Patiromer induces rapid and sustained potassium lowering in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia. Kidney Int. 2015;88:1427-1433. [PMID: 26376130 PMCID: PMC4678168 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.270]

Potassium binders in clinical practice: understanding potassium binder use in contemporary Swedish healthcare-the DEMONSTRATE database

BACKGROUND

Potassium binders mitigate hyperkalemia, allowing patients to maintain their renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitor (RAASi) treatment. This study characterized patients treated with first- or second-generation potassium binders, usage patterns and their effectiveness in reducing potassium levels, and changes in RAASi treatment in a Swedish population-based study.

METHODS

A National Cohort included patients who had record of a treatment episode with a first-generation or second-generation potassium binder between 2018 and 2022. A Mid-Sweden Cohort included patients from the National Cohort who also had a record of a potassium measurement within the 60 days prior to beginning potassium binder treatment. Comorbidities, prior medication use, persistence with potassium binder treatment, subsequent changes in potassium levels and RAASi treatment were evaluated. Persistence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and changes in potassium levels were assessed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

23,892 treatment episodes involving 14,235 patients (mean age 70 years, 33% women) were followed in the National Cohort, and 4860 episodes involving 3179 patients (mean age 72 years, 34% women) in the Mid-Sweden Cohort. Patients treated with second-generation potassium binders had more comorbidities and higher median persistence with treatment compared to those on first-generation potassium binders, 112.5 (95% CI:112.5-117.5) vs. 87.5 (95% CI: 87.5-87.5) days in the National Cohort; 165.5 (95% CI: 121.0-198.0) vs. 97.6 (95% CI: 87.5-110.0) days in the Mid-Sweden Cohort. Both first- and second-generation potassium binders reduced potassium levels from baseline by day 15, 5.7 [95% CI: 4.5-6.8] mmol/L to 4.7 [95% CI: 3.6-5.9] mmol/L and 5.5 (95% CI: 4.3-6.7) mmol/L to 4.9 (95% CI: 3.8-6.1) mmol/L, respectively. Dose reduction or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) was found in 31.4% and 47.7%, respectively, within 120 days of initiating therapy.

CONCLUSION

Both potassium binders effectively reduced potassium levels, but frequent discontinuation or dose reduction of RAASi therapy were still observed during this period. The adjustments of RAASi therapy, despite the achievement of normokalemia within 15 days, may be premature and warrants careful reconsideration to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

A Retrospective Study of Patiromer as Adjunct to Insulin Therapy for Acute Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department

Objective

To investigate the clinical utility of administering patiromer as an adjunct to insulin for potassium reduction in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hyperkalemia.

Methods

 This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to identify adults treated with at least one intravenous dose of regular insulin for hyperkalemia within the ED. Patients who were administered patiromer within one hour before or after their insulin dose were categorized as the intervention group. Matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome, mean change in potassium from baseline to the latest value within the 4-12 hour interval, was compared. Secondary outcomes included net clinical benefit, defined as the mean difference in the number of potassium-lowering interventions minus the change in potassium.

Results

The final analysis included 133 patients treated with patiromer plus insulin and 133 patients treated with insulin alone. Participants had a mean age of 71 years; 43% were female, 31% self-identified as Black, and 38% self-identified as Latinx. No significant changes were observed in potassium from baseline (mean levels 6.2 mEq/L in each group) to the 4-12 hour time frame (patiromer: -0.90 mEq/L, n=78 vs insulin-only: -0.98 mEq/L, n=81; p = 0.51). The calculated net clinical benefit of potassium reduction was -0.25 in favor of the patiromer plus insulin group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In the subgroup of eGFR >30 mL/min, patiromer group received numerically less potassium-lowering interventions (0.63 vs 1.12, p = 0.057).

Conclusion

In this study of patients with acute hyperkalemia in the ED setting, concurrent administration of patiromer did not result in more sustained potassium reduction compared to insulin alone in the overall cohort. The trend in favor of adjunct patiromer in the subgroup with adequate renal function warrants further investigation.

Hyperkalemia treatment standard

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disturbance in both inpatient and outpatient clinical practice. The severity and associated risk depends on the underlying cause and rate of potassium (K+) increase. Acute hyperkalemia requires immediate attention due to potentially life-threatening manifestations resulting from the rapid increase in plasma K+ concentration. Treatment is initially focused on stabilizing the cardiac membrane, followed by maneuvers to shift K+ into the cells, and ultimately initiating strategies to decrease total body K+ content. Chronic hyperkalemia develops over a more extended period of time and manifestations tend to be less severe. Nevertheless, the disorder is not benign since chronic hyperkalemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The approach to patients with chronic hyperkalemia begins with a review of medications potentially responsible for the disorder, ensuring effective diuretic therapy and correcting metabolic acidosis if present. The practice of restricting foods high in K+ to manage hyperkalemia is being reassessed since the evidence supporting the effectiveness of this strategy is lacking. Rather, dietary restriction should be more nuanced, focusing on reducing the intake of nonplant sources of K+. Down-titration and/or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors should be discouraged since these drugs improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and proteinuric kidney disease. In addition to other conservative measures, K+ binding drugs and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors can assist in maintaining the use of these drugs.

[What's new in hyperkalemia management?]

Hyperkalemia is common in everyday clinical practice, and is a major risk factor for mortality. It mainly affects patients with chronic renal failure (CKD), diabetes or receiving treatment with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (iRAAS). Therapeutic management aims not only to avoid the complications of hyperkalemia, but also to avoid discontinuation of cardio- and nephroprotective treatments such as iRAAS. The use of polystyrene sulfonate, widely prescribed, is often limited by patient acceptability. Recent data have cast doubt on its safety, particularly in terms of digestive tolerance. Two new potassium exchange molecules have appeared on the market: patiromer and zirconium sulfonate. Their value in clinical practice, and their acceptability in the event of prolonged prescription, remain to be demonstrated. The combination of a thiazide diuretic or an inhibitor of the sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (iSGLT2) with iRAAS therapy in CKD, may also improve control of kalemia. At present, there are no recommendations for the positioning of the various hypokalemic treatments. The choice of these treatments must be adapted to the patient's pathologies and consider the other expected effects of these molecules.

Evaluation of the introduction of novel potassium binders in routine care; the Stockholm CREAtinine measurements (SCREAM) project

BACKGROUND

The pharmacological management of hyperkalemia traditionally considered calcium or sodium polystyrene sulfonate and, since recently, the novel binders patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. We evaluated their patterns of use, duration of treatment and relative effectiveness/safety in Swedish routine care.

