Kinetics and dynamics of enalapril in patients with liver cirrhosis

Simultaneously Predicting the Pharmacokinetics of CES1-Metabolized Drugs and Their Metabolites Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model in Cirrhosis Subjects

Hepatic carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) metabolizes numerous prodrugs into active ingredients or direct-acting drugs into inactive metabolites. We aimed to develop a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their active metabolites in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Six prodrugs (enalapril, benazepril, cilazapril, temocapril, perindopril and oseltamivir) and three direct-acting drugs (flumazenil, pethidine and remimazolam) were selected. Parameters such as organ blood flows, plasma-binding protein concentrations, functional liver volume, hepatic enzymatic activity, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and gastrointestinal transit rate were integrated into the simulation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs and their active metabolites were simulated for 1000 virtual individuals. The developed semi-PBPK model, after validation in healthy individuals, was extrapolated to LC patients. Most of the observations fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations from 1000 virtual patients. The estimated AUC and Cmax were within 0.5-2-fold of the observed values. The sensitivity analysis showed that the decreased plasma exposure of active metabolites due to the decreased CES1 was partly attenuated by the decreased GFR. Conclusion: The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their metabolites in healthy individuals and LC patients, facilitating tailored dosing of CES1 substrates in LC patients.

Drug Safety in Geriatric Patients: Current Status and Proposed Way Forward

Elderly patients are the main users of drugs and they differ from younger patients. They are a heterogeneous population that cannot be defined only by age but should rather be stratified based on their frailty. The elderly have distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, are frequently polymorbid, and are therefore treated with multiple drugs. They may experience adverse reactions that are difficult to recognize, since some of them present non-specific symptoms easily mistaken for geriatric conditions. Paradoxically, the elderly are underrepresented in clinical trials, especially the frail individuals whose pharmacological response and expected treatment outcome can be different from those of non-frail patients. This means that the benefit-risk balance of drugs used in frail elderly patients is frequently unknown. We present some proposals to overcome the barriers preventing the enrollment of frail elderly patients in clinical trials, and strategies for monitoring their therapy to minimize the risk of adverse reactions. Automated alerts for drug and drug-disease interactions could help appropriate prescribing but should flag only clinically relevant interactions. Pharmaceutical forms should be designed to allow easy dose adjustment and, together with packaging and labeling, should account for the physical and cognitive limitations of frail elderly patients. Aggregate pharmacovigilance reports should summarize the safety profile in the elderly, but rather than presenting the results by age they should focus on patients' frailty, perhaps using the number of comorbidities as a proxy when information on frailty is not available.

Review article: prescribing medications in patients with cirrhosis - a practical guide

BACKGROUND

Most drugs have not been well studied in cirrhosis; recommendations on safe use are based largely on experience and/or expert opinion, with dosing recommendations often based on pharmacokinetic (PK) changes.

AIM

To provide a practical approach to prescribing medications for cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

An indexed MEDLINE search was conducted using keywords cirrhosis, drug-induced liver injury, pharmacodynamics (PDs), PKs, drug disposition and adverse drug reactions. Unpublished information from the Food and Drug Administration and industry was also reviewed.

RESULTS

Most medications have not been adequately studied in cirrhosis, and specific prescribing information is often lacking. Lower doses are generally recommended based on PK changes, but data are limited in terms of correlating PD effects with the degree of liver impairment. Very few drugs have been documented to have their hepatotoxicity potential enhanced by cirrhosis; most of these involve antituberculosis or antiretroviral agents used for HIV or viral hepatitis. Paracetamol can be used safely when prescribed in relatively small doses (2-3 g or less/day) for short durations, and is recommended as first-line treatment of pain. In contrast, NSAIDs should be used cautiously (or not at all) in advanced cirrhosis. Proton pump inhibitors have been linked to an increased risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhosis and should be used with care.

CONCLUSIONS

Most drugs can be used safely in cirrhosis, including those that are potentially hepatotoxic, but lower doses or reduced dosing frequency is often recommended, due to altered PKs. Drugs that can precipitate renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, SBP and encephalopathy should be identified and avoided.

