Pharmacokinetic targeting of i.v. BU with fludarabine as conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplant: the effect of first-dose area under the concentration time curve on transplant-related outcomes

Utilization of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Improve a Busulfan Test-Dose Strategy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

Busulfan is an alkylating agent used as part of conditioning chemotherapy regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided test-dose strategies have been shown to improve the number of patients achieving busulfan exposure goals and improve clinical outcomes. However, current practices require extensive PK sampling. In this study, PK data were retrospectively collected from busulfan drug monitoring records from adult allo-HCT recipients who received once-daily intravenous busulfan at the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC). A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to identify sources of interindividual variability and evaluate alternative PK sampling strategies. A 2-compartment model, with covariate effects of actual body weight and sex, best described the data. The typical value of clearance for an 83 kg male was estimated to be 11.21 L/h. Fifty-nine percent of allo-HCT recipients were estimated to have met the UNCMC institutional myeloablative conditioning (MAC) exposure goal based on model post hoc estimates of clearance using all PK samples obtained following MAC dosing. Fifty-seven percent of patients were estimated to have met this goal based on post hoc estimates using a single PK sample. Our results indicate once-daily, intravenous busulfan PK in adult allo-HCT recipients receiving MAC dosing can be reasonably described by a popPK model, and the use of a sparse PK sampling strategy may be feasible for determining target exposure attainment following MAC dosing. Use of a popPK model and sparse PK sampling strategy to carry out busulfan test-dose procedures could reduce health care costs and inconvenience to patients.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Busulfan and Its Metabolite Sulfolane in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

For patients with myelofibrosis, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment to date. Busulfan-based conditioning regimens are commonly used, although high inter-individual variability (IIV) in busulfan drug exposure makes individual dose selection challenging. Since data regarding the IIV in patients with myelofibrosis are sparse, this study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of busulfan and its metabolite sulfolane in patients with myelofibrosis. The influence of patient-specific covariates on the pharmacokinetics of drug and metabolite was assessed using non-linear mixed effects modeling in NONMEM^®. We obtained 523 plasma concentrations of busulfan and its metabolite sulfolane from 37 patients with myelofibrosis. The final model showed a population clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V_d) of 0.217 L/h/kg and 0.82 L/kg for busulfan and 0.021 L/h/kg and 0.65 L/kg for its metabolite. Total body weight (TBW) and a single-nucleotide polymorphism of glutathione-S-transferase A1 (GSTA1 SNP) displayed a significant impact on volume of distribution and metabolite clearance, respectively. This is the first PopPK-model developed to describe busulfan’s pharmacokinetics in patients with myelofibrosis. Incorporating its metabolite sulfolane into the model not only allowed the characterization of the covariate relationship between GSTA1 and the clearance of the metabolite but also improved the understanding of busulfan’s metabolic pathway.

Evaluation of the Robustness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Coupled with Bayesian Forecasting of Busulfan with Regard to Inaccurate Documentation

Background

Inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion times is a potential source of error in personalizing busulfan doses using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Planned times rather than the actual times for sampling and infusion time are often documented.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the robustness of a limited sampling TDM of busulfan with regard to inaccurate documentation.

Methods

A pharmacometric analysis was conducted in NONMEM® 7.4.3 and “R” by performing stochastic simulation and estimation with four, two and one sample(s) per patient on the basis of a one-compartment- (1CMT) and two-compartment (2CMT) population pharmacokinetic model. The dosing regimens consisted of i.v. busulfan (0.8 mg/kg) every 6 h (Q6H) or 3.2 mg/kg every 24 h (Q24H) with a 2 h- and 3 h infusion time, respectively. The relative prediction error (rPE) and relative root-mean-square error (rRmse) were calculated in order to determine the accuracy and precision of the individual AUC estimation.

Results

A noticeable impact on the estimated AUC based on a 1CMT-model was only observed if uncertain documentation reached ± 30 min (1.60% for Q24H and 2.19% for Q6H). Calculated rPEs and rRmse for Q6H indicate a slightly lower level of accuracy and precision when compared to Q24H. Spread of rPE’s and rRmse for the 2CMT-model were wider and higher compared to estimations based on a 1CMT-model.

