Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires

The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impact of illnesses from the patient perspective. We conducted a scoping review to understand how PROMs were implemented and used, and their impact in the context of VBHC.

METHODS

Arksey and O'Malley's overarching framework supplemented by principles from mixed-methods Framework Synthesis were used. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. An a priori data extraction framework was created using the review question and objectives as key domains against which to extract data. Mixed-methods data were organised, integrated and preserved in original format and reported for each domain.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included with 60,200 participants. Few studies reported a well-developed programme theory and we found little robust evidence of effect. PROMs were universally considered to have the potential to increase patient satisfaction with treatment and services, enhance patient awareness of symptoms and self-management, and improve health outcomes such as quality of life and global health status. Evidence is currently limited on how PROMs work and how best to optimally implement PROMs to achieve the target outcome. Implementation challenges commonly prevented the realisation of optimal outcomes and patients generally needed better and clearer communication about why PROMs were being given and how they could optimally be used to support their own self-management.

CONCLUSION

PROMSs have yet to demonstrate their full potential in a VBHC context. Optimal PROMs implementation is poorly understood by clinicians and patients. Future studies should explore different models of PROM implementation and use within VBHC programmes to understand what works best and why for each specific context, condition, and population.

Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

To investigate the psychometric performance and responsiveness of Catquest-9SF, a patient-reported questionnaire developed to evaluate visual function as related to daily tasks, in patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

This is a pooled analysis on prospective data collected for previous projects. Subjects were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Peel region, Hamilton, and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Catquest-9SF was administered pre-operative and post-operatively to patients with cataract. Psychometric properties, including category threshold order, infit/outfit, precision, unidimensionality, targeting, and differential item functioning were tested using Rasch analysis with Winsteps software (v.4.4.4) for Catquest-9SF. Responsiveness of questionnaire scores to cataract surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

934 patients (mean age = 71.6, 492[52.7%] female) completed the pre- and post-operative Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.01, person reliability = 0.80), and confirmed unidimensionality. The infit range was 0.75-1.29 and the outfit range was 0.74-1.51, with one item ('satisfaction with vision') misfitting (outfit value = 1.51). There was mistargeting of -1.07 in pre-operative scores and mistargeting of -2.43 in both pre- and post-operative scores, meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. There was no adverse differential item functioning. There was a mean 1.47 logit improvement in Catquest-9SF scores after cataract surgery (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Catquest-9SF is a psychometrically robust questionnaire for assessment of visual function in patients with cataract in Ontario, Canada. It is also responsive to clinical improvement after cataract surgery.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis

PURPOSE

The Catquest-9SF questionnaire is a tool measuring visual disability and vision-related limitation in patients' daily activities. The primary objective of this study was the validation of Catquest-9SF in a Greek-speaking cataract population.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated into Greek and translated back into English. A pre-final Greek version was formed and tested by 10 Greek-English bilingual participants and by the translation team, and the final version was produced. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery completed the questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis was performed for the assessment of the Catquest-9SF psychometric properties, including response category ordering, item fit statistics, principal components analysis, precision, differential item functioning and targeting for preoperative and postoperative data collectively.

RESULTS

A total of 100 (55 men, 45 women, mean age = 71.94±6.63) cataract patients completed the Greek version of Catquest-9SF questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. Rasch analysis showed a significant improvement in the median person Rasch score from -1.49 preoperatively to -4.71 logits postoperatively, while the effect size was 1.3. Unidimensionality was confirmed since infit and outfit mean square values varied between 0.66 and 1.37. Rasch analysis showed good precision and separation ability (Person Separation Index of 3.28, and Person Reliability of 0.92). Four response categories were found for all items. The item-person means difference was -1.83 logits. The difference between preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF logit score was positively correlated with preoperative Catquest-9SF logit score (coeff. = 0.798, p<0.0001) and negatively correlated with postoperative spherical equivalent (coeff. = -0.825, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The Greek version of Catquest-9SF proved to be reliable, valid, unidimensional and responsive to changes after cataract surgery presenting good psychometric properties for cataract patients. Some postoperative mistargeting was found indicating that the tasks were easily performed by respondents after cataract surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05323526 -retrospectively registered.

