Genetically determined drug-metabolizing activity and desipramine-associated cardiotoxicity: a case report

Citalopram-Induced Long QT Syndrome and the Mammalian Dive Reflex

While SCUBA diving, a 44-year-old Caucasian patient had an abnormal cardiac rhythm, presumably Torsade de Pointes (TdP), during the initial descent to depth. Upon surfacing, she developed ventricular fibrillation and died. The patient had been treated for mild depression for nearly a year with citalopram 60 mg per day, a drug known to cause prolonged QT interval. She had also been treated with two potentially hepatotoxic drugs. Liver impairment causes selective loss of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 activity, the major pathway for metabolism of citalopram. The post mortem blood level of citalopram was 1300 ng/mL. The patient was found to be an intermediate metabolizer via CYP2D6, the major pathway for metabolism of desmethylcitalopram; the level of which was also abnormally high. It is suggested that drug-induced long QT syndrome (DILQTS), caused by citalopram, combined with the mammalian dive reflex triggered malignant ventricular rhythms resulting in the patient’s death. It is further suggested that, in general, the dive reflex increases the risk of fatal cardiac rhythms when the QT interval is prolonged by drugs.

Genetic polymorphism and toxicology--with emphasis on cytochrome p450

Individual susceptibility to environmental, chemical, and drug toxicity is to some extent determined by polymorphism in drug-metabolizing enzymes, in particular the cytochromes P450 (CYPs). This polymorphism is in particular translated into risk differences concerning drugs metabolized by the highly polymorphic enzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, whereas CYP enzymes active in procarcinogen activation are relatively well conserved without important functional polymorphisms. Examples of drug toxicities that can be predicted by P450 polymorphism include those exerted by codeine, tramadol, warfarin, acenocoumarol, and clopidogrel. The polymorphic CYP2A6 has a role in nicotine metabolism and smoking behavior. Besides this genetic variation, genome-wide association studies now allow for the identification of an increasing number of predictive genetic biomarkers among, e.g., human leukocyte antigens and to some extent drug transporters that provide useful information regarding the choice of the drug and drug dosage in order to avoid toxicity. The translation of this information into the clinical practice has been slow; however, an increasing number of pharmacogenomic drug labels are assigned, where the predictive genotyping before drug treatment can be mandatory, recommended, or only for informational purposes. In this review, we provide an update of the field with emphasis on CYP polymorphism.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Pharmacogenomics: the future of drug therapy

Pharmacogenomics aims to optimize patient management by customizing and synthesizing drugs based on genetic variations in drug response. Polymorphisms affecting metabolism, receptors, and absorption can influence drug sensitivity, toxicity, and dosing. The Human Genome Project, DNA chips, and bioinformatics advance the practice of this field by, respectively, identifying polymorphisms related to drug response, determining an individual's profile of polymorphisms, and integrating data to facilitate clinical decision making. Potential benefits of pharmacogenomics include increasing efficacy and preventing adverse drug reactions, thus improving patient care and decreasing costs. These factors imply that a thorough understanding of the principles and applications of pharmacogenomics will be an indispensable part of the future of drug therapy in clinical medicine.

Pharmacogenomics: a clinician's primer on emerging technologies for improved patient care

Pharmacogenomics is a term recently coined to embody the concept of individualized and rational drug selection based on the genotype of a particular patient. Customization of drug therapy offers the potential for optimal safety and efficacy in an individual patient. Such a process contrasts current prescribing practices, which use medications shown to be safe and effective in patient populations or based on anecdotal experiences. Within patient populations, medications vary in their efficacy among individual patients. More importantly, a medication that is safe and effective in one patient may be ineffective or even harmful in another. Underlying many of these phenotypic differences are genotypic variants (polymorphisms) of key enzymes and proteins that affect the safety and efficacy of a drug in an individual patient. An understanding of these polymorphisms has the potential to enhance patient care by allowing physicians to customize the selection of medication to meet individual patient needs. Pharmacogenomics may also lead to improved compliance and shorter time to optimal disease management, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality. Significant cost savings could result from reductions in polypharmacy as well as from fewer physician encounters and hospitalizations for exacerbations of underlying illness and because of adverse drug reactions.

