Intrasilicone oil injection of bevacizumab at the end of retinal reattachment surgery for severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a complication of retinal detachment (RD) that is characterized by the development of retinal stiffness and contractile membranes on the surface or underside of the retina. It can occur in primary RD and make repair more challenging, or it can occur following initial successful RD repair and lead to re-detachment. Though our understanding of the pathophysiology underlying PVR membrane formation has grown based on cellular and animal models, there remains no currently approved medical therapy for treatment or prevention of PVR. Though some pharmacologic agents remain under active investigation, many have failed to show consistent benefit in human trials despite promising results from preclinical models. Further research is essential not only to enhance our understanding of PVR pathophysiology but also to identify novel therapeutic strategies for treating PVR in human patients.

Clinical therapeutics for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in retinal detachment

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is an abnormal and prolonged healing response to retinal injury (retinal detachment, post retinal detachment surgery) characterised by: pre/subretinal membrane formation; retinal gliosis and retinal shortening, retinal pigment epithelium cell proliferation; and increased glial (mainly Mu¨ller cells), fibroblast and inflammatory cell (macrophage, lymphocyte) activity, leading to tractional retinal holes/breaks and multiple costly eye operations suffered by patients. PVR can cause retinal re-detachment following primary surgical intervention for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Vitrectomy and scleral buckling surgery are the main approaches for treating PVR complications of retinal detachment. Patients require many operations to remove the scar tissue but vision results are suboptimal, and do not meet patient expectations. Over the past 40 years, this has been one of the greatest challenges for vitreoretinal surgeons and patients. Despite previous large clinical trials of multiple candidate drug therapeutics, no proven adjunctive treatment currently exists to either prevent, reduce, or treat PVR formation in retinal detachment. Both cellular proliferation and the intraocular inflammatory response are realistic targets for adjunctive treatments in PVR. The cellular components of PVR periretinal membranes (retinal pigment epithelial, glial, inflammatory and fibroblastic cells) proliferate and are thus targets for antiproliferative agents. In recent years, several new therapeutics have been tested, and we present an updated review of the clinical therapeutics for PVR in retinal detachment.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an update on the current and emerging treatment options

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure in retinal detachment (RD) surgery and a demanding challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons. Despite the large improvements in surgical techniques and a better understanding of PVR pathogenesis in the last years, satisfactory anatomical and visual outcomes have not been provided yet. For this reason, several different adjunctive pharmacological agents have been investigated in combination with surgery. In this review, we analyze the current and emerging adjunctive treatment options for the management of PVR and we discuss their possible clinical application and beneficial role in this subgroup of patients.

Targeting non-muscle myosin II inhibits proliferative vitreoretinopathy through regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a common complication of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, eventually leading to vision loss. To date, there are no effective drugs for the treatment of this disease. In this study, we investigated the effect of blebbistatin, a non-muscle myosin II inhibitor, on the ARPE-19 cell line and in a rabbit model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. In vitro, we found that blebbistatin inhibited the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells and inhibited the ability of RPE cells to migrate, proliferate, generate extracellular matrix, and affect contractility. In vivo the PVR model showed that blebbistatin significantly delayed PVR progression. It also partially prevents the loss of retinal function caused by PVR. Our results suggest that blebbistatin is a potential drug with clinical applications for the treatment of PVR.

Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab for the Prevention of Postoperative Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy in High-Risk Patients Selected by Laser Flare Photometry

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab at the time of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery, on postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in high-risk patients selected by laser flare photometry.

METHODS

This single-center observational retrospective cohort study included 137 consecutive patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for primary RRD with increased aqueous flare between July 2016 and June 2021. From June 2019, an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab was administered as an adjunct to RRD repair. Patients who underwent surgery before this time and who did not receive intravitreal bevacizumab served as controls. The main outcome was the rate of retinal redetachment due to PVR.

RESULTS

The median flare value was 22.0 (16.5-36.5) pc/ms in the control group and 28.2 (19.7-41.0) pc/ms in the bevacizumab group (p = 0.063). Eyes treated with bevacizumab were more likely to have macula-off RRD (p = 0.003), grade B PVR (p = 0.038), and worse visual acuity (p = 0.004) than controls. The rate of PVR redetachment was significantly lower in the bevacizumab group (11.1%) than in the control (30.1%) (p = 0.012). This difference was more pronounced after adjusting for potential confounding factors (p = 0.005); the risk of developing PVR was 4.5-fold higher in controls (95% CI, 1.6-12.8). After adjustment, the final median visual acuity was also significantly higher in eyes treated with bevacizumab (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that bevacizumab may reduce the risk of PVR-related recurrent RRD and improve visual outcomes in high-risk patients selected by laser flare photometry.

Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Reappraisal

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure after retinal detachment (RD) surgery. Despite the development of modern technologies and sophisticated techniques for the management of RD, the growth of fibrocellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both sides of the retinal surface, as well as intraretinal fibrosis, can compromise surgical outcomes. Since 1983, when the term PVR was coined by the Retina Society, a lot of knowledge has been obtained about the physiopathology and risk factors of PVR, but, despite the proposal of a lot of therapeutic challenges, surgical skills seem to be the only effective way to manage PVR complications.

Pharmacological Therapy of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Systematic In Vitro Comparison of 36 Pharmacological Agents

Purpose: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is currently treated surgically. Reliable pharmaceutical options would be desirable, and numerous drugs have been proposed. This in vitro study is intended to systematically compare and determine the most promising candidates for the treatment of PVR. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted in the "PubMed" database to identify previously published agents proposed for medical treatment of PVR -36 substances that met the inclusion criteria. Toxicity and antiproliferative effects were evaluated on primary human retinal pigment epithelial (hRPE) using colorimetric viability assays. The seven substances with the widest therapeutic range between toxicity and no longer detectable antiproliferative effect were then validated with a bromodeoxyuridine assay and a scratch wound healing assay using primary cells derived from surgically excised human PVR membranes (hPVR). Results: Among 36 substances, 12 showed no effect on hRPE at all. Seventeen substances had a significant (P < 0.05) toxic effect of which nine did not have an antiproliferative effect. Fifteen substances significantly reduced hRPE proliferation (P < 0.05). The seven most promising drugs with the highest difference between toxicity and antiproliferative effects on hRPE were dasatinib, methotrexate, resveratrol, retinoic acid, simvastatin, tacrolimus, and tranilast. Whereof resveratrol, simvastatin, and tranilast additionally showed antiproliferative and dasatinib, resveratrol, and tranilast antimigratory effects on hPVR (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study presents a systematic comparison of drugs that have been proposed for PVR treatment in a human disease model. Dasatinib, resveratrol, simvastatin, and tranilast seem to be promising and are well-characterized in human use.

Vitreous humor proteome: unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying proliferative and neovascular vitreoretinal diseases

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) are among the leading causes of blindness. Due to the multifactorial nature of these vitreoretinal diseases, omics approaches are essential for a deeper understanding of the pathophysiologic processes underlying the evolution to a proliferative or neovascular etiology, in which patients suffer from an abrupt loss of vision. For many years, it was thought that the function of the vitreous was merely structural, supporting and protecting the surrounding ocular tissues. Proteomics studies proved that vitreous is more complex and biologically active than initially thought, and its changes reflect the physiological and pathological state of the eye. The vitreous is the scenario of a complex interplay between inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, neurodegeneration, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Vitreous proteome not only reflects the pathological events that occur in the retina, but the changes in the vitreous itself play a central role in the onset and progression of vitreoretinal diseases. Therefore, this review offers an overview of the studies on the vitreous proteome that could help to elucidate some of the pathological mechanisms underlying proliferative and/or neovascular vitreoretinal diseases and to find new potential pharmaceutical targets.

Translational and clinical advancements in management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advancement in the surgical instrumentation and techniques, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the most common cause for failure of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. This review discusses ongoing translational and clinical advancements in PVR.

RECENT FINDINGS

PVR represents an exaggerated and protracted scarring process that can occur after RRD. The primary cell types involved are retinal pigment epithelium, glial, and inflammatory cells. They interact with growth factors and cytokines derived from the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier that trigger a cascade of cellular processes, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell migration, chemotaxis, proliferation, elaboration of basement membrane and collagen and cellular contraction, leading to overt retinal pathology. Although there are currently no medical therapies proven to be effective against PVR in humans, increased understanding of the risks factors and pathophysiology have helped guide investigations for molecular targets of PVR. The leading therapeutic candidates are drugs that mitigate growth factors, inflammation, and proliferation are the leading therapeutic candidates.

SUMMARY

Although multiple molecular targets have been investigated to prevent and treat PVR, none have yet demonstrated substantial evidence of clinical benefit in humans though some show promise. Advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of PVR may help develop a multipronged approach for this condition.