Conclusions

The estimated AUC was not affected substantially by inaccurate documentation of sampling and infusion time. The calculated rPEs and rRmses of estimated AUC indicate robustness and reliability for TDM of busulfan, even in presence of erroneous records.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11095-021-03115-8.

Salvage Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Using Targeted Busulfan for Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Dialysis-Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

A treatment strategy is needed for hemodialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal disease who have relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We examined the feasibility of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and busulfan as a conditioning regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We provided a patient with refractory DLBCL who was receiving hemodialysis with modified salvage chemotherapies that were based on the mechanism of drug pharmacokinetics and an evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of busulfan. After chemotherapy, the patient underwent ASCT.

RESULTS

The regimen was successfully administered without adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy followed by ASCT using a conditioning regimen of reduced melphalan and pharmacokinetically targeted busulfan is a promising strategy for treating patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who also have end-stage renal disease and are receiving hemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetics-adapted Busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning before unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancies in children

Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is an alternative to provide transplants in children with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who lack a related donor. Intravenous Busulfan (Bu) combined with therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing has been increasingly used, with more predictable bioavailability and better outcomes comparing to oral Bu. There is still an important variation in Bu pharmacokinetic between patients that is associated with an increased risk of toxicity and graft failure. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of first-dose pharmacokinetic adapted myeloablative conditioning regimen of intravenous Bu on the different outcomes after transplantation. Data of 36 children who underwent allogeneic HSCT with Bu plus a second alkylating agent at Sainte Justine Hospital in Montreal, Canada, between December 2000 and April 2012 were analyzed. For children with high risk myeloid malignancies receiving an UCBT, first dose Bu pharmacokinetic seems to be a significant prognostic factor, influencing neutrophil (100% vs 67.9%) and platelet recovery (95.5% vs 70.5%), non-relapse mortality (0% vs 18.6%), EFS (64% vs 28.6%) and OS (81.3% vs 37.5%) for a first-dose steady-state concentration (Css) <600ng/mL vs >600ng/mL, respectively. These data reinforce the importance of Busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing in pediatric HSCT patients, particularly in the context of UCBT.

The Impact of Toxicities on First-Year Outcomes after Ex Vivo CD34+-Selected Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies

Factors that impact first-year morbidity and mortality in adults undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with ex vivo CD34⁺ selection have not been previously reported. We assessed all toxicities ≥ grade 3 from the start of conditioning to date of death, relapse, or last contact in 200 patients during the first year after transplantation, identifying 1885 individual toxicities among 17 organ-based toxicity groups. The most prevalent toxicities in the first year were of infectious, metabolic, hematologic, oral/gastrointestinal, hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary etiologies. Renal complications were minimal. Grades II to IV and III and IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 11.5% and 3%, respectively. In separate multivariate models, cardiovascular, hematologic, hepatic, neurologic, pulmonary, and renal toxicities negatively impacted nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival during the first year. A higher-than-targeted busulfan level, patient cytomegalovirus seropositivity, and an Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index of ≥3 were associated with increased risk of NRM and all-cause death. Ex vivo CD34⁺ selection had a favorable 1-year OS of 75% and NRM of 17% and a low incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. These data establish a benchmark to focus efforts in reducing toxicity burden while improving patient outcomes.

Use of an Oral Busulfan Test Dose in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Treated With or Without Fludarabine

This study investigated the importance of an oral test dose for busulfan (BU) dose adjustment before a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and the effect of fludarabine (FLU) on the oral BU pharmacokinetics evaluated after the fifth treatment dose (first BU dose on day 2 of treatment). Twenty-eight patients treated with oral BU (1 mg/kg every 6 hours for 4 days) were divided into 2 groups according to the concomitant administration of FLU (n = 15; 30 mg/m² for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (CY) (n = 13; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). On the day prior to the beginning of the conditioning regimen, blood samples were collected (0-6 hours) after administration of an oral BU test dose of 0.25 mg/kg. Busulfan was quantified in plasma samples by LC-MS/MS, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software. Blood samples were collected between the fifth and sixth treatment dose to confirm the mean plasma steady-state concentration (C_ss ) of BU. The AUC_0-6 and apparent clearance of BU did not differ (P < .05) between the groups receiving FLU and CY. In 81% of the patients who received BU doses adjusted based on the test dose (n = 21), the C_ss was within the target range of 600-900 ng/mL. No association was observed between BU AUC_0-6 and clinical outcome in the study group (n = 28). The results suggest that in concomitant administration of FLU and BU during conditioning regimens for HSCT, changes in BU dose should be considered only after the administration of the fifth BU dose.