METHODS

Observational study of adults initiating therapy with sodium polystyrene sulfonate or a novel binder (sodium zirconium cyclosilicate or patiromer) in Stockholm 2019-2021. We quantified treatment duration by repeated dispensations, compared mean achieved potassium concentration within 60 days, and potential adverse events between treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 1879 adults started treatment with sodium polystyrene sulfonate, and 147 with novel binders (n = 41 patiromer and n = 106 sodium zirconium cyclosilicate). Potassium at baseline for all treatments was 5.7 mmol/L. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate patients stayed on treatment a mean of 61 days (14% filled ≥3 consecutive prescriptions) compared to 109 days on treatment (49% filled ≥3 prescriptions) for novel binders. After 15 days of treatment, potassium similarly decreased to 4.6 (SD 0.6) and 4.8 (SD 0.6) mmol/L in the sodium polystyrene sulfonate and novel binder groups, respectively, and was maintained over the 60 days post-treatment. In multivariable regression, the odds ratio for novel binders (vs sodium polystyrene sulfonate) in reaching potassium ≤ 5.0 mmol/L after 15 days was 0.65 (95% CI 0.38-1.10) and after 60 days 0.89 (95% CI 0.45-1.76). Hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, and initiation of anti-diarrheal/constipation medications were the most-commonly detected adverse events. In multivariable analyses, the OR for these events did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

We observed similar short-term effectiveness and safety for all potassium binders. However, treatment duration was longer for novel binders than for sodium polystyrene sulfonate.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Use: A Rare Adverse Effect of Commonly Prescribed Treatment

We report a case of a 62-year-old man who was brought in by emergency medical services after a fall and change in mental status. He was found to have severe hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, and rhabdomyolysis. The hyperkalemia was treated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS). During hospitalization, he witnessed having black tarry stools along with a significant drop in hemoglobin. Endoscopic evaluation demonstrated nonbleeding large diffuse gastric ulcers with stigmata of recent bleeding, and ulcer biopsy revealed findings consistent with SPS-induced gastric ulceration. No other source of bleeding was localized, suggesting acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to SPS mucosal injury.

Machine learning models for early prediction of potassium lowering effectiveness and adverse events in patients with hyperkalemia

The aim of this study was to develop a model for early prediction of adverse events and treatment effectiveness in patients with hyperkalemia. We collected clinical data from patients with hyperkalemia in the First Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 2015 and 2021. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the predictors on the full dataset. We randomly divided the data into a training group and a validation group, and used LASSO to filter variables in the training set. Six machine learning methods were used to develop the models. The best model was selected based on the area under the curve (AUC). Shapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to explain the best model. A total of 1074 patients with hyperkalemia were finally enrolled. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), breathing, oxygen saturation (SPO2), Glasgow coma score (GCS), liver disease, oliguria, blood sodium, international standardized ratio (ISR), and initial blood potassium were the predictors of the occurrence of adverse events; peripheral edema, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood sodium, actual base residual, and initial blood potassium were the predictors of therapeutic effect. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the best performance (adverse events: AUC = 0.87; therapeutic effect: AUC = 0.75). A model based on clinical characteristics was developed and validated with good performance.

Hyperkalemia: Pharmacotherapies and Clinical Considerations

Hyperkalemia has been defined as a condition where a serum potassium level is >5.5 mmol/l. It is associated with fatal dysrhythmias and muscular dysfunction. Certain medical conditions, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus, and others, can lead to hyperkalemia. Many of the signs of hyperkalemia are nonspecific. A history and physical examination can be beneficial in the diagnosis of the condition. In this regard, certain characteristic electrocardiogram findings are associated with hyperkalemia along with laboratory potassium levels. In acute and potentially lethal conditions, hyperkalemia treatments include glucose and insulin, bicarbonate, calcium gluconate, beta-2 agonists, hyperventilation, and dialysis. There are several drugs, both old and new, that can additionally aid in the reduction of serum potassium levels. The present investigation evaluated some of these different drugs, including sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), and patiromer. These drugs each have increased selectivity for potassium and work primarily in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Each of these medications has unique benefits and contraindications. Clinicians must be aware of these medications when managing patients with hyperkalemia.

Disorders of Potassium

Abnormalities in serum potassium are commonly encountered in patients presenting to the emergency department. A variety of acute and chronic causes can lead to life-threatening illness in both hyperkalemia and hypokalemia. Here we summarize the relevant causes, risks, and treatment options for these frequently encountered disorders.

Pharmacological strategies to manage hyperkalaemia: out with the old, in with the new? Not so fast…

Since the 1950s, sodium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS) has been the dominant cation exchange agent prescribed for hyperkalaemia. Clinicians have had plenty of time to learn of SPS's advantages and limitations. The demands of drug regulatory agencies regarding the incorporation of medications into the market were not so stringent then as they are today, and the efficacy and safety of SPS have been questioned. In recent years, two novel cation exchangers, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, have received (or are in the process of receiving) regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions globally, after scrutiny of carefully conducted trials regarding their short-term and mid-term efficacy. In this debate, we defend the view that all three agents are likely to have similar efficacy. Harms are much better understood for SPS than for newer agents, but currently there are no data to suggest that novel agents are safer than SPS. Drug choices need to consider costs, access and numbers-needed-to-treat to prevent clinically important events; for potassium exchangers, we need trials directly examining clinically important events.

Patiromer utility as an adjunct treatment in patients needing urgent hyperkalaemia management (PLATINUM): design of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

INTRODUCTION

Hyperkalaemia is common, life-threatening and often requires emergency department (ED) management; however, no standardised ED treatment protocol exists. Common treatments transiently reducing serum potassium (K+) (including albuterol, glucose and insulin) may cause hypoglycaemia. We outline the design and rationale of the Patiromer Utility as an Adjunct Treatment in Patients Needing Urgent Hyperkalaemia Management (PLATINUM) study, which will be the largest ED randomised controlled hyperkalaemia trial ever performed, enabling assessment of a standardised approach to hyperkalaemia management, as well as establishing a new evaluation parameter (net clinical benefit) for acute hyperkalaemia treatment investigations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PLATINUM is a Phase 4, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants who present to the ED at approximately 30 US sites. Approximately 300 adult participants with hyperkalaemia (K+ ≥5.8 mEq/L) will be enrolled. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive glucose (25 g intravenously <15 min before insulin), insulin (5 units intravenous bolus) and aerosolised albuterol (10 mg over 30 min), followed by a single oral dose of either 25.2 g patiromer or placebo, with a second dose of patiromer (8.4 g) or placebo after 24 hours. The primary endpoint is net clinical benefit, defined as the mean change in the number of additional interventions less the mean change in serum K+, at hour 6. Secondary endpoints are net clinical benefit at hour 4, proportion of participants without additional K+-related medical interventions, number of additional K+-related interventions and proportion of participants with sustained K+ reduction (K+ ≤5.5 mEq/L). Safety endpoints are the incidence of adverse events, and severity of changes in serum K+ and magnesium.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

A central Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee provided protocol approval (#20201569), with subsequent approval by local IRBs at each site, and participants will provide written consent. Primary results will be published in peer-reviewed manuscripts promptly following study completion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04443608.

A randomized study to compare oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia

BACKGROUND

The KBindER (K⁺ Binders in Emergency Room and hospitalized patients) clinical trial is the first head-to-head evaluation of oral potassium binders (cation-exchange resins) for acute hyperkalemia therapy.

METHODS

Emergency room and hospitalized patients with a blood potassium level ≥ 5.5 mEq/L are randomized to one of four study groups: potassium binder drug (sodium polystyrene sulfonate, patiromer, or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) or nonspecific laxative (polyethylene glycol). Exclusion criteria include recent bowel surgery, ileus, diabetic ketoacidosis, or anticipated dialysis treatment within 4 h of treatment drug. Primary endpoints include change in potassium level at 2 and 4 h after treatment drug. Length of hospital stay, next-morning potassium level, gastrointestinal side effects and palatability will also be analyzed. We are aiming for a final cohort of 80 patients with complete data endpoints (20 per group) for comparative statistics including multivariate adjustment for kidney function, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, metabolic acidosis, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor prescription, and treatment with other agents to lower potassium (insulin, albuterol, loop diuretics).

