertiary brain healthcare settings.

Learning From Mistakes: Cognitive and Metabolic Correlates of Errors on Picture Naming in the Alzheimer’s Disease Spectrum

Background: Analysis of subtypes of picture naming errors produced by patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have seldom been investigated yet may clarify the cognitive and neural underpinnings of naming in the AD spectrum. Objective: To elucidate the neurocognitive bases of picture naming in AD through a qualitative analysis of errors. Methods: Over 1000 naming errors produced by 70 patients with amnestic, visuospatial, linguistic, or frontal AD were correlated with general cognitive tests and with distribution of hypometabolism on FDG-PET. Results: Principal component analysis identified 1) a Visual processing factor clustering visuospatial tests and unrecognized stimuli, pure visual errors and visual-semantic errors, associated with right parieto-occipital hypometabolism; 2) a Concept-Lemma factor grouping language tests and anomias, circumlocutions, superordinates, and coordinates, correlated with left basal temporal hypometabolism; 3) a Lemma-Phonology factor including the digit span and phonological errors, linked with left temporo-parietal hypometabolism. Regression of brain metabolism on individual errors showed that errors due to impairment of basic and higher-order processing of object visual attributes or of their interaction with semantics, were related with bilateral occipital and left occipito-temporal dysfunction. Omissions and superordinates were linked to degradation of broad and basic concepts in the left basal temporal cortex. Semantic-lexical errors derived from faulty semantically- and phonologically-driven lexical retrieval in the left superior and middle temporal gyri. Generation of nonwords was underpinned by of phonological impairment within the left inferior parietal cortex. Conclusion: Analysis of individual naming errors allowed to outline a comprehensive anatomo-functional model of picture naming in classical and atypical AD.

Changes of the Brain Causal Connectivity Networks in Patients With Long-Term Bilateral Hearing Loss

It remains poorly understood how brain causal connectivity networks change following hearing loss and their effects on cognition. In the current study, we investigated this issue. Twelve patients with long-term bilateral sensorineural hearing loss [mean age, 55.7 ± 2.0; range, 39–63 years; threshold of hearing level (HL): left ear, 49.0 ± 4.1 dB HL, range, 31.25–76.25 dB HL; right ear, 55.1 ± 7.1 dB HL, range, 35–115 dB HL; the duration of hearing loss, 16.67 ± 4.5, range, 3–55 years] and 12 matched normally hearing controls (mean age, 52.3 ± 1.8; range, 42–63 years; threshold of hearing level: left ear, 17.6 ± 1.3 dB HL, range, 11.25–26.25 dB HL; right ear, 19.7 ± 1.3 dB HL, range, 8.75–26.25 dB HL) participated in this experiment. We constructed and analyzed the causal connectivity networks based on functional magnetic resonance imaging data of these participants. Two-sample t-tests revealed significant changes of causal connections and nodal degrees in the right secondary visual cortex, associative visual cortex, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left subgenual cortex, and the left cingulate cortex, as well as the shortest causal connectivity paths from the right secondary visual cortex to Broca’s area in hearing loss patients. Neuropsychological tests indicated that hearing loss patients presented significant cognitive decline. Pearson’s correlation analysis indicated that changes of nodal degrees and the shortest causal connectivity paths were significantly related with poor cognitive performances. We also found a cross-modal reorganization between associative visual cortex and auditory cortex in patients with hearing loss. Additionally, we noted that visual and auditory signals had different effects on neural activities of Broca’s area, respectively. These results suggest that changes in brain causal connectivity network are an important neuroimaging mark of cognitive decline. Our findings provide some implications for rehabilitation of hearing loss patients.

Contributions of left and right anterior temporal lobes to semantic cognition: Evidence from patients with small temporopolar lesions

Decades of research have increased the understanding of the contribution of the anterior temporal lobes (ATLs) to semantic cognition. Nonetheless, whether semantic processing of different types of information show a selective relationship with left and right ATLs, or whether semantic processing in the ATLs is independent of the modality of the input is currently unknown. There exists evidence supporting each of these alternatives. A fundamental objection to these findings is that they were obtained from studies with patients with brain damage affecting extensive regions, sometimes bilaterally. In the current study, we assessed a group of 38 temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with either left or right small epileptogenic lesions with a battery of commonly used semantic tasks that tested verbal and non-verbal semantic processing. We found that left TLE patients exhibited worse performance than controls on the verbal semantic tasks, as expected, but also on the non-verbal semantic task. On the other hand, performance of the right TLE group did not differ from controls on the non-verbal task, but was worse on a semantic fluency task. When performance between patient groups was compared, we found that left TLE not only did worse than right TLE on the naming task, but also on the non-verbal associative memory task. When considered together, current data do not support a strong view of input modality differences between left and right ATLs. Additionally, they provide evidence indicating that the left and right ATLs do not make similar contributions to a singular functional system for semantic representation.

Morphometric correlates of anomia in patients with small left temporopolar lesions

Visual object naming is a complex cognitive process that engages an interconnected network of cortical regions moving from occipitotemporal to anterior-inferior temporal cortices, and extending into the inferior frontal cortex. Naming can fail for diverse reasons, and different stages of the naming multi-step process appear to be reliant upon the integrity of different neuroanatomical locations. While the neural correlates of semantic errors have been extensively studied, the neural basis of omission errors remains relatively unspecified. Although a strong line of evidence supports an association between anterior temporal lobe damage and semantic errors, there are some studies suggesting that the anterior temporal lobe could be also associated with omissions. However, support for this hypothesis comes from studies with patients in whom damage affected extensive brain regions, sometimes bilaterally. Here, we availed of a group of 12 patients with epilepsy associated with a small lesion at the tip of the left temporal pole. Using an unbiased surface-based morphometry methodology, we correlated two morphological features with errors observed during visual naming. Analyses revealed a correlation between omission errors and reduced local gyrification index in three cortical clusters: one in the left anteromedial temporal lobe region (AMTL) and two in the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Our findings support the view that regions in ACC and AMTL are critical structures within a network engaged in word selection from semantics.