Use of Intravitreal Methotrexate Infusion in Complicated Retinal Detachment for Prevention of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy in a Pilot Study

Objective

The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of per-operative intravitreal methotrexate (MTX) infusion during vitrectomy in patients of retinal detachment (RD) with advanced grade proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Methods

In this prospective interventional case series, we included patients with Grade C PVR, recurrent RD, and open globe trauma. All patients underwent standard single surgeon operated 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with 80mg of MTX in 1000mL of irrigation fluid. All patients were followed up after four months to assess the final status of retinal attachment and visual acuity. Ethical review board permission was sought for this off-label use of MTX and all patients signed an informed consent form before this intervention.

Results

Thirty eyes of 30 patients with recurrent retinal detachment, open globe trauma, or grade C PVR at initial presentation were included in this study. After PPV, these patients were followed up after four months. A total of 24 (80%) patients maintained retinal attachment at four months. Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range 0.5-3) and mean four months postoperative BCVA was 1.01 logMAR (range 0.3-3) (Student’s t-test; P-value <0.05). Seventeen (56.6%) eyes had pre-operative BCVA of 1.0 whereas 25 (83.3%) had BCVA of 1.0 at the end of the follow-up period. Six (20%) patients had preoperative BCVA of 0.7 whereas 12 (40%) patients had BCVA of 0.7 at four months postoperatively. Out of six (20%) eyes developing RD after this intervention, four eyes achieved retinal reattachment after a second surgery. We did not observe any MTX-related complications during the follow-up period of this study.

Conclusion

Intravitreal MTX infusion during PPV for complicated RD as an adjunctive therapy showed encouraging results and was found to be safe in its use. We need more rigorous and controlled studies to confirm the possible advantages of MTX and its role in the prevention of PVR.

Reporting of Complications in Retinal Detachment Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review Using the CONSORT Extension for Harms

IMPORTANCE

Knowledge on the frequency and severity of complications in surgical trials for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is essential to determine whether surgical procedures are developed and compared adequately, taking into account not only efficacy but also harms.

OBJECTIVE

To review standards of reporting of complications in recent randomized clinical trials of RRD surgery.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This systematic review included randomized clinical trials on RRD surgery published between January 2008 and January 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles retrieved were reviewed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eligible studies were evaluated against checklist items from the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension for Harms criteria by 2 independent authors, and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author.

FINDINGS

Fifty studies were included. The median number of checklist items fulfilled was 8 (range, 0-15), of a possible total of 18. Frequently reported items were discussions balanced with regard to efficacy and adverse events (42 studies [84%]) and inclusions of harm-associated timing of data collection (41 studies [82%]). The least frequently reported items were distinctions between expected and unexpected adverse events (1 study [2%]) and mentions of the use of a validated instrument to report adverse event severity (4 studies [8%]). Frequency of complications was commonly reported (29 studies [58%]) in contrast with complication severity (10 studies [20%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review suggests that severity of complications of RRD surgery has been infrequently quantified and reported in randomized clinical trials and potentially represents an important area of improvement in future RRD surgical trials.

Intravitreal connective tissue growth factor neutralizing antibody or bevacizumab alone or in combination for prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in an experimental model

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is released by retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells and detectable in proliferative membranes (PrMs). This experimental study was performed to investigate the mRNA and protein levels of both CTGF and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in a rabbit model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). In addition, the effects of a single intravitreal injection of the safe dose of anti-CTGF or bevacizumab as monotherapy and in combination were evaluated. PVR was induced in the right eye of albino rabbits by intravitreal injection of cultured adult human RPE cells. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot analysis of CTGF and VEGF-A were performed on whole eye tissue in the PVR model versus controls at different time points. In the next step, the PVR models were assigned to five groups. The monotherapy groups received a single intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml of anti-CTGF 100 μg/ml (final concentration of 6.6 μg/ml in the vitreous) or 0.03 ml of 25 mg/ml bevacizumab. In the combined group, the abovementioned amounts of anti-CTGF and bevacizumab were injected intravitreally from separate sites in one session. No antibody injection was performed in the control group. Intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml of control IgG (1 mg/ml of isotype matched) antibody was performed in the placebo group. After 2 weeks, histologic evaluation including, trichrome staining for collagen, immunostaining by anti-alpha-smooth muscle actin for myofibroblasts, and anti-collagen type-1 antibody on paraffin embedded anterior-posterior sections was done. In addition, fundus photography was performed for clinically equivalent PVR staging. Twenty-four hours following PVR induction, CTGF mRNA and protein levels increased five- and- three-fold compared to controls, respectively (P < 0.001). VEGF-A mRNA and protein levels decreased significantly after 72 h of PVR induction compared to controls (P < 0.05). Means of PrM thickness and myofibroblast cell counts significantly decreased in the anti-CTGF group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). The mean area of collagen type-1 fibers of PrM in the mono- and combination therapy groups that received intravitreal anti-CTGF was significantly reduced (P < 0.001); in addition, mild PVR (stage-1 and 2) formation occurred in comparison with moderate to severe PVR (stage-4 and higher) in other groups. In conclusion, we found that intravitreal injection of CTGF neutralizing antibody resulted in a reduction in PrM thickness, collagen fibers and myofibroblast density in the PVR model. CTGF inhibition may represent a potential therapeutic target for PVR.