Impact of Disease States on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) in elderly patients and patients with renal and hepatic impairment were examined, and a role for an AUC/EC50 ratio to guide dosing was evaluated. A Medline and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts search was used to identify human studies and abstracts. Relevant data were evaluated and summarized. Dosing regimens were compared using an AUC/EC50 ratio. Most studies evaluating ACE inhibitors in renal impairment report a strong linear correlation between creatine clearance and drug elimination. AUC and EC50 values for these drugs in elderly subjects appear similar to younger and hypertensive patients. There is increased AUC in some patients with hepatic impairment. Pharmacodynamic data are conflicting. Prolonged ACE inhibition is evident in renal impairment but not necessarily other disease states. ACE inhibitor dosing for hypertension is reasonable based on pharmacokinetics and EC50 values. Further individualization of therapy may improve outcomes, and using the threshold AUC/EC50 ratio may help guide appropriate dosing.

Antihypertensive and organ-protective effects of benazepril

Benazepril is a nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitor with favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, well-established antihypertensive effects and a good tolerability profile. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that patients treated with benazepril alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine may achieve beneficial renal outcomes that extend beyond blood pressure control. Furthermore, the recent Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality with benazepril when administered as a cotreatment. An additional novel therapeutic area for benazepril is atrial fibrillation. Differences between combination therapies have implications for which patients may be best suited to particular interventions, and further studies are required to fully ascertain this potential.

Drug-Induced Liver Disease and Drug Use Considerations in Liver Disease

Chronic liver disease encompasses a large number of hepatic disorders. One of the most important etiologies of liver disease is drug-induced liver disease, which is the leading cause of liver failure in patients referred for liver transplantation in the United States. Drug-induced liver disease can present in all forms of acute and chronic liver disease with highly variable clinical presentations. There is no effective treatment for most drug-induced liver disease and the recognition and prevention of drug-induced liver disease remain the most important management strategy. Drug dosing in patients with liver disease represents an even more challenging task to clinicians, as there is only scant information on biomarkers that can be used to predict the pharmacokinetic changes of drugs in patients with underlying liver disease. Several factors contribute to alterations in drugs metabolism and clearance in cirrhotic patients, including the severity of the liver disease and the metabolic pathways of each individual drug. Only general guidelines on dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment are available. When drugs with extensive hepatic metabolism are required in patients with preexisting liver disease, benefit of therapeutic effect must be evaluated against the risk of toxicity, and the drugs must be initiated with extreme caution with appropriate dosage reduction.

Cirrhosis does not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel

Clopidogrel, a new platelet ADP receptor antagonist used for the prevention of vascular ischemic events, is converted to an active metabolite via the cytochrome P450 system. Patients with cirrhosis may not metabolize drugs normally and may, in addition, have a number of defects in the coagulation system. To assess the effect of cirrhosis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel, the authors performed an open-label, parallel-group study of 12 patients with Child-Pugh Class A or B cirrhosis and 12 matched controls. All 24 subjects received clopidogrel 75 mg PO QD for 10 days. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel and the major metabolite SR 26334 were analyzed on Days 1 and 10; pharmacodynamics were assessed by the inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation and by bleeding time prolongation factor. Pharmacokinetic analysis of clopidogrel was limited due to low plasma concentrations arising from rapid hydrolysis to SR 26334. The Cmax at SS for clopidogrel was higher in cirrhotics than in normals. However, exposures to the metabolite SR 26334, as measured by AUC(tau), were comparable. At Day 10, there was not a statistically significant difference in mean inhibition of platelet aggregation (49.2% +/- 38.6% in cirrhotics vs. 66.7% +/- 7.5% in normals) or in bleeding time prolongation factor (1.64 +/- 0.49 in cirrhotics vs. 1.54 +/- 0.87 in normals) between groups. No significant adverse events, including bleeding events, were reported. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in this group of subjects with cirrhosis and matched normals. Therefore, no dosage adjustment of clopidogrel is required in patients with Child-Pugh Class A or B cirrhosis.

