High dose combination chemotherapy with ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide or cisplatin, mitomycin C and mustine with autologous bone marrow support in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A phase I/II study

Long-term Results of a Pilot Study on an Intensive Induction Regimen for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

In 1995, we designed and carried out a pilot study on the combination of cisplatin + high dose epirubicin + vinorelbine with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support for the induction treatment of unresectable stage IIIAN2 and wet IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer. The present report concerns the long-term results.

Method

Eligible patients received cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, and epirubicin, 120 mg/m2, on day 1, vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 15, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, 300 μg s.c., from days 3 to 12. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks for 3 times. Subsequently, all the patients were re-evaluated for surgical resection.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled: 21 males and 5 females; median age, 55 years (range, 31–64); median performance status, 90% (range, 80–100); 16 stage IIIA and 10 IIIB. After the 3 cycles, objective response was as follows: 2 complete (8%), 18 partial (69%), 5 no change (19%) and 1 progressive disease (4%). Ten patients were not operated (9 unresectable and 1 refusal) and received radiotherapy. Sixteen patients (61%) underwent surgery and 14 were completely resected (54%). After a median follow-up of 84 months (range, 12–120), the median overall progression-free survival was 17 months (range, 2–104+): 47 months for resected and 8 months for nonresected patients. The median overall survival was 40 months (range, 4–123+): 87 months for resected and 13 months for nonresected patients. One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 73%, 42% and 37%, respectively.

Conclusions

These intensive cytotoxic regimen enabled us to obtain favorable long-term results in a selected series of inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: the experience of the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Solid Tumours Working Party

We report the experience of the EBMT Solid Tumours Working Party (STWP) using high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with PBPC support in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Between 1989 and 2004, 36 NSCLC patients (27 men and 9 women), median age 53.5 years (range: 24-62) were treated with 63 HDCT courses. A high-dose carboplatin-based regimen was used in 53% of the cases. Thirty-two patients had relapsed/metastatic disease, while four classified as stage IIIB received HDCT followed by radiotherapy. No treatment-related death occurred. Of 25 patients who were planned to receive multi-cycle HDCT, 4 cases (16%) interrupted the treatment early due to prolonged severe toxicities and 4 (16%) due to progressive disease. Of 36 evaluable patients, 3 (8%) achieved a complete remission and 13 (36%) had a partial remission at an overall response rate of 44%. Of these, one patient with stage IIIB and one with stage IV are alive disease free at 71+ and 149+ months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range: 6-149), median survival was 7 months (range: 1-149). Despite one anecdotal case, HDCT did not show significant activity, but induced relevant morbidity in NSCLC patients.

Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel following mobilization with epirubicin and cisplatin are feasible but ineffective in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We verified the feasibility of a multi-cycle peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC)-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The HDC regimen consisted of a single course of high-dose epirubicin given in combination with cisplatin plus filgrastim, followed by three courses of high doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel with PBPC reinfusion and filgrastim. Of the 16 enrolled patients, 13 provided an adequate number of PBPCs by a single leukapheresis, while in the three needed two procedures, with a median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 13.5 x 10(6), 10.9 x 10(6) and 0.9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. No toxic death occurred, and the collected PBPCs supported a rapid hematopoietic reconstitution after HDC; however, seven patients early interrupted the treatment early due to early progressive disease (n=4) or prolonged grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (n=3). Despite an overall response rate of 42%, the median survival for stage IV patients has been 5 months (range: 1-25+). Of two patients with stage IIIB NSCLC, one is continuously disease-free at 71+ months, while of 14 with stage IV disease, one is currently alive with disease at 25+ months. In conclusion, the combination of high-dose epirubicin with cisplatin plus filgrastim is an effective regimen in releasing large amounts of PBPCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDC. Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel are ineffective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The literature on high-dose chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation does not - as of yet - provide evidence of relevant benefits. At the same time, the significant risks of treatment-related morbidity and mortality associated with dose-intensified chemotherapy in this vulnerable patient population are increasingly recognized. Whether the advent of new cytotoxic agents such as the Taxans or newer Topoisomerase inhibitors will help to improve the hitherto unsatisfying results of high-dose chemotherapy in NSCLC, remains to be determined. The few ongoing studies in the area strive to examine such newer drug-combinations in a multimodality treatment concept combining neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation with surgery and adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy.