Self-assessed visual function outcome in cataract surgery: minimum important difference of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to study the minimum important difference (MID) of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire in cataract surgery.

METHODS

A nationwide multi-center prospective randomized study was conducted using the Swedish National Cataract Register and the Catquest-9SF questionnaire. Randomized patients (n = 400) who had completed the Catquest-9SF before surgery and three months after surgery were sent an anchor question on self-assessed change in visual function after cataract surgery 14 days after the postoperative Catquest-9SF. Rasch analysis was performed on the preoperative and postoperative Catquest-9SF questionnaires, and the patients were dichotomized with regard to their preoperative Rasch score. The MID range of the two groups was calculated based on the anchor question, and the anchor question based MID was then estimated in a scatter plot. The MID was also estimated based on distribution by calculating Cohen's effect size.

RESULTS

The analyses included 231 patients who had completed the Catquest-9SF on both occasions as well as the questionnaire with the anchor question. The group with better preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 0.5 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.07. The group with worse preoperative visual function had an anchor question based MID of - 1.80 and a Cohen's effect size based MID of - 1.46.

CONCLUSION

This article contributes detailed knowledge of the MID of Catquest-9SF, enabling even more accurate high-quality evaluation of the outcome and benefit of cataract surgery worldwide.

A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC)

BACKGROUND

To figure out the efficacy, effects, safety and patient's subjective perceptions of phacoemulsification with the active-fluidics system (AFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical study. Age-related cataract patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the AFS group and gravity-fluidics system (GFS) group in a ratio of 1:1 to have phacoemulsification. Participants were followed up at one day, one week, one month and three months postoperatively (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100044409).

RESULTS

The overall included participants were 107 finally. The total aspiration time of the AFS group was significantly less than that of the GFS group (p = .020), while no significant difference existed in cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage between the two groups. The best corrected visual acuity was significantly better in the AFS group at one day and one week postoperatively (p = .002, p = .038 respectively). The recovery of central corneal thickening and macular superficial vasculature increase was earlier in the AFS group. The central retinal thickness was significantly higher in the GFS group at one month and three months postoperatively (p = .029, p = .016 respectively). The incidence of corneal adverse events was higher in GFS group (p = .035). No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Pain scores and the scores of Cat-PROM5 questionnaire of the AFS group were significantly lower than that of the GFS group (p = .011, p = .002 respectively).

CONCLUSION

AFS improves the efficiency, effects, safety and patients' subjective perceptions of phacoemulsification compared with GFS. It is worthwhile to promote its application in cataract surgery.KEY MESSAGESThe active-fluidics system automatically detects and maintains stable intraocular pressure at the set value.The active-fluidics system improves the efficiency, effects, safety and patients' subjective perceptions in phacoemulsification.

Quality Assurance in Cataract and Lens Surgery with Special Consideration of Subjective Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Reported Outcome Measures

BACKGROUND

Results of medical interventions must be documented and evaluated. In studies, this is done with clinical outcomes data (clinician/clinical reported outcome measure, CROM). In the past, less weight has been given to patient surveys with questionnaires (patient reported outcome measure, PROM).

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 104 eyes from 53 patients. Of these, 35 patients had cataract surgery and 15 patients had a refractive lens exchange. The implanted lenses included 62 trifocal IOLs (Asphina trifiocal 839, Zeiss), 34 trifocal toric IOLs (Asphina trifocal toric 939, Zeiss) and 8 bifocal IOLs (Asphina 808, Zeiss) with the same IOL platform. Patients completed a modified questionnaire before surgery and one year after surgery. We made changes to the CatQuest-9SF questionnaire so as to also document side effects.

