1
|
Holden LR, Tanenbaum GJ. Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable. J Intell 2023; 11:126. [PMID: 37367528 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically, assessments of human intelligence have been virtually synonymous with practices that contributed to forms of inequality and injustice. As such, modern considerations for assessing human intelligence must focus on equity and fairness. First, we highlight the array of diversity, equity, and inclusion concerns in assessment practices and discuss strategies for addressing them. Next, we define a modern, non-g, emergent view of intelligence using the process overlap theory and argue for its use in improving equitable practices. We then review the empirical evidence, focusing on sub-measures of g to highlight the utility of non-g, emergent models in promoting equity and fairness. We conclude with suggestions for researchers and practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaTasha R Holden
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
- Beckman Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Gabriel J Tanenbaum
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mulligan CA, Ayoub JL. Remote Assessment: Origins, Benefits, and Concerns. J Intell 2023; 11:114. [PMID: 37367516 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11060114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Although guidelines surrounding COVID-19 have relaxed and school-aged students are no longer required to wear masks and social distance in schools, we have become, as a nation and as a society, more comfortable working from home, learning online, and using technology as a platform to communicate ubiquitously across ecological environments. In the school psychology community, we have also become more familiar with assessing students virtually, but at what cost? While there is research suggesting score equivalency between virtual and in-person assessment, score equivalency alone is not sufficient to validate a measure or an adaptation thereof. Furthermore, the majority of psychological measures on the market are normed for in-person administration. In this paper, we will not only review the pitfalls of reliability and validity but will also unpack the ethics of remote assessment as an equitable practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christy A Mulligan
- Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, 1 South Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530, USA
| | - Justin L Ayoub
- Nassau BOCES, 71 Clinton Road P.O. Box 9195, Garden City, NY 11530, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A Psychometric Network Analysis of CHC Intelligence Measures: Implications for Research, Theory, and Interpretation of Broad CHC Scores "Beyond g". J Intell 2023; 11:jintelligence11010019. [PMID: 36662149 PMCID: PMC9865475 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
For over a century, the structure of intelligence has been dominated by factor analytic methods that presume tests are indicators of latent entities (e.g., general intelligence or g). Recently, psychometric network methods and theories (e.g., process overlap theory; dynamic mutualism) have provided alternatives to g-centric factor models. However, few studies have investigated contemporary cognitive measures using network methods. We apply a Gaussian graphical network model to the age 9-19 standardization sample of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Fourth Edition. Results support the primary broad abilities from the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory and suggest that the working memory-attentional control complex may be central to understanding a CHC network model of intelligence. Supplementary multidimensional scaling analyses indicate the existence of possible higher-order dimensions (PPIK; triadic theory; System I-II cognitive processing) as well as separate learning and retrieval aspects of long-term memory. Overall, the network approach offers a viable alternative to factor models with a g-centric bias (i.e., bifactor models) that have led to erroneous conclusions regarding the utility of broad CHC scores in test interpretation beyond the full-scale IQ, g.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wechsler SM, Peixoto EM, Gibim QGMT, Bruno Mundim MC, Ribeiro RKSM, de Souza AF. Assessment of Intelligence with Creativity the Need for a Comprehensive Approach. CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2021.1996750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
5
|
Bulut O, Cormier DC, Aquilina AM, Bulut HC. Age and Sex Invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities: Evidence from Psychometric Network Modeling. J Intell 2021; 9:35. [PMID: 34287315 PMCID: PMC8293399 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence9030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ IV COG) is a comprehensive assessment battery designed to assess broad and narrow cognitive abilities, as defined by the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of intelligence. Previous studies examined the invariance of the WJ assessments across sex and age groups using factor analytic methods. Psychometric network modeling is an alternative methodology that can address both direct and indirect relationships among the observed variables. In this study, we employed psychometric network modeling to examine the invariance of the WJ IV COG across sex and age groups. Using a normative sample (n = 4212 participants) representative of the United States population, we tested the extent to which the factorial structure of the WJ IV COG aligned with CHC theory for the school-aged sample. Next, we used psychometric network modeling as a data-driven method to investigate whether the network structure of the WJ IV COG remains similar across different sex and age (age 6 to 19, inclusively) groups. Our results showed that the WJ IV COG maintained the same network structure across all age and sex groups, although the network structure at younger ages indicated weaker relationships among some subtests. Overall, the results provide construct validity evidence for the WJ IV COG, based on both theoretical and data-driven methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okan Bulut
- Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G5, Canada;
| | - Damien C. Cormier
- Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G5, Canada;
| | - Alexandra M. Aquilina
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G5, Canada;
| | - Hatice C. Bulut
- Department of Educational Sciences, Cukurova University, Adana 01250, Turkey;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lecerf T, Canivez GL. Exploratory Factor Analyses of the French WISC-V (WISC-V FR) for Five Age Groups: Analyses Based on the Standardization Sample. Assessment 2021; 29:1117-1133. [PMID: 33794661 PMCID: PMC9301173 DOI: 10.1177/10731911211005170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the factor structure of the French Wechsler
Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition with five
standardization sample age groups (6-7, 8-9, 10-11, 12-13, 14-16
years) using hierarchical exploratory factor analysis followed by
Schmid–Leiman procedure. The primary research questions included (a)
how many French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition
factors should be extracted and retained in each age subgroup, (b) how
are subtests associated with the latent factors, (c) was there
evidence for the publisher’s claim of five first-order factors and
separate Visual Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors, (d) what
proportion of variance was due to general intelligence versus the
first-order group ability factors following a Schmid–Leiman procedure,
and (e) do results support the age differentiation hypothesis? Results
suggested that four factors might be sufficient for all five age
groups and results did not support the distinction between Visual
Spatial and Fluid Reasoning factors. While the general factor
accounted for the largest portions of variance, the four first-order
factors accounted for small unique portions of variance. Results did
not support the age differentiation hypothesis because the number of
factors remained the same across age groups, and there was no change
in the percentage of variance accounted for by the general factor
across age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Lecerf
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Swiss Distance Learning University, Brig, Switzerland.,University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dombrowski SC, Watkins MW, McGill RJ, Canivez GL, Holingue C, Pritchard AE, Jacobson LA. Measurement Invariance of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition 10-Subtest Primary Battery: Can Index Scores be Compared across Age, Sex, and Diagnostic Groups? JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282920954583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Measurement invariance of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) 10 subtest primary battery was evaluated across sex, age (6–8, 9–11, 12–14, and 15–16 year-olds), and three diagnostic (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and encephalopathy) groups within a large clinical sample ( N = 5359) referred to a children’s specialty hospital. Competing models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a five-factor oblique model corresponding to the publisher’s hypothesized first-order measurement model (e.g., verbal comprehension, fluid reasoning, visual-spatial, working memory, and processing speed) was found to have the best model fit. Multigroup CFA was subsequently used to evaluate progressively more restrictive constraints on the measurement model. Results indicated that full metric invariance was attained across the three groups studied. Full scalar invariance was attained for sex and diagnostic groups. Partial scalar invariance was attained for age-group. The results of this study provide support for the first-order scoring structure of the five WISC-V factors in the 10 subtest primary battery with this large clinical sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Calliope Holingue
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA
| | - Alison E. Pritchard
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA
| | - Lisa A. Jacobson
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grieder S, Grob A. Exploratory Factor Analyses of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2: Implications for Theory and Practice. Assessment 2019; 27:1853-1869. [PMID: 31023061 DOI: 10.1177/1073191119845051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The factor structure of the intelligence and scholastic skills domains of the Intelligence and Development Scales-2 was examined using exploratory factor analyses with the standardization and validation sample (N = 2,030, aged 5 to 20 years). Results partly supported the seven proposed intelligence group factors. However, the theoretical factors Visual Processing and Abstract Reasoning as well as Verbal Reasoning and Long-Term Memory collapsed, resulting in a five-factor structure for intelligence. Adding the three scholastic skills subtests resulted in an additional factor Reading/Writing and in Logical-Mathematical Reasoning showing a loading on abstract Visual Reasoning and the highest general factor loading. A data-driven separation of intelligence and scholastic skills is not evident. Omega reliability estimates based on Schmid-Leiman transformations revealed a strong general factor that accounted for most of the true score variance both overall and at the group factor level. The possible usefulness of factor scores is discussed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Canivez GL, McGill RJ, Dombrowski SC, Watkins MW, Pritchard AE, Jacobson LA. Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests. Assessment 2018; 27:274-296. [PMID: 30516059 DOI: 10.1177/1073191118811609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Independent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) research with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition (WISC-V) standardization sample has failed to provide support for the five group factors proposed by the publisher, but there have been no independent examinations of the WISC-V structure among clinical samples. The present study examined the latent structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests with a large (N = 2,512), bifurcated clinical sample (EFA, n = 1,256; CFA, n = 1,256). EFA did not support five factors as there were no salient subtest factor pattern coefficients on the fifth extracted factor. EFA indicated a four-factor model resembling the WISC-IV with a dominant general factor. A bifactor model with four group factors was supported by CFA as suggested by EFA. Variance estimates from both EFA and CFA found that the general intelligence factor dominated subtest variance and omega-hierarchical coefficients supported interpretation of the general intelligence factor. In both EFA and CFA, group factors explained small portions of common variance and produced low omega-hierarchical subscale coefficients, indicating that the group factors were of poor interpretive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A Jacobson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dombrowski SC, Beaujean AA, McGill RJ, Benson NF. The Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement Provides Too Many Scores for Clinical Interpretation. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282918800745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement, Fourth Edition (WJ IV ACH) is purported to align with Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) theory and offers upward of 20 scores within its interpretive and scoring system. The Technical Manual does not furnish validity evidence for the scores reported by the scoring system, suggesting that evidentiary support may be incomplete. Exploratory bifactor analysis (EBFA; maximum likelihood extraction with a bigeomin [orthogonal] rotation) was applied to the two school-aged correlation matrices at ages 9 to 19. Results indicated nonalignment with CHC theory and do not support the interpretation of most of the scores suggested by the scoring system. Instead, the results of this study suggest that the loading patterns diverge significantly from the interpretive system produced by the WJ IV ACH. Only the academic fluency and academic knowledge clusters emerged following the use of EBFA. Implications for clinical interpretation of the WJ IV ACH are offered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Evidence-Based Assessment: Best Practices, Customary Practices, and Recommendations for Field-Based Assessment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40688-018-0186-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Dombrowski SC, McGill RJ, Canivez GL, Peterson CH. Investigating the Theoretical Structure of the Differential Ability Scales—Second Edition Through Hierarchical Exploratory Factor Analysis. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282918760724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
When the Differential Ability Scales–Second Edition (DAS-II) was developed, the instrument’s content, structure, and theoretical orientation were amended. Despite these changes, the Technical Handbook did not report results from exploratory factor analytic investigations, and confirmatory factor analyses were implemented using selected subtests across the normative age groups from the total battery. To address these omissions, the present study investigated the theoretical structure of the DAS-II using principal axis factoring followed by the Schmid–Leiman procedure with participants from the 5- to 8-year-old age range to determine the degree to which the DAS-II theoretical structure proposed in the Technical Handbook could be replicated. Unlike other age ranges investigated where at most 14 subtests were administered, the entire DAS-II battery was normed on participants aged 5 to 8 years, making it well suited to test the full instrument’s alignment with theory. Results suggested a six-factor solution that was essentially consistent with the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC)-based theoretical structure suggested by the test publisher and simple structure was attained. The only exception involved two subtests (Picture Similarities and Early Number Concepts) that did not saliently load on a group factor. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Parkin JR. Do Achievement Factors Change Across Development? An Investigation With the KTEA-3. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282918754922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R. Parkin
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Lake Washington School District, Redmond, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dombrowski SC, Golay P, McGill RJ, Canivez GL. Investigating the theoretical structure of the DAS-II core battery at school age using Bayesian structural equation modeling. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/pits.22096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|