Structural basis for specific recognition of pre-snRNA by Gemin5

Novel compound heterozygous mutation and phenotype in the tetratricopeptide repeat-like domain of the GEMIN5 gene in two Chinese families

BACKGROUND

GEMIN5 is an RNA-binding protein that regulates multiple molecular functions, including splicing, localisation, translation, and mRNA stability. GEMIN5 mutations present a syndrome centred on cerebellar dysplasia, including motor dysfunction, developmental delay, cerebellar atrophy, and hypotonia.

CASES

We report three patients from two families with novel compound heterozygous mutations in the tetratricopeptide repeat-like domain of the GEMIN5 gene who presented with motor dysfunction, developmental delay, and ataxia syndrome. Novel variants were identified: c.2551_c.2552delCT (Leu851Glufs*30) and c.2911 C > G (Gln971Glu) in Family 1, and c.3287 T > C (Leu1096Pro) and c.2882 G > C (Trp961 Ser) in Family 2, which were inherited from their parents. Moreover, infantile spasms syndrome(ISs) was diagnosed in the family.

CONCLUSION

We report the first case of ISs caused by GEMIN5 gene mutations. Our cases expand on GEMIN5 variants and neurological phenotypes, reinforcing the crucial impact of tetratricopeptide repeat-like domain variants in the GEMIN5 gene.

Mechanism of assembly of snRNP cores assisted by ICln and the SMN complex in fission yeast

The spliceosomal snRNP cores, each comprised of a snRNA and a seven-membered Sm ring (D1/D2/F/E/G/D3/B), are assembled by twelve chaperoning proteins in human. However, only six assembly-assisting proteins, ICln and the SMN complex (SMN/Gemin2/Gemin6-8), have been found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp). Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the chaperone machinery and investigated the roles of these proteins systematically. We found that, like the human system, the assembly in S. pombe requires ICln and the SMN complex sequentially. However, there are several significant differences. For instance, h_F/E/G forms heterohexamers and heterotrimers, while Sp_F/E/G only forms heterohexamers; h_Gemin2 alone can bind D1/D2/F/E/G, but Sp_Gemin2 cannot. Moreover, we found that Sp_Gemin2 is essential using genetic approaches. These mechanistic studies reveal that these six proteins are necessary and sufficient for Sm core assembly at the molecular level, and enrich our understanding of the chaperone systems in species variation and evolution.

Structural basis for Gemin5 decamer-mediated mRNA binding

Gemin5 in the Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) complex serves as the RNA-binding protein to deliver small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) to the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm complex via its N-terminal WD40 domain. Additionally, the C-terminal region plays an important role in regulating RNA translation by directly binding to viral RNAs and cellular mRNAs. Here, we present the three-dimensional structure of the Gemin5 C-terminal region, which adopts a homodecamer architecture comprised of a dimer of pentamers. By structural analysis, mutagenesis, and RNA-binding assays, we find that the intact pentamer/decamer is critical for the Gemin5 C-terminal region to bind cognate RNA ligands and to regulate mRNA translation. The Gemin5 high-order architecture is assembled via pentamerization, allowing binding to RNA ligands in a coordinated manner. We propose a model depicting the regulatory role of Gemin5 in selective RNA binding and translation. Therefore, our work provides insights into the SMN complex-independent function of Gemin5.

Structural biology, complemented by biochemistry experiments and RNA-binding assays show that the Gemin5 C-terminal region adopts a decamer architecture. Gemin5 decamerization is essential for its role in regulating mRNA translation.

Gemin5-dependent RNA association with polysomes enables selective translation of ribosomal and histone mRNAs

Selective translation allows to orchestrate the expression of specific proteins in response to different signals through the concerted action of cis-acting elements and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Gemin5 is a ubiquitous RBP involved in snRNP assembly. In addition, Gemin5 regulates translation of different mRNAs through apparently opposite mechanisms of action. Here, we investigated the differential function of Gemin5 in translation by identifying at a genome-wide scale the mRNAs associated with polysomes. Among the mRNAs showing Gemin5-dependent enrichment in polysomal fractions, we identified a selective enhancement of specific transcripts. Comparison of the targets previously identified by CLIP methodologies with the polysome-associated transcripts revealed that only a fraction of the targets was enriched in polysomes. Two different subsets of these mRNAs carry unique cis-acting regulatory elements, the 5’ terminal oligopyrimidine tracts (5’TOP) and the histone stem-loop (hSL) structure at the 3’ end, respectively, encoding ribosomal proteins and histones. RNA-immunoprecipitation (RIP) showed that ribosomal and histone mRNAs coprecipitate with Gemin5. Furthermore, disruption of the TOP motif impaired Gemin5-RNA interaction, and functional analysis showed that Gemin5 stimulates translation of mRNA reporters bearing an intact TOP motif. Likewise, Gemin5 enhanced hSL-dependent mRNA translation. Thus, Gemin5  promotes polysome association of only a subset of its targets, and as a consequence, it favors translation of the ribosomal and the histone mRNAs. Together, the results presented here unveil Gemin5 as a novel translation regulator of mRNA subsets encoding proteins involved in fundamental cellular processes.

