A multicenter trial of myeloablative clofarabine and busulfan conditioning for relapsed or primary induction failure AML not in remission at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Pretransplantation predictors of survival in nonremission acute myeloid leukemia treated with haploidentical transplantation using steroid-based GVHD prophylaxis

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using glucocorticoids for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (GC-haplo) may become a curative treatment option for nonremission acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This retrospective study aimed to identify pre-HCT predictors of survival in a cohort of 97 nonremission AML treated with GC-haplo in Hyogo Medical University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Relapse and primary induction failure included in 70 (72%) and 27 (28%) patients, respectively. Sixty-one patients (63%) had undergone previous HCT. Multivariate analysis revealed that ≤ 6 months' duration between first complete remission (CR1) and first relapse (Rel1) (CR1-Rel1 interval) (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.89, P = 0.016) and serum albumin before starting the conditioning treatment of ≤ 3.5 g/dL (hazard ratio 1.80, 95%CI 1.09-2.96, P = 0.022) as risk factors for overall survival. Among three groups categorized according to serum albumin and CR1-Rel1 interval, the best 3-year overall survival was observed in patients with albumin > 3.5 g/dL and CR1-Rel1 interval > 6 months or primary induction failure (50.2%, 95%CI 28.9%-68.3%, P < 0.001), revealing that survival could be predicted using albumin and past CR duration in patients with very high-risk AML not in remission before GC-haplo.

Clofarabine Preconditioning followed by Allogeneic Transplant Using TBI and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed Refractory Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia patients with induction failure or relapsed refractory disease have minimal chance of achieving remission with subsequent treatments. Several trials have shown the feasibility of clofarabine-based conditioning in allogeneic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) for non-remission AML patients. Pre-transplant conditioning with clofarabine followed by reduced-intensity allo-HSCT has also demonstrated a potential benefit in those patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors, but it is not commonly used in haploidentical and mismatched transplants. In this case report, we describe our experience of seven cases of non-remission AML who received clofarabine preconditioning followed by an allo-HSCT with PTCy. The 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival was 83.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3-97.9%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 33.4-97.9%). Median days of neutrophil and platelet recovery were 16 (range of 13-23) and 28 (range of 17-75), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100 and chronic GVHD at 1-year showed 28.6% (95% CI: 8-74.2%) and 28.6% (95% CI: 3-63.9%), respectively. The two-year relapse rate was 14.3% (95% CI: 2.14-66.6%). One-year GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GFRS) at 1-year was 71.4% (95% CI: 25.8-92%). Our patients showed successful outcomes with clofarabine preconditioning to reduce the leukemic burden at the pre-transplant period followed by PTCy to reduce GVHD resulting in lower relapsed rate and better GFRS in these patients.

Clofarabine and Busulfan Myeloablative Conditioning in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Active Myeloid Malignancies

Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory myeloid malignancies have a poor prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in patients with active, chemotherapy-refractory myeloid disease is historically associated with high rates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). A MAC regimen combining clofarabine with busulfan (Clo/Bu4) has been reported to exhibit antileukemic activity with acceptable toxicity in patients age ≤70 years. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of a real-world population of patients with active myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic HCT with Clo/Bu4 MAC. In a single-center retrospective descriptive analysis, we identified patients who underwent HCT for myeloid malignancies not in remission using Clo/Bu4 MAC between 2012 and 2020. We report event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), cumulative incidences of relapse and NRM, and the incidence and severity of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We identified 69 patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 22 to 70 years). Most patients had relapsed/refractory or primary refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML; n = 55) or refractory myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 12); 1 patient had chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 1 patient had a blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Fifty patients (72.5%) had complete remission at day 100 post-transplantation. Two-year EFS and OS were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 44%) and 40% (95% CI, 29% to 54%), respectively. Patients with AML had a 2-year EFS and OS of 28% (95% CI, 18% to 44%) and 38% (95% CI, 27% to 54%), respectively; those with MDS had a 2-year EFS and OS of 47% (95% CI, 25% to 88%) and 56% (95% CI, 33% to 94%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 39% (95% CI, 27% to 51%) for all patients, including 45% (95% CI, 31% to 58%) in the patients with AML and 18% (95% CI, 2% to 45%) in those with MDS. NRM at 2 years was 31% (95% CI, 20% to 42%), including 27% (95% CI, 15% to 39%) in patients with AML and 35% (95% CI, 10% to 63%) in those with MDS. The total incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) of any severity was 80%, and the incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 22%. In patients who achieved remission, those who required systemic immunosuppression for aGVHD (58%) had poorer 2-year EFS (29% versus 54%; P = .05) and 2-year OS (39% versus 70%; P = .04) compared to those who did not. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 44% (95% CI, 28% to 58%). Clo/Bu4 MAC followed by allogeneic HCT for patients with active myeloid malignancies is an effective transplantation strategy for patients up to age 70, particularly those with advanced MDS. The high incidence of and poor outcomes associated with aGVHD highlight the importance of optimizing preventative strategies.