Paracrine effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme- and angiotensin-II-receptor- inhibition on transcapillary glucose transport in humans

The paracrine renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) is increasingly recognized to play an important role in the regulation of both, regional vascular tone and regional glucose metabolism. To date, however, a selective investigation of paracrine RAS effects in an in vivo clinical setting was beyond technical reach. We here set out to selectively study the metabolic effects of paracrine RAS inhibition at different levels in healthy volunteers (n = 8). For this purpose bradykinin, enalaprilate and losartan were administered locally to the interstitial space fluid in skeletal muscle by means of reverse microdialysis and transcapillary glucose transport was measured simultaneously. During reverse microdialysis with bradykinin and enalaprilate a significant decrease in arterial-interstitial-gradient for glucose (AIG(glu)) was observed (from 1.49 +/- 0.08 mM to 0.12 +/- 0.63 mM (p = 0.018) for bradykinin and from 1.5 +/- 0.07 mM to 0.24 +/- 0.67 mM (p = 0.043) for enalaprilate). In contrast, losartan had no effect on AIG(glu). The changes in transcapillary glucose transport during bradykinin and enalaprilate administration were accompanied by significant increases in interstitial lactate levels which was most pronounced for bradykinin (from 0.14 +/- 0.01 mM to 0.40 +/- 0.07 mM, p = 0.018). We conclude that paracrine angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibition but not angiotensin II (AT-II) receptor blockade decreases AIG(glu) and facilitates transcapillary glucose transport due to an increase in interstitial bradykinin concentration. These results support the concept that blood pressure control with ACE-inhibitors but not with AT-II-receptor-antagonists has beneficial long term metabolic consequences in hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic subjects.

Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics. An update

Liver disease can modify the kinetics of drugs biotransformed by the liver. This review updates recent developments in this field, with particular emphasis on cytochrome P450 (CYP). CYP is a rapidly expanding area in clinical pharmacology. The information currently available on specific isoforms involved in drug metabolism has increased tremendously over the latest years, but knowledge remains incomplete. Studies on the effects of liver disease on specific isoenzymes of CYP have shown that some isoforms are more susceptible than others to liver disease. A detailed knowledge of the particular isoenzyme involved in the metabolism of a drug and the impact of liver disease on that enzyme can provide a rational basis for dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment. The capacity of the liver to metabolise drugs depends on hepatic blood flow and liver enzyme activity, both of which can be affected by liver disease. In addition, liver failure can influence the binding of a drug to plasma proteins. These changes can occur alone or in combination; when they coexist their effect on drug kinetics is synergistic, not simply additive. The kinetics of drugs with a low hepatic extraction are sensitive to hepatic failure rather than to liver blood flow changes, but drugs having a significant first-pass effect are sensitive to alterations in hepatic blood flow. The drugs examined in this review are: cardiovascular agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, calcium antagonists, ketanserin, antiarrhythmics and hypolipidaemics), diuretics (torasemide), psychoactive and anticonvulsant agents (benzodiazepines, flumazenil, antidepressants and tiagabine), antiemetics (metoclopramide and serotonin antagonists), antiulcers (acid pump inhibitors), anti-infectives and antiretroviral agents (grepafloxacin, ornidazole, pefloxacin, stavudine and zidovudine), immunosuppressants (cyclosporin and tacrolimus), naltrexone, tolcapone and toremifene. According to the available data, the kinetics of many drugs are altered by liver disease to an extent that requires dosage adjustment; the problem is to quantify the required changes. Obviously, this requires the evaluation of the degree of hepatic impairment. At present there is no satisfactory test that gives a quantitative measure of liver function and its impairment. A critical evaluation of these methods is provided. Guidelines providing a rational basis for dosage adjustment are illustrated. Finally, it is important to consider that liver disease not only affects pharmacokinetics but also pharmacodynamics. This review also examines drugs with altered pharmacodynamics.