Functional and structural deficiencies of Gemin5 variants associated with neurological disorders

Dysfunction of RNA-binding proteins is often linked to a wide range of human disease, particularly with neurological conditions. Gemin5 is a member of the survival of the motor neurons (SMN) complex, a ribosome-binding protein and a translation reprogramming factor. Recently, pathogenic mutations in Gemin5 have been reported, but the functional consequences of these variants remain elusive. Here, we report functional and structural deficiencies associated with compound heterozygosity variants within the Gemin5 gene found in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. These clinical variants are located in key domains of Gemin5, the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like dimerization module and the noncanonical RNA-binding site 1 (RBS1). We show that the TPR-like variants disrupt protein dimerization, whereas the RBS1 variant confers protein instability. All mutants are defective in the interaction with protein networks involved in translation and RNA-driven pathways. Importantly, the TPR-like variants fail to associate with native ribosomes, hampering its involvement in translation control and establishing a functional difference with the wild-type protein. Our study provides insights into the molecular basis of disease associated with malfunction of the Gemin5 protein.

The RBS1 domain of Gemin5 is intrinsically unstructured and interacts with RNA through conserved Arg and aromatic residues

Gemin5 is a multifaceted RNA-binding protein that comprises distinct structural domains, including a WD40 and TPR-like for which the X-ray structure is known. In addition, the protein contains a non-canonical RNA-binding domain (RBS1) towards the C-terminus. To understand the RNA binding features of the RBS1 domain, we have characterized its structural characteristics by solution NMR linked to RNA-binding activity. Here we show that a short version of the RBS1 domain that retains the ability to interact with RNA is predominantly unfolded even in the presence of RNA. Furthermore, an exhaustive mutational analysis indicates the presence of an evolutionarily conserved motif enriched in R, S, W, and H residues, necessary to promote RNA-binding via π-π interactions. The combined results of NMR and RNA-binding on wild-type and mutant proteins highlight the importance of aromatic and arginine residues for RNA recognition by RBS1, revealing that the net charge and the π-amino acid density of this region of Gemin5 are key factors for RNA recognition.

Pathogenic variants in the survival of motor neurons complex gene GEMIN5 cause cerebellar atrophy

Cerebellar ataxia is a genetically heterogeneous disorder. GEMIN5 encoding an RNA-binding protein of the survival of motor neuron complex, is essential for small nuclear ribonucleoprotein biogenesis, and it was recently reported that biallelic loss-of-function variants cause neurodevelopmental delay, hypotonia, and cerebellar ataxia. Here, whole-exome analysis revealed compound heterozygous GEMIN5 variants in two individuals from our cohort of 162 patients with cerebellar atrophy/hypoplasia. Three novel truncating variants and one previously reported missense variant were identified: c.2196dupA, p.(Arg733Thrfs*6) and c.1831G > A, p.(Val611Met) in individual 1, and c.3913delG, p.(Ala1305Leufs*14) and c.4496dupA, p.(Tyr1499*) in individual 2. Western blotting analysis using lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from both affected individuals showed significantly reduced levels of GEMIN5 protein. Zebrafish model for null variants p.(Arg733Thrfs*6) and p.(Ala1305Leufs*14) exhibited complete lethality at 2 weeks and recapitulated a distinct dysplastic phenotype. The phenotypes of affected individuals and the zebrafish mutant models strongly suggest that biallelic loss-of-function variants in GEMIN5 cause cerebellar atrophy/hypoplasia.

