1
|
van Steenhoven JEC, van Maaren MC, Verreck EEF, Schipper RJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Kuijer A, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Inequalities in the omission of axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive patients in the Netherlands: Innovative hospitals are early adopters of a de-escalating approach. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1378-1387. [PMID: 36522834 PMCID: PMC10108210 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
During the last decade completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was gradually omitted in sentinel lymph node positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients. However, adoption varies among hospitals. We analyzed factors associated with the omission of cALND in all Dutch SLN+ patients. As one of the focus hospital-related factors we defined "innovative" as the percentage of gene-expression profile (GEP) deployment within the indicated group of patients per hospital as a proxy for early adoption of innovations. cT1-2N0M0 SLN+ patients treated between 2011 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were defined to be innovative based on their GEP use. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed to assess the relationship between innovative capacity, patient-, treatment- and hospital-related characteristics and cALND performance. 14 317 patients were included. Treatment in a hospital with high innovative capacity was associated with a lower probability of receiving cALND (OR 0.69, OR 0.46 and OR 0.35 in modestly, fairly and very innovative, respectively). Other factors associated with a lower probability of receiving a cALND were age 70 and 79 years and ≥79 years (ORs 0.59 [95% CI: 0.50-0.68] and 0.21 [95% CI: 0.17-0.26]) and treatment in an academic hospital (OR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.33-0.51]). Factors associated with an increased probability of undergoing cALND were HR-/HER2- tumors (OR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.19-1.80]), macrometastatic lymph node involvement (OR 6.37 [95% CI: 5.70-7.13]) and mastectomy (OR 4.57 [95% CI: 4.09-5.10]). Patients treated in a hospital that early adopted innovations were less likely to receive cALND. Our findings endorse the need for studies on barriers and facilitators of implementing innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert J Schipper
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Meer DJ, Kramer I, van Maaren MC, van Diest PJ, C Linn S, Maduro JH, J A Strobbe L, Siesling S, Schmidt MK, Voogd AC. Comprehensive trends in incidence, treatment, survival and mortality of first primary invasive breast cancer stratified by age, stage and receptor subtype in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2017. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:2289-2303. [PMID: 33252836 PMCID: PMC8048677 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Our study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of trends in incidence, survival, mortality and treatment of first primary invasive breast cancer (BC), according to age, stage and receptor subtype in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2017. Data from all women diagnosed with first primary stage I to IV BC (N = 320 249) were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. BC mortality and general population data were retrieved from Statistics Netherlands. Age-standardised incidence and mortality rates were calculated with annual percentage change (APC) and average annual percentage change (AAPC) statistics. The relative survival (RS) was used as estimator for disease-specific survival. The BC incidence for all BC patients combined significantly increased until 2013 from 126 to 158 per 100 000 person-years, after which a declining trend was observed. Surgery became less extensive, but (neo-)adjuvant systemic treatments and their combinations were given more frequently. The RS improved for all age groups and for most stages and receptor subtypes, but remained stable for all subtypes since 2012 to 2013 and since 2000 to 2009 for Stage IV BC at 15 years of follow-up. Overall, the 5- and 10-year RS increased from 76.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76.1, 77.4) and 55.9% (95% CI: 54.7, 57.1) in 1989 to 1999 to 91.0% (95% CI: 90.5, 91.5) and 82.9% (95% CI: 82.2, 83.5), respectively, in 2010 to 2016. BC mortality improved regardless of age and overall decreased from 57 to 35 per 100 000 person-years between 1989 and 2017. In conclusion, the BC incidence in the Netherlands has steadily increased since 1989, but the latest trends show promising declines. Survival improved markedly for most patients and the mortality decreased regardless of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniël J van der Meer
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht
| | - Iris Kramer
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht
| | | | - John H Maduro
- Department of radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Luc J A Strobbe
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adri C Voogd
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht.,Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Steenhoven JEC, van Dalen T. ASO Author Reflections: The Changing Role of Gene Expression Profiling in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:800-801. [PMID: 31650304 PMCID: PMC6901413 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07955-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, Schreuder K, Elias SG, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E, Siesling S, van Dalen T. The Changing Role of Gene-Expression Profiling in the Era of De-escalating Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3495-3501. [PMID: 31209664 PMCID: PMC6739278 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07511-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We assessed the recent trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy thereby evaluating the role of the 70-gene signature (70-GS) testing in decision-making in the systemic treatment of patients with lymph node negative (N0) and lymph node positive (N+) breast cancer. Methods Patients with a national guideline directed indication for 70-GS use treated between 2013 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated within guideline- and age-delineated subgroups. The influence of the 70-GS on chemotherapy use was assessed with logistic regression. Results During the study period, the overall administration of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 49 to 23% and 70-GS use increased from 24 to 51%. The 70-GS was not associated with a decreased likelihood for N0 patients to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.17), as the proportion of N0 patients who received chemotherapy in the absence of 70-GS use decreased during the study period. In patients with