Prospective CYP2D6 genotyping as an exclusion criterion for enrollment of a phase III clinical trial

A phase III study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (Lamictal), desipramine (Norpramin), and placebo in the treatment of unipolar depression. Desipramine is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), and kinetics of this compound are altered in poor metabolizers. Genotyping was utilized to exclude poor metabolizers in order to increase subject safety and to eliminate the need to continuously monitor plasma desipramine levels. As part of screening, subjects were genotyped for the *3(A), *4(B), and *5(D) alleles, which identify approximately 95% of poor metabolizers. Extensive metabolizers were eligible for randomization to the lamotrigine, desipramine, or placebo arm. Follow-up genotyping for the *6(T) and *7(E) alleles was performed after study enrollment and was used to identify poor metabolizers who may have been incorrectly identified as extensive metabolizers upon initial three-allele screening. Of 628 subjects screened for *3(A), *4(B), *5(D) alleles, 590 (93.9%) were classified as extensive metabolizers. The remaining 38 (6.1%) subjects were poor metabolizers and excluded. Subsequent *6(T) and *7(E) testing revealed that two poor metabolizers had been enrolled, and the follow-up genotyping provided an explanation for the high desipramine plasma concentrations in one subject. No differences in phenotypic or allelic frequencies were found between the study population and literature populations. However, the frequency of poor metabolizers varied among clinical sites (0-15%). For a compound that is extensively metabolized by CYP2D6, prescreening subjects for *3(A), *4(B), *5(D), *6(T) and *7(E) alleles can increase subject safety and eliminate the need to continuously monitor drug plasma concentrations.

Current pharmacogenomic approaches to clinical drug development

Pharmacogenomics has recently become an integral part of the drug development process. The pharmacogenomics revolution comes at a time when pharmaceutical companies are faced with mounting pressures to lower the cost of drugs despite the continued rise in research and development spending needed to bring new drugs to market. Pharmaceutical companies want to avoid late stage failures or drugs labelled for restricted use following approval. More than twenty years of pharmacogenetic studies have established many of the genetic traits responsible for interindividual differences in the way patients metabolise drugs. The genetic polymorphisms found in the major drug metabolising enzymes (DMEs) and their associated phenotypes are well established. These monogenetic traits have a predictable influence on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacological effects of a large number of commonly prescribed drugs. This knowledge has been used to develop affordable, robust, clinical genotyping methods that can be used by pharmaceutical companies to screen patients prior to drug therapy. Prospective screening of Phase I volunteers for DME polymorphisms is done routinely at a number of pharmaceutical companies. As the pharmacogenomic initiatives at these companies evolve, more and more patients enrolled in Phase II-III clinical trials are genotyped to correlate efficacy with genetic markers that predict pharmacodynamic effects. There are a number of pharmacogenomic markers that provide useful diagnostic tools to prospectively evaluate treatment regimens, including the genetics of the host, cancerous tumours or infectious agents. The incorporation of pharmacogenomics into clinical drug development offers the opportunity for pharmaceutical companies to evaluate drugs with a better understanding of the effect that specific genetic variants will have on drug response. Prospective testing can ensure the inclusion of important phenotypic subgroups, thus impacting the efficiency of drug development. Ultimately this approach will validate the utility of genotyping prior to prescription, thereby ensuring that patients receive the right drug at the right dose the first time.