Biology of the mRNA Splicing Machinery and Its Dysregulation in Cancer Providing Therapeutic Opportunities

Dysregulation of messenger RNA (mRNA) processing—in particular mRNA splicing—is a hallmark of cancer. Compared to normal cells, cancer cells frequently present aberrant mRNA splicing, which promotes cancer progression and treatment resistance. This hallmark provides opportunities for developing new targeted cancer treatments. Splicing of precursor mRNA into mature mRNA is executed by a dynamic complex of proteins and small RNAs called the spliceosome. Spliceosomes are part of the supraspliceosome, a macromolecular structure where all co-transcriptional mRNA processing activities in the cell nucleus are coordinated. Here we review the biology of the mRNA splicing machinery in the context of other mRNA processing activities in the supraspliceosome and present current knowledge of its dysregulation in lung cancer. In addition, we review investigations to discover therapeutic targets in the spliceosome and give an overview of inhibitors and modulators of the mRNA splicing process identified so far. Together, this provides insight into the value of targeting the spliceosome as a possible new treatment for lung cancer.

Emerging Roles of Gemin5: From snRNPs Assembly to Translation Control

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play a pivotal role in the lifespan of RNAs. The disfunction of RBPs is frequently the cause of cell disorders which are incompatible with life. Furthermore, the ordered assembly of RBPs and RNAs in ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles determines the function of biological complexes, as illustrated by the survival of the motor neuron (SMN) complex. Defects in the SMN complex assembly causes spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), an infant invalidating disease. This multi-subunit chaperone controls the assembly of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), which are the critical components of the splicing machinery. However, the functional and structural characterization of individual members of the SMN complex, such as SMN, Gemin3, and Gemin5, have accumulated evidence for the additional roles of these proteins, unveiling their participation in other RNA-mediated events. In particular, Gemin5 is a multidomain protein that comprises tryptophan-aspartic acid (WD) repeat motifs at the N-terminal region, a dimerization domain at the middle region, and a non-canonical RNA-binding domain at the C-terminal end of the protein. Beyond small nuclear RNA (snRNA) recognition, Gemin5 interacts with a selective group of mRNA targets in the cell environment and plays a key role in reprogramming translation depending on the RNA partner and the cellular conditions. Here, we review recent studies on the SMN complex, with emphasis on the individual components regarding their involvement in cellular processes critical for cell survival.

Structure of tRNA methyltransferase complex of Trm7 and Trm734 reveals a novel binding interface for tRNA recognition

The complex between Trm7 and Trm734 (Trm7–Trm734) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae catalyzes 2′-O-methylation at position 34 in tRNA. We report biochemical and structural studies of the Trm7–Trm734 complex. Purified recombinant Trm7–Trm734 preferentially methylates tRNA^Phe transcript variants possessing two of three factors (Cm32, m¹G37 and pyrimidine34). Therefore, tRNA^Phe, tRNA^Trp and tRNA^Leu are specifically methylated by Trm7–Trm734. We have solved the crystal structures of the apo and S-adenosyl-L-methionine bound forms of Trm7–Trm734. Small angle X-ray scattering reveals that Trm7–Trm734 exists as a hetero-dimer in solution. Trm7 possesses a Rossmann-fold catalytic domain, while Trm734 consists of three WD40 β-propeller domains (termed BPA, BPB and BPC). BPA and BPC form a unique V-shaped cleft, which docks to Trm7. The C-terminal region of Trm7 is required for binding to Trm734. The D-arm of substrate tRNA is required for methylation by Trm7–Trm734. If the D-arm in tRNA^Phe is docked onto the positively charged area of BPB in Trm734, the anticodon-loop is located near the catalytic pocket of Trm7. This model suggests that Trm734 is required for correct positioning of tRNA for methylation. Additionally, a point-mutation in Trm7, which is observed in FTSJ1 (human Trm7 ortholog) of nosyndromic X-linked intellectual disability patients, decreases the methylation activity.

