1
|
Slatore CG, Disher N, Scott JY, Golden SE, Hooker E, Govier DJ, Hynes DM. Resistance to Switching Health Care Institution Among Veterans Referred for VA-Purchased Care. J Gen Intern Med 2025:10.1007/s11606-025-09404-x. [PMID: 40050556 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09404-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how Veterans choose between receiving Veterans Affairs (VA)-paid health care from VA-direct care (care provided in VA facilities) vs. non-VA facilities (VA-purchased care). OBJECTIVE To evaluate Veterans' resistance to switch their hypothetical choice of health care institution with reasonable alterations in quality and access using Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE). DESIGN We conducted a nationwide survey among Veterans who had been offered a referral for VA-purchased care. PARTICIPANTS Of the 12,547 Veterans we approached, 1253 (10.0%) respondents had evaluable data. MAIN MEASURES We summarized DCE results. We evaluated the multi-variable adjusted association of travel time to the nearest VA facility (≤ 1 h vs. > 1 h) with resistance to switch health care institutions. We calculated predicted probabilities (PP) for resistance to switching and separately based on distrust in VA health care. KEY RESULTS When respondents imagined their local VA facility was 1 h farther away than their local VA-purchased care facility, more than 60% chose VA-direct care for every quality and access improvement scenario (e.g., VA had higher quality of care). However, when all factors of care in both institutions were equal, up to 60% of respondents who initially chose VA-purchased care would not switch to VA-direct care for any incremental improvement in access and quality of VA-direct care. Travel time was not associated with high resistance to switching health care location (adjusted OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.4; p = .70). Respondents who originally chose VA-purchased care and had high distrust in VA had the highest predicted probabilities of resistance to switch (≤ 1 h travel time: PP 36%, CI 28-43%; > 1 h travel time: PP 42%, CI 34-49%). CONCLUSIONS Interventions to increase Veterans choosing VA-direct care should improve Veterans' understanding of VA and non-VA quality and access and also improve trust in VA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Washington, D.C, USA.
| | - Natalie Disher
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Scott
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara E Golden
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hooker
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Diana J Govier
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Health Systems Management & Policy, OR Health & Science - Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Health Management and Policy Program, College of Health and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slatore CG, Scott JY, Hooker ER, Disher N, Golden S, Govier D, Hynes DM. Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Choosing Care in VA Facilities Versus VA-Purchased Care. Med Care Res Rev 2024; 81:395-407. [PMID: 39075797 DOI: 10.1177/10775587241264594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Many Veterans receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care from non-VA facilities but little is known about factors that Veterans consider for this choice. Between May 2020 and August 2021, we surveyed VA-purchased care-eligible VA patients about barriers and facilitators to choosing where to receive care. We examined the association between travel time to their VA facility and their choice of VA-purchased care (VA-paid health care received in non-VA settings) versus VA facility and whether this association was modified by distrust. We received 1,662 responses and 692 (42%) chose a VA facility. Eighty percent reported quality care was in their top three factors that influenced their decision. Respondents with the highest distrust and who lived >1 hr from the nearest VA facility had the lowest predicted probability (PP) of choosing VA (PP 15%; 95% confidence interval: 10%-20%). Veterans value quality of care. VA and other health care systems should consider patient-centered ways to improve and publicize quality and reduce distrust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Scott
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Hooker
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Natalie Disher
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara Golden
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Diana Govier
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Health Systems Management & Policy, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Health Management and Policy Program, College of Health and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University; Corvallis, OR, USA
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pyne JM, Kelly PA, Fischer EP, Owen RR, Cucciare MA, Miller CJ, Connolly SL, Zamora KA, Koenig CJ, Seal KH, Fortney JC. Trust and perceived mental health access: Exploring the relationship between perceived access barriers and veteran-reported trust. Psychol Serv 2024; 21:102-109. [PMID: 38127502 PMCID: PMC11006371 DOI: 10.1037/ser0000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The importance of patients' trust in health care is well known. However, identifying actionable access barriers to trust is challenging. The goal of these exploratory analyses is to identify actionable access barriers that correlate with and predict patients' lack of trust in providers and in the health care system. This article combines existing data from three studies regarding perceived access to mental health services to explore the relationship between provider and system trust and other access barriers. Data from the Perceived Access Inventory (PAI) were analyzed from three studies that together enrolled a total of 353 veterans who screened positive for a mental health problem and had a VA mental health encounter in the previous 12 months. The PAI includes actionable barriers to accessing VA mental health services. The data are cross-sectional, and analyses include Spearman rank correlations of PAI access barriers and provider and system trust, and linear regressions examining the effect of demographic, clinical, and PAI barriers on lack of trust in VA mental health providers and in the VA health care system. Age, depression, and anxiety symptoms and PAI items demonstrated statistically significant bivariate correlations with provider and system trust. However, in multivariate linear regressions, only PAI items remained statistically significant. The PAI items that predicted provider and system trust could be addressed in interventions to improve provider- and system-level trust. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Pyne
- Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
| | - P Adam Kelly
- South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
| | - Ellen P Fischer
- Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
| | - Richard R Owen
- Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
| | - Michael A Cucciare
- Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System
| | - Christopher J Miller
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Samantha L Connolly
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System
| | | | | | | | - John C Fortney
- Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fortney JC, Carey EP, Rajan S, Rise PJ, Gunzburger EC, Felker BL. A Comparison of Patient-Reported Mental Health Outcomes for the Department of Veterans Affairs' Regional Telehealth and Community Care Programs. Health Serv Res 2022; 57:755-763. [PMID: 35467011 PMCID: PMC9264470 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare patient‐reported outcomes for veterans with limited access to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health services referred to the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) or regional telehealth Clinical Resource Hubs‐Mental Health (CRH‐MH). Data Sources This national evaluation used secondary data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, chart review, and primary data collected by baseline survey between October 8, 2019 and May 27, 2020 and a 4‐month follow‐up survey. Study Design A quasi‐experimental longitudinal study design was used to sample 545 veterans with VCCP or CRH‐MH referrals for new treatment episodes. Patient‐reported outcomes included symptom severity, perceived access, utilization, and patient‐centeredness. Data Collection During the baseline and follow‐up surveys, all veterans were administered the Patient Health Questionnaire‐8 (PHQ‐8) to assess depression severity, and veterans with a provisional diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were also administered the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) to assess PTSD symptom severity. The 4‐month follow‐up survey also asked about perceived access using the Perceived Access Inventory, the number of encounters, and patient‐centeredness of care using the Patient‐Centered Care portion of the Veterans Satisfaction Survey. Principal Findings Results indicated that compared to VCCP consults, veterans with CRH‐MH consults reported 0.65 (CI95 = 0.51–0.83, p < 0.01) times the number of barriers to care, but a non‐significant lower number of encounters (−0.792, CI95 −2.221, 0.636, p = 0.28). There was no significant (p = 0.24) difference in satisfaction with patient‐centeredness, with both groups “agreeing” on average to positively worded questions. Veterans in both groups experienced little improvement in depression or PTSD symptom severity, and there were no clinically meaningful differences between groups. Conclusions Overall findings indicate that the CRH‐MH and VCCP generate similar patient‐reported outcomes. Future research should compare the quality and cost of care delivered by the VCCP and CRH‐MH programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Fortney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evan P Carey
- Department of Biostatistics & Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Suparna Rajan
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter J Rise
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elise C Gunzburger
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bradford L Felker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|