Molecular Targets for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

While innovations in the surgical management of retinal detachment (RD) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) have significantly improved anatomic and visual outcomes over the years, recurrent RD due to PVR remains the major limitation to success. There are currently no medical therapies proven to be effective against PVR in humans. Increased understanding of the pathophysiology and risk factors for PVR have helped guide investigations for molecular targets. Drugs that counteract inflammation, proliferation, and growth factors are the leading candidates for treatment of PVR. This review discusses the ongoing search for pharmacologic therapies, with an emphasis on the results of recent clinical investigations.

Intravitreal Conbercept Injection as an Adjuvant in Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Infusion for Severe Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose: To assess the clinical effects of preoperative, intraoperative, or preoperative combined with intraoperative intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 severe PDR patients undergoing vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group 1 (34 eyes) received IVC injections 3 to 5 days before surgery; Group 2 (35 eyes) received IVC injections at the end of surgery; and Group 3 (29 eyes) received IVC injections 3 to 5 days before and at the end of operation. Follow-up examinations were performed for 6 months. Results: The incidence and severity of intraoperative bleeding were not significantly different (P = 0.233). However, the duration of surgery was significantly shorter in Group 1 and Group 3 compared with Group 2 (P < 0.001). The incidences of early and late recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH) were 32.35%, 28.57%, and 13.80%, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mean best-corrected visual acuity had significantly increased to 1.25 ± 0.45 logMAR in Group 1, 1.29 ± 0.46 logMAR in Group 2, 1.16 ± 0.44 logMAR in Group 3 (all P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative VH, neovascular glaucoma, and retinal detachment in Group 3 was slightly lower, however, no significant differences were observed (all P > 0.05). In young patients, similar results were observed and Group 3 had better visual improvements (P = 0.037). Conclusions: Preoperative IVC injection could be a safe and effective adjunct in pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for severe PDR. Preoperative combined with intraoperative IVC are promising, especially in young patients.

Intra-silicone Oil Injection of Methotrexate in Retinal Reattachment Surgery for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

Purpose: To evaluate the role of intrasilicone oil injection of methotrexate (MTX) at the end of vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).Methods: In this prospective comparative study, pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment were performed for eyes with RRD with grade C PVR. In the MTX group, 250 µg MTX was injected into the silicone oil at the end of surgery. The rate of retinal redetachment associated with PVR was assessed.Results: In total, 44 eyes of 44 patients (22 in the MTX group and 22 controls) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Retinal redetachment occurred in one eye (4.5%) in the MTX group and five eyes (22.7%) in the control group (p = 0.18). The change in visual acuity was similar between the two groups at final visit (p = 0.15).Conclusion: The rate of redetachment associated with PVR was lower after intrasilicone injection of MTX at the end of vitrectomy for RRD with severe PVR compared to control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Review

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most common cause for failure of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair and is characterized by the growth and contraction of cellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both sides of the retinal surface as well as intraretinal fibrosis. Currently, PVR is thought to be an abnormal wound healing response that is primarily driven by inflammatory, retinal, and RPE cells. At this time, surgery is the only management option for PVR as there is no proven pharmacologic agent for the treatment or prevention of PVR. Laboratory research to better understand PVR pathophysiology and clinical trials of various agents to prevent PVR formation are ongoing.

Determining the effect of low-dose isotretinoin on proliferative vitreoretinopathy: the DELIVER trial

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of low-dose, oral isotretinoin in lowering the risk of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

METHODS

Prospective, open label, dual-cohort study with pathology-matched historical controls. The prospective experimental arms included two cohorts, composed of 51 eyes with recurrent PVR-related RRD and 58 eyes with primary RRD associated with high-risk features for developing PVR. Eyes in the experimental arms received 20 mg of isotretinoin by mouth once daily for 12 weeks starting the day after surgical repair. The primary outcome measure was single surgery anatomical success rate at 3 months following the study surgery.

