The use of intravitreal gases in non-vitrectomised eyes

Scleral buckling with adjuvant pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling alone for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

To compare the efficacy of scleral buckling with adjuvant pneumatic retinopexy (SB with PR) and scleral buckling (SB) alone for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). This retrospective and comparative study included patients who underwent SB with PR (n = 88) or SB alone (n = 161) for primary RRD. The primary anatomical success rate for SB with PR was 81.8%, whereas that for SB alone was 80.7% (P = 0.836). Among patients who achieved primary anatomical success, those in the SB with PR group showed postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation more frequently than those in the SB alone group (11 of 72 [15.3%] vs. 6 of 130 [4.6%]) (P = 0.009). The mean time to subretinal fluid absorption was not significantly different between the SB with PR and SB alone groups (11.2 ± 6.2 vs. 11.4 ± 5.8 months, P = 0.881). In the SB with PR group, retinal detachment involving ≥ three quadrants was a significant risk factor for surgical failure (hazard ratio, 3.04; P = 0.041). Adjuvant pneumatic retinopexy does not provide additional benefit in improving the surgical outcomes of SB for primary RRD repair.

Case Series of Inappropriate Concentration of Intraocular Sulfur Hexafluoride

Due to high complexity, vitreoretinal surgery presents a higher number of patient safety incidents compared with other ophthalmic procedures. Intraocular gases are one of the most useful adjuncts to vitrectomy and surprisingly, surgeons commonly admit to having occasional problems with incorrect gas concentration. The aim of this study is to present a consecutive case series of patients with improper concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) applied during vitrectomy. Three patients underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy and at the end of surgery inappropriate dilution of 100% SF₆ was administered. It was attributed to a calculation error, change in the gas supplier, or increased partial pressure of SF₆ before dilution. Postoperatively, due to IOP increase, two eyes required intravitreal gas-air exchange. Subsequently, cataract surgery was performed in one eye with concomitant vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade due to retinal detachment. To prevent such complications, we suggest using intraocular gases with great care, training of ophthalmic personnel, and prompting manufacturers to provide SF₆ in a prepared concentration of 20%.