Kinesin-ADP: whole lotta shakin' goin' on

Investigating role of conformational changes of microtubule in regulating its binding affinity to kinesin by all-atom molecular dynamics simulation

Changes of affinity of kinesin head to microtubule regulated by changes in the nucleotide state are essential to processive movement of kinesin on microtubule. Here, using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations we show that besides the nucleotide state, large conformational changes of microtubule-tubulin heterodimers induced by strong interaction with the head in strongly binding state are also indispensable to regulate the affinity of the head to the tubulin. In strongly binding state the high affinity of the head to microtubule arises largely from mutual conformational changes of the microtubule and head induced by the specific interaction between them via an induced-fit mechanism. Moreover, the ADP-head has a much weaker affinity to the local microtubule-tubulin, whose conformation is largely altered by the interaction with the head in strongly binding state, than to other unperturbed tubulins. This indicates that upon Pi release the ADP-head temporarily has a much weaker affinity to the local tubulin than to other tubulins.

Processivity of dimeric kinesin-1 molecular motors

Kinesin‐1 is a homodimeric motor protein that can move along microtubule filaments by hydrolyzing ATP with a high processivity. How the two motor domains are coordinated to achieve such high processivity is not clear. To address this issue, we computationally studied the run length of the dimer with our proposed model. The computational data quantitatively reproduced the puzzling experimental data, including the dramatically asymmetric character of the run length with respect to the direction of external load acting on the coiled‐coil stalk, the enhancement of the run length by addition of phosphate, and the contrary features of the run length for different types of kinesin‐1 with extensions of their neck linkers compared with those without extension of the neck linker. The computational data on other aspects of the movement dynamics such as velocity and durations of one‐head‐bound and two‐head‐bound states in a mechanochemical coupling cycle were also in quantitative agreement with the available experimental data. Moreover, predicted results are provided on dependence of the run length upon external load acting on one head of the dimer, which can be easily tested in the future using single‐molecule optical trapping assays.

Reduction of photobleaching and photodamage in single molecule detection: observing single actin monomer in skeletal myofibrils

Recent advances in detector technology make it possible to achieve single molecule detection (SMD) in a cell. SMD avoids complications associated with averaging signals from large assemblies and with diluting and disorganizing proteins. However, it requires that cells be illuminated with an intense laser beam, which causes photobleaching and cell damage. To reduce these effects, we study cells on coverslips coated with silver nanoparticle monolayers (NML). Muscle is used as an example. Actin is labeled with a low concentration of fluorescent phalloidin to assure that less than a single molecule in a sarcomere is fluorescent. On a glass substrate, the fluorescence of actin decays in a step-wise fashion, establishing a single molecule detection regime. Single molecules of actin in living muscle are visualized for the first time. NML coating decreases the fluorescence lifetime 17 times and enhances intensity ten times. As a result, fluorescence of muscle bleaches four to five times slower than on glass. Monolayers decrease photobleaching because they shorten the fluorescence lifetime, thus decreasing the time that a fluorophore spends in the excited state when it is vulnerable to oxygen attack. They decrease damage to cells because they enhance the electric field near the fluorophore, making it possible to illuminate samples with weaker light.

Cross-bridge duty cycle in isometric contraction of skeletal myofibrils

During interaction of actin with myosin, cross-bridges impart mechanical impulses to thin filaments resulting in rotations of actin monomers. Impulses are delivered on the average every tc seconds. A cross-bridge spends a fraction of this time (ts) strongly attached to actin, during which it generates force. The "duty cycle" (DC), defined as the fraction of the total cross-bridge cycle that myosin spends attached to actin in a force generating state (ts/ tc), is small for cross-bridges acting against zero load, like freely shortening muscle, and increases as the load rises. Here we report, for the first time, an attempt to measure DC of a single cross-bridge in muscle. A single actin molecule in a half-sarcomere was labeled with fluorescent phalloidin. Its orientation was measured by monitoring intensity of the polarized TIRF images. Actin changed orientation when a cross-bridge bound to it. During isometric contraction, but not during rigor, actin orientation oscillated between two values, corresponding to the actin-bound and actin-free state of the cross-bridge. The average ts and tc were 3.4 and 6 s, respectively. These results suggest that, in isometrically working muscle, cross-bridges spend about half of the cycle time attached to actin. The fact that 1/ tc was much smaller than the ATPase rate suggests that the bulk of the energy of ATP hydrolysis is used for purposes other than performance of mechanical work.

Kinesin-microtubule binding depends on both nucleotide state and loading direction

Kinesin is a motor protein that transports organelles along a microtubule toward its plus end by using the energy of ATP hydrolysis. To clarify the nucleotide-dependent binding mode, we measured the unbinding force for one-headed kinesin heterodimers in addition to conventional two-headed kinesin homodimers under several nucleotide states. We found that both a weak and a strong binding state exist in each head of kinesin corresponding to a small and a large unbinding force, respectively; that is, weak for the ADP state and strong for the nucleotide-free and adenosine 5'-[beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate states. Model analysis showed that (i) the two binding modes in each head could be explained by a difference in the binding energy and (ii) the directional instability of binding, i.e., dependence of unbinding force on loading direction, could be explained by a difference in the characteristic distance for the kinesin-microtubule interaction during plus- and minus-end-directed loading. Both these factors must play an important role in the molecular mechanism of kinesin motility.