Re-induction therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in complete remission after the first course of treatment

A standard salvage regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not in complete remission (CR) after initial induction therapy does not exist. We retrospectively investigated re-induction therapy for 151 patients with AML who did not achieve CR after the initial course between January 2014 and March 2021. The re-induction regimen did not correlate with the CR rate after the second course, whereas patients had similar 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) based on different re-induction regimens. Multivariable analysis revealed that International European Leukaemia Net (ELN) risk stratification independently predicted both OS and EFS among patients not in CR after the first course, although the re-induction regimen did not predict prognosis. Urgent salvage alloHSCT may improve the prognosis of patients with refractory AML. In summary, our study showed that the re-induction regimen did not significantly predict the prognosis of patients with AML not in CR after the first course of treatment. The development and selection of an efficient treatment algorithm for the treatment of AML remains a pressing research challenge.

Type 1 interferon to prevent leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation

Augmenting early GVL response by prophylactic type 1 IFN may reduce the rates of leukemic relapse after HCT in very high–risk AML.

Reciprocal toxicities, including acute GVHD and nonrelapse mortality, were not increased after type 1 IFN treatment.

A potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response is crucial in preventing relapse, the major impediment to successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In preclinical studies, type 1 interferon (IFN-α) enhanced cross-presentation of leukemia-specific antigens by CD8α dendritic cells (DCs) and amplified GVL. This observation was translated into a proof-of-concept phase 1/2 clinical trial with long-acting IFN-α (pegylated IFN-α [pegIFNα]) in patients undergoing HCT for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with treatment-resistant AML not in remission or those with poor-risk leukemia were administered 4 dosages of pegIFNα every 14 days beginning at day −1 before HCT. Dose selection was established by adaptive design that continuously assessed the probability of dose-limiting toxicities throughout the trial. Efficacy was evaluated by determining the 6-month incidence of relapse at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-six patients (median age, 60 years) received pegIFNα treatment. Grade 3 or greater severe adverse events occurred in 25% of patients, establishing 180 μg as the MTD. In phase 2, the incidence of relapse was 39% at 6 months, which was sustained through 1-year post-HCT. The incidence of transplant-related mortality was 13%, and severe grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 11%. Paired blood samples from donors and recipients after HCT revealed elevated levels of type 1 IFN with cellular response, the persistence of cross-presenting DCs, and circulating leukemia antigen-specific T cells. These data suggest that prophylactic administration of pegIFNα is feasible in the peri-HCT period. In high-risk AML, increased toxicity was not observed with preliminary evidence for reduction in leukemia relapse after HCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02328755.

The changing landscape for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has been an unequal challenge for many decades. Although significant progress has been made in the discovery of the mechanisms underlying the molecular pathogenesis of the disease, more than 50% of AML patients still die, mostly from relapsed disease. Currently, the only potential curative option for patients with R/R AML remains allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in second complete remission, which is far being easy to achieve, mainly for patients with primary induction failure or older than 65 years. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in the management of patients with R/R AML, with particular emphasis to new therapeutic options that are replacing conventional salvage chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of new agents selectively targeting molecular abnormalities offer more effective and less toxic alternative to chemotherapy, potentially useful as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in second complete remission.

SUMMARY

The recent approval of new drugs for R/R is transforming the paradigm of care we have relied on for the past 50 years. Ongoing clinical trials will tell us how bright is the future for R/R AML patients.

Propensity-score Matched Comparison of Salvage Chemotherapy Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis, and there is no single standard of care first-line salvage regimen. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a common salvage regimen with a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile in poor-risk AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of first relapse/primary refractory patients with AML that received salvage chemotherapy from January 2009 to July 2019. We propensity-score matched patients 1:1 (based on age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, Charlson comorbidity index, de novo vs. secondary AML, and whether or not they received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first complete remission) into 2 groups, FLAG (Group 1) or non-FLAG (Group 2) as first-line salvage regimen, with 66 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete response and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery).