Feline cholangiohepatitis complex

Feline cholangiohepatitis complex causes a diffuse intrahepatic cholestasis of unknown etiology. Recognized histologic forms include acute suppurative cholangitis/cholangiohepatitis, long-term nonsuppurative cholangitis/cholangiohepatitis, and biliary cirrhosis. Treatment of cholangiohepatitis complex varies based on histologic type. Thus a liver biopsy is necessary for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Because cholangiohepatitis complex causes diffuse hepatic change, percutaneous needle biopsies are often sufficient for obtaining a diagnosis. Antibiotics are used to treat all forms of feline cholangiohepatitis complex, but steroids may be of equal or greater importance for use in the treatment of long-term nonsuppurative cholangiohepatitis. Prognosis is guarded for cats with any form of cholangiohepatitis complex due to the variable response to treatment seen in many cats. Spontaneous remission occasionally occurs.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of fosinopril and fosinoprilat in patients with hepatic impairment

The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor fosinopril and its active diacid, fosinoprilat, were evaluated in 6 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Fosinopril was administered at a dosage of 10 mg once daily for 14 days. Results in the two groups were similar, with no evidence of accumulation of fosinoprilat in hepatically impaired patients. Mean (+/- SD) maximum observed plasma concentrations of fosinoprilat in the healthy subjects were 112.0 +/- 67.2 ng/mL after the first dose and 144.1 +/- 61.7 ng/mL at steady-state. Corresponding values for the hepatically impaired patients were 111.4 +/- 40.1 ng/mL and 140.2 +/- 50.9 ng/mL. The area under the serum concentration versus time curve for healthy volunteers was 790.7 +/- 431.0 ng.hr/mL after the first dose and 940.3 +/- 400.4 ng.hr/mL at steady-state. Similar values were noted in hepatically impaired patients: 926.0 +/- 293.9 ng.hr/mL and 1,255.4 +/- 434.0 ng.hr/mL for first dose and steady-state, respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected in fosinoprilat pharmacokinetic values between healthy and hepatically impaired subjects. Absence of accumulation can be attributed to the dual route of elimination of fosinoprilat reported in previous studies. Renal excretion of fosinoprilat in hepatically impaired patients prevents increased accumulation. The present findings suggest that the starting dose of fosinopril used in hypertensive patients with normal renal and hepatic function can also be used in patients with hepatic impairment secondary to cirrhosis.

Renal and hormonal responses to repeated treatment with enalapril in non-azotemic cirrhosis with ascites

Since a single dose of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril was shown to cause natriuresis in cirrhosis in a previous study, we investigated whether repeated doses of this substance would sustain a favorable renal effect in cirrhosis. Ten milligrams of enalapril maleate were administered once a day for 8 days to ten patients with non-azotemic cirrhosis and ascites. Enalapril reduced blood pressure significantly at 4 to 12 h (systolic blood pressure) and 2, 6, and 8 h (diastolic blood pressure) on day 2, compared to pretreatment (day 0) values, but this depressor effect decreased on day 8. No change in heart rate could be detected. Enalapril significantly suppressed serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and plasma aldosterone concentration (p < 0.001 to 0.01), which were elevated prior to treatment, with pretreatment values of 25.8 +/- 1.8 IU/l for serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and 241 +/- 67 pg/ml for plasma aldosterone concentration. This drug caused a 12 to 24% increase (p < 0.05 to 0.01) in mean daily urinary volume and a 40 to 54% increase (p < 0.001 to 0.01) in mean daily urinary sodium excretion from the respective pretreatment baselines during the 8-day period. Creatinine clearance was improved (p < 0.05) by the treatment, with mean improvement values from 24 to 34% above the pretreatment value of 47.4 +/- 4.3 ml/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of pefloxacin in patients with hepatocellular deficiency