DISCUSSION

The findings from our study will inform decision-making guidelines on the role of oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585542 . Registered 14 October 2020.

Real-world evaluation of patiromer utilization and its effects on serum potassium in veterans with end stage kidney disease

Hyperkalemia (serum potassium [K+] ≥5.1) is life-threatening in patients diagnosed with end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Patiromer is approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia, although its role in hyperkalemic patients with ESKD is not well understood. This study describes real-world patiromer utilization in an ESKD population and its corresponding association with serum K+ level changes. The study population was comprised of US veterans with an outpatient dispensing of patiromer and 2 or more International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes for ESKD. A treatment course of patiromer was defined by serial dispensing events without a 30-day gap. Patiromer utilization was described by duration, average dose, persistence, and proportion of days covered during patiromer course. Mean serum K+ values were described for baseline and 3 follow-up intervals during the 180-day follow-up period. There were 458 patients with ESKD included in the study. On average, patients had 1.24 (95% CI: 1.20-1.29) patiromer courses. Half of the population discontinued their first patiromer course within 30 days, while approximately 10% of patients remained persistent at the end of the 180-day period and 102 (22.3%) patients started a second course during the 180-day follow up period. Average serum K+ concentrations during baseline and the 3 evaluation intervals during the 180-day follow-up were 5.91 mEq/L (5.85-5.97), 4.94 mEq/L (4.86-5.03), 4.89 mEq/L (4.8-4.98) and 4.88 mEq/L (4.8-4.96). Few patients remained persistent on their initial course of patiromer at the end of follow-up, but approximately 20% of patients initiated a second treatment episode after a 30-day gap in treatment during the 180-day follow-up period. Nonetheless, average serum K+ in ESKD patients were sustainably reduced by approximately 1 mEq/L during follow-up.

Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Links, Risks and Management

Hyperkalemia is a common clinical problem with potentially fatal consequences. The prevalence of hyperkalemia is increasing, partially due to wide-scale utilization of prognostically beneficial medications that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAASi). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the multitude of risk factors for and associations with hyperkalemia. Reductions in urinary potassium excretion that occur in CKD can lead to an inability to maintain potassium homeostasis. In CKD patients, there are a variety of strategies to tackle acute and chronic hyperkalemia, including protecting myocardium from arrhythmias, shifting potassium into cells, increasing potassium excretion from the body, addressing dietary intake and treating associated conditions, which may exacerbate problems such as metabolic acidosis. The evidence base is variable but has recently been supplemented with the discovery of novel oral potassium binders, which have shown promise and efficacy in studies. Their use is likely to become widespread and offers another tool to the clinician treating hyperkalemia. Our review article provides an overview of hyperkalemia in CKD patients, including an exploration of relevant guidelines and nuances around management.

Clinical Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Real-World Data of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia remains one of the most difficult consequences of disease state and treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes. Controlling hyperkalemia can be difficult, but has become easier with the introduction of novel oral potassium binders. Patiromer was approved in 2015 for the treatment of hyperkalemia by the FDA in the United States. Several pivotal trials proved its efficacy, safety, and improved tolerability compared with previous hyperkalemia treatments. Additionally, many real-world publications and trials have given deeper insights into the capabilities of patiromer. We discuss improved disease state outcomes with combining patiromer with RAASi. This paper will also highlight new trials forthcoming that are highly anticipated to expand the possibilities in using patiromer to improve outcomes and populations.

Comparison of Patiromer to Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate in Acute Hyperkalemia

Background: Patiromer and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) are cation-exchangers approved for the treatment of chronic hyperkalemia. Data regarding their efficacy acutely is lacking. Despite this, both drugs are frequently used in the emergent setting. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the potassium reduction of patiromer to SPS within 6 to 24 hours following a single dose. Methods: This retrospective quality improvement project included hyperkalemic patients receiving 1 dose of patiromer or SPS and had a second potassium level drawn in 6 to 24 hours. Doses of 8.4 g of patiromer and 15 g of SPS were considered "low dose" while 16.8 g of patiromer and 30 g of SPS were considered "high dose." The presence of a dose-response relationship was assessed through a linear regression analysis. Results: Mean (SD) potassium reduction was higher in SPS than patiromer [0.76 (0.63) mEq/L vs 0.32 (0.65) mEq/L, (P = .001)]. A dose response relationship was not demonstrated in low versus high dose groups [-0.21 (0.14), P = .13] and CKD, ESRD, and renal transplant patients when compared to patients with normal renal function [0.11 (0.17), P = .51, -0.07 (0.19), P = -0.07 (0.19), P = .73, and -0.10 (0.22), P = .65]. Conclusions: This study suggests a clinically significant reduction in potassium with SPS compared to patiromer. Although SPS was successful in demonstrating this outcome, due to well-documented adverse reactions in the literature and a time to onset of 6 hours, it cannot be recommended for use in acute hyperkalemia either.

Can Novel Potassium Binders Liberate People with Chronic Kidney Disease from the Low-Potassium Diet? A Cautionary Tale

The advent of new potassium binders provides an important breakthrough in the chronic management of hyperkalemia for people with CKD. In addition to the direct benefits of managing hyperkalemia, many researchers and clinicians view these new medications as a possible means to safely transition patients away from the low-potassium diet to a more healthful eating pattern. In this review, we examine the mechanisms of potassium binders in the context of hyperkalemia risk related to dietary potassium intake in people with CKD. We note that whereas these medications target hyperkalemia caused by potassium bioaccumulation, the primary evidence for restricting dietary potassium is risk of postprandial hyperkalemia. The majority of ingested potassium is absorbed alongside endogenously secreted potassium in the small intestines, but the action of these novel medications is predominantly constrained to the large intestine. As a result and despite their effectiveness in lowering basal potassium levels, it remains unclear whether potassium binders would provide protection against hyperkalemia caused by excessive dietary potassium intake in people with CKD. Until this knowledge gap is bridged, clinicians should consider postprandial hyperkalemia risk when removing restrictions on dietary potassium intake in people with CKD on potassium binders.

Assessment of Patiromer Monotherapy for Hyperkalemia in an Acute Care Setting

IMPORTANCE

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients; however, the clinical usefulness of administering patiromer for reduction of serum potassium levels in this setting is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes associated with patiromer as monotherapy in patients with acute hyperkalemia in an acute care setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study used electronic health record data from adult patients treated with patiromer for acute hyperkalemia in emergency departments, inpatient units, and intensive care units at an urban, academic medical center in the Bronx, New York, between January 30, 2018, and December 30, 2019. Data analysis was conducted between June 2020 and February 2021.

EXPOSURES

A single dose of oral patiromer (8.4 g, 16.8 g, or 25.2 g).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE

The primary outcome was the mean absolute reduction in serum potassium level from baseline at 3 distinct time intervals after patiromer administration: 0 to 6 hours, greater than 6 to 12 hours, and greater than 12 to 24 hours. Key secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypokalemia and potassium reduction stratified by baseline potassium level and care setting.