Negative cooperativity between Gemin2 and RNA provides insights into RNA selection and the SMN complex's release in snRNP assembly

The assembly of snRNP cores, in which seven Sm proteins, D1/D2/F/E/G/D3/B, form a ring around the nonameric Sm site of snRNAs, is the early step of spliceosome formation and essential to eukaryotes. It is mediated by the PMRT5 and SMN complexes sequentially in vivo. SMN deficiency causes neurodegenerative disease spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). How the SMN complex assembles snRNP cores is largely unknown, especially how the SMN complex achieves high RNA assembly specificity and how it is released. Here we show, using crystallographic and biochemical approaches, that Gemin2 of the SMN complex enhances RNA specificity of SmD1/D2/F/E/G via a negative cooperativity between Gemin2 and RNA in binding SmD1/D2/F/E/G. Gemin2, independent of its N-tail, constrains the horseshoe-shaped SmD1/D2/F/E/G from outside in a physiologically relevant, narrow state, enabling high RNA specificity. Moreover, the assembly of RNAs inside widens SmD1/D2/F/E/G, causes the release of Gemin2/SMN allosterically and allows SmD3/B to join. The assembly of SmD3/B further facilitates the release of Gemin2/SMN. This is the first to show negative cooperativity in snRNP assembly, which provides insights into RNA selection and the SMN complex's release. These findings reveal a basic mechanism of snRNP core assembly and facilitate pathogenesis studies of SMA.

Structural basis for the dimerization of Gemin5 and its role in protein recruitment and translation control

In all organisms, a selected type of proteins accomplishes critical roles in cellular processes that govern gene expression. The multifunctional protein Gemin5 cooperates in translation control and ribosome binding, besides acting as the RNA-binding protein of the survival of motor neuron (SMN) complex. While these functions reside on distinct domains located at each end of the protein, the structure and function of the middle region remained unknown. Here, we solved the crystal structure of an extended tetratricopeptide (TPR)-like domain in human Gemin5 that self-assembles into a previously unknown canoe-shaped dimer. We further show that the dimerization module is functional in living cells driving the interaction between the viral-induced cleavage fragment p85 and the full-length Gemin5, which anchors splicing and translation members. Disruption of the dimerization surface by a point mutation in the TPR-like domain prevents this interaction and also abrogates translation enhancement induced by p85. The characterization of this unanticipated dimerization domain provides the structural basis for a role of the middle region of Gemin5 as a central hub for protein-protein interactions.

The landscape of the non-canonical RNA-binding site of Gemin5 unveils a feedback loop counteracting the negative effect on translation

Gemin5 is a predominantly cytoplasmic protein that downregulates translation, beyond controlling snRNPs assembly. The C-terminal region harbors a non-canonical RNA-binding site consisting of two domains, RBS1 and RBS2, which differ in RNA-binding capacity and the ability to modulate translation. Here, we show that these domains recognize distinct RNA targets in living cells. Interestingly, the most abundant and exclusive RNA target of the RBS1 domain was Gemin5 mRNA. Biochemical and functional characterization of this target demonstrated that RBS1 polypeptide physically interacts with a predicted thermodynamically stable stem–loop upregulating mRNA translation, thereby counteracting the negative effect of Gemin5 protein on global protein synthesis. In support of this result, destabilization of the stem–loop impairs the stimulatory effect on translation. Moreover, RBS1 stimulates translation of the endogenous Gemin5 mRNA. Hence, although the RBS1 domain downregulates global translation, it positively enhances translation of RNA targets carrying thermodynamically stable secondary structure motifs. This mechanism allows fine-tuning the availability of Gemin5 to play its multiple roles in gene expression control.

SARNAclust: Semi-automatic detection of RNA protein binding motifs from immunoprecipitation data

RNA-protein binding is critical to gene regulation, controlling fundamental processes including splicing, translation, localization and stability, and aberrant RNA-protein interactions are known to play a role in a wide variety of diseases. However, molecular understanding of RNA-protein interactions remains limited; in particular, identification of RNA motifs that bind proteins has long been challenging, especially when such motifs depend on both sequence and structure. Moreover, although RNA binding proteins (RBPs) often contain more than one binding domain, algorithms capable of identifying more than one binding motif simultaneously have not been developed. In this paper we present a novel pipeline to determine binding peaks in crosslinking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) data, to discover multiple possible RNA sequence/structure motifs among them, and to experimentally validate such motifs. At the core is a new semi-automatic algorithm SARNAclust, the first unsupervised method to identify and deconvolve multiple sequence/structure motifs simultaneously. SARNAclust computes similarity between sequence/structure objects using a graph kernel, providing the ability to isolate the impact of specific features through the bulge graph formalism. Application of SARNAclust to synthetic data shows its capability of clustering 5 motifs at once with a V-measure value of over 0.95, while GraphClust achieves only a V-measure of 0.083 and RNAcontext cannot detect any of the motifs. When applied to existing eCLIP sets, SARNAclust finds known motifs for SLBP and HNRNPC and novel motifs for several other RBPs such as AGGF1, AKAP8L and ILF3. We demonstrate an experimental validation protocol, a targeted Bind-n-Seq-like high-throughput sequencing approach that relies on RNA inverse folding for oligo pool design, that can validate the components within the SLBP motif. Finally, we use this protocol to experimentally interrogate the SARNAclust motif predictions for protein ILF3. Our results support a newly identified partially double-stranded UUUUUGAGA motif similar to that known for the splicing factor HNRNPC.

