Erratum: Production of gene-targeted sheep by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells

HMEJ-mediated site-specific integration of a myostatin inhibitor increases skeletal muscle mass in porcine

As a robust antagonist of myostatin (MSTN), follistatin (FST) is an important regulator of skeletal muscle development, and the delivery of FST to muscle tissue represents a potential therapeutic strategy for muscular dystrophies. The N terminus and FSI domain of FST are the functional domains for MSTN binding. Here, we aimed to achieve site-specific integration of FSI-I-I, including the signal peptide, N terminus, and three FSI domains, into the last codon of the porcine MSTN gene using a homology-mediated end joining (HMEJ)-based strategy mediated by CRISPR-Cas9. Based on somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technology, we successfully obtained FSI-I-I knockin pigs. H&E staining of longissimus dorsi and gastrocnemius cross-sections showed larger myofiber sizes in FSI-I-I knockin pigs than in controls. Moreover, the Smad and Erk pathways were inhibited, whereas the PI3k/Akt pathway was activated in FSI-I-I knockin pigs. In addition, the levels of MyoD, Myf5, and MyoG transcription were upregulated while that of MRF4 was downregulated in FSI-I-I knockin pigs. These results indicate that the FSI-I-I gene mediates skeletal muscle hypertrophy through an MSTN-related signaling pathway and the expression of myogenic regulatory factors. Overall, FSI-I-I knockin pigs with hypertrophic muscle tissue hold great promise as a therapeutic model for human muscular dystrophies.

Human germline genetic modification: scientific and bioethical perspectives

The latest mammalian genetic modification technology offers efficient and reliable targeting of genomic sequences, in the guise of designer genetic recombination tools. These and other improvements in genetic engineering technology suggest that human germline genetic modification (HGGM) will become a safe and effective prospect in the relatively near future. Several substantive ethical objections have been raised against HGGM including claims of unacceptably high levels of risk, damage to the status of future persons, and violations of justice and autonomy. This paper critically reviews the latest GM science and discusses the key ethical objections to HGGM. We conclude that major benefits are likely to accrue through the use of safe and effective HGGM and that it would thus be unethical to take a precautionary stance against HGGM.

Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture

Initial technologies for creating transgenic swine only permitted random integration of the construct. However, by combining the technology for homologous recombination in fetal somatic cells with that of nuclear transfer (NT), it is now possible to create specific modifications to the swine genome. The first such example is that of knocking out a gene that is responsible for hyperacute rejection (HAR) when organs from swine are transferred to primates. Because swine are widely used as models of human diseases, there are opportunities for genetic modification to alter these models or to create additional models of human disease. Unfortunately, some of the offspring resulting from NT have abnormal phenotypes. However, it appears that these abnormal phenotypes are a result of epigenetic modifications and, thus, are not transmitted to the offspring of the clones. Although the technique of producing animals with specific genetic modifications by NT has been achieved, improvements to the NT technique as well as improvements in the culture conditions for somatic cells and the techniques for genetic modification are still needed.