RESULTS

Among 881 encounters of patiromer treatment, the mean (SD) age of patients was 67.4 (14.4) years; 463 encounters (52.6%) were for male patients, and most (338 [38.4%]) were for patients who identified as non-Hispanic Black. The mean (SD) baseline serum potassium level was 5.60 (0.35) mEq/L (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 1.0), and within the first 6 hours after patiromer administration, the mean (SD) potassium reduction was 0.50 (0.56) mEq/L (P < .001). Both absolute and relative potassium reduction from baseline varied across baseline hyperkalemia severity but not by care setting. The lowest dose of patiromer (8.4 g) was used in 721 encounters (81.8%), and in 725 encounters (82.3%), no further doses of a potassium binder were required. Hypokalemia was noted in 2 encounters (0.2%) at 24 hours after patiromer administration.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients with acute, non-life-threatening hyperkalemia, a single dose of patiromer was associated with a significant decrease in serum potassium levels and a low incidence of hypokalemia. These findings suggest that patiromer monotherapy may be useful in an institutional setting for managing elevated potassium levels and minimizing the risk of hypokalemia associated with other potassium control measures.

Management of hypertension and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in adults with diabetic kidney disease: Association of British Clinical Diabetologists and the Renal Association UK guideline update 2021

People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at risk of developing progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney failure. Hypertension is a major, reversible risk factor in people with diabetes for development of albuminuria, impaired kidney function, end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Blood pressure control has been shown to be beneficial in people with diabetes in slowing progression of kidney disease and reducing cardiovascular events. However, randomised controlled trial evidence differs in type 1 and type 2 diabetes and different stages of CKD in terms of target blood pressure. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important mechanism for the development and progression of CKD and cardiovascular disease. Randomised trials demonstrate that RAAS blockade is effective in preventing/ slowing progression of CKD and reducing cardiovascular events in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, albeit differently according to the stage of CKD. Emerging therapy with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, non-steroidal selective mineralocorticoid antagonists and endothelin-A receptor antagonists have been shown in randomised trials to lower blood pressure and further reduce the risk of progression of CKD and cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes. This guideline reviews the current evidence and makes recommendations about blood pressure control and the use of RAAS-blocking agents in different stages of CKD in people with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Hyperkalaemia is frequent in haemodialysis (HD) patients and associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Despite routine clinical use, evidence regarding the efficacy of potassium (K⁺) binders in HD is scant. We wished to compare the efficacy of patiromer (PAT) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) on K⁺ levels in this setting.

Methods

We screened patients in three HD centres with pre-HD K⁺ value between 5.0 and 6.4 mmol/L, after an initial 2-week washout period for those previously on K⁺ binders. We included patients in an unblinded two-arm crossover trial comparing SPS 15 g before each meal on non-dialysis days with PAT 16.8 g once daily on non-dialysis days with randomized attribution order and a 2-week intermediate washout period. The primary outcome was the mean weekly K⁺ value.

Results

We included 51 patients and analysed 48 with mean age of 66.4 ± 19.4 years, 72.9% men and 43.4% diabetics. Mean weekly K⁺ values were 5.00 ± 0.54 mmol/L, 4.55 ± 0.75 mmol/L and 5.17 ± 0.64 mmol/L under PAT (P = .003), SPS (P < .001) and washout, respectively. In direct comparison, K⁺ values and prevalence of hyperkalaemia were lower under SPS as compared with PAT (P < .001). While the incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was similar between treatments, SPS showed lower subjective tolerability score (6.0 ± 2.4 and 6.9 ± 1.9) and compliance (10.8 ± 20.4% and 2.4 ± 7.3% missed doses) as compared with PAT (P < .001 for both).

Conclusion

Both PAT and SPS are effective in decreasing K⁺ levels in chronic HD patients. However, at the tested doses, SPS was significantly more effective in doing so as compared with PAT, despite lower tolerability and compliance. Larger randomized controlled trials should be conducted in order to confirm our findings and determine whether they would impact clinical outcomes.

Hyperkalemia management in the emergency department: An expert panel consensus

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality identified in the emergency department (ED) and potentially fatal. However, there is no consensus over the potassium threshold that warrants intervention or its treatment algorithm. Commonly used medications are at best temporizing measures, and the roles of binders are unclear in the emergent setting. As the prevalence of comorbid conditions altering potassium homeostasis rises, hyperkalemia becomes more common, and hence there is a need to standardize management. A panel was assembled to synthesize the available evidence and identify gaps in knowledge in hyperkalemia treatment in the ED. The panel was composed of 7 medical practitioners, including 5 physicians, a nurse, and a clinical pharmacist with collective expertise in the areas of emergency medicine, nephrology, and hospital medicine. This panel was sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians with a goal to create a consensus document for managing acute hyperkalemia. The panel evaluated the evidence on calcium for myocyte stabilization and potassium shifting and excretion. This article summarizes information on available therapies for hyperkalemia and proposes a hyperkalemia treatment algorithm for the ED practitioner based on the currently available literature and highlights diagnostic pitfalls and evidence gaps.

A Rare Case of Patiromer Induced Hypercalcemia

Patiromer is a calcium (Ca)-potassium (K) exchange resin approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Disorders of Ca or acid base balance were not reported in pre-approval clinical trials. We present a case of a patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with an unusual picture of hypercalcemia, metabolic alkalosis and hypokalemia upon intensification of patiromer dosing. A 56-year-old white man with CKD stage 4 (baseline creatinine 2.8 mg/dL) due to type 1 diabetes mellitus, proteinuria (1.5 g/g) and persistently high serum potassium 5.9 mEq/L attributed to type 4 renal tubular acidosis was evaluated in clinic. Due to high risk of CKD progression, patiromer 8.4 g daily, followed by 16.8 g daily was prescribed to enable renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor. After 5 months of being on patiromer 16.8 g daily, routine laboratory tests revealed serum potassium 2.5 mEq/L, serum calcium 12.8 mg/dL and carbon dioxide 34 mEq/L. Patiromer was discontinued and thorough investigation held was negative for other causes of hypercalcemia. Five days after patiromer discontinuation, serum calcium returned to normal. The role of secondary hyperparathyroidism in this case remains unclear. We, therefore recommend cautious vigilance of patients receiving patiromer and undergoing dose escalation.

Binding Potassium to Improve Treatment With Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors: Results From Multiple One-Stage Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials

This manuscript presents findings from the first dichotomous data pooling analysis on clinical trials (CT) regarding the effectiveness of binding potassium. The results emanated from pairwise and network meta-analyses aiming evaluation of response to commercial potassium-binding polymers, that is, to achieve and maintain normal serum potassium (n = 1,722), and the association between this response and an optimal dosing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) needing individuals affected by heart failure (HF) or resistant hypertension, who may be consuming other hyperkalemia-inducing drugs (HKID) (e.g., β-blockers, heparin, etc.), and frequently are affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 1,044): According to the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA), sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) (SUCRA >0.78), patiromer (SUCRA >0.58) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) (SUCRA <0.39) were different concerning their capacity to achieve normokalemia (serum potassium level (sK+) 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) or acceptable kalemia (sK+ ≤ 5.1 mEq/L) in individuals with hyperkalemia (sK+ >5.1 mEq/L), and, when normokalemia is achieved, patiromer 16.8-25.2 g/day (SUCRA = 0.94) and patiromer 8.4-16.8 g/day (SUCRA = 0.41) can allow to increase the dose of spironolactone up to 50 mg/day in subjects affected by heart failure (HF) or with resistant hypertension needing treatment with other RAASi. The potential of zirconium cyclosilicate should be explored further, as no data exists to assess properly its capacity to optimize dosing of RAASi, contrarily as it occurs with patiromer. More research is also necessary to discern between benefits of binding potassium among all type of hyperkalemic patients, for example, patients with DM who may need treatment for proteinuria, patients with early hypertension, etc. Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42020185614, CRD42020185558, CRD42020191430.