Phase II trial of induction high-dose chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and radiation therapy for patients with marginally resectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an active regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Historically, patients with stage III disease have manifested higher response rates than patients with metastatic disease, and patients achieving a pathologic complete response to induction chemoradiation therapy prior to surgery have shown better long-term outcome. Based upon our pilot data using high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel, we designed a phase II trial in patients with marginally resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Ten patients, with bulky nodal stage IIIA disease, initially received etoposide (2 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Two cycles, 28 days apart, of carboplatin (AUC 12 in seven patients; AUC 16 in three patients) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) were administered with filgrastim (5 microg/kg) and PBSC support. After re-evaluation, patients underwent a thoracotomy followed by radiotherapy (44-60 Gy) if deemed resectable, or radiotherapy alone (60 Gy) if not resectable. The median age was 58.5 years (48-66) with a median ECOG performance status of 0 (0-1). Histology was adenocarcinoma in seven patients; the remainder had either squamous cell, large cell or bronchoalveolar carcinoma. Based on CT radiography, the overall response rate was 40%. Eight of ten patients underwent resection with four right pneumonectomies, three right upper lobectomies and one wedge resection of the right upper lobe. Six patients had a complete resection. Of eight patients resected, four were downstaged by induction therapy, three remained unchanged and one was found to have more extensive disease. The remaining two patients developed metastatic disease while receiving chemotherapy. The median dose of postoperative radiotherapy was 54 Gy (35-66 Gy). Actual median follow-up for all patients was 89 weeks (25 to 136+). The actuarial median overall survival was 124 weeks (25 to 136+) and time to progression was 57 weeks (17 to 136+). The median dose of carboplatin delivered expressed as mg/m2 was 779 (615-1540). Neutropenic fever occurred in two patients during the initial mobilization cycle only. The median number of units of RBC and/or platelets transfused was 0 (0-2 and 0-6, respectively). There were no significant non-hematologic toxicities. High-dose induction chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is feasible and safe with an acceptable response rate. Thoracotomy, including pneumonectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, were well tolerated by patients after undergoing high-dose induction chemotherapy with no apparent increase in peri-operative morbidity. The pathologic complete response rate was low--one out of ten patients. These results indicate that dose escalation of induction chemotherapy does not improve response rates even in this highly selected patient population. Accordingly, the complexity and potential toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy, as delivered in this trial as neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, is not warranted.

Dose-intense therapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin (VIP-E) in 107 consecutive patients with limited- and extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I/II trial to assess the feasibility and activity of combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin in limited-stage (LS, stage I-IIIB) and extensive-stage (ES, stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). End-points were treatment-related morbidity and mortality, response rate, duration of response, and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given at a dose of etoposide (500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4000 mg/m2), cisplatin (50 mg/m2), and epirubicin (50 mg/m2) (VIP-E) to 107 patients with NSCLC. Twenty-five patients with qualifying responses proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after etoposide (1500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (12,000 mg/m2), carboplatin (750 mg/m2) and epirubicin (150 mg/m2) (VIC-E) conditioning. RESULTS OF CONVENTIONAL-DOSE VIP-E: 35 of 102 (34%) evaluable patients responded (2 CR's, 33 PR's), 33/102 patients (33%) showed no change (NC); the remainder of patients progressed with therapy (PD). Objective response rate was 68% (4% CR, 64% PR) in LS-NSCLC and 23% (1.4% CR, 21.4% PR) in ES-NSCLC. Median duration of survival was 13 months in LS-NSCLC and 5.5 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-year survival was 26% in LS and 2% in ES-NSCLC. RESULTS OF HIGH-DOSE VIC-E: 23 of 24 evaluable patients improved or maintained prior responses (92%), I patient showed NC. Treatment mortality was 4%. Median duration of survival was 17 months in LS-NSCLC and 10 months in ES-NSCLC. Two-year survival was 30% in LS and 8% in ES-NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Response-rates and survival after conventional-dose VIP-E chemotherapy are comparable to other published trials of combination chemotherapy in NSCLC. Toxicity and mortality is acceptable in limited stage, but unacceptably high in extensive stage NSCLC. Although better response-rates were achieved in the high-dose arm, they did not translate into improved survival. Most stage IV NSCLC-patients will neither benefit from VIP-E conventional dose, nor from VIC-E high dose chemotherapy. Whether selected LS-patients with partial or complete responses to VIP-E induction chemotherapy could benefit from dose intensification in an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant setting remains to be determined.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: do we know the questions? A survey of randomized trials from 1966-1993

BACKGROUND

Substantial lack of consensus exists regarding the appropriate management of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of the present study was to investigate why published clinical trials have not resolved this uncertainty, and to examine the potential of current randomized studies to resolve the major controversies regarding the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

A literature search identified papers addressing the therapy of locally advanced NSCLC published in the English language from January 1966 through May 1993. The treatment modalities studied in these trials were recorded. The CD-ROM Physician Data Query database was used to identify ongoing studies in NSCLC. For phase III trials in stage III NSCLC, the treatment modalities, eligibility criteria, outcome measures, and statistical considerations were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 164 reports of phase III trials were identified, representing 11% of the 1516 publications meeting search criteria. A wide range of comparisons have been reported; the number of study arms, the number of different modalities employed as control arms, and the number of modalities employed as investigational arms increased over time. Eighteen active phase III protocols open to patients with stage III NSCLC were identified. In trials which enrolled patients with stage IIIB disease, therapy in control arms employed six different strategies of surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy, alone or in combination, and investigational arms were equally heterogeneous. Variation was also present in the spectrum of disease stages studied, in patient eligibility criteria, and in the clinical outcome measures investigated. The magnitude of improvement in survival sought was varied in its absolute magnitude, in the selection of survival probability for the control arm, and in the time point of its evaluation.

