Comparison of intra-procedural pain between a novel continuous arteriovenous exchange and conventional pull-push techniques of partial exchange transfusion in neonates: a randomized controlled trial

Novel device for automating exchange transfusions through umbilical venous route in neonates

Manually performed double-volume exchange transfusion (DVET) is tedious, error-prone, and may incur the risk of embolism. We aimed to develop a device that automates the DVET procedure performed through the umbilical venous route. We evaluated changes in blood passing through the device during DVET. We developed an electro-mechanical device with accessories (tubing and valve assembly) to perform a complete DVET. It comprises two syringes driven by a common pump that moves back and forth to withdraw aliquots of the patient's blood and infuse equal volumes of donor blood. In tandem, it draws donor blood from a blood bank bag and pushes the patient blood drawn from the previous cycle into a waste bag, respectively. One-way duckbill valves and a two-way pinch valve ensure the separation of the donor and patient blood. A sensor detects bubbles and clots. A dashboard displays set and measured parameters. We tested the accuracy of the delivered flow rate and volume, electrical safety, embolus detection, and changes in hematological and biochemical values. The delivered flow and volume were within 5% of the set parameters. All electrical safety parameters were within normal limits. The sensor consistently detected microbubbles and clots. There were no clinically significant differences in laboratory parameters between samples drawn directly from the blood bank bag and drawn from the exit port at 80, 100, 120, and 160 s with a fixed aliquot volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prototype of a novel device can safely automate a DVET. Further trials of this device are warranted.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Double volume exchange transfusion is often performed manually, but this is time-consuming and error-prone. • Previous attempts at automation were not widely adopted because they involved inserting two catheters and did not have mechanisms to prevent embolism.

WHAT IS NEW

• This novel device fully automates double volume exchange transfusions through a single-lumen umbilical venous catheter. • It prevents air and clot embolism and has a screen for input and output parameters and alarms.

Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review

The Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics to measure neonatal pain and sedation. However, little is known regarding its reliability and validity for diverse neonatal subpopulations. Twenty-nine studies were included in our review, demonstrating broad application of N-PASS and good or excellent reliability and validity for various neonatal subpopulations. Our systematic review found N-PASS to be valid and reliable for many but not all neonatal subpopulations. There is a lack of support for N-PASS reliability and validity for measuring prolonged pain and sedation in nonmechanically ventilated infants and for acute pain in postoperative infants in any gestational age category. Overall, N-PASS is a psychometrically sound and pragmatic instrument evaluating pain and sedation for most neonatal populations. Future research using N-PASS is encouraged to evaluate and report its validity and reliability, especially for neonatal subpopulations not included in this review.