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of pefloxacin were evaluated in 25 patients with hepatocellular insufficiency. The severity of liver disease was graded A, B or C according to the Child-Pugh classification. Pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated in patients on day 1 of treatment were compared with those computed in 11 healthy volunteers (the control group) after a single dose. Blood samples were taken at frequent intervals after drug administration and assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. The mean age of patients with liver impairment was slightly greater (59.5 years, range 33 to 81 years) than that of the control group (46.7 years, range 42 to 51 years). In the patients with liver disease, the mean (+/- SD) half-life of elimination, although highly variable, was significantly longer (46.3 +/- 42.5 hours) than in the control group (11.3 +/- 3.5 hours, p < 0.001). The total clearance was significantly decreased (1.76 +/- 1.31 L/h vs 6.03 +/- 2.99 L/h in the control group). In groups B and C of the Child-Pugh classification, total body clearance was about 30% of normal values. Elimination half-life increased by 200% in group B and 373% in group C compared with values in healthy volunteers. Intergroup differences (group B vs group C of the Child-Pugh classification) were not statistically significant. The minimum concentrations inhibiting 90% of Gram-negative strains (MIC90) were exceeded by plasma pefloxacin concentrations throughout treatment. For most patients, trough plasma concentrations were above 2 mg/L and peak plasma concentrations averaged 8.5 mg/L. Large inter- and intraindividual variations in the elimination half-life, total clearance and volume of distribution were observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of a single oral dose of the novel ACE inhibitor spirapril in patients with chronic liver disease

The pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of orally administered spirapril, a novel angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, have been investigated in patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 10), in patients with chronic, non-cirrhotic liver disease (n = 8) and in a control group of healthy subjects (n = 16). The absorption and elimination of spirapril did not differ between patients with liver disease and control subjects. In contrast, the bioavailability of spiraprilat, the metabolite responsible for the pharmacological action of spirapril, was significantly reduced in patients (AUC 820 micrograms.h.l-1, 923 micrograms.h.l-1 and 1300 micrograms.h.l-1 in patients with cirrhosis, patients with non-cirrhotic liver disease and in healthy subjects, respectively. Compared to healthy subjects, cirrhotic patients had a reduced rate constant of spiraprilat formation (1.10 h-1 in patients vs. 2.00 h-1 in control subjects) while the elimination half-life of spiraprilat was not different. The effect of spirapril on diastolic blood pressure was decreased in patients with chronic liver disease as compared to the controls. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of spirapril was unchanged in patients with different types of liver disease, including cirrhosis. However, the bioavailability of spiraprilat and hypotensive effect of spirapril were reduced in patients.

Enalapril clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. An overview

The conventional pharmacokinetic profile of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril, is a lipid-soluble and relatively inactive prodrug with good oral absorption (60 to 70%), a rapid peak plasma concentration (1 hour) and rapid clearance (undetectable by 4 hours) by de-esterification in the liver to a primary active diacid metabolite, enalaprilat. Peak plasma enalaprilat concentrations occur 2 to 4 hours after oral enalapril administration. Elimination thereafter is biphasic, with an initial phase which reflects renal filtration (elimination half-life 2 to 6 hours) and a subsequent prolonged phase (elimination half-life 36 hours), the latter representing equilibration of drug from tissue distribution sites. The prolonged phase does not contribute to drug accumulation on repeated administration but is thought to be of pharmacological significance in mediating drug effects. Renal impairment [particularly creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min (< 1.2 L/h)] results in significant accumulation of enalaprilat and necessitates dosage reduction. Accumulation is probably the cause of reduced elimination in healthy elderly individuals and in patients with concomitant diabetes, hypertension and heart failure. Conventional pharmacokinetic approaches have recently been extended by more detailed descriptions of the nonlinear binding of enalaprilat to ACE in plasma and tissue sites. As a result of these new approaches, there have been significant improvements in the characterisation of concentration-time profiles for single-dose administration and the translation to steady-state. Such improvements have further importance for the accurate integration of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to enalapril(at) in a concentration-effect model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of temocapril, an ACE inhibitor with preferential biliary excretion, in patients with impaired liver function

