Serum neuron-specific enolase (S-NSE) in progressive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Serum levels of neuron-specific enolase as a prognostic factor for disease progression in patients with GET/NEN in the pancreas and the small intestine

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentrations as a prognostic factor in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and to determine the relationship between NSE and clinicopathological features. Serum NSE levels were measured in 179 NEN patients before treatment. It was found that NSE levels in patients with a primary pancreatic location were higher compared to patients with a small intestine lesion (P = 0.015). NSE levels were significantly higher in patients with primary pancreatic location with histological grade G2 compared with the group with low-grade G1 (P = 0.047). Patients with initial liver involvement showed significantly higher NSE levels compared to patients with tumour location in the pancreas (P = 0.009). Statistical analysis confirmed that higher NSE levels were associated with disease progression (P = 0.001) in both the overall study group and in patients with tumours in the pancreas and small intestine. During treatment monitoring, an increase in median NSE concentrations was observed in patients with persistent progression with subsequent blood draws, and a decrease in NSE concentrations was observed in patients with disease stabilisation. We showed that NSE concentrations have prognostic value for progression-free survival in addition to primary liver involvement. In conclusion, the most important results of the study include the demonstration of an association between NSE concentrations and clinical status, which confirms its usefulness in patient monitoring and as a potential predictive indicator for progression-free survival in patients with NENs.

Clinical significance of serum neuron-specific enolase in gastric adenocarcinoma

As a biomarker, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has been widely recognized in the diagnosis of benign diseases and malignant tumors. This study aimed to investigate the potential diagnostic value of NSE in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.Serum levels of the NSE were compared between 219 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and 298 healthy individuals, NSE and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Meanwhile, to evaluate the diagnostic capability of NSE, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and area under curve (AUC) was calculated.In the present study, the median serum NSE level of the patient group was 20.770 ng/mL, which was higher than that of the control group 15.625 ng/mL (P < .05). Serum NSE level in patients group compared with healthy control was statistically significant (P < .05). Serum NSE level was associated with pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) staging, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Besides, the AUC of NSE in gastric adenocarcinoma was 0.742, which was higher than those of the other 3 markers (0.573-0.644). Besides, the AUC of the combined 4 markers was higher than any individual marker (0.778).Serum NSE detecting may have good value for diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Besides, the combination of NSE, CEA, CA19-9, and CA242 performed even better than any single marker. Thus, the combined detection of the 4 tumor markers may be more useful for the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Reevaluation of the Usefulness of Systematic Bone Scanning in Initial Staging and follow-up of Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Taking into Account the Serum Levels of Neuron-Specific Enolase

The prescription of bone scans (BS) in the initial staging and follow-up of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a traditional attitude. The availability of the serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) assay and budget limitations led us to evaluate retrospectively, in 57 patients, the consequences of a more selective attitude, namely to perform BS only in those patients with abnormal serum NSE levels. Both BS and NSE assays were performed in 47 patients referred for initial staging of SCLC; NSE levels were normal in 8 but in 2 of these cases (25%) secondary bone localizations with great clinical significance were discovered at BS. During follow-up, 59 BS were performed in conjunction with NSE assays; 45 NSE levels were in the normal range whereas 17 (38%) corresponding BS were suggestive of bone metastases. In conclusion, due to the frequent occurrence of false-negative results in patients with bone metastases, serum NSE levels proved to be useless in the selection for BS of patients suffering from SCLC.

Overexpression of Neuron-Specific Enolase as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Enolase is a cytoplasmic enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 2-phosphoglycerate to phosphoenolpyruvate in the glycolytic pathway. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the overexpression of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) can serve as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To assess its prognostic value in GC, NSE expression was measured by immunohistochemistry in a clinically annotated tissue microarray comprising of 327 human GC specimens. Cytoplasmic NSE expression was scored from 0 to 4, reflecting the percentage of NSE-positive cells.

RESULTS

In terms of histology as per the World Health Organization criteria (P=0.340), there were no differences between the NSE overexpression (NSE-OE) and NSE underexpression (NSE-UE) groups. The NSE-OE group showed a significantly lower rate of advanced GC (P<0.010), lymph node metastasis (P=0.010), advanced stage group (P<0.010), cancer-related death (P<0.010), and cancer recurrence (P<0.010). Additionally, a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the NSE-OE group had longer cumulative survival times than the NSE-UE group (log-rank test, P<0.010). However, there were no significant differences in the serum levels of NSE expression in patients with GC and healthy volunteers (P=0.280).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NSE overexpressing GC tissues showed better prognostic results, implying that NSE could be a candidate biomarker of GC.

