Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and minimum effective clinical dose of intravenous nicardipine

Nicardipine-induced acute respiratory failure: Case report and literature review

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) is a major physiological mechanism that prevents the development of hypoxemia secondary to a regional decrease in the ventilation-perfusion ratio (the intrapulmonary shunt effect). Calcium plays a critical role in the cellular response to hypoxia and the regulation of the pulmonary vascular tone. Therefore, calcium channel antagonists such as nicardipine have the potential to interfere with the pulmonary response to hypoxia, increasing intrapulmonary blood shunt and thus worsening underlying hypoxemia. This article reports the case of a 40-year-old man suffering from lobar pneumonia, who developed a rapidly progressing hypoxemia after starting nicardipine infusion for blood pressure control. After ruling out all major causes of hypoxemic respiratory failure, the involvement of the calcium channel antagonist was strongly suspected. Hypoxemia caused by HPV release is an underreported side effect of calcium channel blockers. There are few clinical reports that describe the occurrence of this adverse event, and to our knowledge, only one other publication describes a patient suffering from infectious pneumopathy. In this article, we discuss the cellular mechanisms behind the HPV, as well as the pharmacology of calcium channel antagonists and their involvement in the development of acute respiratory failure. The purpose of this report is to remind clinicians dealing with patients affected by acute hypoxemia that pharmacologic HPV inhibition should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis, thus avoiding unnecessary costly and time-consuming assessments.

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

Hyperinflation of Nitroprusside

Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a generically available and rapid-acting intravenous (IV) vasodilator that has been used clinically for decades. Prior to 2013, the cost of SNP was relatively low, and SNP was an affordable option for the treatment of acute hypertension. However, from 2013 to 2017, average wholesale prices for SNP rose to as high as $900 per vial, earning the drug its status as a "hyperinflation drug." Hyperinflation drugs such as SNP pose a significant challenge for pharmacy departments. A multidisciplinary effort involving stakeholders from many backgrounds, including pharmacists, physicians, and nurses, is key to developing an effective plan to address the problem. A therapeutic interchange, wherein a drug with similar efficacy is substituted for another, is often an appropriate strategy in this scenario. Fortunately, alternative drugs with a solid evidence base exist for the management of acute hypertension. The dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, clevidipine and nicardipine, are IV titratable antihypertensive agents with favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Various studies indicate that clevidipine and nicardipine are effective alternatives to SNP for indications including hypertensive crisis and postoperative hypertension. Some hospitals have reported significant cost savings without adverse outcomes by substituting clevidipine or nicardipine for SNP. This article is intended to serve as a review of the evidence for clevidipine and nicardipine as potential substitutes for SNP and to provide strategies to successfully implement this therapeutic interchange.

Sodium Nitroprusside as a Hyperinflation Drug and Therapeutic Alternatives

Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a generically available and rapid-acting intravenous (IV) vasodilator that has been used clinically for decades. Prior to 2013, the cost of SNP was relatively low, and SNP was an affordable option for the treatment of acute hypertension. However, from 2013 to 2017, average wholesale prices for SNP rose to as high as US$900 per vial, earning the drug its status as a "hyperinflation drug." Hyperinflation drugs pose a significant challenge for pharmacy departments. A multidisciplinary effort involving stakeholders from many backgrounds, including pharmacists, physicians, and nurses, is key to developing an effective cost containment strategy. A therapeutic interchange, wherein a drug with similar efficacy is substituted for another, is often an appropriate strategy to address rising drug costs. Fortunately, alternative drugs with a solid evidence base exist for the management of acute hypertension. The dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, clevidipine and nicardipine, are IV titratable antihypertensive agents with favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Various studies indicate that clevidipine and nicardipine are effective alternatives to SNP for indications including hypertensive crisis and postoperative hypertension. Some hospitals have reported significant cost savings without adverse outcomes by substituting clevidipine or nicardipine for SNP. This article is intended to serve as a review of the evidence for clevidipine and nicardipine as potential substitutes for SNP and to provide strategies to successfully implement this therapeutic interchange.