RESULTS

The effort required by the patients to answer the questionnaire was a burden. Transcribing the data into electronic files so as they could be saved and analyzed was a lot of work for the staff. Among the patients, 88.7% were spectacle-independent in everyday life, and 77.5% for reading. 44.4% had a halo problem. 92% reported the operation as a success. 100% had a prediction error of ≤ ± 0.75 dpt.

CONCLUSION

There is a high rate of patient satisfaction with the outcome of the intervention. New questionnaires are needed for new IOLs. The Catquest-9SF is from 2009. Accordingly, revisions and new validation is necessary. Beyond that, only automatic data transfer will reduce the amount of work involved in data input.

Validation and comparison of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in patients with cataracts: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to investigate and compare the psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) in a large sample of patients with cataracts.

METHODS

A total of 1052 patients with bilateral age-related cataracts were recruited in the study. Patients with other comorbidities that severely impacted vision were excluded. Participants completed the two questionnaires in random order. Classical test theory and Rasch analyses were used to assess the psychometric properties of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

Complete data were obtained from 899 patients. The mean overall index score on the NEI VFQ-25 was 76.1 ± 19.0, while that on the VF-14 was 46.5 ± 15.0. Cronbach's α-values for the NEI VFQ-25 and VF-14 were 0.89 and 0.95, respectively. Ceiling effects were observed on nine of the 12 subscales in the NEI VFQ-25. The correlation between total scores on the NEI VFQ-25 and VF-14 was moderate (r = 0.600; p < 0.001), and subscales of the NEI VFQ-25 were weakly or moderately correlated with the similar domains on the VF-14. Rasch analysis revealed ordered category thresholds and sufficient person separation for both instruments, while the two questionnaires had critical deficiencies in unidimensionality, targeting and differential item functioning.

CONCLUSION

Neither the NEI VFQ-25 nor VF-14 is optimal for the assessment of vision-related quality of life in typical Chinese patients with cataracts. The potential deficiencies of the questionnaires should be taken into consideration prior to application of the instruments or interpretation of the results.

Measures of visual disturbance in patients receiving extended depth-of-focus or trifocal intraocular lenses

The degree of visual disturbance associated with a particular model of intraocular lens (IOL) depends on several factors, including IOL optic, material, and mechanics. Characterization of visual disturbance profiles is paramount for informing clinical IOL selection. Although many studies evaluating presbyopia-correcting IOLs include subjective assessment of visual symptoms, the types of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to capture these outcomes are inconsistent across studies, complicating data contextualization. Furthermore, some tools produce more meaningful results than others. This review presents a discussion on the scientific literature published on the subjective and semiobjective (halo and glare simulator, light-distortion analyzer, vision monitor, and halometers) methods used to assess visual disturbances in patients implanted with trifocal or extended depth-of-focus IOLs, highlighting their advantages and limitations. It underscores the importance of between-study comparisons and the need for standardized PROMs in clinical IOL research to provide more accurate information for IOL selection.

First steps in PROMs and PREMs collection in Wales as part of the prudent and value-based healthcare agenda

Purpose

Patients are experts in their own health and should be treated as equal partners in their care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective way of gathering patient feedback and can facilitate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis to improve decision making and service improvement. The PROMs, PREMs & Effectiveness Programme was initiated in 2016 and aimed to develop an electronic platform to facilitate collection of PROMs and Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) from secondary care patients across Wales.

Methods

We worked with all Health Boards in Wales, the NHS Wales Informatics Service (NWIS), and Cedar (a healthcare technology research centre) to identify and meet technical requirements to develop a platform which is fit for purpose. Patient groups were included throughout the development to gather feedback and for extensive testing. Clinical teams helped identify the most appropriate tools, with licences, translations and electronic formatting issues being managed centrally.

Results

The developed platform is integrated with patient administration systems minimising the need for manual input, with processes in place to allow automatic collection triggers according to nationally agreed schedules. We have over 30 nationally agreed PROMs ‘pathways’ with over 110,000 PROMs collected to date. Responses are fed back to clinicians via the electronic patient record and to each health board via feeds to the national data warehouse, making data easily accessible to different teams, maximising use and application.