Extension of a pilot study: impact from the cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphism on outcome and costs associated with severe mental illness

The influence of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genetic variability was examined in psychiatric inpatients by evaluating adverse drug events (ADEs), hospital stays, and total costs over a 1-year period in an extension of a previously published brief report. One hundred consecutive psychiatric patients from Eastern State Hospital in Lexington, Kentucky, were genotyped for CYP2D6 expression. ADEs were evaluated by a neurologic rating scale, modified Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale, or chart review. Information on total hospitalization days and total costs were gathered for a 1-year period. Forty-five percent of the patients received medications that were primarily dependent on the CYP2D6 enzyme for their elimination. When the analysis was restricted to just those patients in each group receiving medication heavily dependent on the CYP2D6 enzyme, the following were observed: (1) a trend toward greater numbers of ADEs from medications as one moved from the group with ultrarapid CYP2D6 activity (UM) to the group with absent CYP2D6 activity (PM); (2) the cost of treating patients with extremes in CYP2D6 activity (UM and PM) was on average $4,000 to $6,000 per year greater than the cost of treating patients in the efficient metabolizer (EM) and intermediate metabolizer (IM) groups; and (3) total duration of hospital stay was more pronounced for those in CYP2D6 PM group. Variance of hospital stays and costs calculated from these preliminary data suggests that 1,500 to 2,000 patients must be evaluated over at least a 1-year period to determine whether the CYP2D6 genetic variation significantly alters the duration of hospital stay and costs.

Polymorphic cytochromes P450 and drugs used in psychiatry

1. The cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9, display polymorphism. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 have been studied extensively, and despite their low abundance in the liver, they catalyze the metabolism of many drugs. 2. CYP2D6 has numerous allelic variants, whereas CYP2C19 has only two. Most variants are translated into inactive, truncated protein or fail to express protein. 3. CYP2C9 is expressed as the wild-type enzyme and has two variants, in each of which one amino acid residue has been replaced. 4. The nucleotide base sequences of the cDNAs of the three polymorphic genes and their variants have been determined, and the proteins derived from these genes have been characterized. 5. An absence of CYP2D6 and/or CYP2C19 in an individual produces a poor metabolizer (PM) of drugs that are substrates of these enzymes. 6. When two drugs that are substrates for a polymorphic CYP enzyme are administered concomitantly, each will compete for that enzyme and competitively inhibit the metabolism of the other substrate. This can result in toxicity. 7. Patients can be readily phenotyped or genotyped to determine their CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 enzymatic status. Poor metabolizers (PMs), extensive metabolizers (EMs), and ultrarapid metabolizers (URMs) can be identified. 8. Numerous substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 are identified. 9. An individual's diet and age can influence CYP enzyme activity. 10. CYP2D6 polymorphism has been associated with the risk of onset of various illnesses, including cancer, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and epilepsy.

Metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants

1. Despite the considerable advances in the treatments available for mood disorders over the past generation, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remain an important option for the pharmacotherapy of depression. 2. The pharmacokinetics of TCAs are characterized by substantial presystemic first-pass metabolism, a large volume of distribution, extensive protein binding, and an elimination half-life averaging about 1 day (up to 3 days for protriptyline). 3. Clearance of tricyclics is dependent primarily on hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) oxidative enzymes. Although the activities of some P450 isoenzymes are largely under genetic control, they may be influenced by external factors, such as the concomitant use of other medications or substances. Patient variables, such as ethnicity and age, also affect TCA metabolism. The impact of gender and related reproductive issues is coming under increased scrutiny. 4. Metabolism of TCAs, especially their hydroxylation, results in the formation of active metabolites, which contribute to both the therapeutic and the adverse effects of these compounds. 5. Renal clearance of the polar metabolites of TCAs is reduced by normal aging, accounting for much of the increased risk of toxicity in older patients. 6. Knowledge of factors affecting the metabolism of TCAs can further the development and understanding of newer antidepressant medications.