Six subjects with normal liver function (Group 1) and 7 patients with liver dysfunction (Group 2; mean ICGR15 value 30.5 (5.2)%; range 16 to 56) received a single oral dose of 1 mg temocapril, a prodrug-type ACE inhibitor, with preferentially excreted by the biliary route. The plasma temocapril concentrations in Group 2 at 30 min and 1 h postdose were significantly higher than in Group 1, but the difference had disappeared 2 h postdosing. Although the half life of temocapril diacid in Group 2 was significantly longer than in Group 1, there was no significant difference between the two groups in AUC, Cmax or tmax. In Group 2, urinary recovery of temocapril was significantly increased, suggesting a possible delay in the bioactivation of temocapril into the diacid, but recovery of the diacid itself was not abnormal. ACE inhibitory action in Group 2 remained unchanged. Temocapril is regarded as an ACE inhibitor the disposition and efficacy of which are little affected in patients with impaired liver function.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibition in cirrhosis. Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of the ACE-inhibitor cilazapril (Ro 31-2848)

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor, cilazapril, is converted to its active metabolite, cilazaprilat, by ester hydrolysis in the liver. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 1 mg oral dose of cilazapril were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers and in 9 cirrhotic patients with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension. A significantly increased mean plasma peak concentration (40.0 +/- 13.6 ng/ml vs. 25.5 +/- 7.9 ng/ml; p < 0.05) and a decreased apparent oral clearance (7.8 +/- 6.0 l/h vs. 16.4 +/- 5.4 l/h; p < 0.05) of cilazapril were found in cirrhotic patients compared to healthy volunteers. The plasma concentration of cilazaprilat declined in 2 phases. In both phases the plasma half-life was significantly longer in patients with cirrhosis (1st phase: 2.5 +/- 0.8 h vs. 1.7 +/- 0.6 h; p < 0.05; 2nd phase: 46.2 +/- 16.6 h vs. 28.8 +/- 4.7 h; p < 0.001). Consequently, cilazaprilat concentrations at 24 h were higher in patients than in volunteers (1.42 +/- 0.33 ng/ml vs. 0.87 +/- 0.14 ng/ml; p < 0.001). The predose activity of the ACE (26.3 +/- 7.3 U/l vs. 16.8 +/- 4.5 U/l; p < 0.005) and plasma renin activity (3.3 +/- 3.2 ng/ml/h vs. 1.4 +/- 1.0 ng/ml/h) were higher in patients than in volunteers. Maximum ACE-inhibition occurred at similar times in patients (2.7 h) and volunteers (2.3 h). Maximum ACE-inhibition was slightly higher in volunteers (94.6%) than in patients (90.6%). At later time points (> 24 h), however, ACE-inhibition was more pronounced in patients (at 72 h: 39.6 +/- 6.9% vs. 23.5 +/- 8.2%; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative pharmacokinetics of captopril, enalapril, and quinapril

This review compares the metabolism and pharmacokinetic profiles of captopril, the first orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and 2 newer ACE inhibitors, enalapril and quinapril. Captopril differs from both enalapril and quinapril in that its chemical structure contains a sulfhydryl group, the presence of which may be important in the development of adverse reactions. Captopril also differs from enalapril and quinapril in its ability to be metabolized in plasma. Enalapril and quinapril are both de-esterified, most likely in the liver, to their active metabolites, enalaprilat and quinaprilat. All 3 ACE inhibitors are eliminated primarily via renal excretion, and renal dysfunction markedly increases the area under the time versus plasma concentration curves. Hepatic dysfunction also slows the conversion of enalapril and quinapril to their active metabolites. There is evidence that both captopril and enalapril, but not quinapril, may accumulate with repeated dosing. The pharmacokinetics of these agents are not significantly modified by co-administration of other drugs. However, captopril does cause marked increases in trough plasma levels of digoxin. Overall, the pharmacokinetic profiles of captopril, enalapril, and quinapril make them suitable for a wide range of patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure.