Fludarabine-Busulfan Reduced-Intensity Conditioning in Comparison with Fludarabine-Melphalan Is Associated with Increased Relapse Risk In Spite of Pharmacokinetic Dosing

Fludarabine with busulfan (FB) and fludarabine with melphalan (FM) are commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. Pharmacokinetic dosing of busulfan (Bu) is frequently done for myeloablative conditioning, but evidence for its use is limited in RIC transplants. We compared transplant outcomes of FB versus FM using i.v. Bu targeted to the area under the curve (AUC). A total of 134 RIC transplants (47 FB and 87 FM) for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome were identified, and median follow-up of the cohort was 40 months (range, 0 to 63.3). A significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was associated with FB versus FM at 35.6% versus 17.3%, respectively (P = .0058). Furthermore, 2-year progression-free survival rates were higher for FM versus FB at 60.5% versus 48.7%, respectively (P = .04). However, 2-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were similar. The need for dose adjustment based on AUC did not alter relapse risk or NRM. Patients with Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90 who received FM had a 2-year OS rate of 74.8% versus 48.3% for FB (P = .03). FB use remained prognostic for relapse in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 5.89; P = .0097). In summary, in spite of AUC-directed dosing, FB compared with FM was associated with a significantly higher CIR.

Busulfan dosing algorithm and sampling strategy in stem cell transplantation patients

AIM

The aim of this investigation was to develop a model-based dosing algorithm for busulfan and identify an optimal sampling scheme for use in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Clinical data from an ongoing study (n = 29) in stem cell transplantation patients were used for the purposes our analysis. A one compartment model was selected as basis for sampling optimization and subsequent evaluation of a suitable dosing algorithm. Internal and external model validation procedures were performed prior to the optimization steps using ED-optimality criteria. Using systemic exposure as parameter of interest, dosing algorithms were considered for individual patients with the scope of minimizing the deviation from target range as determined by AUC(0,6 h).

RESULTS

Busulfan exposure after oral administration was best predicted after the inclusion of adjusted ideal body weight and alanine transferase as covariates on clearance. Population parameter estimates were 3.98 h(-1), 48.8 l and 12.3 l h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, volume of distribution and oral clearance, respectively. Inter-occasion variability was used to describe the differences between test dose and treatment. Based on simulation scenarios, a dosing algorithm was identified, which ensures target exposure values are attained after a test dose. Moreover, our findings show that a sparse sampling scheme with five samples per patient is sufficient to characterize the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in individual patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of the proposed dosing algorithm in conjunction with a sparse sampling scheme may contribute to considerable improvement in the safety and efficacy profile of patients undergoing treatment for stem cell transplantation.

Once-daily i.v. BU-based conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic SCT: a study of influence of GST gene polymorphisms on BU pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients

I.v. BU has been proven to have better bioavailability, reliable systemic drug exposure with more predictable blood levels and lower toxicity than oral BU when used as part of conditioning regimens before hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Some studies have shown that once-daily i.v. BU had the same clinical efficacy as i.v. BU administered four times daily. To observe the clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of once-daily i.v. BU and to evaluate the influence of glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene polymorphisms on once-daily i.v. BU PK in adult Chinese patients with allogeneic HSCT, we analyzed 25 patients receiving related or unrelated donor transplant conditioned with i.v. BU-based regimens. With a median follow-up of 32.7 months, the 2-year OS and EFS were 64 and 63.8% for all the patients, respectively, and the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse for all patients was 18.3%. On the basis of HPLC analysis, the mean clearance and mean daily area under the curve (AUC) of i.v. BU were calculated as 4.02 mL/min per kg and 3380.77 μM/min, respectively. The estimated Cmax was 1.031±0.0325 μg/mL. The estimated t1/2 and Vd values were 3.618±0.1932 h and 1.212±0.0352 L/kg. The once-daily i.v. BU-based conditioning regimen was very well tolerated with minor toxicity in patients, most likely because of dose assurance with predictable PK. There was no GSTA1 *B/*B homozygous patient in our Chinese patients. A significant association between BU metabolism and GSTA1 polymorphism was observed. The GSTA1 *A/*B genotype group showed a significantly higher AUC (P<0.0001), higher Cmax (P=0.0003) and lower clearance (P=0.0007) than the GSTA1 *A/*A genotype group. AUC was lower in GSTP1 *A/*A genotypes compared with*A/*G (P=0.0283) and *G/*G genotypes (P=0.0111). The BU clearance in GSTP1 *A/*A genotype was shown to be higher than *A/*G (P=0.0255) and *G/*G genotypes (P=0.0111). In addition, the differences of PK in BU among different ethnic groups existed because of the different distribution frequencies of GST gene polymorphism in Chinese patients and Caucasian patients.