Calcium Antagonists for Perioperative Blood Pressure Control

Calcium entry blockers constitute three major classes of pharmacologic agents: phenylalkylamines (eg, verapa mil), benzothiazepines (eg, diltiazem), and dihydropyri dines (eg, nifedipine). The effectiveness of all types of calcium channel blockers in the prevention and treat ment of coronary artery disease as well as chronic and acute hypertension is undisputable. Their beneficial clinical effects may be due to peripheral and coronary vasodilatation, resulting in reduction in myocardial oxy gen consumption, and an increase in myocardial oxy gen supply in addition to their antispasmodic effect and the ability to prevent intracellular calcium overload. For the management of perioperative hypertension develop ing in patients undergoing cardiac or noncardiac sur gery, the dihydropyridines appear to be especially suit able. Intravenous (IV) formulations of nifedipine, nicardipine, and isradipine have been successfully used in this setting. At the present time, nicardipine is the most widely used IV dihydropyridine. This is due to its potent afterload-reducing activity and relatively short duration of action, although its effect may increase the longer the drug is being infused. The ideal drug for perioperative blood pressure control should be one with the pharmacodynamic profile of the vascular selec tive dihydropyridines, but with an ultrashort duration of action.

High affinity complexes of pannexin channels and L-type calcium channel splice-variants in human lung: Possible role in clevidipine-induced dyspnea relief in acute heart failure

Clevidipine, a dihydropyridine (DHP) analogue, lowers blood pressure (BP) by inhibiting l-type calcium channels (Ca_V1.2; gene CACNA1C) predominantly located in vascular smooth muscle (VSM). However, clinical observations suggest that clevidipine acts by a more complex mechanism. Clevidipine more potently reduces pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) than systemic vascular resistance and its spectrum of effects on PVR are not shared by other DHPs. Clevidipine has potent spasmolytic effects in peripheral arteries at doses that are sub-clinical for BP lowering and, in hypertensive acute heart failure, clevidipine, but not other DHPs, provides dyspnea relief, partially independent of BP reduction. These observations suggest that a molecular variation in Ca_V1.2 may exist which confers unique pharmacology to different DHPs. We sequenced CACNA1C transcripts from human lungs and measured their affinity for clevidipine. Human lung tissue contains CACNA1C mRNA with many different splice variations. Ca_V1.2 channels with a specific combination of variable exons showed higher affinity for clevidipine, well below the concentration associated with BP reduction. Co-expression with pannexin 1 further increased the clevidipine affinity for this Ca_V1.2 splice variant. A high-affinity splice variant of Ca_V1.2 in combination with pannexin 1 could underlie the selective effects of clevidipine on pulmonary arterial pressure and on dyspnea.

Research in Context

Clevidipine lowers blood pressure by inhibiting calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle. In patients with acute heart failure, clevidipine was shown to relieve breathing problems. This was only partially related to the blood pressure lowering actions of clevidipine and not conferred by another calcium channel inhibitor. We here found calcium channel variants in human lung that are more selectively inhibited by clevidipine, especially when associated with pannexin channels. This study gives a possible mechanism for clevidipine's relief of breathing problems and supports future clinical trials testing the role of clevidipine in the treatment of acute heart failure.

•

CaV1.2 splice variants are found in human lung that have increased affinity for clevidipine.

•

Co-expression of CaV1.2 splice variant with Pannexin 1 further increases affinity for clevidipine but not for nicardipine.

•

Study supports future clinical trials testing the role of clevidipine in the treatment of acute hypertensive heart failure.

Clevidipine for the treatment of severe hypertension in adults

BACKGROUND

Intravenous antihypertensive agents are used when immediate control of blood pressure (BP) is required, including during the perioperative cardiac surgery period. Controlling postoperative BP is challenging because of the need to adequately reduce BP while maintaining appropriate end-organ perfusion. Clevidipine is an intravenous, ultra-short-acting, third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist with selectivity for arteriolar vasodilatation. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of severe hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of clevidipine.

METHODS

To minimize selection bias, each author conducted an independent search for English-language publications indexed on MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 2010 using the term clevidipine. All identified prospective, randomized and nonrandomized Phase III trials were included in the review.