RNA-protein binding is critical to gene regulation, and aberrant RNA-protein interactions play a role in a wide variety of diseases. However, molecular understanding of these interactions remains limited because of the difficulty of ascertaining the motifs that bind each protein. To address this challenge, we have developed a novel algorithm, SARNAclust, to computationally identify combined structure/sequence motifs from immunoprecipitation data. SARNAclust can deconvolve multiple motifs simultaneously and determine the importance of specific features through a graph kernel and bulge graph formalism. We have verified SARNAclust to be effective on synthetic motif data and also tested it on ENCODE eCLIP datasets, identifying known motifs and novel predictions. We have experimentally validated SARNAclust for two proteins, SLBP and ILF3, using RNA Bind-n-Seq measurements. Applying SARNAclust to ENCODE data provides new evidence for previously unknown regulatory interactions, notably splicing co-regulation by ILF3 and the splicing factor hnRNPC.

The right pick: structural basis of snRNA selection by Gemin5

In this Perspective, Wahl and Fischer discuss three studies that have now provided insights into how an assembly factor specifically recognizes substrate RNA molecules and enables their usage for assembly of Sm-class uridine-rich small nuclear RNA–protein complexes.

Macromolecular complexes, rather than individual biopolymers, perform many cellular activities. Faithful assembly of these complexes in vivo is therefore a vital challenge of all cells, and its failure can have fatal consequences. To form functional complexes, cells use elaborate measures to select the “right” components and combine them into working entities. How assembly is achieved at the molecular level is unclear in many cases. Three groups (Jin and colleagues, pp. 2391–2403; Xu and colleagues, pp. 2376–2390; and Tang and colleagues in Cell Research) have now provided insights into how an assembly factor specifically recognizes substrate RNA molecules and enables their usage for assembly of Sm-class uridine-rich small nuclear RNA–protein complexes.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy: From Defective Chaperoning of snRNP Assembly to Neuromuscular Dysfunction

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder that results from decreased levels of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. SMN is part of a multiprotein complex that also includes Gemins 2–8 and Unrip. The SMN-Gemins complex cooperates with the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) complex, whose constituents include WD45, PRMT5 and pICln. Both complexes function as molecular chaperones, interacting with and assisting in the assembly of an Sm protein core onto small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) to generate small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), which are the operating components of the spliceosome. Molecular and structural studies have refined our knowledge of the key events taking place within the crowded environment of cells and the numerous precautions undertaken to ensure the faithful assembly of snRNPs. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether a loss of chaperoning in snRNP assembly, considered as a “housekeeping” activity, is responsible for the selective neuromuscular phenotype in SMA. This review thus shines light on in vivo studies that point toward disturbances in snRNP assembly and the consequential transcriptome abnormalities as the primary drivers of the progressive neuromuscular degeneration underpinning the disease. Disruption of U1 snRNP or snRNP assembly factors other than SMN induces phenotypes that mirror aspects of SMN deficiency, and splicing defects, described in numerous SMA models, can lead to a DNA damage and stress response that compromises the survival of the motor system. Restoring the correct chaperoning of snRNP assembly is therefore predicted to enhance the benefit of SMA therapeutic modalities based on augmenting SMN expression.

Deciphering the mRNP Code: RNA-Bound Determinants of Post-Transcriptional Gene Regulation

Eukaryotic cells determine the final protein output of their genetic program not only by controlling transcription but also by regulating the localization, translation and turnover rates of their mRNAs. Ultimately, the fate of any given mRNA is determined by the ensemble of all associated RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), non-coding RNAs and metabolites collectively known as the messenger ribonucleoprotein particle (mRNP). Although many mRNA-associated factors have been identified over the past years, little is known about the composition of individual mRNPs and the cooperation of their constituents. In this review we discuss recent progress that has been made on how this 'mRNP code' is established on individual transcripts and how it is interpreted during gene expression in eukaryotic cells.