N1a disease, 70-GS testing was associated with a decreased likelihood to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.15–0.29). In patients < 50 years and 50–59 years of age, 70-GS use was associated with a consistent lower proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy throughout the study period (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13–0.23 and OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43–0.65, respectively). Conclusions In this population-based study, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ breast cancer strongly declined. For node-positive and younger patients, 70-GS use was associated with a decreased probability for patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-07511-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - K Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Bentum S, van Dalen T, Siesling S. Use and Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Relation to the Clinical Risk of Developing Metastases in Early Breast Cancer Patients in the Netherlands. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:85-92. [PMID: 30650410 DOI: 10.1159/000495742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nationwide use of the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS) and implications regarding chemotherapy administration in relation to clinical risk in early breast cancer patients are investigated. METHODS Breast cancer patients surgically treated between 2014 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and categorized as having a clinical low, intermediate, or high risk of developing metastases. Deployment of the 21-RS is advocated in patients with an intermediate risk of developing metastases. The use and impact of the 21-RS test result on chemotherapy administration were assessed in relation to the clinical risk as well as patient and tumor characteristics; χ2 tests were used for analysis. RESULTS Of all patients, 20,488 were considered as clinical low-, 4,309 as intermediate-, and 15,266 as high-risk patients. The 21-RS was deployed in 0.1% (n = 23), 3.2% (n = 137), and 0.6% (n = 90) of these categories, respectively. In the clinical intermediate-risk group, the 21-RS assigned 73.7, 13.1, and 13.1% of patients to the genomic low-, intermediate-, and high-risk category, respectively. Adherence to the 21-RS was 95.6% in these patients. CONCLUSION In the Netherlands, the 21-RS test is applied both inside and outside the guideline-directed area. In case of discordance between the genomic and clinical risk, patients were treated in line with the result of the 21-RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands, .,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Bentum
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Q, Li L, Jiang X, Du Q, Li Y, Li T, Gong H, Cao B. Characteristics and prognostic values of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women in Beijing with operable breast cancer: a retrospective analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021819. [PMID: 30413499 PMCID: PMC6231570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated the characteristics and prognostic values of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women with operable breast cancer in Beijing. DESIGN A retrospective study through case information enquiry or telephonic follow-up. SETTING Beijing Friendship Hospital. PARTICIPANTS 1042 patients with primary operable breast cancer between 2008 and 2012 were enrolled in the study. MEASURES The characteristics and 5-year relapse rates according to the Nottingham Prognosis Index (NPI) and molecular subtypes were analysed. RESULTS In 1042 patients, the percentages of high histological grade, N1+N2, T2+T4 were 7.3%, 24.2%, 46.9%, respectively. In patients with invasive breast cancer, the percentages of auxiliary staging, positive margins, vascular invasion and nerve infiltration were 65.0%, 2.8%, 10.5% and 1.1%, respectively. The missing percentages of auxiliary staging, margins, vascular tumour invasion and nerve infiltration were 14.2%, 31.4%, 46.5% and 97.4%, respectively. The percentages of ER-positive, PR-positive, HER2-positive and Ki-67 high expression were 64.3%, 43.8%, 18.8% and 62.7%, respectively. The percentages of luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpression and basal-like breast cancers were 10.5%, 54.2%, 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Luminal A, luminal B and basal-like breast cancer subtypes were more common in the >60 years group, the 41-60 years group and the 20-40 years group, respectively. The 5-year relapse rates according to NPI were as follows: 6.2% in the low recurrence risk group, 10.4% in the moderate recurrence risk group and 12.9% in the high recurrence risk group. The 5-year relapse rates according to molecular subtypes were as follows: luminal A 4.0%, luminal B 7.0%, HER2-overexpression14.2%, basal-like 15.6%. CONCLUSIONS Reasonable analysis of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women with operable breast cancer in Beijing may be useful to guide precise treatment and predict prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyue Jiang
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Du
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yingrui Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular biology, Basic Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Teng Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Gong
- Department of Surgery, Beijing Changping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Bangwei Cao
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The number of breast cancer (BC) cases is growing worldwide, being most frequently diagnosed in the early-setting. Mammaprint™ is a 70-gene-expression signature, originally designed for selecting early BC patients with low risk of developing metastasis, so that they could be spared adjuvant chemotherapy. Its use as a prognostic biomarker has been extensively validated, both retrospectively and prospectively. However, its value as a predictive tool and as a clinically useful tool remains controversial. This review will describe how the test works, its application in the clinic and its limitations. Cost-effectiveness studies will be summarized. Finally, we will provide a perspective on the use of Mammaprint in the near future, as a valuable tool for personalizing the treatment of early BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Brandão
- Institut Jules Bordet & L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Noam Pondé
