1
|
Greenberg S, Chang NC, Corder SR, Reed CC, Eluri S, Dellon ES. Dilation-predominant approach versus routine care in patients with difficult-to-treat eosinophilic esophagitis: a retrospective comparison. Endoscopy 2022; 54:243-250. [PMID: 33910259 DOI: 10.1055/a-1493-5627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about esophageal dilation as a long-term treatment approach for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We examined the impact of a "dilate and wait" strategy on symptom management and safety of patients with EoE. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included two patient groups: those who underwent a dilation-predominant approach (≥ 3 dilations as sole therapy or for histologically refractory disease [> 15 eos/hpf]); and those who had routine care (< 3 dilations or histologic response). Group characteristics were compared and outcomes for the dilation-only group assessed. RESULTS 53/205 patients (26 %) received the dilation-predominant strategy (total 408 dilations), predominantly for histologic treatment nonresponse (75 %). These patients were younger (33 vs. 41 years; P = 0.003), had a narrower baseline esophageal diameter (9.8 vs. 11.5 mm; P = 0.005), underwent more dilations (7.7 vs. 3.4; P < 0.001), but achieved a smaller final diameter (15.7 vs. 16.7 mm; P = 0.01) vs. routine care. With this strategy, 30 patients (57 %) had ongoing symptom improvement, with esophageal caliber change independently associated with symptom response (adjusted odds ratio 1.79, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-2.78); 26 (49 %) used the strategy as a bridge to clinical trials. Over a median follow-up of 1001 days (interquartile range 581-1710), no deaths or dilation-related perforations occurred, but there were nine emergency room visits, including one for post-dilation bleeding and four for food impaction. CONCLUSIONS A dilation-predominant long-term treatment strategy allowed for symptom control or bridge to clinical trials for patients with difficult-to-treat EoE. Close follow-up and monitoring for complications are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Greenberg
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Nicole C Chang
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - S Ryanne Corder
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Craig C Reed
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Swathi Eluri
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reflections on Our Editorship of The American Journal of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:2313-2315. [PMID: 35134007 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
3
|
Wilson JM, Li RC, McGowan EC. The Role of Food Allergy in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Asthma Allergy 2020; 13:679-688. [PMID: 33364787 PMCID: PMC7751314 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s238565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Food allergy is often understood as an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, characterized by allergic symptoms which occur “immediately” after the ingestion of a relevant food allergen. Increasingly, however, other food-related immune-mediated disorders are recognized in which symptoms can have a delayed onset and IgE does not play a central role. One of the described examples of the latter is eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) – a disease defined pathologically by local eosinophilic inflammation in the esophagus in the setting of symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. The evidence that EoE is a food-mediated allergic disease includes i) almost all patients respond to an elemental diet and many respond to a diet in which dairy, wheat, eggs and/or soy are eliminated, ii) the presence of food-specific IgE and Th2 cells are consistent with a loss of tolerance to trigger foods and iii) many EoE patients have concomitant IgE-mediated food allergy and other allergic co-morbidities. This narrative review focuses on the hypothesis that EoE is a form of chronic food allergy. The goal is to describe similarities and differences in EoE and IgE-mediated food allergy, and to consider ways that these two increasingly common forms of food allergy are related to each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Wilson
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Rung-Chi Li
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Emily C McGowan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
In eosinophilic esophagitis, the main cause of solid-food dysphagia is tissue remodeling resulting in strictures and narrowed esophagus. Endoscopy and biopsies help to identify the degree of inflammation but often miss the fibrosis. Although initially considered dangerous, esophageal dilation has evolved into an extremely effective and safe treatment in fibrostenotic disease. The key is starting low with small-diameter bougies or balloons, and gradually dilating the esophagus and strictures to 16 to 18 mm. Results in more than 1000 adults and children have shown low rates of complications, especially perforations, and no deaths, but postprocedure chest pain is common.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson JM, McGowan EC. Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2017; 38:125-139. [PMID: 29132668 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Unlike traditional food allergies, immunoglobulin E (IgE) is not a key mediator of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nonetheless, foods antigens are important triggers of EoE, and allergists play an important role in management of this chronic disease. This review addresses insights into the diagnosis and management as it relates to our evolving understanding about the pathogenesis of EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Wilson
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 801355, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | - Emily C McGowan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 801355, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|