Genetic polymorphisms of human N-acetyltransferase, cytochrome P450, glutathione-S-transferase, and epoxide hydrolase enzymes: relevance to xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity

In this review, an overview is presented of the current knowledge of genetic polymorphisms of four of the most important enzyme families involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, that is, the N-acetyltransferase (NAT), cytochrome P450 (P450), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) enzymes. The emphasis is on two main topics, the molecular genetics of the polymorphisms and the consequences for xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity. Studies are described in which wild-type and mutant alleles of biotransformation enzymes have been expressed in heterologous systems to study the molecular genetics and the metabolism and pharmacological or toxicological effects of xenobiotics. Furthermore, studies are described that have investigated the effects of genetic polymorphisms of biotransformation enzymes on the metabolism of drugs in humans and on the metabolism of genotoxic compounds in vivo as well. The effects of the polymorphisms are highly dependent on the enzyme systems involved and the compounds being metabolized. Several polymorphisms are described that also clearly influence the metabolism and effects of drugs and toxic compounds, in vivo in humans. Future perspectives in studies on genetic polymorphisms of biotransformation enzymes are also discussed. It is concluded that genetic polymorphisms of biotransformation enzymes are in a number of cases a major factor involved in the interindividual variability in xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity. This may lead to interindividual variability in efficacy of drugs and disease susceptibility.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in affective disorders--I. Basic pharmacology

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline, are the result of rational research to find drugs that were as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants but with fewer safety and tolerability problems. The SSRIs selectively and powerfully inhibit serotonin reuptake and result in a potentiation of serotonergic neurotransmission. The property of potent serotonin reuptake appears to give a broad spectrum of therapeutic activity in depression, anxiety, obsessional and impulse control disorders. However, despite the sharing of the same principal mechanism of action, SSRIs are structurally diverse with clear variations in their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. The potency for serotonin reuptake inhibition varies amongst this group, as does the selectivity for serotonin relative to noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibition. The relative potency of sertraline for dopamine reuptake inhibition differentiates it pharmacologically from other SSRIs. Affinity for neuroreceptors, such as sigma1, muscarinic and 5-HT2c, also differs widely. Furthermore, the inhibition of nitric oxide synthetase by paroxetine, and possibly other SSRIs, may have significant pharmacodynamic effects. Citalopram and fluoxetine are racemic mixtures of different chiral forms that possess varying pharmacokinetic and pharmacological profiles. Fluoxetine has a long acting and pharmacologically active metabolite. There are important clinical differences among the SSRIs in their pharmacokinetic characteristics. These include differences in their half-lives, linear versus non-linear pharmacokinetics, effect of age on their clearance and their potential to inhibit drug metabolising cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes. These pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences underly the increasingly apparent important clinical differences amongst the SSRIs.

Relationship between plasma desipramine levels, CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical response to desipramine: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The clinical relevance of the CYP2D6 oxidation polymorphism in the treatment of depression with desipramine (DMI) was studied prospectively in depressed outpatients.

METHODS

After CYP2D6 phenotype determination with dextromethorphan, 31 patients were treated with oral DMI at a dosage of 100 mg per day for 3 weeks. At the end of the 3rd week of treatment, severity of depressive symptoms was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and steady-state plasma concentrations of DMI and its metabolite 2-hydroxydesipramine (2-OH-DMI) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Plasma DMI levels were significantly correlated with dextromethorphan metabolic ratio. The two patients with the poor metabolizer phenotype showed the highest plasma concentrations of DMI and complained of severe adverse effects, requiring dosage reduction. No significant correlation was found between plasma levels of either DMI or DMI plus 2-OH-DMI and antidepressant effect.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that the dextromethorphan metabolic ratio has a great impact on steady-state plasma levels of DMI in depressed patients and may identify subjects at risk for severe concentration-dependent adverse effects. On the other hand, this index of CYP2D6 activity does not seem to predict the degree of clinical amelioration.