RESULTS

Seven Phase III trials were identified in which clevidipine was compared with baseline, placebo, or other intravenous antihypertensive agents in the settings of severe hypertension (1 study), preoperative cardiac surgery (1), perioperative cardiac surgery (1), and postoperative cardiac surgery (4). In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of clevidipine in treating preoperative hypertension, the mean reduction from baseline in mean arterial pressure was 31.2% with clevidipine and 11.2% with placebo (P < 0.001). In a randomized, open-label, prospective study involving separate comparisons of clevidipine with nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, and nicardipine, the median total AUC for digression in systolic BP from the predetermined target range differed significantly between clevidipine and nitroglycerin (4.14 vs 8.87 mm Hg . min/h; respectively, P < 0.001) and between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (4.37 vs 10.5 mm Hg . min/h; P = 0.003), but not between clevidipine and nicardipine (1.76 and 1.69 mm Hg . min/h). Another study found no significant difference in efficacy in controlling BP during the 3-hour study period between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (AUC for mean [SD] arterial pressure, 106 [25] and 101 [28] mm Hg . min/h, respectively). Adverse events in these studies included atrial fibrillation (13.0%-36.1% clevidipine vs 12.0% placebo), nausea (5.0%-21.0% vs 12.0%, respectively), fever (19.0% vs 13.7%), insomnia (12.0% vs 6.1%), and acute renal failure (9.0% vs 2.0%). In the studies reviewed, only 1 case of chest discomfort in the setting of severe hypertension was considered a serious adverse event related to clevidipine therapy.

CONCLUSION

In the Phase III trials reviewed, clevidipine was effective in controlling BP in the settings of perioperative cardiac surgery and severe hypertension and was associated with minimal adverse effects.

Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Effects of Clevidipine, an Ultrashort-Acting Calcium Antagonist for Rapid Blood Pressure Control

Clevidipine is an ultrashort-acting vasoselective calcium antagonist under development for short-term intravenous control of blood pressure. Studies in animals, healthy volunteers and patients have demonstrated the vascular selectivity and rapid onset and offset of antihypertensive action of clevidipine, a synthetic 1,4-dihydropyridine that inhibits L-type calcium channels. Clevidipine has a high clearance (0.05 L/min/kg) and is rapidly hydrolyzed to inactive metabolites by esterases in arterial blood. Its half-life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is less than one min. Unlike sodium nitroprusside, a drug commonly used for the short-term control of blood pressure, which dilates both arterioles and veins, clevidipine reduces blood pressure through a selective effect on arterioles. As documented in animals and in cardiac surgical patients, clevidipine reduces peripheral resistance without any undesirable effect on cardiac filling pressure. It increases stroke volume and cardiac output. In anesthetized patients undergoing cardiac surgery clevidipine, unlike sodium nitroprusside, does not increase heart rate. In addition of having a favorable hemodynamic profile, suitable for rapid control of blood pressure, clevidipine protects against ischemia/reperfusion injuries, which are not uncommon during major surgery. In anesthetized pigs, clevidipine reduced infarct size after 45 min-long myocardial ischemia by 40%. In rats, renal function and splanchnic blood flow were better maintained when blood pressure was reduced with clevidipine than with sodium nitroprusside. Clevidipine was well tolerated in Phases I and II of clinical trials that included more than 300 individuals/patients. Since there are no known compounds with similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties in clinical development, it is anticipated that clevidipine, a compound tailored to the needs of anesthesiologists, has the potential to become a drug of choice for controlling blood pressure during surgical procedures.

