1
|
Review: Local Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibition in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12:pharmaceutics12060539. [PMID: 32545207 PMCID: PMC7356880 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) characterized by intestinal inflammation. Increased intestinal levels of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are associated with disease activity and severity. Anti-TNF-α therapy is administered systemically and efficacious in the treatment of IBD. However, systemic exposure is associated with adverse events that may impede therapeutic treatment. Clinical studies show that the efficacy correlates with immunological effects localized in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) as opposed to systemic effects. These data suggest that site-specific TNF-α inhibition in IBD may be efficacious with fewer expected side effects related to systemic exposure. We therefore reviewed the available literature that investigated the efficacy or feasibility of local TNF-α inhibition in IBD. A literature search was performed on PubMed with given search terms and strategy. Of 8739 hits, 48 citations were included in this review. These studies ranged from animal studies to randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. In these studies, local anti-TNF-α therapy was achieved with antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), small interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNA (miRNA) and genetically modified organisms. This narrative review summarizes and discusses these approaches in view of the clinical relevance of local TNF-α inhibition in IBD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Pineton de Chambrun G, Amiot A, Bouguen G, Viennot S, Altwegg R, Louis E, Collins M, Fumery M, Poullenot F, Armengol L, Buisson A, Abitbol V, Laharie D, Seksik P, Nancey S, Blanc P, Bouhnik Y, Pariente B, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Boschetti G, Flourié B, Danion P, Savoye G, brazier F, Loreau J, Beaugerie L, Sokol H, Nion-Larmurier I, Bourrier A, Landman C, Lefèvre J, Chafai N, Bouta N, Funakoshi N. Efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Treatment in Patients With Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:620-627.e1. [PMID: 31202984 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS It is a challenge to manage patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP) refractory to standard therapy. We investigated the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in a large cohort of patients with refractory UP. METHODS We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 104 consecutive patients with active UP refractory to conventional therapies, treated at 1 of 15 centers in France or 1 center in Belgium (the GETAID cohort). Patients received at least 1 injection of anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab) from October 2006 through February 2017. Clinical response was defined as significant improvement in UC-related symptoms, and remission as complete disappearance of UC-related symptoms, each determined by treating physicians. We collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data. The median duration of follow-up was 24 months (interquartile range, 13-51 months). The primary outcome was clinical response of UP to anti-TNF treatment. RESULTS Overall, 80 patients (77%) had a clinical response to anti-TNF therapy and 52 patients (50%) achieved clinical remission. Extra-intestinal manifestations (odds ratio OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.7), ongoing treatment with topical steroids (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.73), and ongoing treatment with topical 5-aminosalycilates (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.62) were significantly associated with the absence of clinical remission. Sixty percent (38/63) of the patients who had endoscopic assessment during follow up had mucosal healing. Among the overall population (n = 104), the cumulative probabilities of sustained clinical remission were 87.6% ± 3.4% at 1 year and 74.7% ± 4.8% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS In a retrospective study of 104 patients with refractory UP, anti-TNF therapy induced clinical remission in 50% and mucosal healing in 60%. About two thirds of the patients were still receiving anti-TNF therapy at 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aurélien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil University, Creteil, France
| | - Guillaume Bouguen
- CHU Rennes, Univ Rennes, INSERM, CIC1414, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer), F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Stéphanie Viennot
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Romain Altwegg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
| | - Michael Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bicêtre University Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Florian Poullenot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haut-Leveque Hospital, Bordeaux University, Pessac, France
| | - Laura Armengol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Estaing Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Vered Abitbol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - David Laharie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haut-Leveque Hospital, Bordeaux University, Pessac, France
| | - Philippe Seksik
- Département de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Nancey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Lyon University, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Blanc
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaujon Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Clichy, France
| | - Benjamin Pariente
- Department of Gastroenterology, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille 2 University, Lille, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brabois Hospital, Nancy University, Nancy les Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
The treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 32-33:49-57. [PMID: 30060939 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative proctitis is defined as a mucosal inflammation limited to the rectum. Ulcerative proctitis is responsible for distressing symptoms and alteration of patient quality of life. Effective treatment is important to prevent or delay proximal extension of the disease and to improve quality of life. Refractory ulcerative proctitis is defined as the failure of topical and oral 5-aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids. Medical management of refractory ulcerative proctitis may be challenging as there is little evidence regarding drug efficacy in this clinical situation. Data are currently available for azathioprine, topical tacrolimus and anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies as rescue treatment for refractory ulcerative proctitis. Other biologics may be of benefit despite a lack of dedicated clinical trials. Ultimately, experimental therapies such as epidermal growth factor enemas, appendectomy or fecal transplantation may be tried before restorative proctocolectomy with J pouch anastomosis, which has demonstrated good results with regards to clinical remission and quality of life.