Discussion

The national platform has provided a co-ordinated approach to PROMs collection in Wales, offering an effective means of communicating with patients outside the traditional clinic visit.

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient Distress from Preoperative Fasting in Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To develop and psychometrically validate a questionnaire to measure patient distress with preoperative fasting related to cataract surgery.Methods: In this single-centered cross-sectional study, consecutive sampling of cataract patients was undertaken immediately preoperatively from February to December 2019. A questionnaire evaluating patient distress with fasting was designed and administered. Questionnaire development occurred in an iterative process and was conducted with consultation from expert investigators and patients. Validation and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire were performed with Rasch analysis.Results: A preliminary version of the questionnaire was developed by 10 study investigators. Across five iterations of development, the questionnaire was administered to 186 cataract patients. Psychometric evaluation of the 13-item questionnaire demonstrated ordered thresholds, acceptable item calibration and fit, adequate internal consistency, ability to discriminate between three levels of distress from preoperative fasting and no notable differential item functioning. However, issues with mistargeting, clustering of items on the person-item map and multidimensionality remained. Given these concerns, 13 separate re-analyses were conducted via removal of certain items. A 6-item subset was determined to be well targeted, unidimensional, did not display item clustering and was able to discriminate between patients with high and low distress from preoperative fasting.Conclusion: A 6-item questionnaire is a valid, psychometrically robust and reliable measure for the assessment of patient distress with preoperative fasting in cataract surgery. Items include hunger, thirst, hoarseness, weakness, anxiety and nausea. Future studies should seek to validate this questionnaire across a variety of sociodemographic contexts, languages and specialties.

Catquest-9SF questionnaire and eCAPS: Validation in a Canadian population

Background

Visual acuity alone has limitations in assessing a patient’s appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery. Several tools, including the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and the electronic cataract appropriateness and priority system (eCAPS) have been developed to evaluate patients–reported visual function as related to day-to-day tasks. The aim of this study was to validate Catquest-9SF and eCAPS in a Canadian population and propose a shorter version of each, in an attempt to extend their applicability in clinical practice.

Methods

The English translation of the Swedish Catquest-9SF and eCAPS were self-administered separately in pre-operative patients in tertiary care in Peel region, Ontario. Rasch analysis was used to validate both scales and assess their psychometric properties, such as category threshold order, item fit, unidimensionality, precision, targeting, and differential item functioning.

Results

A total of 313 cataract patients (mean age = 69.1, 56.5% female) completed the Catquest-9SF and eCAPS. Catquest-9SF had ordered response thresholds, adequate precision (person separation index = 2.09, person reliability = 0.81), unidimensionality and no misfits (infit range 0.75–1.35, outfit range 0.83–1.36). There mean for patients was equal to -1.43 (lower than the mean for items which is set automatically at zero), meaning that tasks were relatively easy for respondent ability. eCAPS had 3 items that misfit the Rasch model and were excluded (infit range 0.82–1.30, outfit range 0.75–1.36). Precision was inadequate (person separation index = 0.19, person reliability = 0.04). 78.8% of subjects scored≤9 (answered that they had no issues for most questions).

Conclusions

Catquest-9SF demonstrated good psychometric properties and is suitable for assessing visual function of care-seeking patients referred for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. There was some mistargeting, suggesting that the tasks were relatively easy to perform, which is consistent with previous research. On the contrary, eCAPS is not sensitive in differentiating patients who had impaired visual functioning.

A randomised, prospective study of 'off-the-shelf' use of toric intraocular lenses for cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism in the NHS

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To compare visual and refractive outcomes of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) with 'off-the-shelf' use of toric IOLs (TIOLs), with a fixed 2-dioptre cylinder (DC) correction, for cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism in a public-sector setting.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Seventy-seven patients (77 eyes, first treated eye) with visually significant cataract and pre-operative corneal astigmatism ≥2.00 DC were randomised to receive either 'off-the-shelf' TIOLs, with a fixed 2.00 DC cylinder correction (39 eyes), or monofocal IOLs (38 eyes) with LRIs. The concept of fixing the cylindrical correction was to minimise costs, allow a full TIOL bank to be available and eliminate the need for individual TIOL ordering. Outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and refraction. Astigmatic changes were evaluated using the Alpins vector method.