Intravenous Nicardipine

Nicardipine is a water soluble calcium channel antagonist, with predominantly vasodilatory actions. Intravenous (IV) nicardipine (Cardene IV), which demonstrates a relatively rapid onset/offset of action, is used in situations requiring the rapid control of blood pressure (BP). IV nicardipine was as effective as IV nitroprusside in the short-term reduction of BP in patients with severe or postoperative hypertension. A potential role for IV nicardipine in the intraoperative acute control of BP in patients undergoing various surgical procedures (including cardiovascular, neurovascular and abdominal surgery), and in the deliberate induction of reduced BP in surgical procedures in which haemostasis may be difficult (e.g. surgery involving the hip or spine) was demonstrated in preliminary studies. Preliminary studies also indicated the ability of a bolus dose of IV nicardipine to attenuate the hypertensive response, but not the increase in tachycardia, after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients. In large, well designed studies, IV nicardipine prevented cerebral vasospasm in patients with recent aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage; however, overall clinical outcomes at 3 months were similar to those in patients who received standard management. Small preliminary studies have investigated the use of IV nicardipine in a variety of other settings, including acute intracerebral haemorrhage, acute ischaemic stroke, pre-eclampsia, acute aortic dissection, premature labour and electroconvulsive therapy.In conclusion, the efficacy of IV nicardipine in the short-term treatment of hypertension in settings for which oral therapy is not feasible or not desirable is well established. The ability to titrate IV nicardipine to the tolerance levels of individual patients makes this agent an attractive option, especially in critically ill patients or those undergoing surgery. Potential exists for further investigation of the use of this agent in clinical settings where a vasodilatory agent with minimal inotropic effects is appropriate.

Comparison of the Effects of Nicardipine and Sodium Nitroprusside for Control of Increased Blood Pressure after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

We compared the haemodynamic effects of nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. When post-surgery systolic blood pressure reached > 150 mmHg, patients were randomly given nicardipine (N group, n = 26) or sodium nitroprusside (S group, n = 21). The drugs were infused at a rate of 2 μg/kg per min for 10 min. If the target blood pressure (120-140 mmHg) was not achieved, the infusion rate was increased by 1 üg/kg per min every 10 min. Cardiac and stroke volume indices had increased significantly in the N group after 10 min and in both groups after 60 min. The infusion duration and total dose of drug were significantly lower in the N group compared with the S group. Nicardipine infusion controlled post-operative hypertension more rapidly and was superior to sodium nitroprusside in maintaining left ventricular performance immediately after drug infusion.

Circulatory effects and pharmacology of clevidipine, a novel ultra short acting and vascular selective calcium antagonist, in hypertensive humans

The pharmacokinetics of clevidipine, a potent short-acting vascular-selective calcium antagonist, was investigated during steady state and the postinfusion period in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Furthermore, the dose-effect and blood concentration-effect relations and the tolerability of the drug were studied. Twenty patients were randomized to clevidipine intravenously at target dose rates of 0.18, 0.91, 2.74, and 5.48 microg/kg/min, respectively, or placebo. Each patient received in random order three infusion rates of clevidipine or placebo during three separate study days. Dose-dependent reduction in blood pressure and a modest increase in heart rate were noted. The extremely high clearance value and the small volume of distribution resulted in short half-lives of clevidipine, 2.2 and 16.8 min, respectively. The blood concentration and dose rate producing half the maximal effect (i.e. EC50 and ED50) were approximately 25 nM and 1.5 microg/kg/min, respectively. There was a linear relation between blood concentration and dose rate in the range studied. Clevidipine was safe and generally well tolerated; one patient was excluded because of adverse events at 2.74 microg/kg/min. In conclusion, clevidipine is a high-clearance calcium antagonist that may become a valuable contribution to the drugs used in conditions in which precise and rapid control of blood pressure is needed.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic results with a new ultrashort-acting calcium antagonist, clevidipine, following gradually increasing intravenous doses to healthy volunteers

AIMS

To investigate the tolerability and safety of clevidipine in healthy male volunteers during intravenous infusion at gradually increasing dose rates and to obtain preliminary information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of the drug.

METHODS

Twenty-five subjects were enrolled in the study and twenty-one of them were included twice, resulting in a total of forty-six study entries encompassing 20 min infusions of clevidipine at target dose rates ranging from 0.12 to 48 nmol min-1 kg-1. Haemodynamic variables and adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Concentrations of clevidipine and its primary metabolite, H 152/81, were followed in whole blood, and the pharmacokinetics were evaluated by non-compartmental and compartmental analysis. An Emax model was fitted to the effect on mean arterial pressure (MAP) over heart rate (HR) and the corresponding blood concentrations of clevidipine.

