Rehabilitants' conscientiousness as a moderator of the intention-planning-behavior chain

Beyond yellow flags: The Big-Five personality traits and psychologically informed musculoskeletal rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Psychosocial variables are known to play an important role in musculoskeletal pain. Recent efforts incorporating psychological theory into rehabilitative medicine, as part of patient-centred care or psychologically informed physical therapy, have gained broader acceptance. The fear-avoidance model is the dominant psychosocial model and has introduced a variety of phenomena which assess psychological distress (i.e., yellow flags). Yellow flags, such as fear, anxiety and catastrophizing, are useful concepts for musculoskeletal providers but reflect a narrow range of psychological responses to pain.

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians lack a more comprehensive framework to understand psychological profiles of each patient and provide individualised care. This narrative review presents the case for applying personality psychology and the Big-Five trait model (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness to experience) to musculoskeletal medicine. These traits have strong associations with various health outcomes and provide a robust framework to understand patient emotion, motivation, cognition and behaviour.

KEY RESULTS

High conscientiousness is associated with positive health outcomes and health promoting behaviours. High neuroticism with low conscientiousness increases the odds of negative health outcomes. Extraversion, agreeableness and openness have less direct effects but have positive correlations with important health behaviours, including active coping, positive affect, rehabilitation compliance, social connection and education level.

CLINICAL APPLICATION

The Big-Five model offers an evidence-based way for MSK providers to better understand the personality of their patients and how it relates to health. These traits offer the potential for additional prognostic factors, tailored treatments and psychological intervention.

Personality and weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review

Aims

Managing weight in the context of type 2 diabetes presents unique hormonal, medicinal, behavioural and psychological challenges. The relationship between weight management and personality has previously been reviewed for general and cardiovascular disease populations but is less well understood in diabetes. This systematic review investigated the relationship between personality constructs and weight management outcomes and behaviours among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Medline, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus databases were searched to July 2021. Eligibility: empirical quantitative studies; English language; adults with type 2 diabetes; investigation of personality-weight management association. Search terms included variants of: diabetes, physical activity, diet, body mass index (BMI), adiposity, personality constructs and validated scales. A narrative synthesis, with quality assessment, was conducted.

Results

Seventeen studies were identified: nine cross-sectional, six cohort and two randomised controlled trials (N=6,672 participants, range: 30-1,553). Three studies had a low risk of bias. Personality measurement varied. The Big Five and Type D personality constructs were the most common measures. Higher emotional instability (neuroticism, negative affect, anxiety, unmitigated communion and external locus of control) was negatively associated with healthy diet and physical activity, and positively associated with BMI. Conscientiousness had positive associations with healthy diet and physical activity and negative associations with BMI and anthropometric indices.

Conclusions

Among adults with type 2 diabetes, evidence exists of a relationship between weight management and personality, specifically, negative emotionality and conscientiousness. Consideration of personality may be important for optimising weight management and further research is warranted.

Systematic review registration

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019111002.

Is a better planned day a healthier day? A daily diary study

OBJECTIVE

Previous research has shown that intentions, implementation intentions, active planning and coping planning predict engagement in important health behaviours. This study investigated the role of general daily planning as opposed to specific behaviour planning as a predictor of engagement in lifestyle behaviours. The study also examined conscientiousness and mean levels of planning as moderators of that relationship.

DESIGN

This study utilised a daily diary approach wherein 76 adults were recruited to complete daily diary surveys for 14 days. Multilevel models assessed the within- and between-person relationships between planning and five lifestyle behaviours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical exercise, fruit and vegetable intake, time spent in social interaction, time spent in nature and heavy alcohol intake.

RESULTS

Within-person general daily planning predicted engagement in exercise. Interactions were found between within-person general daily planning and between-person general daily planning as predictors of exercise, social interaction and time spent in nature.

CONCLUSION

These findings introduce general daily planning as a potentially influential variable for explaining engagement in some lifestyle behaviours. Further, the interactions shed further light on when planning may be more and less helpful depending on individual differences.

Temporary Disability Pension, RTW-Intentions, and RTW-Behavior: Expectations and Experiences of Disability Pensioners over 17 Months

Purpose: Individuals receiving a temporary disability pension (TDP) should get the opportunity to return to work (RTW). The current study aims to determine the factors contributing to RTW. Methods: 453 individuals on TDP were interviewed at three measurement points (T1, T2 = T1 + approximately 7 months, T3 = T1 + approximately 17 months). Socio-demographics, psychological predictors, and current work status (maintained TDP, permanent disability pension, old-age pension, employed, or receipt of other benefits) were assessed. Results: Throughout the duration of the study, only four of the former temporary disability pensioners returned to work, and an additional seven made themselves available to the labor market. These were individuals who were younger, in TDP for a shorter period of time, and reported a higher RTW-intention. Higher RTW-intention was cross-sectionally associated with younger age, shorter TDP duration, and more positive outcome expectancies. Additionally, study participants who expected that medical rehabilitation would help them RTW were more motivated to RTW. An increase in RTW-intention over 17 months was related to younger age and better health. Conclusion: Personal factors such as self-efficacy and job-related variables appear less important for RTW than age and subjective health status. The observed RTW rates call for early support and tailored medical rehabilitation interventions that help individuals prevent functional limitations, overcome disability, and facilitate RTW.