RESULTS

The single surgery anatomic success rate was 78.4% versus 70.0% (p=0.358) in eyes with recurrent PVR-related retinal detachment exposed to isotretinoin versus historical controls, respectively. In eyes with RRD at high risk for developing PVR, the single surgery success rate was 84.5% versus 61.1% (p=0.005) for eyes exposed to isotretinoin versus historical controls, respectively. For eyes enrolled in the experimental arms, the most common isotretinoin-related side effects were dry skin/mucus membranes in 106 patients (97.2%), abnormal sleep/dreams in 4 patients (3.7%) and fatigue in 3 patients (2.8%).

CONCLUSION

The management and prevention of PVR is challenging and complex. At the dose and duration given in this study, oral istotretinoin may reduce the risk of PVR-associated recurrent retinal detachment in eyes with primary RRD at high risk of developing PVR.

EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB IN VITRECTOMY FOR PATIENTS WITH PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in vitrectomy for patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-related retinal detachment.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their earliest entries through October, 2016, to identify the studies that had evaluated the effects of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in vitrectomy for eyes with PVR-related retinal detachment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The relevant data were analyzed using Stata 12.0 software. The weighted mean difference, relative risk, and their 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

The authors' search yielded 133 records from which 3 studies that have examined the effects of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (120 eyes with PVR-related retinal detachment) were included for review and analysis. Their meta-analyses showed that neither the best-corrected visual acuity nor retinal redetachment rate showed any clinically or statistically important difference between the nonbevacizumab and bevacizumab groups (P > 0.05). In addition, bevacizumab did not influence the interval between vitrectomy and retinal redetachment (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in vitrectomy for patients with PVR-related retinal detachment did not decrease retinal redetachment rate or improve visual acuity. Better-designed studies with larger simple sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to reach valid conclusions regarding benefits and harms. Moreover, evaluation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy on surgical outcomes in eyes with milder subtypes of PVR or no PVR, but deemed at high risk of PVR, may be worthy of future consideration.

Pharmacotherapies for Retinal Detachment

Retinal detachment is an important cause of visual loss. Currently, surgical techniques, including vitrectomy, scleral buckle, and pneumatic retinopexy, are the only means to repair retinal detachment and restore vision. However, surgical failure rates may be as high as 20%, and visual outcomes continue to vary secondary to multiple processes, including postoperative cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation, macular folds, and, ultimately, photoreceptor death. Therefore, pharmacotherapies are being sought to aid the success rates of modern surgical techniques and reduce or slow the degeneration of photoreceptors during retinal detachment. This review discusses potential therapeutic avenues that aid in retinal reattachment, reduce the rate of retinal redetachment by limiting proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and protect against photoreceptor cell death.

Effect of Serial Intrasilicone Oil Bevacizumab Injections in Eyes With Recurrent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Retinal Detachment

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of serial intrasilicone oil bevacizumab injections (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) on visual acuity (VA) and anatomic outcomes in eyes undergoing proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-related retinal detachment (RD) repair.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, historical-control pilot study.

METHODS

setting: Tertiary care center.

STUDY POPULATION

Nondiabetic eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and silicone oil tamponade with or without scleral buckling procedure (SBP) for recurrent RD due to PVR.

INTERVENTION

Intrasilicone oil injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab was performed intraoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 2, and 3.

OUTCOMES

Retinal reattachment rate, final VA, and rate of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation at month 6.

RESULTS

Twenty eyes of 20 patients were enrolled and compared to a historical control group composed of 35 age- and sex-matched controls. In the study group, logMAR VA improved from mean 1.78 ± 0.43 (Snellen 20/1205) to 1.43 ± 0.70 (Snellen 20/538, P = .04), retinal reattachment was achieved in 14 of 20 eyes (70%), and ERM formation was observed in 7 of 20 eyes (35%) at 6 months. In the control group, logMAR VA improved from mean 1.50 ± 0.74 (Snellen 20/632) to 1.43 ± 0.58 (Snellen 20/538, P = .64), retinal reattachment was achieved in 25 of 35 eyes (71%), and ERM formation was observed in 7 of 35 eyes (20%) at 6 months. No significant difference in final VA (P = .96), retinal reattachment rate (P = .75), or ERM formation (P = .33) was observed between groups. No intrasilicone oil injection-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial intrasilicone oil injections of bevacizumab did not improve retinal reattachment rate, improve final VA, or reduce ERM formation in patients undergoing PVR-related RD surgery.