A randomized controlled trial of contingency management for smoking abstinence versus contingency management for shaping cessation: One-year outcome

Effectiveness of Contingency Management in Tobacco Smokers with Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review

Background: Effective interventions are required to address tobacco smoking in people with depressive symptomatology. In this context, contingency management could be one useful therapeutic strategy. Objectives: This study is a systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions for smokers with depressive symptomatology including a contingency management component, evaluating their efficacy with regards to tobacco abstinence, depressive symptomatology, adherence to treatment and other variables related to tobacco use. For this purpose, a search was carried out in Pubmed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov in September 2022. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Of the 208 articles identified, six were included in this review. Results: For the most part, the research included suggests that contingency management is an effective strategy for improving abstinence outcomes, adherence, and other smoking-related variables such as delay discounting and intensity of cigarette demand in smokers with depressive symptomatology. Conclusions: Although contingency management could be a promising intervention in tobacco smokers with depressive symptomatology, further research in this area is still required.

The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Narrative Review of Evidence

ABSTRACT

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are characterized by a recurrent and maladaptive use of drugs and/or alcohol. Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) comprise different types of interventions: traditional CBT and the more recent "third wave" behavior therapies, such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and schema therapy (ST). We searched English-language articles published between 2014 and present. This review includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, pilot studies, and reviews of CBTs for SUDs available on PubMed. Results seem to indicate that CBT and MBCT are effective interventions for SUDs; however, the studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity, so no exhaustive conclusions could be outlined at this time. ACT and DBT in SUD management are limited to few studies and results are therefore inconclusive.

Contingency management for smoking cessation among individuals with substance use disorders: In-treatment and post-treatment effects

INTRODUCTION

Smokers with substance use disorders (SUDs) show elevated tobacco prevalence, and smoking abstinence rates are considerably low. This randomized controlled trial sought to compare the effect of a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) that includes an episodic future thinking (EFT) component with the same treatment protocol plus contingency management (CM). This study aims to examine the effect of CM on smoking outcomes and in-treatment behaviors (i.e., retention, session attendance and adherence to nicotine use reduction guidelines), and to analyze whether these in-treatment variables predicted days of continuous abstinence at end-of-treatment.

METHOD

A total of 54 treatment-seeking participants (75.9% males, M = 46.19 years old) were allocated to CBT + EFT (n = 30) or CBT + EFT + CM (n = 24). Intervention consisted of eight weeks of group-based sessions. Tobacco abstinence was verified biochemically by testing levels of carbon monoxide (≤4ppm) and urine cotinine (≤80 ng/ml).

RESULTS

CM intervention increased 24-hour tobacco abstinence (50% vs. 20%, χ²(1) = 5.4; p = .021) and days of continuous abstinence (M = 5.92 ± 7.67 vs. 5.53 ± 12.42; t(52) = -0.132; p = 0.89) at end-of-treatment in comparison with CBT + EFT intervention. Although not statistically significant, CBT + EFT + CM enhanced in-treatment behaviors, in terms of retention (83.3% vs. 70%; χ²(1) = 0.255; p = .208), sessions attended (12.29 ± 3.22 vs. 10.93 ± 3.26; t(52) = -1.527; p = .133) and adherence to weekly nicotine use reduction targets (41.07% ± 31.96 vs. 35% ±2 6.28; t(52) = -0.766; p = .447). A higher percentage of samples meeting reduction guidelines (β = 0.609; p<.001) predicted days of continuous abstinence at end-of-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Combining CM with CBT + EFT improves short-term quitting rates. Findings suggest the need to incorporate strategies for improving adherence to nicotine reduction guidelines.

Episodic future thinking for smoking cessation in individuals with substance use disorder: Treatment feasibility and acceptability

BACKGROUND

Smokers with substance use disorders (SUD) smoke approximately four times more than the general population. Current efforts are focused on improving smoking cessation treatments for this population. Episodic future thinking (EFT), a novel intervention aimed at decreasing impulsive choice, has shown promising results for reducing cigarette demand in experimental settings. This feasibility study sought to examine the feasibility and preliminary EFT effects on delay discounting (DD) and nicotine intake reductions throughout treatment.

METHOD

Smokers in substance use treatment (N = 29; 75.9% males) received an 8-week cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) + EFT for smoking cessation. The study assessed feasibility through successful recruitment rates, retention, and adherence to treatment. Participants' satisfaction acted as our acceptability measure. We computed nonparametric range tests to analyze changes in continuous variables.

RESULTS

Among interested individuals, 42 (43.75%) met the inclusion criteria, and 29 entered the treatment program. Rate of treatment completion was 65.5% (19/29). Mean (SD) sessions attended were 7(1.11), and mean patient satisfaction rating with treatment was 8.83/10. The study observed low compliance with EFT, with 15.8% (3/19) of patients practicing at least 50% of the requested times.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT + EFT is acceptable for the SUD population. However, future studies should implement some adjustments to improve the adherence and feasibility of EFT, such as reducing the number of practices and temporal intervals in EFT events. Given the small sample size, and the absence of a control group, future larger scale trials are needed to elucidate EFT effects on DD and smoking cessation.