A novel APC mosaicism in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis

APC Splicing Mutations Leading to In-Frame Exon 12 or Exon 13 Skipping Are Rare Events in FAP Pathogenesis and Define the Clinical Outcome

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene APC. To date, nearly 2000 APC mutations have been described in FAP, most of which are predicted to result in truncated protein products. Mutations leading to aberrant APC splicing have rarely been reported. Here, we characterized a novel germline heterozygous splice donor site mutation in APC exon 12 (NM_000038.5: c.1621_1626+7del) leading to exon 12 skipping in an Italian family with the attenuated FAP (AFAP) phenotype. Moreover, we performed a literature meta-analysis of APC splicing mutations. We found that 119 unique APC splicing mutations, including the one described here, have been reported in FAP patients, 69 of which have been characterized at the mRNA level. Among these, only a small proportion (9/69) results in an in-frame protein, with four mutations causing skipping of exon 12 or 13 with loss of armadillo repeat 2 (ARM2) and 3 (ARM3), and five mutations leading to skipping of exon 5, 7, 8, or (partially) 9 with loss of regions not encompassing known functional domains. The APC splicing mutations causing skipping of exon 12 or 13 considered in this study cluster with the AFAP phenotype and reveal a potential molecular mechanism of pathogenesis in FAP disease.

Mosaicism in Patients With Colorectal Cancer or Polyposis Syndromes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Somatic mosaicism, in which variants arise post-zygotically and are therefore not present in all cells in the body, may be an underestimated cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis syndromes. We performed a systematic review to provide a comprehensive overview of somatic mosaicism in patients with CRC and polyposis syndromes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed through March 2018 to identify reports of mosaicism in patients with CRC or polyposis syndromes. We divided the final set of studies into 3 subgroups describing APC mosaicism, mosaicism in other CRC susceptibility genes, and epigenetic mosaicism.

RESULTS

Of the 232 articles identified in our systematic search, 46 met the criteria for further analysis. Of these, 35 studies described mosaic variants or epimutations in patients with CRC or polyposis syndromes. Nineteen studies described APC mosaicism, comprising a total of 57 patients. Six described mosaicism in genes associated with familial CRC syndromes, such as Lynch and Cowden syndromes. Ten studies described epigenetic mosaicism, sometimes resulting from a germline variant (such as deletion of EPCAM).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that somatic mosaicism is underdiagnosed but critical for determining the clinical management of patients with de novo polyposis who possibly carry mosaic APC variants, and present a decision tree for the clinical management of these patients. Mosaicism in genes associated with susceptibility to CRC contributes to development of other familial CRC syndromes. Heritable epigenetic mosaicism is likely underestimated and could have a dominant pattern of inheritance. However, the inheritance of primary mosaic epimutations, without an underlying genetic cause, is complex and not fully understood.

An APC Mutation in a Large Chinese Kindred With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Was Identified Using Both Next Generation Sequencing and Simple STR Marker Haplotypes

Background

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized primarily by the development of numerous adenomatous polyps in the colon and a high risk for colorectal cancer. FAP is caused by germline mutations of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. The proband in this family was a 39-year-old female patient with the pathologic diagnosis of adenomatous polyps, and then a five-generation kindred with FAP was characterized in the following years. This article identified an APC mutation, and demonstrated the practical use of APC-linked STR markers, which could be used to reduce misdiagnosis of prenatal diagnosis or preimplantation genetic diagnosis resulted from contamination or allele drop-out.

Methods

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify the possible APC mutations in an affected individual from a family with autosomal dominant colon cancer. Targeted sequencing then used to identify additional related individuals with the mutation. Three short tandem repeat (STR) loci, D5S299, D5S134, and D5S346, were used for PCR-based microsatellite analysis of the APC gene in the extended family.

Results

We identified an APC: p.W553X mutation. The STR haplotype at the APC locus, A1B4C1, was shared by all clinically affected individuals with the APC: p.W553X mutation. In addition, the APC: p.D1822V variant was observed in 40% affected individuals and in two unaffected individuals.