Comparative properties of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: relations with inhibition of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme and potential clinical implications

This review summarizes the evidence indicating that local synthesis of angiotensin II, and interference with this process by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), may be important in the treatment of hypertension. Inhibition of tissue converting enzyme generally has a stronger correlation with the hemodynamic effects of ACE inhibitors than inhibition of ACE in plasma. Reported differences in the ability of ACE inhibitors to penetrate tissues and to bind to the converting enzyme may be closely related to the relative lipophilicity of these agents. Finally, correlation of data from clinical studies with results provided by laboratory experimentation suggests that the efficacy of different ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients may be predicted from differences among the actions of these drugs in vitro and in whole animals.

The pharmacokinetics of perindopril in patients with liver cirrhosis

Perindopril is a non-sulphydryl angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which requires hydrolysis to its active metabolite, perindoprilat, to produce its effects. Ten cirrhotic patients with mild to severe disease were studied after oral administration of a single 8 mg dose of perindopril as its tert-butylamine salt. Compared with a historical control group of young healthy volunteers receiving the same single oral dose of perindopril, mean AUC values of the prodrug perindopril were double in patients with liver cirrhosis (602 +/- 294 s.d. ng ml-1 h vs 266 +/- 70 s.d. ng ml-1 h) whereas the mean AUC of perindoprilat was found to be similar (134 +/- 139 ng ml-1 h vs 120 +/- 29 ng ml-1 h). The partial metabolic clearance of perindopril to perindoprilat was much lower in the cirrhotics (26 +/- 12 ml min-1 vs 58 +/- 22 ml min-1). The maximum inhibition of plasma ACE activity measured in the cirrhotic patients (87.5 +/- 5.1%) was comparable with that previously reported with perindopril in patients with mild hepatic impairment as well as in patients with essential hypertension. We suggest that liver cirrhosis may be associated with imparied deesterification of perindopril to its active metabolite perindoprilat but that no dosage adjustment of perindopril is required in cirrhotic patients.

Enalapril. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in hypertension

Enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor usually administered orally once daily, decreases blood pressure by lowering peripheral vascular resistance without increasing heart rate or output. It is effective in lowering blood pressure in all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension. Patients not responding adequately to enalapril monotherapy usually respond with the addition of a thiazide diuretic (or a calcium antagonist or beta-blocker), and rarely require a third antihypertensive agent. Enalapril is at least as effective as other established and newer ACE inhibitors, and members of other antihypertensive drug classes including diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and alpha-blockers, but therapy with enalapril may be less frequently limited by serious adverse effects or treatment contraindications than with other drug classes. The most frequent adverse effect limiting all ACE inhibitor therapy in clinical practice is cough. This favourable profile of efficacy and tolerability, and the substantial weight of clinical experience, explain the increasing acceptance of enalapril as a major antihypertensive treatment and supports its use as logical first-line therapeutic option.

The pharmacokinetics of benazepril relative to other ACE inhibitors

Benazepril is a prodrug that, following rapid conversion to benazeprilat, is a potent nonsulfhydryl inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. The absorption, bioactivation, distribution, and elimination of benazepril and benazeprilat have been evaluated in healthy subjects, hypertensive patients, and patients with characteristics known to alter the pharmacokinetic disposition of ACE inhibitors, such as renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and advanced age. Following oral administration, benazepril is absorbed and transformed into benazeprilat in the liver. Coadministration of benazepril with food delays absorption slightly but does not affect the ultimate bioavailability of benazeprilat. Severe hepatic impairment slows conversion of benazepril to benazeprilat but does not affect the overall bioavailability of benazeprilat; thus dosage adjustment is not necessary in the hepatically impaired population. Mild-to-moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance greater than 30 ml/min) slightly increases benazeprilat concentrations; severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min) reduces benazeprilat elimination and requires dosage reduction. In elderly patients, benazepril disposition is the same as in younger patients, although benazeprilat clearance is slightly reduced. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions occur with benazepril and many other medications commonly prescribed to elderly hypertensive patients. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of benazepril are stable over a wide range of conditions, and dosage adjustments for pharmacokinetic reasons are required infrequently.