Consensus-Based Recommendations for the Management of Hyperkalemia in the Hemodialysis Setting

Hyperkalemia (serum K⁺ >5.0 mmol/L) is commonly observed among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis and associated with increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias. Current international guidelines may not reflect the latest evidence on managing hyperkalemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis, and there is a lack of high-quality published studies in this area. This consensus guideline aims to provide recommendations in relation to clinical practice. Available published evidence was evaluated through a systematic literature review, and the nominal group technique was used to develop consensus recommendations from a panel of experienced nephrologists, covering monitoring, dietary restrictions, prescription of K⁺ binders, and concomitant prescription of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Recent studies have shown that K⁺ binders reduce the incidence of hyperkalemia, but further evidence is needed in areas including whether reduced-K⁺ diets or treatment with K⁺ binders improve patient-centered outcomes. Treatment of hyperkalemia in the hemodialysis setting is complex, and decisions need to be tailored for individual patients.

Patiromer and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Treatment of Hyperkalemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) are newer options for hyperkalemia treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety and side effect profile of patiromer and SZC compared with placebo or other standards of care in the management of hyperkalemia.

Methods

We searched electronic databases for relevant articles. The screening was performed independently and data were extracted among the selected studies. We performed a statistical analysis on Revman 5.4 software. The odds ratio (OR) was used for outcome estimation with a 95% CI.

Results

Patiromer had lower rates of hyperkalemia (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.89) compared with standard of care. The analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of overall adverse effects, any serious/specific adverse effects, or treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse effects. Comparing the SZC-10 group with standard of care showed no significant differences in the occurrence of hyperkalemia during treatment, overall adverse effects, any serious/specific adverse effects, or treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse effects but showed a higher rate of edema in the treatment group (OR = 6.77; 95% CI, 1.03–44.25). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between the 2 SZC doses for the occurrence of any adverse effects, hyperkalemia, constipation, diarrhea, or urinary tract infection, whereas edema was higher among patients receiving SZC-10 (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.19–8.27).

Conclusions

In patients with acute hyperkalemia, SZC is the drug of choice due to its more rapid reduction of serum potassium level, whereas in patients with chronic hyperkalemia, patiromer appears to be the drug of choice because SZC is associated with an increase in edema, likely due to an increase in sodium absorption, which could have important adverse consequences in patients with chronic kidney disease and or heart failure. Thus, both drugs were found to be safe while treating hyperkalemia. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021; 82:XXX–XXX)

Hyperkalemia: Major but still understudied complication among heart transplant recipients

Hyperkalemia is a recognized and potentially life-threatening complication of heart transplantation. In the complex biosystem created by transplantation, recipients are susceptible to multiple mechanisms for hyperkalemia which are discussed in detail in this manuscript. Hyperkalemia in heart transplantation could occur pre-transplant, during the transplant period, or post-transplant. Pre-transplant causes of hyperkalemia include hypothermia, donor heart preservation solutions, conventional cardioplegia, normokalemic cardioplegia, continuous warm reperfusion technique, and ex-vivo heart perfusion. Intra-transplant causes of hyperkalemia include anesthetic medications used during the procedure, heparinization, blood transfusions, and a low output state. Finally, post-transplant causes of hyperkalemia include hemostasis and drug-induced hyperkalemia. Hyperkalemia has been studied in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but there is limited data on the incidence, causes, management, and prevention in heart transplant recipients. Hyperkalemia is associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality and readmission in these patients. This review describes the current literature pertaining to the causes, pathophysiology, and treatment of hyperkalemia in patients undergoing heart transplantation and focuses primarily on post-heart transplantation.

Adverse gastrointestinal events with sodium polystyrene sulphonate and calcium polystyrene sulphonate use in dialysis patients: a nationwide registry study

INTRODUCTION

Sodium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS) and calcium polystyrene sulphonate (CPS) are commonly used cation-exchange resins for the treatment and control of hyperkalaemia. However, their use (particularly SPS) has been limited by reports of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events. The safety of these compounds in patients undergoing dialysis requires larger investigation.

AIMS

To study the occurrence of adverse GI events (occlusion, perforation, thrombosis/ischaemia) in the periods of SPS or CPS exposition versus the periods without exposition in dialysis patients.

METHODS

Dialysis patients were extracted from the French National Registry and merged with the French hospital discharge database (between 2006 and 2017). For our primary analysis, we used patients who had any claim of SPS use (n = 43 771). Time-varying Cox models, negative binomial regression and pre- versus post-treatment average treatment effects.

RESULTS

The mean age was 66 ± 15 years, 37% were female and 92% were undergoing haemodialysis. Over a 1-year follow-up, patients on periods with SPS (on-SPS) did not present an increased risk of adverse GI events versus the periods without SPS (off-SPS):  incidence rate (IR) (per 1000 person years) = 7.4 (6.4-8.7) versus 9.5 (8.1-11.0); adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.60-1.09), P = 0.17. Patients exposed to SPS did not experience a higher rate of adverse GI events in the year after SPS initiation versus the year before SPS initiation; P-value for parallel trend = 0.87. Patients on-CPS also did not show an increased risk of adverse GI events versus off-CPS: IR (per 1000 py) = 8.6 (5.1-11.9) versus 7.8 (5.1-11.9); adjusted HR (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.31-1.80), P = 0.52. The rates of adverse GI events in the periods on and off exposure were also similar over a follow-up of 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Our large, nationwide study shows that the incidence of adverse GI events in patients undergoing dialysis was low and that neither the use of SPS nor CPS was associated with increased GI events risk.

Clinical Management of Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte abnormality with potentially life-threatening consequences. Despite various guidelines, no universally accepted consensus exists on best practices for hyperkalemia monitoring, with variations in precise potassium (K⁺) concentration thresholds or for the management of acute or chronic hyperkalemia. Based on the available evidence, this review identifies several critical issues and unmet needs with regard to the management of hyperkalemia. Real-world studies are needed for a better understanding of the prevalence of hyperkalemia outside the clinical trial setting. There is a need to improve effective management of hyperkalemia, including classification and K⁺ monitoring, when to reinitiate previously discontinued renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, and when to use oral K⁺-binding agents. Monitoring serum K⁺ should be individualized; however, increased frequency of monitoring should be considered for patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, heart failure, or a history of hyperkalemia and for those receiving RAASi therapy. Recent clinical studies suggest that the newer K⁺ binders (patiromer sorbitex calcium and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) may facilitate optimization of RAASi therapy. Enhancing the knowledge of primary care physicians and internists with respect to the safety profiles of these newer K⁺ binders may increase confidence in managing patients with hyperkalemia. Lastly, the availability of newer K⁺-binding agents requires further study to establish whether stringent dietary K⁺ restrictions are needed in patients receiving K⁺-binder therapy. Individualized monitoring of serum K⁺ among patients with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and the use of newer K⁺-binding agents may allow for optimization of RAASi therapy and more effective management of hyperkalemia.