Conclusion

We described a protein truncation mutation, APC: p.W553X; demonstrated the value of APC-linked STR markers (D5S299, D5S134, and D5S346) haplotypes; and suggested the potential role of these haplotypes in detecting loss of heterozygosity of the APC gene.

Next-generation sequencing with comprehensive bioinformatics analysis facilitates somatic mosaic APC gene mutation detection in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Background

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant colorectal tumor characterized by numerous adenomatous colonic polyps that often lead to colon cancer. Although most patients with FAP harbored germline mutations in APC gene, it was recently recognized that patients with clinical FAP, but without detectable pathogenic mutations, could be associated with somatic mosaic APC mutation.

Methods

We reanalyzed the nest-generation sequencing (NGS) gene panel testing results of patients who were diagnosed with FAP, but did not have APC mutations, at Yonsei Cancer Prevention Center between July 2016 and March 2018. We tested several variant calling algorithms to identify low level mosaic variants. In one patient with a low frequency APC mutation, NGS analysis was performed together with endoscopic biopsy. Variant calling tools HaplotypeCaller, MuTect2, VarScan2, and Pindel were used. We also used 3′-Modified Oligonucleotides (MEMO)-PCR or conventional PCR for confirmation.

Results

Among 28 patients with clinical suspicion of FAP but no detectable pathogenic variants of colonic polyposis associated genes, somatic mosaic pathogenic variants were identified in seven patients. The variant allele frequency ranged from 0.3 to 7.7%. These variants were mostly detected through variant caller MuTect2 and Pindel, and were further confirmed using mutant enrichment with MEMO-PCR.

Conclusions

The NGS with an adequate combination of bioinformatics tools is effective to detect low level somatic variants in a single assay. Because mosaic APC mutations are more frequent than previously thought, the presence of mosaic mutations must be considered when analyzing genetic tests of patients with FAP.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12920-019-0553-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format

The quantitative analysis of human genetic variation is crucial for understanding the molecular characteristics of serious medical conditions, such as tumors. Because digital polymerase chain reactions (PCR) enable the precise quantification of DNA copy number variants, they are becoming an essential tool for detecting rare genetic variations, such as drug-resistant mutations. It is expected that molecular diagnoses using digital PCR (dPCR) will be available in clinical practice in the near future; thus, how to efficiently conduct dPCR with human genetic material is a hot topic. Here, we introduce a method to detect Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) somatic mosaicism using dPCR with the chip-in-a-tube format, which allows eight dPCR reactions to be simultaneously conducted. Care should be taken when filling and sealing the reaction mixture on the chips. This article demonstrates how to avoid the over- and underestimation of positive partitions. Furthermore, we present a simple procedure for collecting the dPCR product from the partitions on the chips, which can then be used to confirm the specific amplification. We hope that this methods report will help promote the dPCR with the chip-in-a-tube method in genetic research.

Application of digital PCR with chip-in-a-tube format to analyze Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) somatic mosaicism

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, digital PCR (dPCR) technology has significantly improved, and its application in clinical diagnostics is rapidly advancing. The Clarity™ dPCR platform, which employs the chip-in-a-tube format to broaden its range of applications, has been used to determine gene copy number. However, detection of mutations in human samples, the most demanding task in clinical practice, has not yet been reported using this platform.

METHODS

The Clarity™ dPCR platform was used to detect somatic Adenomatous polyposis coli mosaicism c.834+2T>C, which had been identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in a patient with sporadic familial adenomatous polyposis. In addition, we were able to determine the size of the dPCR product.

RESULTS

The mutation rate in the peripheral blood of the patient calculated using the dPCR platform was 13.2%. This was similar to that determined using NGS (12.7%). In contrast, in healthy donors, the mutation rate was <0.1%. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the dPCR product size was consistent with its theoretical value.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the dPCR platform with the chip-in-a-tube format is suitable for the analysis of mosaicism and enables the validation of the dPCR product size.