RESULTS

Mean UDVA improved from logMAR 0.88 (SD 0.56)[~20/150] pre-operatively to 0.18 (SD 0.19)[~20/30] post-operatively in TIOL group, versus 0.82 (SD 0.55)[~20/130] to 0.27 (SD 0.15)[~20/40] in monofocal/LRI group (P = 0.02; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.01). Mean CDVA improved from logMAR 0.40 (SD 0.26)[~20/50] to 0.01 (SD 0.12)[~20/20] in TIOL group, and 0.41 (SD 0.38)[~20/40] to 0.06 (SD 0.12)[~20/25] in LRI group (P = 0.07; 95% CI: -0.11, 0.01). Average post-operative refractive cylinder in TIOL group was 1.35 DC (SD 0.84 DC) and in LRI group 1.91 DC (SD 1.07 DC) (P = 0.01; 95% CI: -1, -0.12). Mean difference vector magnitude was 1.92 DC (SD 1.08 DC) in LRI group and 1.37 DC (SD 0.84 DC) in TIOL group (P = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

TIOLs with a fixed 2.00 DC correction during cataract surgery may improve UDVA, reduce post-operative cylinder and result in a more reliable astigmatic correction compared with monofocal IOLs with LRIs.

A randomised controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: 12-month results

AIMS

To report 12-month outcomes of randomised controlled trial comparing conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective single-masked randomised case-controlled trial. Four hundred patients were randomised to CPS or FLACS with the LenSx platform (Alcon Laboratories Inc.). Visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell loss (ECL), adverse events and quality of life outcomes, using EuroQOL 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-3 L) and cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaires (Cat-PROM5), were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty four patients (58.5%) attended 12-month follow-up (116 FLACS, 118 CPS). Mean LogMAR unaided distance visual acuity) (±SD) was 0.12 (0.18) with FLACS and 0.13 (0.19) with CPS (p=0.68; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]-0.06,0.04). Mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.1±0.6 diopters (D) with FLACS and -0.2±0.6 D with CPS (p=0.44; 95% CI -0.09, 0.21). Mean corrected distance visual acuity (±SD) was -0.01 (0.1) with FLACS and 0(0.1) with CPS (p=0.45; 95% CI -0.04,0.02). Two patients per group underwent YAG laser capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification (p=1). Mean ECL (per mm²±SD) was 301±320 with FLACS and 228±303 with CPS (p=0.07; 95% CI -7.26, 153.26). Mean Cat-PROM scores (±SD) were -5.5 (2.6) with FLACS and -5.8 (2.5) with CPS (p=0.3; 95% CI 0.31,1.01). EQ5-3DL mean index score (±SD) was 0.92 (0.13) with FLACS and 0.89 (0.14) with CPS (p=0.1; 95% CI -0.1, 0.01). Vector analysis comparing manual limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) and intrastromal femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomies (iFAKs) showed a greater correction index (p=0.02; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.60) and smaller difference vector (p=0.046; 95% CI -0.54, -0.01) with iFAK.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in vision, refraction, adverse postoperative events or PROMs between FLACS and CPS groups at 12 months. iFAKs may provide more effective astigmatic correction compared to LRIs, 12 months postoperatively.