A Case of Fatal Intestinal Infarct Preceded by Recurrent Ischaemic Colitis due to the Enterotoxic Effect of Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate

Case description

A 64-year-old patient with chronic renal failure and persistent hyperkalaemia not corrected by dialysis, was prescribed sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) at a low dose (30 g/day for 2 days a week during the long interdialytic interval). After 3 months of therapy, the patient developed intense abdominal pain with non-specific colitis identified with a colonoscopy. In addition, the biopsy specimens showed rhomboid SPS crystals in the intestinal mucosa. Fourteen months after discontinuing therapy, the patient again presented with colitis and persistent biopsy finding of SPS crystals. The patient died a few months later due to intestinal infarction.

Discussion and conclusion

SPS is a cation exchange resin used to treat hyperkalaemia resistant to dialysis, but may cause inflammation and ischaemia of the colon. In our patient, a short 3-month course of low-dose SPS therapy (without sorbitol, which is used to counter iatrogenic constipation caused by SPS) induced relapsing colitis, which was followed by massive intestinal infarction a few months later. In light of frequent reports of its enterotoxic effects, SPS should be replaced with the new potassium chelators (patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate).

LEARNING POINTS

Sodium polystyrene sulfonate can cause life-threatening colitis.Alternatives medications should be used for the long-term reduction of potassium levels.

An evaluation of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate as a treatment option for hyperkalemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperkalemia, defined as serum potassium level > 5.0 mEq/l, is associated with serious cardiac dysrhythmias, sudden death and increased mortality risk. It is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes (DM) and heart failure (HF), particularly in those treated with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors or potassium-sparing diuretics. Although these drugs have documented renal and cardiac protective benefits, frequent hyperkalemia associated with their use often dictates administration of suboptimal doses or their discontinuation altogether. Treatment for chronic hyperkalemia in these settings has been challenging; however, the recent introduction of two new potassium-binding resins has revolutionized our approach to treating hyperkalemia.

AREAS COVERED

We review key clinical data relating to the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) as a treatment option for hyperkalemia.

EXPERT OPINION

SZC and Patiromer are promising new agents for lowering serum potassium in hyperkalemic patients, including those with CKD, with and without DM or HF, facilitating the use of the RAAS inhibitors for renal and cardiac protection. Recent randomized clinical trials have shown that SZC effectively lowers serum potassium and maintains normokalemia in most hyperkalemic patients. Clinical trials showed that SZC lowers serum potassium within 1 h, although it is not approved for treating acute hyperkalemia. SZC was well tolerated and associated with minimal adverse effects.

Management of hyperkalaemia in acute kidney injury in a heart failure patient with patiromer

AIMS

One prevalent comorbidity of chronic heart failure (CHF) is chronic kidney disease(CKD). Hyperkalemia is associated with both CHF and CKD, which often leads to withdrawal of heart failure medications in clinical praxis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A patient is presented who suffered from acute kidney injury with pre-existing CKD as heart failure comorbidity and a history of hyperkalemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This case shows that potassium levels remained stable in acute kidney injury under ongoing heart failure medications, including an MRA, with the use of the potassium binder patiromer.

Largest Experience of Safety and Efficacy of Patiromer in Solid Organ Transplant

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

New Treatment Options for Hyperkalemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Hyperkalemia may cause life-threatening cardiac and neuromuscular alterations, and it is associated with high mortality rates. Its treatment includes a multifaceted approach, guided by potassium levels and clinical presentation. In general, treatment of hyperkalemia may be directed towards stabilizing cell membrane potential, promoting transcellular potassium shift and lowering total K+ body content. The latter can be obtained by dialysis, or by increasing potassium elimination by urine or the gastrointestinal tract. Until recently, the only therapeutic option for increasing fecal K+ excretion was represented by the cation-exchanging resin sodium polystyrene sulfonate. However, despite its common use, the efficacy of this drug has been poorly studied in controlled studies, and concerns about its safety have been reported. Interestingly, new drugs, namely patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, have been developed to treat hyperkalemia by increasing gastrointestinal potassium elimination. These medications have proved their efficacy and safety in large clinical trials, involving subjects at high risk of hyperkalemia, such as patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action and the updated data of patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, considering that the availability of these new treatment options offers the possibility of improving the management of both acute and chronic hyperkalemia.

Optimally managing hyperkalemia in patients with cardiorenal syndrome

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) are now a standard treatment in most patients with cardiovascular disease, especially in those with heart failure (HF). The European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association gave a Class IA recommendation for the use of RAASi in the treatment of Classes II-IV symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF), based on their strong clinical benefits of lowering all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations in these subjects. However, RAASi therapy or adding mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in subjects receiving background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers may be associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia (HK), especially in those with reduced kidney function. As a result, a significant proportion of these subjects either have RAASi dose reduced or more often discontinued when they develop HK. Discontinuation of RAASi in patients hospitalized with HFREF was associated with higher postdischarge mortality and rehospitalization rates, while optimal dosing of RAASi significantly reduced median hospital stays, outpatient visits and related costs. Thus, effective treatment is required to lower potassium level and maintain normokalemia in subjects with HF and reduced kidney disease who develop or are at risk of HK, thus enabling them to continue their RAASi therapy and maximize benefits from RAASi. In this review, we provide an up-to-date review of the prevalence and significance of HK in patients with cardiorenal syndrome, as well as their optimal management of HK with recent novel therapies.

Potassium Binders for Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease-Diet, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Therapy, and Hemodialysis

Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The management of CKD requires balancing the benefits of specific treatments, which may exacerbate the potential for hyperkalemia, with the risks of hyperkalemia itself. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, which slow CKD progression and improve cardiovascular outcomes, are often discontinued if hyperkalemia develops. Patients with hyperkalemia are frequently advised to restrict dietary potassium (K⁺), depriving these patients of many heart-healthy foods. Patients receiving hemodialysis are particularly susceptible to hyperkalemia during long interdialytic intervals, and managing this risk without causing hypokalemia can be challenging. Recently, 2 K⁺-binding agents were approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia: sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and patiromer. These agents offer alternatives to sodium polystyrene sulfonate, which is associated with serious gastrointestinal adverse effects. For this review, PubMed was searched for English-language articles published in 2014-2018 using the terms patiromer, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, sodium polystyrene sulfonate, hyperkalemia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, diet, and dialysis. In randomized controlled studies of patients with hyperkalemia, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and patiromer effectively reduced serum K⁺ and were generally well tolerated. Furthermore, patients in these studies could maintain RAAS inhibitor therapy and, in some studies, were not required to limit dietary K⁺. There may also be a role for these agents in preventing hyperkalemia in patients receiving hemodialysis. Thus, K⁺-binding agents may allow patients with CKD at risk for hyperkalemia to optimize RAAS inhibitor therapy, receive benefits of a K⁺-rich diet, and experience improved hemodialysis outcomes. Additional long-term studies are necessary to confirm these effects.