Assessment of liver metabolic function. Clinical implications

Inter- and intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of most drugs is largely determined by variable liver function as described by parameters of hepatic blood flow and metabolic capacity. These parameters may be altered as a result of disease affecting the liver, genetic differences in metabolising enzymes, and various types of drug interactions, including enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition or down-regulation. With the now known large number of drug metabolising enzymes, their differential substrate specificity, and their differential induction or inhibition, each test substance of liver function should be used as a probe for its specific metabolising enzyme. Thus, the concept of model test-substances providing general information about liver function has severe limitations. To test the metabolic activity of several enzymes, either several test substances may be given (cocktail approach) or several metabolites of a single test substance may be analysed (metabolic fingerprint approach). The enzyme-specific analysis of liver function results in a preference for analysis of the metabolites rather than analysis of the clearance of the parent test substance. There are specific methods to quantify the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19MEPH, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A, and phase II enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, glucuronyl-transferases or N-acetyltransferases, in vivo. Interactions based on competitive or noncompetitive inhibition should be analysed specifically for the cytochrome P450 enzyme involved. At least 5 different types of cytochrome P450 enzyme induction may result in major variability of hepatic function; this may be quantified by biochemical parameters, clearance methods, or highly enzyme-specific methods such as Western blot analysis or molecular biological techniques such as mRNA quantification in blood and tissues. Therapeutic drug monitoring is already implicitly used for quantification of the enzyme activities relevant for a specific drug. Selective impairment of hepatic enzymes due to gene mutations may have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs similar to that caused by cirrhosis. Assessment of this heritable source of variability in liver function is possible by in vivo or ex vivo enzymological methods. For genetically polymorphic enzymes and carrier proteins involved in drug disposition, molecular genetic methods using a patient's blood sample may be used for classification of the individual into: (i) the impaired or poor metaboliser (homozygous deficient); (ii) the extensive (homozygous active) metaboliser group; and (iii) the moderately extensive metaboliser (heterozygous) group. For hepatic blood flow determinations, galactose or sorbitol given at relatively low doses may be much better indicators than the indocyanine green.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics: current requirements and future perspectives from a regulatory point of view

1. There is an increasing appreciation of the relevance of pharmacokinetics of drugs during evaluation of their safety for human clinical use. Regulatory requirements for clinical pharmacokinetic data have progressively evolved to emphasize and address these safety implications. 2. Historically the dose schedules usually recommended have been too high, often with serious consequences. Therefore, the need to establish reliable dose response (both therapeutic and toxic) relationships must be an important objective. 3. Concurrent developments in our understanding of the pharmacological effects (therapeutic or toxic) of metabolites, the interethnic and interindividual differences in drug responses and the toxicological aspects of drug chirality now provide compelling reasons for the roles of bioactivation, pharmacogenetics and stereochemical factors to be addressed in pharmacokinetic studies during the clinical development of drugs. 4. Apart from the traditional pharmacokinetic studies following single and multiple doses in healthy volunteers, patients and special subgroups, reliable dose-response curves for therapeutic and toxic effects must be established in well-designed controlled studies using a wide range of doses. Often, doses lower than those recommended have a much improved risk/benefit ratio. 5. Secondary pharmacology of the drug and its active metabolites must be defined for assessment of safety (adverse reactions and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions) in high dose/concentration situations. 6. The enzyme systems responsible for the metabolism of a drug must be identified followed by rational investigations of drug-drug and drug-disease interactions both from the efficacy and safety viewpoints. Factors responsible for alterations in the functional expression of this enzyme system must be identified and the safety and efficacy implications of these findings at interethnic, inter- and intraindividual levels must be fully explored during all phases of the clinical development of the drug. This should lead to carefully designed patient subgroup-specific dose schedules which maximize the risk/benefit ratio for all patients. 7. Drugs operate in a chiral environment and, not surprisingly, enantiomers of a drug differ significantly in their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The possibility of interactions between enantiomers of a drug and of enantioselective interactions should be examined. These should be thoroughly investigated and the decision to market a racemic mixture or one of its enantiomers must be justified. 8. Analysis of population pharmacokinetics offers an approach by which to examine the roles of various factors which are likely to be clinically relevant for the safe and effective use of drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)