RESULTS

Clevidipine was administered up to a target dose rate of 48 nmol min-1 kg-1, where a pre-determined escape criterion was reached (HR>120 beats min-1 ) and the study was stopped. The most common adverse events were flush and headache, which can be directly related to the mechanism of action of clevidipine. There was a linear relationship between blood concentration and dose rate in the range studied. The median clearance value determined by non-compartmental analysis was 0.125 l min-1 kg-1. Applying the population approach to the sparse data on clevidipine concentrations, an open two compartment pharmacokinetic model was found to be the best model in describing the disposition of the drug. The population mean clearance value determined by this method was 0.121 l min-1 kg-1, and the volume of distribution at steady state was 0.56 l kg-1. The initial half-life, contributing by more than 80% to the total area under the blood concentration-time curve following i.v. bolus administration, was 1.8 min, and the terminal half-life was 9.5 min. At the highest dose rates, MAP was reduced by approximately 10%, and the HR reached the pre-determined escape criterion for this study (>120 beats min-1 ).

CONCLUSIONS

Clevidipine is well tolerated and safe in healthy volunteers at dose rates up to at least 48 nmol min-1 kg-1. The pharmacokinetics are linear over a wide dose range. Clevidipine is a high clearance drug with extremely short half-lives. The effect of clevidipine on the blood pressure was marginal, probably due to a compensatory baroreflex activation in this population of healthy volunteers. A simple Emax model adequately describes the relationship between the pharmacodynamic response (MAP/HR) and the blood concentrations of clevidipine.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I

Understanding the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties of vasodilatory drugs facilitates optimal use in clinical practice. It should be kept in mind that a drug belongs to a class but is a distinct entity, sometimes derived from a prototype to achieve a specific effect. The most common pharmacokinetic drug improvement is the development of a drug with a half-life sufficiently long to allow an adequate once-daily dosage. Developing a controlled release preparation can increase the apparent half-life of a drug. Altering the molecular structure may also increase the half-life of a prototype drug. Another desirable improvement is increasing the specificity of a drug, which may result in fewer adverse effects, or more efficacy at the target site. This is especially important for vasodilatory drugs which may be administered over decades for the treatment of hypertension, which usually does not interfere with subjective well-being. Compliance is greatly increased with once-daily dosing. Vasodilatory agents cause relaxation by either a decrease in cytoplasmic calcium, an increase in nitric oxide (NO) or by inhibiting myosin light chain kinase. They are divided into 9 classes: calcium antagonists, potassium channel openers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, alpha-adrenergic and imidazole receptor antagonists, beta 1-adrenergic agonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, eicosanoids and NO donors. Despite chemical differences, the pharmacokinetic properties of calcium antagonists are similar. Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is high, with all substances undergoing considerable first-pass metabolism by the liver, resulting in low bioavailability and pronounced individual variation in pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment has little effect on pharmacokinetics since renal elimination of these agents is minimal. Except for the newer drugs of the dihydropyridine type, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nilvadipine, nisoldipine and nitrendipine, the half-life of calcium antagonists is short. Maintaining an effective drug concentration for the remainder of these agents requires multiple daily dosing, in some cases even with controlled release formulations. However, a coat-core preparation of nifedipine has been developed to allow once-daily administration. Adverse effects are directly correlated to the potency of the individual calcium antagonists. Treatment with the potassium channel opener minoxidil is reserved for patients with moderately severe to severe hypertension which is refractory to other treatment. Diazoxide and hydralazine are chiefly used to treat severe hypertensive emergencies, primary pulmonary and malignant hypertension and in severe preeclampsia. ACE inhibitors prevent conversion of angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II and are most effective when renin production is increased. Since ACE is identical to kininase-II, which inactivates the potent endogenous vasodilator bradykinin, ACE inhibition causes a reduction in bradykinin degradation. ACE inhibitors exert cardioprotective and cardioreparative effects by preventing and reversing cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy in animal models. The predominant elimination pathway of most ACE inhibitors is via renal excretion. Therefore, renal impairment is associated with reduced elimination and a dosage reduction of 25 to 50% is recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Separating angiotensin-II inhibition from bradykinin potentiation has been the goal in developing angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. The incidence of adverse effects of such an agent, losartan, is comparable to that encountered with placebo treatment, and the troublesome cough associated with ACE inhibitors is absent.