Evaluation of eye movements and visual performance in patients with cataract

Eye movement is an essential component of visual perception. Eye movement disorders have been observed in many eye disease, and are thought to affect various visual performance in daily life. However, eye movement behaviors of the elderly with cataract are poorly understood, and the impact of cataract surgery on eye movements has not been investigated. In this study, we observed the eye movement behaviors in thirty patients with bilateral age-related cataract while performing three performance-based tasks (visual search, face recognition and reading). Eye movements were automatically recorded by an eye tracker during task performance. We found an overall improved visual performance postoperatively, presented as elevated percentage of correctly identified objects and faces, reduced search time and increased reading speed. Eye movement parameters were found significantly altered after cataract surgery. Fixation count, total fixation duration and total visit duration were markedly increased in the visual search task and face recognition task. The proportion of regressive saccades was obviously decreased in the reading task. These eye movement parameters were found to be correlated with the measures of visual performance. Our findings suggested a potential association between the eye movement disturbance and impaired visual performance, and provided a new insight on the potential usefulness of eye movement as an objective and valid tool to understand visual impairments caused by cataract, as well as evaluate practical outcomes of cataract surgery.

Visual and refractive outcomes and glistenings occurrence after implantation of 2 hydrophobic acrylic aspheric monofocal IOLs

PURPOSE

To compare the Clareon IOL with the Tecnis PCB00 IOL in terms of visual performance, refractive outcomes, glistenings occurrence, and quality-of-life outcomes.

SETTING

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Single-center, single-masked, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine patients with bilateral cataracts were randomized to receive the Clareon (C IOL) or Tecnis (T IOL) IOL. Visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell loss, contrast sensitivity, mesopic gap acuity, evaluation of glistenings, and rates of perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Quality-of-life outcomes were measured with the EuroQOL-5 dimensions questionnaire and the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) questionnaire. Optimized A-constants were available for the T IOL but not for the C IOL.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (140 eyes) received the C IOLs and 68 patients (134 eyes) received the T IOLs. Data were analyzed for the first implanted eye. At 12 months, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.02 ± 0.10 and 0.01 ± 0.08 (mean ± SD; P = .49; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.04) in the C IOL and T IOL groups, respectively. Corrected distance visual acuity was -0.02 ± 0.09 and -0.03 ± 0.06, respectively (P = .45; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.04). The increase in CCT was 14 ± 19 and 16 ± 28 μm, respectively (P = .63; 95% CI, -10.16 to 6.16). Mean absolute refraction spherical equivalent error from target refraction was 0.41 ± 0.28 for the C IOL and 0.25 ± 0.2 for the T IOL groups (P = .002; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.24). Glistenings were minimal (median grade 0), with no difference in grades between groups (P = .2). PROMs improved postoperatively and were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in visual outcomes between the Clareon IOL and Tecnis PCB00 IOL. Glistenings were rarely observed in either IOL with no difference in grades. There was no difference in perioperative or postoperative complications. Surgeon optimization of the A-constant for the Clareon IOL is recommended.

A matched case-control study of the clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes of cystoid macular edema complicating phacoemulsification surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the visual outcomes of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME) as compared with age- and copathology-matched control subjects, the costs of treatment and follow-up, and the patient-reported outcomes using the new Cat-patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) 5 questionnaire.

SETTING

West Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Matched case-control study.

METHODS

Fifty-two eyes of 49 patients developed CME over an 18-month period. Age- and copathology-matched patients were identified from clinical records over the same time period in a 2:1 ratio (90 eyes). Postoperative clinical outcomes were recorded including treatments received, costs of treatments, and patient-reported outcome measures using the Cat-PROM5.

RESULTS

Patients with CME reported a significantly worse outcome from surgery than control subjects. Furthermore, patients with CME had significantly worse visual acuity postoperatively than control subjects (CME: logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.40 ± 0.33, n = 37; control subjects: 0.30 ± 0.33; P < .05) despite there being no difference in preoperative visual acuity. In patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM), notably those with CME had worse patient-reported outcomes than control subjects with ERM, and only 18% received prophylactic corticosteroid injection at surgery compared with 63.6% of control subjects. CME resulted in an excess of 266 outpatient appointments, with 388 weeks of topical therapy, 18 orbital floor injections, 6 intravitreal steroid injections, 5 intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections, and 1 intravitreal dexamethasone implant with an excess expenditure of £216.81 per case.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients developing CME after cataract surgery had reduced visual acuity at 4 to 6 weeks, patient-reported visual outcomes, and increased number of hospital appointments, treatments, and costs.