IMPLICATIONS

We demonstrated diversity in research practice reflected in five major types of variation: (i) selection of control arms, (ii) selection of study investigational arms, (iii) choice of eligibility criteria, (iv) outcome measures selected for study, and (v) type and magnitude of benefit sought in the primary outcome measure. This variation has important implications regarding the inability of these studies to address some fundamental management controversies, and the ability to generalize the results of these trials to the general population of NSCLC patients. This diversity reflects a poorly defined process for setting the goals of clinical research. The generation of future trials may be improved by strategies that identify the most important controversies, identify important outcome measures, improve consensus among physicians, and provide the opportunity to incorporate patients' preferences in this clinical situation.

Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer can no longer be regarded as resistant to chemotherapy, and there have recently been considerable improvements in the use of the older agents and advances in the identification of new drugs. Recent meta-analysis has also confirmed the view that chemotherapy can have small but modest survival benefits. Although in the treatment of stage IV disease the criteria of efficacy have concentrated on tumour response rates, more recently it has become obvious that these patients can also benefit in terms of improved symptom control.

RECENT ADVANCES

For patients with locally advanced stage III disease there have been important developments indicating the benefit of combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation. Furthermore, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicates that resection is possible in about half the patients, and on pathological examination of 15%-20% of the resected specimens there is no evidence of residual tumour. These results justify an increase in the use of systemic chemotherapy in this disease.

Effective removal of SCLC cells from human bone marrow. Use of four monoclonal antibodies and immunomagnetic beads

High dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) has shown promise in several types of cancer. There is, however, a risk of transfusing contaminating tumour cells with the bone marrow cells, e.g. in patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). To eliminate SCLC cells from normal human bone marrow, four monoclonal antibodies reactive with SCLC cells were used with immunomagnetic beads in model experiments. With two cycles of immunomagnetic elimination the individual antibodies removed 2.5-4.4 log of H-146 tumour cells from a single cell suspension, as assessed in a highly reproducible soft agar assay. Different combinations of two antibodies were only marginally more effective than the individual MAbs, whereas 5-6 log removal was obtained with a combination of all four antibodies. The method was equally effective when the tumour cells were mixed with bone marrow cells at a ratio of 1:10. The immunomagnetic procedure did not significantly affect the survival of normal progenitor cells, assessed in CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM assays. The results indicate that the procedure safely and effectively can be used to eliminate tumour cells from the bone marrow in conjunction with ABMT in patients with SCLC.

Ifosfamide/mesna. A review of its antineoplastic activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in cancer

Ifosfamide is an oxazaphosphorine alkylating agent with a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity. It is a prodrug metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidase enzymes to isofosforamide mustard, the active alkylating compound. Mesna, a uroprotective thiol agent, is routinely administered concomitantly with ifosfamide, and has almost eliminated ifosfamide-induced haemorrhagic cystitis and has reduced nephron toxicity. Therapeutic studies, mostly noncomparative in nature, have demonstrated the efficacy of ifosfamide/mesna alone, or more commonly as a component of combination regimens, in a variety of cancers. In patients with relapsed or refractory disseminated nonseminomatous testicular cancer, a salvage regimen of ifosfamide/mesna, cisplatin and either etoposide or vinblastine produced complete response in approximately one-quarter of patients. As a component of both induction and salvage chemotherapeutic regimens, ifosfamide/mesna has produced favourable response rates in small cell lung cancer, paediatric solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma, and ovarian cancer. Induction therapy with ifosfamide/mesna-containing chemotherapeutic regimens has been encouraging in non-small cell lung cancer, adult soft-tissue sarcomas, and as neoadjuvant therapy in advanced cervical cancer. As salvage therapy, ifosfamide/mesna-containing combinations have a palliative role in advanced breast cancer and advanced cervical cancer. Ifosfamide/mesna can elicit responses in patients refractory to numerous other antineoplastic drugs, including cyclophosphamide. With administration of concomitant mesna to protect against ifosfamide-induced urotoxicity, the principal dose-limiting toxicity of ifosfamide is myelosuppression; leucopenia is generally more severe than thrombocytopenia. Reversible CNS adverse effects ranging from mild somnolence and confusion to severe encephalopathy and coma can occur in approximately 10 to 20% of patients after intravenous infusion, and the incidence of neurotoxicity may be increased to 50% after oral administration because of differences in the preferential route of metabolism between the 2 routes of administration. Other adverse effects of ifosfamide include nephrotoxicity, alopecia, and nausea/vomiting. In general, intravenously administered mesna is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects; however, gastrointestinal disturbances are common following oral administration. Thus, ifosfamide/mesna is an important and worthwhile addition to the currently available range of chemotherapeutic agents. It has a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity and causes less marked myelosuppression than many other cytotoxic agents. At present, the role of ifosfamide/mesna in refractory germ cell testicular cancer is clearly defined; however, its overall place in the treatment of other forms of cancer awaits delineation in future well-controlled comparative studies.