Prolonged disease control by nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation for metastatic breast cancer

Treating breast cancer with cell-based approaches: an overview

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Despite there being considerable progress in the treatment of this disease, metastatic dissemination is still considered an incurable condition at the present time, causing 500,000 deaths worldwide every year. Although most of the research efforts have been focused on pharmacological approaches, over the last three decades, the use of bone marrow and peripheral blood-derived cell therapy approaches have been attempted and developed. Areas covered: This review will briefly address cell therapy for breast cancer, including autologous stem cell transplantations for overcoming the myelosuppressive effects of high-dose chemotherapy, allogeneic stem cell transplants and adoptive immunotherapy using bone-marrow derived T-cells. Expert opinion: The treatment of breast cancer using bone marrow or peripheral-blood derived cells has evolved from a supportive care approach to allow dose escalation of conventional chemotherapy to a therapeutic strategy aimed at eliciting immune cell mediated anticancer immunity. This latter principle has led to the development of adoptive immunotherapies, either with 'natural' or genetically engineered effectors, which are being intensively investigated for their great potential against several solid tumors, including breast cancer.

[The anti-tumor immune response in breast cancer: Update and therapeutic perspectives]

The role of the immune response in breast cancer is now well recognized and increasingly taken in account. The goal of this article is, in the first part, to underline its prognostic impact and to precise the immunosurvelliance, immunoselection and the immunosubversion concepts involved in the control and evasion of breast carcinoma. In the second part, therapeutic strategies for the restauration of anti-tumor immunity are developed. Vaccination strategies and checkpoints inhibitors blockade strategies are discussed as well as the immunogenic death linked to the conventional treatments of breast cancer.

Fludarabine downregulates indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in tumors via a proteasome-mediated degradation mechanism

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is found in multiple malignancies and exerts immunosuppressive effects that are central in protecting tumors from host T lymphocyte rejection. IDO is an enzyme involved in the catabolism of tryptophan resulting in inhibition of T lymphocyte function. While inhibition of IDO enzymatic activity results in tumor rejection, it is still unknown how we can directly target IDO expression within tumors using drugs. We have chosen to interfere with IDO expression by targeting the key-signaling event signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1). We evaluated the efficacy of fludarabine, previously described to inhibit STAT1 phosphorylation. Interestingly, fludarabine was efficient in suppressing protein expression and consequently IDO activity in two different cell lines derived from breast cancer and melanoma when IDO was activated with interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) or supernatants prepared from activated T lymphocytes. However, fludarabine had no inhibitory effect on STAT1 phosphorylation. Other IFN-γ-responsive genes were only marginally inhibited by fludarabine. The level of IDO transcript was unaffected by this inhibitor, suggesting the involvement of post-transcriptional control. Strikingly, we have found that the inhibition of proteasome partially protected IDO from fludarabine-induced degradation, indicating that fludarabine induces IDO degradation through a proteasome-dependent pathway. Currently used in the clinic to treat some malignancies, fludarabine has the potential for use in the treatment of human tumors through induction of IDO degradation and consequently, for the promotion of T cell-mediated anti-tumor response.

Allogeneic transplantation as anticancer immunotherapy

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) utilizes HLA-matched donor bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell grafts to reconstitute haematopoiesis and immunity in patients with bone marrow failure or hematological malignancies. It is now clear that much of the anti-cancer effect of AlloSCT is due to the ability of engrafting donor derived lymphocyte populations to eradicate residual malignant clones, through a phenomenon known as the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. Recognition of the importance of GVT in the long-term control of cancer has allowed substantial reductions in the pre-transplant conditioning intensity, leading to the development of reduced-intensity or even non-myeloablative transplant regimens in some patient groups. These reduced intensity regimens still allow donor cell engraftment and GVT, whilst reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with traditional myeloablative conditioning. Through clinical observations and experimental models of AlloSCT substantial insights have been provided into the mechanisms of immunological control of malignancy even outside the setting of AlloSCT, providing an opportunity to duplicate these anti-cancer mechanisms via non-allogeneic immunotherapies.