- Institut Jules Bordet & L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Institut Jules Bordet & L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blok EJ, Bastiaannet E, van den Hout WB, Liefers GJ, Smit VTHBM, Kroep JR, van de Velde CJH. Systematic review of the clinical and economic value of gene expression profiles for invasive early breast cancer available in Europe. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 62:74-90. [PMID: 29175678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Gene expression profiles with prognostic capacities have shown good performance in multiple clinical trials. However, with multiple assays available and numerous types of validation studies performed, the added value for daily clinical practice is still unclear. In Europe, the MammaPrint, OncotypeDX, PAM50/Prosigna and Endopredict assays are commercially available. In this systematic review, we aim to assess these assays on four important criteria: Assay development and methodology, clinical validation, clinical utility and economic value. We performed a literature search covering PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane, for studies related to one or more of the four selected assays. We identified 147 papers for inclusion in this review. MammaPrint and OncotypeDX both have evidence available, including level IA clinical trial results for both assays. Both assays provide prognostic information. Predictive value has only been shown for OncotypeDX. In the clinical utility studies, a higher reduction in chemotherapy was achieved by OncotypeDX, although the number of available studies differ considerably between tests. On average, economic evaluations estimate that genomic testing results in a moderate increase in total costs, but that these costs are acceptable in relation to the expected improved patient outcome. PAM50/prosigna and EndoPredict showed comparable prognostic capacities, but with less economical and clinical utility studies. Furthermore, for these assays no level IA trial data are available yet. In summary, all assays have shown excellent prognostic capacities. The differences in the quantity and quality of evidence are discussed. Future studies shall focus on the selection of appropriate subgroups for testing and long-term outcome of validation trials, in order to determine the place of these assays in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Blok
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W B van den Hout
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Rutgers EJT, Smorenburg CH, van Dalen T, Siesling S. Impact of gene-expression profiling in patients with early breast cancer when applied outside the guideline directed indication area. Eur J Cancer 2017; 84:270-277. [PMID: 28844015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In Dutch guidelines, gene expression profiles (GEP) are indicated in estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer patients in whom benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is uncertain based on traditional prognostic factors alone. Aim of the present study is to assess the use and impact of GEP on administration of adjuvant CT in breast cancer patients who have according to national guidelines a clear indication to either use or withhold adjuvant chemotherapy (clinical high or low risk). METHODS Clinical low- and high-risk patients, according to Dutch breast cancer guidelines, diagnosed between 2011 and 2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Influence of GEP use and GEP test result on CT administration was assessed with logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 26,425 patients were identified; 4.8% of patients with clinical low risk (444/9354), 7.5% of the patients with a clinical high risk (1281/17,071) received a GEP. GEP use was associated with significantly increased odds of CT administration in clinical low-risk patients (OR = 2.12 95% CI: 1.44-3.11). In clinical high-risk patients, GEP use was associated with a decreased frequency of CT administration (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63). Adherence to the GEP result was higher in clinical high-risk patients with a discordant GEP result as compared to clinical low-risk patients with a discordant GEP result: 71.7% vs. 52.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION GEP is frequently used outside the indicated area and significantly influenced the administration of adjuvant CT, although adherence to the test result was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E J Th Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Th van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuijer A, Straver M, den Dekker B, van Bommel AC, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Wesseling J, Linn SC, Rutgers EJ, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Impact of 70-Gene Signature Use on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2814-2819. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.3959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gene-expression profiles increasingly are used in addition to conventional prognostic factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions. The Dutch guideline suggests use of validated gene-expression profiles in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive, early-stage breast cancer without overt lymph node metastases. We aimed to assess the impact of a 70-gene signature (70-GS) test on CT decisions in patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study in patients younger than 70 years old who had undergone surgery for ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, physicians were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant CT before deployment of the 70-GS test and after the test result was available. Results Between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, 660 patients, treated in 33 hospitals, were enrolled. Fifty-one percent of patients had pT1cN0, BRII, HER2-Neu-negative breast cancer. On the basis of conventional clinicopathological characteristics, physicians recommended CT in 270 (41%) of the 660 patients and recommended withholding CT in 107 (16%) of the 660 patients. For the remaining 43% of patients, the physicians were unsure and unable to give advice before 70-GS testing. In patients for whom CT was initially recommended or not recommended, 56% and 59%, respectively, were assigned to a low-risk profile by the 70-GS (κ, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.11). After disclosure of the 70-GS test result, the preliminary advice was changed in 51% of patients who received a recommendation before testing; the definitive CT recommendation of the physician was in line with the 70-GS result in 96% of patients. Conclusion In this prospective, multicenter study in a selection of patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, 70-GS use changed the physician-intended recommendation to administer CT in half of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Marieke Straver
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Bianca den Dekker
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Annelotte C.M. van Bommel
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Carolien H. Smorenburg
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Emiel J.Th. Rutgers