Clinical pharmacokinetics in patients with liver disease

From considerations of hepatic physiology and pathology coupled with pharmacokinetic principles, it appears that altered drug elimination in liver disease may result from the following mechanisms: reduction in absolute cell mass, in cellular enzyme content and/or activity, in portal vein perfusion due to extrahepatic/intrahepatic shunting, or of portal perfusion of hepatocyte mass due to decreased portal flow or sinusoidal perfusion; increase in arterial perfusion relative to portal perfusion; preferential perfusion of the sinusoidal midzone and terminal zones by arterioles; potential for direct mixing of arterial blood within the space of Disse; reduced exchange across the endothelial lining; and impaired diffusion within the space of Disse. In general, oxidative drug metabolism is impaired in liver disease and the degree of impairment of oxidisation differs between drugs but correlates best with the degree of sinusoidal capillarisation, i.e. the degree of access of the drug from the sinusoid to the hepatocyte. Drug conjugation appears to be relatively unaffected by liver disease, whereas elimination by biliary excretion correlates best with the degree of intrahepatic shunting and not with sinusoidal capillarisation. As the latter should impair hepatocyte access of all compounds similarly, a potentially important mechanism could be impaired access of oxygen to hepatocytes as oxidative metabolism is much more sensitive to oxygen supply than are conjugation or biliary excretion. This suggests a potentially important therapeutic role for agents which increase the hepatic oxygen supply. Useful adjunctive strategies may also derive from the oxygen limitation hypothesis. Anaemia should be targeted as a critically important variable, as should oxygen-carrying capacity, i.e. modification of the smoking habit. Additionally, enzyme inducers such as barbiturates may be used if overriding hypoxic constraints are removed by oxygen supplementation. Agents likely to seriously compromise arterial perfusion of the hepatic vascular bed should be avoided, e.g. those causing postural hypotension or vasospasm. Vasodilators can be used to actively promote arterial perfusion. While the effect of liver disease on drug handling is highly variable and difficult to predict, there are well recognised principles for modifying dosage. These include halving the dose of drugs given systemically (or of low clearance drugs given orally) and a 50 to 90% reduction in the dose of drugs with a high hepatic clearance given orally. Changes in the pharmacodynamic effects of drugs (either alone or in addition to pharmacokinetic changes) can also be profound, and awareness of this possibility should be increased.

The influence of hepatic cirrhosis on the pharmacokinetics of benazepril hydrochloride

The influence of hepatic disease on the pharmacokinetics of the new ACE inhibitor, benazepril hydrochloride, was evaluated in 12 male patients suffering from liver cirrhosis. The patients received a single oral 20 mg dose. The plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of unchanged benazepril and its active metabolite benazeprilat were determined. Compared with a historical control group of healthy volunteers treated with the same benazepril. HC1 dose, the plasma concentrations of benazepril were doubled in the cirrhotic patients. However, the time to reach maximum concentration (0.5 h) was not affected. The plasma kinetics and the urinary excretion of the metabolite benazeprilat were not significantly altered: Area under the curve and maximum concentration as well as time to maximum concentration (1.5 h) were comparable with those in the healthy subjects. There was also no significant difference between the two populations for the total urinary excretion and the renal clearance of benazeprilat. Both benazepril and benazeprilat were highly bound to serum proteins (96 and 94 per cent, respectively). In conclusion, the rate and the amount of bioactivation of the inactive prodrug benazepril to the active benazeprilat were virtually unaffected by hepatic cirrhosis. Thus, there seems to be no need for dosage adjustment of benazepril hydrochloride in patients suffering from cirrhosis of the liver.

The pharmacokinetics of enalapril in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis

The possibility of an impaired hepatic de-esterification of enalapril to enalaprilat due to hepatic dysfunction was assessed in seven patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and 10 normal control subjects. The peak serum concentration and time to the peak serum concentration of enalaprilat, as well as the suppression of serum angiotensin converting enzyme activity, following a single oral dose of enalapril maleate (10 mg) were not different in the two groups. The elimination half-life of enalaprilat was related to renal function. The results suggest that hepatic biotransformation of the drug may not be disturbed in a clinically significant manner in patients with moderate hepatic dysfunction due to compensated liver cirrhosis.