Distinct patterns of gained chromosomes in high hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(1;19)(q23;p13), t(9;22)(q34;q22) or MLL rearrangements

Duplication 1q is highly correlated with poor prognosis in high hyperdiploid pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The role of structural abnormalities in high hyperdiploidy (HeH) has been debatable, with few studies that addressed recurrent translocations with concurrent HeH (t-HeH). We aimed at the characterization of HeH cases in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients with special emphasis on the structural abnormalities including t-HeH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study included all patients diagnosed with HeH over the period from January 2016 to April 2019 presenting to the Pediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

RESULTS

Among 480 de novo B-ALL pediatric patients, HeH was detected in eighty (16.7%) cases with a median age of 5 years. t-HeH was identified in 17/480 (3.5%) cases: 9(1.9%) with t(12;21), 7(1.5%) with t(9;22), and 1(0.2%) with t(4;11). Duplication (1q) was the most prevalent structural abnormality in c-HeH (hyperdiploidy without recurrent translocations) (n = 12,15%). Children ≥10 years or presenting with white blood cells (WBC) ≥50 × 10⁹ /L) had an inferior 3 year-overall survival as compared to younger children (P = .003), and to lower WBC (P = .02). Duplication (1q) was an independent adverse parameter on the disease-free survival (DFS) of c-HeH patients (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age and WBC ≥ 50 × 10⁹ /L were adverse prognostic factors. Duplication (1q) is correlated with lower DFS in c-HeH patients. t-HeH has distinct patterns of chromosomal gain.

High hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-A 25-year population-based survey of the Austrian ALL-BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) Study Group

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases are high hyperdiploid (HD). Despite their low relative recurrence risk, this group accounts for the overall largest relapse proportion.

PROCEDURE

To evaluate potential risk factors in our population-based cohort of patients with HD ALL enrolled in four Austrian ALL-BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster) studies from 1986 to 2010 (n = 210), we reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and cytogenetic data of the respective cases in relation to their outcome.

RESULTS

The 5-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire group was 83.1 ± 2.7% and 92.0 ± 1.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that trisomy 17 was significantly associated with a better EFS and OS, whereas trisomy 10 and a modal chromosome number (MCN) > 53 chromosomes were significantly associated with a better OS. Except for the latter, findings remained valid in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In line with previous studies, our retrospective analysis shows that MCN and specific trisomies are relevant prognostic indicators in an ALL-BFM cohort of patients with HD ALL. However, considering the current dominant role of minimal residual disease monitoring for prognostic stratification in ALL, including this particular subgroup, it is unlikely that this information is compelling enough to be utilized for refined risk classification in future ALL-BFM treatment protocols.

Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Both B-cell and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exhibit recurrent cytogenetic alterations, many with prognostic implications. This chapter overviews the major recurrent categories of cytogenetic abnormalities associated with ALL, with an emphasis on the detection and characterization of these cases by G-band and FISH analyses.

Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR

The most widely used approach for defining gene function is to reduce or completely disrupt its normal expression. For over a decade, RNAi has ruled the lab, offering a magic bullet to disrupt gene expression in many organisms. However, new biotechnological tools--specifically CRISPR-based technologies--have become available and are squeezing out RNAi dominance in mammalian cell studies. These seemingly competing technologies leave research investigators with the question: "Which technology should I use in my experiment?" This review offers a practical resource to compare and contrast these technologies, guiding the investigator when and where to use this fantastic array of powerful tools.

A (1;19) translocation involving TCF3-PBX1 fusion within the context of a hyperdiploid karyotype in adult B-ALL: a case report and review of the literature

Background

The t(1;19)(q23;p13), which can result in the TCF3-PBX1 chimeric gene, is one of the most frequent translocations in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and is observed in both adult and pediatric populations at an overall frequency of 6%. It can occur in a balanced or unbalanced form and as a sole abnormality is associated with an intermediate prognosis. Additionally, this translocation is observed in the context of hyperdiploid B-ALL, in which case it is associated with a poor prognosis. However, due to different translocation partner genes at chromosomes 1 and 19, distinct subtypes of hyperdiploid B-ALL with t(1;19)/der(19)t(1;19) are recognized based on the presence or absence of the TCF3-PBX1 fusion gene, but the cytogenetic and etiologic differences between the two remain understudied.

Findings

We report a case of an adult with a history of relapsed precursor B-ALL whose conventional cytogenetics showed an abnormal female karyotype with both hyperdiploidy and a t(1;19)(q23;p13). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on previously G-banded metaphases using the LSI TCF3/PBX1 Dual Color, Dual Fusion Translocation Probe confirmed the presence of the TCF3-PBX1 gene fusion.

Conclusions

This particular pattern with a TCF3-PBX1 fusion within the context of a hyperdiploid karyotype is seen in B-ALL and is usually associated with a poor outcome. This case is one of only a few cases with both hyperdiploidy and a confirmed TCF3-PBX1 fusion, demonstrating the importance of using FISH for proper molecular classification of these cases in order to distinguish them from those with hyperdiploidy but no TCF3-PBX1 fusion gene. Such molecular studies may provide insight into the precise differences between TCF3-PBX1 positive and negative hyperdiploid B-ALL bearing the t(1;19)(q23;p13).