RESULTS

The median patient age was 59 years (range, 19-80 years). Patients treated with FLAG had a higher overall response rate (complete response/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery) (71.2% vs. 50.0%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-5.08; P = .013), longer event-free survival (8.9 vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .005), and longer overall survival (14.2 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; P = .019). Patients who received FLAG had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (22 vs. 34 days; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This analysis supports the FLAG regimen as an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Phase I/II multisite trial of optimally dosed clofarabine and low-dose TBI for hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

Clofarabine is an immunosuppressive purine nucleoside analog that may have better anti-leukemic activity than fludarabine. We performed a prospective phase I/II multisite trial of clofarabine with 2 Gy total body irradiation as non-myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia who were unfit for more intense regimens. Our main objective was to improve the 6-month relapse rate following non-myeloablative conditioning, while maintaining historic rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and engraftment. Forty-four patients, 53 to 74 (median: 69) years, were treated with clofarabine at 150 to 250 mg/m² , of whom 36 were treated at the maximum protocol-specified dose. One patient developed multifactorial acute kidney injury and another developed multiorgan failure, but no other grade 3 to 5 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. All patients fully engrafted. The 6-month relapse rate was 16% (95% CI, 5%-27%) among all patients and 14% (95% CI, 3%-26%) among high-risk patients treated at the maximum dose, meeting the pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint. Overall survival was 55% (95% CI, 40%-70%) and leukemia-free survival was 52% (95% CI, 37%-67%) at 2 years. Compared to a historical high-risk cohort treated with the combination of fludarabine at 90 mg/m² and 2 Gy TBI, protocol patients treated with the clofarabine-TBI regimen had lower rates of overall mortality (HR of 0.50, 95% CI, 0.28-0.91), disease progression or death (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.27-0.85), and morphologic relapse (HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.13-0.69), and comparable NRM (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.36-2.00). The combination of clofarabine with TBI warrants further investigation in patients with high-risk AML.

Management of primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in the era of targeted therapies

Primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or primary induction failure, represents a continued challenge in clinical management. This review presents an overview of primary refractory disease and a discussion of risk factors for induction failure, including current evidence regarding the impact of karyotype and molecular mutation status on responsiveness to chemotherapy. We review the evidence for various treatment options for refractory AML including salvage chemotherapy regimens, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, targeted agents, and non-intensive therapies such as hypomethylating agents. A therapeutic approach to this patient population is presented, and several new and emerging therapies are reviewed.

The safety and efficacy of clofarabine in combination with high-dose cytarabine and total body irradiation myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with poor-risk acute leukemia

Acute leukemias in children with CR3, refractory relapse, or induction failure (IF) have a poor prognosis. Clofarabine has single agent activity in relapsed leukemia and synergy with cytarabine. We sought to determine the safety and overall survival in a Phase I/II trial of conditioning with clofarabine (doses 40 - 52 mg/m²), cytarabine 1000 mg/m², and 1200 cGy TBI followed by alloSCT in children, adolescents, and young adults with poor-risk leukemia. Thirty-seven patients; Age 12 years (1-22 years); ALL/AML: 34:3 (18 IF, 10 CR3, 13 refractory relapse); 15 related, 22 unrelated donors. Probabilities of neutrophil, platelet engraftment, acute GvHD, and chronic GvHD were 94%, 84%, 49%, and 30%, respectively. Probability of day 100 TRM was 8.1%. 2-year EFS (event free survival) and OS (overall survival) were 38.6% (CI₉₅: 23-54%), and 41.3% (CI₉₅: 25-57%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated overt disease at time of transplant (relative risk (RR) 3.65, CI₉₅: 1.35-9.89, P = 0.011) and umbilical cord blood source (RR 2.17, CI₉₅: 1.33-4.15, P = 0.019) to be predictors of worse EFS/OS. This novel myeloablative conditioning regimen followed by alloSCT is safe and well tolerated in CAYA with very poor-risk ALL or AML. Further investigation in CAYA with better risk ALL and AML undergoing alloSCT is warranted.

Clofarabine followed by haploidentical stem cell transplant using fludarabine, busulfan, and total-body irradiation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in non-remission AML

Approximately 30-40% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience induction failures. In these patients who do not achieve remission with two cycles of standard induction therapies, the probability of achieving remission with subsequent inductions is very limited. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative option for these patients, but high relapse rate and transplant-related mortality often preclude them to proceed to transplant. Thus, AML not in remission at time of HSCT remains a huge unmet need in current HSCT practice, particularly if the patient does not have an HLA-matched donor identified by the time of two induction failures. We used clofarabine cytoreduction immediately followed by fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (Bu) × 3 with total-body irradiation (TBI) conditioning (Flu/Bu3/TBI) for haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant with post-transplant cyclophosphamide for two cases of refractory AML with a very high tumor burden at transplant and achieved complete remission by day + 30 in both cases.

HLA haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation using clofarabine and busulfan for refractory pediatric hematological malignancy

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning with clofarabine and target area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC)-based busulfan adjustment was performed in three patients with refractory pediatric leukemia. The target AUC for two patients who had already received multiple transplantations was 3600 and 4000 μmol min/L, and that for the patient with Down's syndrome was 3000 μmol min/L. Regimen-related toxicity was well tolerated in all cases. All three maintained cytological remission throughout the follow-up period (between 31 and 167 weeks). Thus, haploidentical HCT conditioning with clofarabine and target AUC-based busulfan adjustment may be a preferable option for children with recurrent or refractory pediatric leukemia.