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhen H, Yang L, Li L, Yu J, Zhao L, Li Y, Li Q. Correlation analysis between molecular subtypes and Nottingham Prognostic Index in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:74096-74105. [PMID: 29088770 PMCID: PMC5650325 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular subtypes and Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) are both prognostic models for breast cancer patients. We evaluated the association between molecular subtypes and NPI in 1042 breast cancer patients. The molecular subtypes indicating poorer prognosis were positively correlated to higher NPI (r = 0.138, P = 0.001). ER positive expression and PR high expression were positively correlated with NPI (r = 0.142, P = 0.001; r = 0.139, P = 0.001; respectively) and negatively correlated with histological grade (r = −0.233, P < 0.001; r = −0.176, P < 0.001; respectively). Ki67 status was negatively correlated with NPI and positively correlated with histological grade (r = −0.120, P =0.004; r = 0.197, P < 0.001; respectively). The percentages of cases with NPI score 2.00–3.40 were higher in the luminar A, ER+, PR high expression and Ki67 low expression group, and the percentages of cases with NPI > 5.40 were higher in the HER2 overexpression subtype, basal-like subtype, ER-, PR low/negative expression, and Ki67 high expression groups. The excellent consistence was observed between histological grade and molecular subtypes, ER, PR, Ki67. The difference of histological grade between the HER2 positive and negative group was statistically significant. In conclusion, there was closely association between molecular subtypes and NPI in breast cancer. For further comparing the prognostic significance of molecular subtypes and NPI, survival analyses should be performed on the same population in a large-scale prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongchao Zhen
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Liuting Yang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Basic Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Junxian Yu
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yingying Li
- Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Basic Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China
| | - Qin Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuijer A, Schreuder K, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Rutgers EJT, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Factors Associated with the Use of Gene Expression Profiles in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Study. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:276-81. [PMID: 27508402 DOI: 10.1159/000448278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer guidelines suggest the use of gene expression profiles (GEPs) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients in whom controversy exists regarding adjuvant chemotherapy benefit based on traditional prognostic factors alone. We evaluated the current use of GEPs in these patients in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary breast cancer patients treated between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014 and eligible for GEP use according to the Dutch national breast cancer guideline were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: ER+ patients <70 years with grade 1 tumors >2 cm or grade 2 tumors 1-2 cm without overt lymph node metastases (pN0-Nmi). Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was performed to associate characteristics of patients, tumors and hospitals with GEP use. RESULTS GEPs were increasingly deployed: 12% of eligible patients received a GEP in 2011 versus 46% in 2014. Lobular versus ductal morphology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), pN1mi status (versus pN0, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68), and tumor size (>3 cm vs. >2 cm, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.88) were inversely associated with GEP use. High socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64) and younger age (OR 0.96/year increasing age, 95% CI 0.95-0.96) were positively associated with GEP use. GEP use per hospital did vary, but no predefined institutional factors remained independently associated with GEP use. CONCLUSION GEP use increased over time and was influenced by patient- and tumor-associated factors as well as by SES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kuijer A, Drukker CA, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Th Rutgers EJ, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Changes over time in the impact of gene-expression profiles on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients: A nationwide study. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:769-75. [PMID: 27062369 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Ten years ago gene-expression profiles were introduced to aid adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in breast cancer. Since then subsequent national guidelines gradually expanded the indication area for adjuvant chemotherapy. In this nation-wide study the evolution of the proportion of patients with estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in relation to gene-expression profile use in patient groups that became newly eligible for chemotherapy according to national guideline changes over time is assessed. Data on all surgically treated early breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2004-2006 and 2012-2014 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. ER+/Her2- patients with tumor-characteristics making them eligible for gene-expression testing in both cohorts and a discordant chemotherapy recommendation over time (2004 guideline not recommending and 2012 guideline recommending chemotherapy) were identified. We identified 3,864 patients eligible for gene-expression profile use during both periods. Gene-expression profiles were deployed in 5% and 35% of the patients in the respective periods. In both periods the majority of patients was assigned to a low genomic risk-profile (67% and 69%, respectively) and high adherence rates to the test result were observed (86% and 91%, respectively). Without deploying a gene-expression profile 8% and 52% (p <0.001) of the respective cohorts received chemotherapy while 21% and 28% of these patients received chemotherapy when a gene-expression profile was used (p 0.191). In conclusion, in ER+/Her2- early stage breast cancer patients gene-expression profile use was associated with a consistent proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy despite an adjusted guideline-based recommendation to administer chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C A Drukker
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Th Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Th van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|