Evidence for a GVL effect following reduced-intensity allo-SCT in ALL: a British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation study

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Analysis for HLA Loss Patients Following Partially Mismatched Related Donor Transplantation Using HLA Chimerism for Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing

Genomic loss of mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA loss) is one of the most vital immune escape mechanisms of leukemic cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the methods currently used for HLA loss analysis have some shortcomings. Limited literature has been published, especially in lymphoid malignancies. This study aims to evaluate the incidences, risk factors of HLA loss, and clinical outcomes of HLA loss patients. In all, 160 patients undergoing partially mismatched related donor (MMRD) transplantation from 18 centers in China were selected for HLA loss analysis with the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method, which was validated by HLA-KMR. Variables of the prognostic risk factors for HLA loss or HLA loss–related relapse were identified with the logistic regression or the Fine and Gray regression model. An HLA loss detection system, HLA-CLN [HLA chimerism for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis by NGS], was successfully developed. Forty (25.0%) patients with HLA loss were reported, including 27 with myeloid and 13 with lymphoid malignancies. Surprisingly, 6 of those 40 patients did not relapse. The 2-year cumulative incidences of HLA loss (22.7% vs 22.0%, P = 0.731) and HLA loss–related relapse (18.4% vs 20.0%, P = 0.616) were similar between patients with myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. The number of HLA mismatches (5/10 vs <5/10) was significantly associated with HLA loss in the whole cohort [odds ratio (OR): 3.15, P = 0.021] and patients with myeloid malignancies (OR: 3.94, P = 0.021). A higher refined-disease risk index (OR: 6.91, P = 0.033) and donor–recipient ABO incompatibility (OR: 4.58, P = 0.057) contributed to HLA loss in lymphoid malignancies. To sum up, HLA-CLN could overcome the limitations of HLA-KMR and achieve a better HLA coverage for more patients. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in patients with HLA loss between myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. In addition, the results suggested that a patient with HLA loss might not always relapse.

A risk score system for stratifying the risk of relapse in B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients after allogenic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

For patients with B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), many variables have been demonstrated to be associated with leukemia relapse. In this study, we attempted to establish a risk score system to predict transplant outcomes more precisely in patients with B-ALL after allo-SCT.

METHODS

A total of 477 patients with B-ALL who underwent allo-SCT at Peking University People's Hospital from December 2010 to December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with transplant outcomes after allo-SCT, and establish a risk score to identify patients with different probabilities of relapse. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, and 95.4% of patients achieved platelet engraftment. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and non-relapse mortality were 20.7%, 70.4%, 65.6%, and 13.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with positive post-transplantation minimal residual disease (MRD), transplanted beyond the first complete remission (≥CR2), and without chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) had higher CIR (P  < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P  < 0.001, respectively) and worse LFS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.017, and P  < 0.001, respectively), and OS (P  < 0.001, P = 0.009, and P  < 0.001, respectively) than patients without MRD after transplantation, transplanted in CR1, and with cGVHD. A risk score for predicting relapse was formulated with the three above variables. The 5-year relapse rates were 6.3%, 16.6%, 55.9%, and 81.8% for patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 (P  < 0.001), respectively, while the 5-year LFS and OS values decreased with increasing risk score.

CONCLUSION

This new risk score system might stratify patients with different risks of relapse, which could guide treatment.

The treatment of adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with ALL represent a unique population in terms of their biology and treatment. Studies have demonstrated an improved outcome when these patients are treated with pediatric-inspired regimens. Novel antibody based therapies have demonstrated impressive results in relapsed/refractory B-ALL and are starting to be evaluated in the upfront setting. Immunotherapy with CAR T cells had great success in ALL and clinical trials are ongoing and further studies are being done to expand access to this therapy and decrease toxicities. Although our outcomes with this disease have improved significantly, transplant still plays a role for high risk patients in CR1 (based on MRD status) and for patients with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the present state