Use of quantum dot beads-labeled monoclonal antibody to improve the sensitivity of a quantitative and simultaneous immunochromatographic assay for neuron specific enolase and carcinoembryonic antigen

Detection of multiplex tumor markers was of great importance for cancer diagnosis. Immunochromatographic test strip (ICTS) was the most frequently-used point-of-care detection means. Herein, a convenient and fast method for simultaneous quantitative detection of neuron specific enolase (NSE) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was developed based on ICTS using quantum dot beads (QBs) as marking material. Good monodispersity, high colloidal stability and carboxyl-modified (COOH-) QBs were used. For this method, two test lines were applied to the NC membrane for simultaneous analysis of CEA and NSE respectively. The ideal limit of CEA and NSE detection was 0.0378ng/mL and 0.0426ng/mL with scarcely any cross-reactivity. Moreover, the fluorescent signal intensity of the nitrocellulose membrane could be easily read out in the cooperation of the "Handing" system without professional operators. The possible clinical utilization of this platform was demonstrated by detecting 100 clinic human serums. The result showed that the platform had sensitivity of 99% and 97% for CEA and NSE, while the specificity was 97% and 100% respectively. Our results indicated that the QBs based ICTS not only owning the ability of sensitive and specific simultaneous detection of CEA and NSE, but also showing the potential in developing this ICTS into a routine part of early lung cancer diagnosis.

Serum markers in small cell lung cancer: opportunities for improvement

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death from malignancy worldwide. In particular small cell lung cancers, which comprise about 15-20% of all lung cancers, are extremely aggressive and cure rates are extremely low. Therefore, new treatment modalities are needed and detection at an early stage of disease, as well as adequate monitoring of treatment response is essential in order to improve outcome. In this respect, the use of non-invasive tools for screening and monitoring has gained increasing interest and the clinical applicability of reliable, tumor-related substances that can be detected as tumor markers in easily accessible body fluids is subject of intense investigation. Some of these indicators, such as high LDH levels in serum as a reflection of the disease, have been in use for a long time as a general tumor marker. To allow for improved monitoring of the efficacy of new therapeutic modalities and for accurate subtyping, there is a strong need for specific and sensitive markers that are more directly related to the biology and behavior of small cell lung cancer. In this review the current status of these potential markers, like CEA, NSE, ProGRP, CK-BB, SCC, CgA, NCAM and several cytokeratins will be critically analyzed with respect to their performance in blood based assays. Based on known cleavage sites for cytoplasmic and extracellular proteases, a prediction of stable fragments can be obtained and used for optimal test design. Furthermore, insight into the synthesis of specific splice variants and neo-epitopes resulting from protein modification and cleavage, offers further opportunities for improvement of tumor assays. Finally, we discuss the possibility that detection of SCLC related autoantibodies in paraneoplastic disease can be used as a very early indicator of SCLC.

Characteristics and clinical validity of two immunoassays for ProGRP

Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) is a promising serum tumor marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We have tested assay specificity and performed a correlation study between a recently developed time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (TR-IFMA) for proGRP and the established Advanced Life Science Institute (ALSI) ELISA method. Between-method correlation and comparison of clinical performance were studied in 481 individuals, among them, 178 lung cancers, 84 benign diseases of the lung, and 219 healthy controls. Follow-up time >6 years was observed for 89 patients with SCLC. The two assays had quite different epitope specificities where the TR-IFMA recognized a considerable smaller proGRP fragment than the ALSI ELISA. However, the correlation between the two methods for elevated proGRP values (>85 ng/l) was good (ρ = 0.948). Both assays displayed good discrimination between benign lung diseases and SCLC. The cut-off values for positive classification of SCLC versus non-small cell lung cancers and benign lung diseases at >95% specificity were 85 ng/l for the TR-IFMA and 42 ng/l for the ALSI ELISA. Both proGRP assays showed good clinical validity. However, due to differences in the recommended cut-off values, switching methods is not recommended. There was a significant difference in survival of patients with TR-IFMA proGRP values over the cut-off (85 ng/l) compared with patients with values under the cut-off, p = 0.0002. In contrast, the ALSI ELISA assay failed to provide statistically significant prognostic information, p = 0.066.

Production and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies for Immunoassay of the Lung Cancer Marker proGRP

Progastrin-releasing peptide (proGRP) is a precursor of gastrin-releasing peptide, a hormone which is secreted from neuroendocrine cells. It has been shown to be a useful serum marker for small cell lung cancer. We raised monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against proGRP with the primary aim of establishing a sensitive immunoassay. Immunization was performed with recombinant proGRP (amino acids 31-98) conjugated to thyroglobulin or with a DNP-modified peptide. Seven of the MAbs recognizing both recombinant and cell line-derived peptide were characterized and epitope-mapped. Based on cross-inhibition studies the antibodies could be categorized into three main groups. The molecular epitope assignment was studied by using phages displaying proGRP peptides, random peptide libraries displayed on phage and by pepscan analysis utilizing 10-mer biotinylated peptides. Two of the MAbs (E146, E172) bound to a defined region on the N-terminal part of proGRP(31-98), three recognized conformational-dependent epitopes in the middle of the peptide (E179, E180, E181) and two bound to the C-terminal part (E149, E168). Consensus sequences were obtained for MAbs E146, E149 and E168. The binding kinetics of the MAbs was determined by surface plasmon resonance, and a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay was established.