Patiromer for Treatment of Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia is common and potentially life threatening. Patiromer is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared oral potassium binder effective in the chronic treatment of hyperkalemia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the potential efficacy and safety of oral patiromer in treating acute hyperkalemia in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label convenience sample pilot study in an inner-city ED. Adult patients with end-stage renal disease and a serum potassium level of ≥ 6.0 mEq/L were randomized to standard of care (SOC) or one dose of 25.2 g oral patiromer plus SOC (PAT). Blood samples and electrocardiograms were collected at enrollment and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours thereafter. The primary outcome was the difference in potassium between groups at 6 hours. Secondary outcomes were the amount and number of times insulin and albuterol were given.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in the final analysis, 15 in each group. There were no differences in age, sex, or baseline serum potassium. There was no difference in mean serum potassium between SOC and PAT groups at 6 hours (6.32 mEq/L, confidence interval [CI] = 6.0 to 6.63 mEq/L vs. 5.81 mEq/L, CI = 5.48 to 6.14 mEq/L). However, 2 hours posttreatment the serum potassium of the PAT group was lower than SOC group (5.90 mEq/L, CI = 5.63 to 6.17 mEq/L vs. 6.51 mEq/L, CI = 6.25 to 6.78 mEq/L) and also 0.61 mEq/L lower than baseline. There were no differences in the amount or number of administrations of insulin or albuterol between groups, although the amount of albuterol used in the PAT group at 6 hours was lower but not significant (median, 0 mg vs. 12.5 mg; p = 0.097). There were no differences in adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

In this open-label pilot study of severe hyperkalemia, a single dose of 25.2 g of oral patiromer reduced serum potassium within 2 hours but did not show a difference at 6 hours. This is the first study showing that patiromer may have a role in the acute management of hyperkalemia; however, more rigorous studies are needed.

Pivotal clinical trials, meta-analyses and current guidelines in the treatment of hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia (HK) is the most common electrolyte disturbance observed in patients with advanced stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), is a potentially life-threatening clinical condition due to an increased risk of fatal arrhythmias, and strongly impacts the quality of life and prognosis of CKD patients. Moreover, while renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) represent the most cardio-nephro-protective drugs used in clinical practice, the treatment with these drugs per se increases serum potassium (sK) values, particularly when heart failure and diabetes mellitus coexist. In fact, the onset or recurrence of HK is frequently associated with not starting, down-titrating or withdrawing RAASIs, and is an indication to begin renal replacement treatment in end-stage renal disease. Current strategies aimed at preventing and treating chronic HK are still unsatisfactory, as evidenced by the relatively high prevalence of HK also in patients under stable nephrology care, and even in the ideal setting of randomized clinical trials. Indeed, dietary potassium restriction, the use of sodium bicarbonate or diuretics, the withdrawal or down-titration of RAASIs, or the administration of old potassium binders, namely sodium polystyrene sulphonate and calcium polystyrene sulphonate, have limited efficacy and are poorly tolerated; therefore, these strategies are not suitable for long-term control of sK. As such, there is an important unmet need for novel therapeutic options for the chronic management of patients at risk for HK. The development of new potassium binders may change the treatment landscape in the near future. This review summarizes the current evidence on the treatment of chronic HK in cardio-renal patients.

Boosting the Limited Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Through New Agents for Hyperkalemia

Background:

Hyperkalemia is an important clinical problem that is associated with significant lifethreatening complications. Several conditions are associated with increased risk for hyperkalemia such as chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors.

Objective:

The purpose of this review is to present and critically discuss treatment options for the management of hyperkalemia.

Method:

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify studies assessing the drug-induced management of hyperkalemia.

Results:

The management of chronic hyperkalemia seems to be challenging and includes a variety of traditional interventions, such as restriction in the intake of the dietary potassium, loop diuretics or sodium polystyrene sulfonate. In the last few years, several new agents have emerged as promising options to reduce potassium levels in hyperkalemic patients. Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate 9 (ZS-9) have been examined in hyperkalemic patients and were found to be efficient and safe. Importantly, the efficacy of these novel drugs might allow the continuation of the use of RAAS inhibitors, morbidity- and mortality-wise beneficial class of drugs in the setting of chronic kidney disease and heart failure.

Conclusion:

Data support that the recently emerged patiromer and ZS-9 offer significant hyperkalemia-related benefits. Larger trials are needed to unveil the impact of these drugs in other patients’ subpopulations, as well.

Management of hyperkalemia in the acutely ill patient

Purpose

To review the mechanisms of action, expected efficacy and side effects of strategies to control hyperkalemia in acutely ill patients.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant papers published in English between Jan 1, 1938, and July 1, 2018, in accordance with the PRISMA Statement using the following terms: “hyperkalemia,” “intensive care,” “acute kidney injury,” “acute kidney failure,” “hyperkalemia treatment,” “renal replacement therapy,” “dialysis,” “sodium bicarbonate,” “emergency,” “acute.” Reports from within the past 10 years were selected preferentially, together with highly relevant older publications.

Results

Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality and may cause cardiac electrophysiological disturbances in the acutely ill patient. Frequently used therapies for hyperkalemia may, however, also be associated with morbidity. Therapeutics may include the simultaneous administration of insulin and glucose (associated with frequent dysglycemic complications), β-2 agonists (associated with potential cardiac ischemia and arrhythmias), hypertonic sodium bicarbonate infusion in the acidotic patient (representing a large hypertonic sodium load) and renal replacement therapy (effective but invasive). Potassium-lowering drugs can cause rapid decrease in serum potassium level leading to cardiac hyperexcitability and rhythm disorders.

Conclusions

Treatment of hyperkalemia should not only focus on the ability of specific therapies to lower serum potassium level but also on their potential side effects. Tailoring treatment to the patient condition and situation may limit the risks.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0509-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

New frontiers for management of hyperkalaemia: the emergence of novel agents

Hyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte abnormality, associated with higher risk of morbid events, and increasing in prevalence—in part, due to increasing rates of comorbidities such as heart failure, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi). In spite of this growing problem, the existing treatments for chronic hyperkalaemia have been limited, and are typically confined to dietary potassium restrictions and cessation or modification of RAASi, with latter option being potentially problematic given the known morbidity and mortality benefit of RAASi therapy in certain disease states, such as heart failure. The use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS/Kayexelate) for chronic hyperkalaemia has been low, due to poor tolerability, potential gastrointestinal safety concerns, and remaining uncertainty in regards to its efficacy. Given the shortcomings of existing therapies, novel treatments are clearly needed. There are now two novel treatment options, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), both approved by the FDA and EMA for treatment of chronic hyperkalaemia. These novel compounds have been demonstrated in multiple studies to be efficacious in achieving and maintaining normal serum potassium levels, over an extended time period, in patients with hyperkalaemia; and appear to be relatively safe and well-tolerated. Whether the correction of hyperkalaemia with these agents will allow optimization of RAASi, which could theoretically lead to improvement in clinical outcomes, especially in patients with heart failure, remains to be determined. Several clinical trials are ongoing to address these important knowledge gaps.

Chronic Hyperkalemia in Cardiorenal Patients: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and New Treatment Options

Chronic hyperkalemia (HK) is a serious medical condition that often manifests in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF) leading to poor outcomes and necessitating careful management by cardionephrologists. CKD, HF, diabetes, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors use is known to induce HK. Current therapeutic options are not optimal, as pointed out by a large number of CKD and HF patients with HK. The following review will focus on the main risk factors for developing HK and also aims to provide a guide for a correct diagnosis and present new approaches to therapy.