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) has an important role in management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Proper patient selection is central to ensure optimal outcomes. Areas covered: This review covers various aspects of HSCT in ALL patients, including indications, donor selection, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant management. Expert commentary: Allo-HSCT is important in post-remission management of ALL but proper risk-stratification is a major challenge. Incorporation of minimal residual disease (MRD) and molecular testing will improve patient allocation. Patients receiving pediatric-inspired induction who achieve molecular remission might not need allo-HSCT in first remission. Allo-HSCT should be considered in patients who don't achieve MDR negativity, didn't receive intensive induction, or have high risk cytogenetic and molecular features. Despite improved responses with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Philadelphia positive (Ph+) ALL, allo-HSCT remains standard. Matched sibling donors are the optimal graft source, but other sources are valid alternatives. There is no single optimal conditioning regimen and retrospective studies found myeloablative and reduced intensity regimens to be comparable. Following allo-HSCT, there is no role for maintenance therapy in Philadelphia-negative ALL. In Ph+ ALL, maintenance TKIs improve outcomes. The integration of targeted and immunotherapies in the peri-transplant period holds potential for improved outcomes.

Refining the Role of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia as Novel Therapies Emerge

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare adult neoplasm. The disorder consists of precursor B or T phenotypes. In the pediatric population, ALL was a success story in that 80% of children with ALL enjoy long-term survival. In adults, similar complete remission rates are achieved with current induction regimens; however, less than 50% of patients are alive at 5 years, with most deaths due to relapsed disease. Accordingly, optimizing post remission consolidation therapy might improve in outcomes. Such strategies may include chemotherapy and autologous or allogeneic transplant. Moreover, the ability to modify such therapy based on better disease risk stratification while taking into account patient characteristics such as performance status and presence of comorbidities is necessary to tailor treatment accordingly. Here, we review available medical literature on the use of hematopoietic cell transplantation as a consolidation modality in the treatment of adult ALL.

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly or infirm patients with advanced myeloid malignancies

We report a retrospective single-center analysis of 112 consecutive patients that underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine (FLU) and busulfan (BU) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myeloproliferative syndrome (MPS) from 2005 to 2014. Three-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46 and 58 %, respectively. Patients ≥60 years of age showed a similar outcome compared to younger patients (3-year OS 55 vs. 61 %, p = 0.96; 3-year EFS 46 vs. 46 %, p = 0.82). Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years adjusted for relapse as competing risk was 25 % for patients aged <60 years and 15 % for older patients (p = 0.15). Infusions of higher CD34(+) blood stem cell doses were associated with a significantly better outcome in the elderly subgroup (3-year OS 82 vs. 39 %, p = 0.007). Moreover, complete donor chimerism at day +100 was associated with a significantly improved survival (3-year OS 69 vs. 23 %, p = 0.003). In conclusion, our data suggest that RIC with FLU/BU enables long-term disease-free survival even in an elderly patient population. Age has no negative impact on the outcome of allogeneic HCT, and decision for transplant should be based on disease risk and performance status rather than age alone.

Ph+ ALL patients in first complete remission have similar survival after reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic transplantation: impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitor and minimal residual disease

The efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We analyzed 197 adults with Ph+ ALL in first complete remission; 67 patients receiving RIC were matched with 130 receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for age, donor type and HCT year. Over 75% received pre-HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mostly imatinib; 39% (RIC) and 49% (MAC) were minimal residual disease (MRD)(neg) pre-HCT. At a median 4.5 years follow-up, 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in RIC (13%) than MAC (36%; P=0.001) while the 3-year relapse rate was 49% in RIC and 28% in MAC (P=0.058). Overall survival (OS) was similar (RIC 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27-52) vs 35% (95% CI 27-44); P=0.62). Patients MRD(pos) pre-HCT had higher risk of relapse with RIC vs MAC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.97; P=0.026). However, patients receiving pre-HCT TKI in combination with MRD negativity pre-RIC HCT had superior OS (55%) compared with a similar MRD population after MAC (33%; P=0.0042). In multivariate analysis, RIC lowered TRM (HR 0.6; P=0.057), but absence of pre-HCT TKI (HR 1.88; P=0.018), RIC (HR 1.891; P=0.054) and pre-HCT MRD(pos) (HR 1.6; P=0.070) increased relapse risk. RIC is a valid alternative strategy for Ph+ ALL patients ineligible for MAC and MRD(neg) status is preferred pre-HCT.