Neuron-specific enolase and lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels in lung cancer have been investigated widely; however, their diagnostic values have not yet been clarified. The authors investigated the diagnostic validity of NSE in BALF and serum in lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective case-control study, NSE levels in BALF (B-NSE) and serum (S-NSE) of 3 groups of subjects were analyzed: control subjects (group 1, n = 15), patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; group 2, n = 15), and lung cancer (group 3, n = 35).

RESULTS

The differences in S-NSE and B-NSE levels between the groups were not significant (P > 0.05). S-NSE and B-NSE levels did not show any difference between smokers and nonsmokers, small cell lung cancer and nonsmall cell lung cancer patients, and stage I-II and stage III-IV patients in group 3 (P > 0.05). B-NSE or B-NSE/urea did not show any significance in comparison with S-NSE in the diagnosis and/or staging of malignancy (P > 0.05). S-NSE and B-NSE were well correlated with each other (r = 0.84, P = 0.000). The sensitivity of the S-NSE was 60% and the specificity was 40%.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that, although elevation of B-NSE is a well-known parameter in small cell lung cancer, it can also be elevated considerably in nonsmall cell lung cancer and COPD. Because of the significant correlation between S-NSE and B-NSE, it may be sufficient to measure S-NSE activity because it is easier and less invasive. However, NSE has no role in the exact diagnosis of lung cancer; it can only be investigated in a scientific setting.

Tumor M2-pyruvate kinase in the follow-up of inoperable lung cancer patients: a pilot study

Tumor markers were used for disease monitoring in lung cancer patients. The goal of this pilot study was to determine the diagnostic efficiency of a new tumor metabolic marker, Tumor M2-pyruvate kinase (Tumor M2-PK) for the detection of tumor growth in inoperable lung cancer patients.Fifty-seven consecutive and primary inoperable lung cancer patients were included in this prospective study. Changes in plasma levels of Tumor M2-PK were compared to the clinical course of the disease. Clinical monitoring was evaluated according to the standard criteria of the WHO. Of the 57 patients, 19 were in remission, 18 showed signs of stable disease and there were 20 tumor progressions under therapy. In the further follow-up after treatment, tumor relapse occurred in 30 patients. Tumor M2-PK was measured in plasma before and after treatment as well as at time of relapse. During tumor remission Tumor M2-PK levels decreased significantly under treatment (P=0.0004). As might be expected, pre- and post-treatment marker concentrations did not differ significantly in patients with stable disease. In progressive lung cancer patients a significant increase in Tumor M2-PK was detectable (P=0.0094). Overall, a decrease of Tumor M2-PK was seen in 17 (89%) of all responders, while an increase could be detected in 16 (80%) of the patients experiencing tumor progression. After treatment tumor relapse occurred in 30 patients. Tumor M2-PK increased significantly (P=0.0201) at time of relapse in 17 patients with non-small cell lung cancers and exceeded the cut-off in 11 of the 17 (65%). In conclusion, Tumor M2-PK proved useful as a diagnostic aid for therapy control in lung cancer patients. This marker can also be used to detect tumor relapse after treatment. Tumor M2-PK could be well suited to complete the present diagnostic panel for monitoring of inoperable lung cancer patients.

Normal serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) value after the first cycle of chemotherapy: an early predictor of complete response and survival in patients with small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) is the most sensitive tumor marker of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) at diagnosis. Its prognostic value is still debated. Thus, the authors decided to assess the predictive value, in terms of complete response and survival, of serum NSE measured before and after one cycle of chemotherapy in patients with SCLC.

METHODS

Sera from 135 patients with histologically proven limited (n = 63) or metastatic (n = 72) SCLC were obtained. Clinical and biologic parameters with a known or suspected prognostic relevance were reviewed. Serum NSE was measured before chemotherapy (D1-NSE) and 28 days after its initiation (D28-NSE). The prognostic value of the parameters under study was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The level of serum NSE was raised in 120 patients (88%) prior to therapy. The probability of a normal D28-NSE value was not affected by the baseline D1-NSE value. Disease extension (P = 0.0005), performance status (P = 0.0001), D28-NSE (P = 0.003), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (P = 0.008) were found to be predictive for survival, whereas age, gender, plasma sodium, serum protides, and D1-NSE were not. Median survival and 2-year overall survival were 15.3 months and 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13-31%) when D28-NSE was normal and 8.1 months and 15% (95% CI, 8-27%) when it was not (P < 0.03). Only performance status (P = 0.001), disease extension (P = 0.002), and D28-NSE (P = 0.02) were found to be independent prognostic parameters for survival in the multivariate analysis. A simple prognostic index was developed using these 3 variables. Limited disease, a normal D28-NSE value, and a normal CEA value prior to therapy were the only parameters predictive for complete response in the univariate analysis, and D28-NSE (P = 0.01) and disease extension (P = 0.0001) were found to be independent variables in multivariate analysis. A complete response to therapy occurred in 62% with a normal D28-NSE value and in only 34% in the opposite case.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal serum D28-NSE is a strong, independent early predictor of both complete response to therapy and survival. This simple tool may be proposed for use in the clinic and in research, in association with an assessment of disease extension and performance status, to predict the outcome of patients with SCLC.