Patiromer: A Review in Hyperkalaemia

Patiromer (Veltassa^®) for oral suspension is a non-absorbed, sodium-free potassium binding polymer that exchanges calcium for potassium in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, thereby increasing faecal potassium excretion and reducing serum potassium levels. Patiromer was approved in the USA in 2015 and is now approved in several other countries, including those of the EU, for the treatment of hyperkalaemia in adults. In clinical trials, patiromer reduced serum potassium levels and the risk of recurrent hyperkalaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or diabetic nephropathy with or without heart failure (HF), allowing the majority of patients to continue receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors (drugs that inhibit the renal excretion of potassium) for up to 52 weeks. Patiromer also maintained normokalaemia in patients with HF and a propensity for hyperkalaemia, enabling concomitant administration and up-titration of spironolactone. Patiromer was generally well tolerated, with a low risk of hypokalaemia. GI disorders and hypomagnesaemia were the most common adverse events; these were generally of mild or moderate severity. Therefore, oral patiromer is a valuable treatment option for the long-term management of hyperkalaemia.

Chronic hyperkalemia in non-dialysis CKD: controversial issues in nephrology practice

Chronic hyperkalemia is a major complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that occurs frequently, heralds poor prognosis, and necessitates careful management by the nephrologist. Current strategies aimed at prevention and treatment of hyperkalemia are still suboptimal, as evidenced by the relatively high prevalence of hyperkalemia in patients under stable nephrology care, and even in the ideal setting of randomized trials where best treatment and monitoring are mandatory. The aim of this review was to identify and discuss a range of unresolved issues related to the management of chronic hyperkalemia in non-dialysis CKD. The following topics of clinical interest were addressed: diagnosis, relationship with main comorbidities of CKD, therapy with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, efficacy of current dietary and pharmacological treatment, and the potential role of the new generation of potassium binders. Opinion-based answers are provided for each of these controversial issues.

Long-term effects of patiromer for hyperkalaemia treatment in patients with mild heart failure and diabetic nephropathy on angiotensin-converting enzymes/angiotensin receptor blockers: results from AMETHYST-DN

AIMS

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in heart failure (HF) increases the risk of hyperkalaemia (HK), limiting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use. Patiromer is a sodium-free, non-absorbed potassium binder approved for HK treatment. We retrospectively evaluated patiromer's long-term safety and efficacy in HF patients from AMETHYST-DN.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with Type 2 diabetes, CKD, and HK [baseline serum potassium >5.0-5.5 mmol/L (mild) or >5.5-<6.0 mmol/L (moderate)], with or without HF (New York Heart Association Class I and II, by investigator judgement), on ACE-I/ARB, were randomized to patiromer 8.4-33.6 g to start, divided twice daily. Overall, 105/304 (35%) patients had HF (75%, Class II). Mean (standard deviation) ejection fraction (EF) was 44.9% (8.2) (n = 81) in patients with HF; 26 had EF ≤40%. In HF patients, mean serum potassium decreased by Day 3 through Week 52. At Week 4, estimated mean (95% confidence interval) change in serum potassium was -0.64 mmol/L (-0.72, -0.55) in mild and -0.97 mmol/L (-1.14, -0.80) in moderate HK (both P < 0.0001). Most HF patients with mild (>88%) and moderate (≥73%) HK had normokalaemia at each visit from Weeks 12 to 52. Three HF patients were withdrawn because of high (n = 1) or low (n = 2) serum potassium. The most common patiromer-related adverse event was hypomagnesaemia (8.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a clinical diagnosis of HF, diabetes, CKD, and HK on ACE-I/ARB, patiromer was well tolerated and effective for HK treatment over 52 weeks.

The tolerability and safety profile of patiromer: a novel polymer-based potassium binder for the treatment of hyperkalemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperkalemia (HK) occurs often among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF) and those treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASI). Even small deviations from normal potassium levels carry increased risk of mortality. Patiromer is approved for treatment of HK and has been shown in clinical trials to reduce serum potassium among patients with HK and comorbid conditions. Areas covered: We review pooled data from two clinical trials of patiromer in patients with CKD and HK, safety of patiromer in special populations, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies, and other studies in healthy volunteers. Expert opinion: Potassium must be maintained within a narrow range to avoid increased risk of mortality. Patients with CKD and HF and those receiving RAASI require careful monitoring of potassium levels. Patiromer effectively reduces serum potassium, and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) are the most common patiromer-associated AEs. Effective management of HK with patiromer may allow use of RAASI at optimal doses as recommended by treatment guidelines. Future research should examine the potential for potassium binders, including patiromer, to extend use of RAASI in appropriate patient populations.

Hyperkalemia in the Hypertensive Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperkalemia develops in a patient with systemic arterial hypertension (HTN) if one or more risk factors are present, namely chronic kidney disease (CKD) (especially severe stage 4-5 CKD), diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure (HF), or pharmacological therapies that interfere with potassium homeostasis, mainly through renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibition (RAASi). Hyperkalemia is a considerable reason of morbidity (emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) and portends a higher mortality risk in patients at risk; for instance, hyperkalemia increases the risk of mortality within 1 day of a hyperkalemic event. This review aims to identify the risk factors for high-serum potassium, highlight the risk versus benefit of RAASi in certain patient populations, and outline preventive as well as therapeutic strategies for hyperkalemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A growing body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of cation-exchange resins, patiromer, or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, in patients with a compelling indication for RAASi, yet in whom such therapy was complicated by hyperkalemia, allowing these patients to benefit from continued RAASi therapy. In summary, novel cation exchange polymers present the clinician with a new and safe strategy to address hyperkalemia in patients with a compelling indication for ongoing RAASi therapy instead of withdrawal of such therapy.

Evidence in support of hyperkalaemia management strategies: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalaemia is a potentially life-threatening condition that can be managed with pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. With the recent development of new hyperkalaemia treatments, new information on safe and effective management of hyperkalaemia has emerged.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to identify all relevant comparative and non-comparative clinical data on management of hyperkalaemia in adults. Our secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of quantitatively comparing randomised controlled trial (RCT) data on the novel treatment sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS) and established pharmacological treatments for the non-emergency management of hyperkalaemia, such as the cation-exchangers sodium/calcium polystyrene sulphonate (SPS/CPS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 3^rd April 2017, with additional hand-searches of key congresses and previous SLRs. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Eligible records reported interventional or observational studies of pharmacological or non-pharmacological management of hyperkalaemia in adults.

RESULTS

Database searches identified 2,073 unique records. Two hundred and one publications were included, reporting 30 RCTs, 29 interventional non-RCTs and 43 observational studies. Interventions investigated in RCTs included ZS (3), SPS/CPS (3), patiromer (4) and combinations of temporising agents (6 RCTs). A robust and meaningful indirect treatment comparison between ZS and long-established cation-binding agents (SPS/CPS) was infeasible because of heterogeneity between studies (including time points and dosing) and small sample size in SPS/CPS studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite hyperkalaemia being associated with several chronic diseases, there is a paucity of high-quality randomised evidence on long-established treatment options (SPS and CPS) and a limited evidence base for hyperkalaemia management with these agents.