Irrigation with thapsigargin and various concentrations of 5-fluorouracil in a sealed-capsule irrigation device in young rabbit eyes to prevent after-cataract

Effect of Topical 5-Fluorouracil on Lacrimal Drainage System: Histopathological Evidence From Animal Experiments and Potential Clinical Implications

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the histopathological changes in the lacrimal drainage system of rabbits following the application of 1% topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for 4 weeks.

METHODS

Ten eyes of 10 healthy New Zealand white rabbits were subjected to topical instillation of 1% (10 mg/mL) 5-FU, 1 drop 4 times a day for 4 weeks. Rabbits underwent a detailed ocular examination including eyelids, ocular surface, punctal, peri-punctal changes, and nasolacrimal duct patency at baseline and after 4 weeks of 5-FU. The rabbits were then sacrificed, and the eyelid, conjunctiva, lacrimal gland, and the entire lacrimal drainage system were retrieved for histopathological analysis as per standard protocols.

RESULTS

Clinically demonstrable peripunctal changes and canalicular stenosis were noted in 6 (60%, 6/10) rabbits. Two of these (20%, 2/10) had additional complete regurgitation of clear fluid, indicating a nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The remaining 4 (40%, 4/10) clinically did not demonstrate lacrimal drainage changes and were patent on irrigation. The conjunctiva showed focal loss of goblet cells in several areas. Significant changes were noted in the canalicular, lacrimal sac, and the nasolacrimal duct tissues in the form of epithelial hyperplasia, subepithelial inflammation, edema, dilated and congested vessels, and fibrosis. The lacrimal gland, eyelid tissue (excluding tarsal conjunctiva), and cornea showed no significant histopathological changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and histopathological changes were noted in the lacrimal drainage system of rabbits subjected to topical 5-FU application. These findings can have potential clinical implications for patients receiving 5-FU therapy.

AIR/FLUID-DROPPING TECHNIQUE FOR INTRACAPSULAR DISTILLED WATER APPLICATION: A Vitrectomy Approach for Selective Targeting of Lens Epithelial Cells

PURPOSE

We describe a simplified technique of intracapsular distilled water application for targeting lens epithelial cells using vitrectomy approach of fluid-air exchange and to evaluate the reliability and safety of this technique.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with cataract were randomly assigned to treatment group and control group. After the nucleus removal and cortical aspiration, the space of anterior chamber and capsular bag were maintained with continuous infusion of sterile air by using fluid-air exchange technique through side-port incision. Distilled water was dropped into the capsular bag using a specially designed syringe. A concave air-fluid surface (a physical phenomenon) insured the contact of distilled water with the inner surface of the capsule without overflowing from the bag. The distilled water remained in place for 3 minutes and was then removed by the syringe.

RESULTS

No intraoperative surgical complication was observed, and no damage to adjacent intraocular structures was observed during the postoperative follow-up. There was no statistical difference of corneal endothelial cell loss between the treatment group and the control group. Histological study confirmed damage to the lens epithelial cells from anterior capsular specimens treated by the technique.

CONCLUSION

The simplified technique using vitrectomy approach is safe and specific for targeting lens epithelial cells without associated complications.

Experimental models for posterior capsule opacification research

Millions of people worldwide are blinded due to cataract formation. At present the only means of treating a cataract is through surgical intervention. A modern cataract operation involves the creation of an opening in the anterior lens capsule to allow access to the fibre cells, which are then removed. This leaves in place a capsular bag that comprises the remaining anterior capsule and the entire posterior capsule. In most cases, an intraocular lens is implanted into the capsular bag during surgery. This procedure initially generates good visual restoration, but unfortunately, residual lens epithelial cells undergo a wound-healing response invoked by surgery, which in time commonly results in a secondary loss of vision. This condition is known as posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and exhibits classical features of fibrosis, including hyperproliferation, migration, matrix deposition, matrix contraction and transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts. These changes alone can cause visual deterioration, but in a significant number of cases, fibre differentiation is also observed, which gives rise to Soemmering's ring and Elschnig's pearl formation. Elucidating the regulatory factors that govern these events is fundamental in the drive to develop future strategies to prevent or delay visual deterioration resulting from PCO. A range of experimental platforms are available for the study of PCO that range from in vivo animal models to in vitro human cell and tissue culture models. In the current review, we will highlight some of the experimental models used in PCO research and provide examples of key findings that have resulted from these approaches.

Doxorubicin-loaded MePEG-PCL nanoparticles for prevention of posterior capsular opacification

AIMS

Cytotoxic drugs are considered as potent candidates for the prevention of posterior capsular opacification (PCO), but the toxicity incited to healthy intraocular structures is a major concern. In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of PEG methyl ether-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) (MePEG-PCL) doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded nanoparticles (NPs) for prevention of PCO and their influence on intraocular tissues.

METHODS

MePEG-PCL DOX NPs were prepared and characterized. The cytotoxic effect of DOX NPs on lens epithelial cells was compared with free drug. Its effect on PCO prevention following single subconjunctival delivery to lensectomized rabbits was assessed. Toxicity to intraocular structures was evaluated by specular microscopy, electroretinography and histopathology. The availability of DOX in aqueous humor was determined by HPLC.

RESULTS

The cytotoxic effect of DOX NPs was higher compared with free DOX due to prolonged retention within the cells. A significant reduction in degree of PCO was observed in DOX NP-treated eyes compared with untreated controls. There was no significant change in the density and morphology of corneal endothelial cells or the histology of intraocular structures. Electroretinographs of treated eyes did not change compared with the pretreatment values. DOX could be detected by HPLC in the aqueous humor up to 48 h following single subconjunctival injection.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that DOX-loaded MePEG-PCL NPs show promise as a new approach to selectively kill highly proliferative lens epithelial cells in vivo following cataract surgery, while sparing normal tissue.

Transmission electron microscopy of the rabbit posterior capsule irrigated with thapsigargin and 5-fluorouracil in a sealed-capsule irrigation device

PURPOSE

To investigate, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the effect on the posterior capsule of a young rabbit eye of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or thapsigargin in a sealed-capsule irrigation device.

SETTING

St Erik's Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

METHODS

Clear lens extraction was performed unilaterally in eight 4-week-old rabbits. A sealed-capsule irrigation device was irrigated for 2 min with 20 ml of one of the following: balanced salt solution (BSS; n=2), thapsigargin 300 muM (n=2), 5-FU 50 mg/ml (n=2), or 5-FU 25 mg/ml (n=2). The substances were washed out for 10 s with BSS. The eyes were left aphakic. Six weeks postoperatively, the animals were killed, and the posterior capsule was extracted and fixed for TEM. As a control, we also evaluated the capsules from the two fellow eyes in the BSS group that did not undergo surgery.

RESULTS

The ultrastructure of the posterior capsule in eyes irrigated with 5-FU or thapsigargin did not differ from that in the eyes irrigated with BSS or in the eyes that did not have surgery. The membranes had the same ultrastructure with thin collagen fibres on the anterior and posterior face of the posterior capsule and an amorphic matrix.

CONCLUSION

Thapsigargin or 5-FU used in a sealed-capsule irrigation device does not seem to harm the posterior capsule, which appeared similar to when the capsule is irrigated with BSS.