Myeloablative intravenous pharmacokinetically targeted busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Mortality associated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has limited its broader application in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Pharmacokinetic treatment with targeted intravenous busulfan combined with fludarabine (BuFlu) was developed as a preparative regimen for acute leukemia and myelodysplasia. Data from this regimen in lymphoid malignancies are limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed outcomes in 60 consecutive patients with various subtypes of NHL and a median age of 54 years (range, 27-68 years) who received allo-HCT with targeted intravenous BuFlu between December 2004 and August 2010. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1-8) and median time from diagnosis to HCT was 32 months (range, 4.5-177.5 months).

RESULTS

At conditioning, 28 (47%) patients had a complete response (CR). Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus plus methotrexate in 65% of cases. Donors were matched/related (n = 32 [53%]), matched/unrelated (n = 21 [35%]), or mismatched/unrelated (n = 7 [12%]). All patients underwent grafting. The cumulative incidence of grade II/IV acute GVHD was 74% (grade III/IV was 20%). The 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 62%. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 3 years was 10% and 25%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 27%. Three-year progression-free and overall survival for all patients was 47.8% and 55%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Targeted intravenous BuFlu is a relatively well tolerated regimen and offers an alternative option when myeloablation is deemed necessary in patients with NHL.

The histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA sensitizes acute myeloid leukemia cells to a combination of nucleoside analogs and the DNA-alkylating agent busulfan

Fludarabine (Flu), clofarabine (Clo) and busulfan (Bu) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). We reported that combining [Flu + Clo + Bu] had a synergistic cytotoxicity in AML cells. We hypothesized that combining [Flu + Clo + Bu] with the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA will further enhance cytotoxicity. We exposed the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines KBM3/Bu250(6) and OCI-AML3 to Flu, Clo, Bu and SAHA alone and in various combinations. [Flu + Clo + Bu + SAHA] resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity, which can be attributed to (1) activated DNA-damage response and cell cycle checkpoint activation through the ATM-CHK2-P53 (or P73) pathway or ATM-CHK2-cdc25-cdc2 pathway, (2) histone modifications and (3) activated apoptosis pathway. The [Flu + Clo + Bu + SAHA] combination causes mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, leakage of cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo into the cytosol with caspase activation, and release of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) into the nucleus resulting in nuclear fragmentation and cell death. These results provide a mechanistic basis for using SAHA in future clinical trials with double nucleoside analog-busulfan combinations in pretransplant conditioning therapy.

Pharmacokinetically-targeted BU and fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with ALL in first remission

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation offers improved survival in patients with ALL, but with regimens containing TBI, the nonrelapse mortality is 20-40%. Efforts to lessen transplant toxicities by reducing conditioning regimen intensity have led to increased relapse risk. Therefore, there is a need for less toxic regimens that maintain an anti-leukemia effect. We report here a retrospective review of 65 patients with ALL in first remission receiving grafts from allogeneic donors after fludarabine 40 mg/m(2)/day for 4 days and i.v. BU targeted to a median daily area under the concentration-time curve below 6000 μmoles min/L. At 2 years after transplantation, OS was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI): 52-77%), relapse-free survival was 61% (95% CI: 48-73%), cumulative incidence of relapse was 26% (95% CI: 17-39%) and cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 14% (95% CI: 8-26%). Age over 35 years, Ph chromosome positivity and minimal residual disease at transplant did not adversely affect outcomes. Pharmacokinetically targeted BU and fludarabine can provide intensive pre-transplant conditioning for adults with ALL in first remission, with promising relapse-free and OS rates.