Immunotherapy of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy of breast cancer has been shown to prevent recurrence, improve survival and eliminate breast cancer in humans.

AREAS COVERED

The reason for this review is to present the current information and the prospects for the future of immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans to include tumor antigens for vaccines and targets for monoclonal antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapy, and immune modulatory agents, such as adjuvants to stimulate the immune response and inhibitors of checkpoint blockade to prevent downmodulation of activated lymphocytes, to enhance these modalities. The research discussed and the literature search undertaken is of the clinical immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans, from 2000 to September, 2011.

EXPERT OPINION

The key message of the paper is that one reason for the failure of the immune system to control macroscopic disease is that the immune escape mechanisms involving both tumor and the tumor stroma prevent the immune system from destroying the tumor. Changing the tumor microenvironment is necessary to eliminate macroscopic tumors. Prospects for improvement are proposals for combining current modalities of therapy with type 1 cellular immunity-inducing agents, all targeting multiple tumor antigens and in the context of minimal disease.

Phase I trial of adoptive cell transfer with mixed-profile type-I/type-II allogeneic T cells for metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) response to allogeneic lymphocytes requires donor T-cell engraftment and is limited by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In mice, type-II-polarized T cells promote engraftment and modulate GVHD, whereas type-I-polarized T cells mediate more potent graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects. This phase I translational study evaluated adoptive transfer of ex vivo costimulated type-I/type-II (T1/T2) donor T cells with T-cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) for MBC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients had received anthracycline, taxane, and antibody therapies, and been treated for metastatic disease and a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical-sibling donor. Donor lymphocytes were costimulated ex vivo with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibody-coated magnetic beads in interleukin (IL)-2/IL-4-supplemented media. Patients received reduced intensity conditioning, donor stem cells and T1/T2 cells, and monitoring for toxicity, engraftment, GVHD, and tumor response; results were compared with historical controls, identically treated except for T1/T2 product infusions.

RESULTS

Mixed type-I/type-II CD4(+) T cells predominated in T1/T2 products. Nine patients received T1/T2 cells at dose level 1 (5 × 10(6) cells/kg). T-cell donor chimerism reached 100% by a median of 28 days. Seven (78%) developed acute GVHD. At day +28, five patients had partial responses (56%) and none had MBC progression; thereafter, two patients had continued responses. Donor T-cell engraftment and tumor responses appeared faster than in historical controls, but GVHD rates were similar and responders progressed early, often following treatment of acute GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic T1/T2 cells were safely infused with TCD-AlloSCT, appeared to promote donor engraftment, and may have contributed to transient early tumor responses.

Cancer immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy consists of approaches that modify the host immune system, and/or the utilization of components of the immune system, as cancer treatment. During the past 25 years, 17 immunologic products have received regulatory approval based on anticancer activity as single agents and/or in combination with chemotherapy. These include the nonspecific immune stimulants BCG and levamisole; the cytokines interferon-α and interleukin-2; the monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ofatumumab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab; the radiolabeled antibodies Y-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I-131 tositumomab; the immunotoxins denileukin diftitox and gemtuzumab ozogamicin; nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplants with donor lymphocyte infusions; and the anti-prostate cancer cell-based therapy sipuleucel-T. All but two of these products are still regularly used to treat various B- and T-cell malignancies, and numerous solid tumors, including breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma, kidney, glioblastoma, bladder, and head and neck. Positive randomized trials have recently been reported for idiotype vaccines in lymphoma and a peptide vaccine in melanoma. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody ipilumumab, which blocks regulatory T-cells, is expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future, based on a randomized trial in melanoma. As the fourth modality of cancer treatment, biotherapy/immunotherapy is an increasingly important component of the anticancer armamentarium.