Development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice among patients with age-related cataract

OBJECTIVE

Shared decision making and meaningful patient involvement are key in improving cataract treatment outcomes, but no decision aid has been formally developed and validated for this purpose. Our aims were to develop a patient decision aid to guide patients' decision about when to undergo cataract surgery, and to determine patient's comprehension and booklet's acceptability.

METHODS

The patient decision aid was developed and included evidence-based information about general cataract, its benefits, risks of treatment options, and value clarification exercise. A total of 30 patients with age-related cataract aged between 50 and 80 years were interviewed after using either the patient decision aid (n = 15) or the traditional education booklet (n = 15).

RESULTS

The patients who received the decision aid agreed that the information was new (n = 15, 100%), the length of the aid was "just about right" (n = 13, 87%), the information was clear and easy to understand (n = 13, 87%), the decision aid was helpful in making decision (n = 13, 87%) and would like to recommend this decision aid to others (n = 14, 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision aid was assessed positively by patients with age-related cataract. There is a need for its further verification in the context of primary eye care setting.

Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients

PURPOSE

The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision 'bolt-on' domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population.

METHODS

The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4-8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman's rs =  - 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs =  - 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs =  - 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34-0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20-0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13-0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17-0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting.

Mapping to Quality of Life and Capability Measures in Cataract Surgery Patients: From Cat-PROM5 to EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-O Using Mixture Modelling

Objectives. Cataract is a prevalent and potentially blinding eye condition. Cataract surgery, the only proven treatment for this condition, is a very frequently undertaken procedure. The objective of this analysis was to develop a mapping algorithm that could be used to predict quality of life and capability scores from the Cat-PROM5, a newly developed, validated patient-reported outcome measure for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods. We estimated linear models and adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models. Data were taken from the Predict-CAT cohort of up to 1181 patients undergoing cataract surgery at two sites in England. The Cat-PROM5 was mapped to two quality of life measures (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) and one capability measure (ICECAP-O). All patients reported ICECAP-O and one or other of the EQ-5D measures both before and after cataract surgery. Model performance was assessed using likelihood statistics, graphical inspections of model fit, and error measurements. Results. Adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models dominated linear models on all performance criteria. Mixture models offered very good fit. Three component models that allowed component membership to be a function of covariates (age, sex, and diabetic status depending on specification and outcome measure) and which conditioned on covariates offered the best performance in almost all cases. An exception was the EQ-5D-5L post-surgery for which a two-component model was selected. Conclusions. Mapping from Cat-PROM5 to quality of life and capability measures using adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models is feasible, and the estimates can be used to support cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to cataract care. Mixture models performed strongly for both quality of life outcomes and capability outcomes.

Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: A systematic review

Cataract is a common cause of reversible blindness. Visual acuity alone is not enough to assess appropriateness for surgery, prioritization, and outcomes. Catquest-9SF questionnaire evaluates patients' self-assessed visual function as related to daily tasks. We summarize and assess the validity of Catquest-9SF as a patient-reported outcome questionnaire to determine its suitability for clinical use. Thirteen studies with sample sizes ranging 102-10,886 (total n = 15,289) undertaken from 2009 to 2018 were included. Catquest-9SF showed unidimensionality, ordered response thresholds, and acceptable precision in all studies. Nine studies had significant mistargeting (range 0.66 to -2.04); the tasks being easy relative to the respondent ability in most studies. Two studies had misfitting items. We conclude Catquest-9SF is a valid and reliable tool to measure visual function in patients with cataract in various populations. Because results can be population specific, it is recommended that Catquest-9SF be validated in a new population before it is incorporated in routine practice.