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Proctitis accounts for a significant proportion of cases of ulcerative colitis (UC), and some patients subsequently develop more extensive disease. However, most patients continue to have limited inflammation, although the changes in the distal colon and rectum can occasionally be severe, and symptoms of increased frequency, rectal bleeding and urgency can be as disabling as they are for patients with more extensive colitis. Furthermore, although symptoms are typically well controlled with standard medications, medically refractory proctitis poses particular problems. Patients generally are not systemically unwell, and there is no added fear of cancer. Therefore, the prospect of colectomy for such limited disease is resisted by patients, physicians and surgeons alike. Unusual therapies, often delivered locally by enema or suppository, have been tested in small case series without definitive outcomes. The pathogenesis of such limited, yet intractable inflammation remains unclear, and the differential diagnosis should be carefully reviewed to ensure that local disease, whether it is infectious, vascular, or a result of injury or degeneration, is not overlooked. Ileo-anal pouch formation is the surgery of choice for about 20% of patients with UC who undergo colectomy. In the majority of cases, this surgery results in an acceptable quality of life and freedom from a stoma. However, in a sizeable minority of cases, pouch dysfunction can cause intractable problems. The causes of pouch dysfunction are varied and must all be considered carefully, particularly in refractory cases. Pouchitis is a common issue and is usually transient and easily treated. However, refractory and chronic pouchitis can be challenging. Ischaemia, injury, infection and Crohn's disease can all cause refractory pouch dysfunction. In a minority of cases, there appears to be no apparent organic pathology, and the presumptive diagnosis is that of a functional pouch disorder. Although it is much rarer, neoplastic changes in the pouch must also be considered, and the risk managed appropriately. The management of both intractable proctitis and the problematic pouch is made more challenging by the wide differential diagnosis that must be considered and by the paucity of high-quality clinical trials to support any one therapy. Key strategies to overcoming these limitations include methodical and systematic investigation and review, and a willingness to tailor therapy to the individual patient. Clinical trials of new treatments should be supported, and data from the experience with small cohorts of patients should be meticulously collected, critically analysed and widely disseminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Kent
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital and the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
A multicenter, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesalamine suppositories 1 g at bedtime and 500 mg Twice daily in patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56:513-22. [PMID: 20676771 PMCID: PMC3029674 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1334-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2010] [Accepted: 06/18/2010] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a prevalent condition associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Topical mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA]) inhibits inflammatory processes in UP. METHODS We evaluated effects of mesalamine 1-g suppository administered QHS compared with 500-mg suppository administered BID on UP activity (e.g., disease extension/mucosal appearance), remission, onset of response, safety and compliance in 97 patients with UP. A 6-week, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, noninferiority study was conducted (and published) with Disease Activity Index (DAI) at week 6 as the primary efficacy variable and individual components of DAI at week 6 (i.e., stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance, global assessment) as secondary variables. Unreported outcomes were remission (DAI < 3 at weeks 3 and 6), disease extension, and complete response to treatment (DAI = 0; post-hoc, exploratory analysis). RESULTS DAI values after 6 weeks were significantly reduced (±SD) from 6.6 ± 1.5 to 1.6 ± 2.3 (500-mg BID); and from 6.1 ± 1.5 to 1.3 ± 2.2 (1-g QHS). Mucosal appearance significantly improved from baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment from 1.8 ± 0.5 to 0.8 ± 0.7 and 0.5 ± 0.7 (500-mg BID; P ≤ 0.0062) and from 1.7 ± 0.5 to 0.9 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.6 (1-g QHS; P ≤ 0.0001), respectively. Remission was comparable (78.3-86.1%); onset of response generally occurred within 3 weeks, and disease extension was reduced (>70%) after 6 weeks in both groups. Mesalamine was well tolerated. Compliance was >96%. CONCLUSIONS Mesalamine 500-mg BID and 1-g QHS suppositories are safe and effective for patients with UP. Most patients reported significant improvement within 3 weeks and UP remission and reduced disease extension after 6 weeks of treatment. Validity of QHS administration was confirmed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bouguen G, Roblin X, Bourreille A, Feier L, Filippi J, Nancey S, Bretagne JF, Flourié B, Hébuterne X, Bigard MA, Siproudhis L, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Infliximab for refractory ulcerative proctitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:1178-85. [PMID: 20222911 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04293.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy of infliximab in treating ulcerative proctitis remains unknown. AIM To evaluate the clinical, biological and endoscopic efficacy of infliximab therapy in refractory proctitis. METHODS The charts of 420 patients treated with infliximab for ulcerative colitis were reviewed. Thirteen patients were treated with infliximab for refractory ulcerative proctitis in six referral centres between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS Following infliximab therapy induction, 9/13 patients (69%) had a complete response (defined as absence of diarrhoea and blood), 2/13 (15%) had a partial response and 2/13 (15%) were primary nonresponders. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 3-48). Among the 11 patients with clinical response after infliximab induction therapy, 9 (82%) patients maintained response at last follow-up. Disappearance of rectal disorders was observed in all nine patients who maintained clinical response at last follow-up. Following infliximab induction therapy, the mean CRP level fell from 12.8 mg/L to 4.7 mg/L. Endoscopic evaluation was performed before and after infliximab in seven patients, showing an improvement in mucosal lesions in four patients, persistent mild endoscopic activity in two patients and no improvement in one patient. One patient underwent proctocolectomy. CONCLUSION Infliximab therapy seems to be effective in inducing and maintaining a clinical response in refractory ulcerative proctitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Bouguen
- Inserm, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Rennes, Pontchaillou, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|