Clinical pharmacology of nicardipine in liver transplant patients

Slow calcium channel antagonists are widely used among transplanted patients suffering from hypertension, although some of them tend to reduce hepatic blood flow. The aim of our study was to determine the pharmacological properties of nicardipine in transplanted patients with hypertension. Ten hours after liver transplantation, six patients (three men, three women) received 5 mg of intravenous nicardipine to prevent high blood pressure during intensive care. Prior to the administration and during the study (at the completion of the infusion, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after infusion), the systemic and splanchnic parameters were measured (Swan Ganz catheter). Blood samples were drawn simultaneously from radial artery and free hepatic veins, in order to obtain the hepatic extraction of nicardipine. The hepatic extraction ratio was around 70% for the first 3 min, then decreased and remained stable thereafter, around 45%, showing a non linear first-pass metabolism pattern. Plasma hepatic clearance of nicardipine (699-850 ml/min) was close to total plasma clearance throughout the study (978 +/- 222 ml/min, from 71 to 87%) and half of the estimated hepatic plasma flow values at the same times (1467-1770 ml/min, from 44 to 51%). No statistically significant changes were observed in cardiac output and hepatic blood flow during the study, although there was a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure from 87 +/- 6 mmHg baseline level to 76 +/- 3 mmHg, 60 min after administration. Nicardipine chlorhydrate seems to be appropriate in post operative liver transplant patients when blood pressure must be decreased. Nicardipine safely lowers peripheral resistance, and does not induce changes in hepatic blood flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Application of a system analysis approach to population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy males

Nicardipine hydrochloride, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, possesses antihypertensive and arterial vasodilator properties. A system analysis approach, which makes fewer structural assumptions than compartmental methods, is presented for determining the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy males following a discontinuous infusion at four dose levels. The results indicate that the average total body clearance of nicardipine is 0.920 L/h/kg and the volume of distribution is 0.275 L/kg. Nicardipine hydrochloride has a mean residence time in the body of 1.27 h, of which 0.324 h were spent in the systemic circulation and the remainder in the periphery. The determined pharmacokinetic model was linked to a pharmacodynamic model that allowed the change in the mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate to be described and predicted. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was derived and the predictive power of the proposed model was assessed with a cross-validation technique that employs a relative predictive quotient for comparing the predictions to the fitted model. The results indicate that the proposed model describes the pharmacodynamics of nicardipine in healthy males and has good predictive ability when tested with a cross-validation procedure.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists. An update

The calcium antagonists are valuable and widely used agents in the management of essential hypertension and angina. There is an increasing number of new agents to add to the 3 prototype substances nifedipine, diltiazem and verapamil. These new agents are dihydropyridines structurally related to nifedipine. However, they tend to have longer elimination half-lives (t 1/2 beta) and may be suitable for twice-daily administration. Amlodipine is an exception with a t 1/2 beta in excess of 30h. Apart from elimination rates, however, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the newer agents have a notable tendency to resemble those of the established agents. They are highly cleared drugs, are relatively highly protein bound. As they are subject to significant first-pass metabolism, old age and hepatic impairment will increase their plasma concentrations due to a reduced first-pass effect. Renal impairment does little to their pharmacokinetics since the fraction eliminated unchanged by the kidney is small. For most agents, plasma concentration-response relationships have been described. Interesting areas for further research include chronopharmacokinetics, stereoselective pharmacokinetics and lipid solubility. Drugs affecting hepatic blood flow and drug metabolising capacity have predictable interaction potential. Some of the newer calcium antagonists will, like verapamil, increase plasma digoxin concentrations. Verapamil and diltiazem decrease phenazone (antipyrine) metabolism and therefore tend to decrease the metabolism of other drugs.