The use of patient-reported outcome research in modern ophthalmology: impact on clinical trials and routine clinical practice

This review article considers the rising demand for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in modern ophthalmic research and clinical practice. We review what PROMs are, how they are developed and chosen for use, and how their quality can be critically appraised. We outline the progress made to develop PROMs in each clinical subspecialty. We highlight recent examples of the use of PROMs as secondary outcome measures in randomized controlled clinical trials and consider the impact they have had. With increasing interest in using PROMs as primary outcome measures, particularly where interventions have been found to be of equivalent efficacy by traditional outcome metrics, we highlight the importance of instrument precision in permitting smaller sample sizes to be recruited. Our review finds that while there has been considerable progress in PROM development, particularly in cataract, glaucoma, medical retina, and low vision, there is a paucity of useful tools for less common ophthalmic conditions. Development and validation of item banks, administered using computer adaptive testing, has been proposed as a solution to overcome many of the traditional limitations of PROMs, but further work will be needed to examine their acceptability to patients, clinicians, and investigators.

A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical results of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

SETTING

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Single-center prospective randomized interventional case-controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomized to receive either CPS or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The surgery was performed with a femtosecond laser (Lensx), and all operations were performed with a gravity-fluidics torsional phacoemulsification machine (Infiniti). The visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), central foveal thickness (CFT), endothelial cell loss, and rates of intraoperative and postoperative events were recorded. Quality of life outcomes were measured with the EuroQOL 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) and patient-reported quality of vision was assessed with a cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures questionnaire (Cat-PROM5).

RESULTS

The study comprised 400 eyes of 400 patients who had CPS (n = 200) or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (n = 200). Seven patients (3.5%) in the femtosecond laser-assisted group were not able to complete the treatment and received CPS. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) 0.15 ± 0.21 (SD) and 0.15 ± 0.19 logMAR after CPS and femtosecond laser-assisted surgery, respectively (P = 1.0); the pinhole-corrected visual acuity was 0.04 ± 0.12 and 0.04 ± 0.12, respectively (P = 1.0); the increase in CCT was 13 ± 19 μm and 15 ± 25 μm, respectively (P = .5); and the endothelial cell loss was 9.7 ± 13.7 % and 10.2% ± 13.7, respectively (P = .76). The manifest refraction spherical equivalent error was -0.14 ± 0.60 diopters (D) after CPS and -0.12 ± 0.60 D after femtosecond laser-assisted surgery (P = .74); the mean change in CFT was 9 ± 35 μm and 6 ± 35 μm, respectively (P = .55); and the rate of posterior capsule rupture was 3% and 0%, respectively (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the nonsignificant differences between 2 treatment modalities, notwithstanding a significant reduction in posterior capsule ruptures in the femtosecond laser-assisted surgery group.

Cat-PROM5: a brief psychometrically robust self-report questionnaire instrument for cataract surgery

Purpose

To develop a short, psychometrically robust and responsive cataract patient reported outcome measure suitable for use in high-volume surgical environments.

Methods

A prospective study in which participants completed development versions of questionnaires exploring the quality of their eyesight using items harvested from two existing United Kingdom developed parent questionnaires. Participants were 822 patients awaiting cataract surgery recruited from 4 cataract surgical centres based in the UK. Exclusion criteria were other visually significant comorbidities and age <50 years. An iterative multi-stage process of evaluation using Rasch and factor analyses with sequential item reduction was undertaken.

Results

A definitive item set of just five items delivered performance in accordance with the requirements of the Rasch model: no threshold disordering, no misfitting items, Rasch-based reliability 0.90, person separation 2.98, Cronbach’s α 0.89, good targeting of questions to patients with cataract with pre-operative item mean −0.41 logits and absence of significant floor or ceiling effects, minor deviations of item invariance, and confirmed unidimensionality. The test–re-test repeatability intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.89 with excellent responsiveness to surgery, Cohen’s d −1.45 SD. Rasch calibration values are provided for Cat-PROM5 users.

Conclusions

A psychometrically robust and highly responsive five-item cataract surgery patient reported outcome measure has been developed, which is suitable for use in high-volume cataract surgical services.