Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection after autologous transplant for multiple myeloma: low platelet count predicts for poor collection and sole use of resulting graft enhances risk of myelodysplasia

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma performed with cells procured after previous transplantation-study on behalf of CMWP of the EBMT

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) may be performed in multiple myeloma (MM) patients relapsing after a previous auto-HCT. For those without an adequate dose of stored stem cells, remobilization is necessary. This retrospective study included patients who, following disease relapse after the first auto-HCT(s), underwent stem cell remobilization and auto-HCT performed using these cells. There were 305 patients, 68% male, median age at salvage auto-HCT was 59 years. The median time to relapse after the first-line penultimate auto-HCT(s) was 30.6 months, the median follow-up after salvage auto-HCT 31 months. The 2- and 4-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) after the salvage auto-HCT was 5 and 9%, the relapse incidence 56 and 76%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) after 2 and 4 years was 76 and 52%, progression-free survival (PFS) 39 and 15%. In multivariable analysis an increasing interval between the penultimate auto-HCT and relapse was associated with better OS and PFS, later calendar year of salvage auto-HCT with better OS. In conclusion, salvage auto-HCT performed with cells remobilized after a previous auto-HCT was associated with acceptable NRM. The leading cause of failure was disease progression of MM, which correlated with a shorter interval from the penultimate auto-HCT to the first relapse.

Salvage autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma performed with stem cells procured after previous high dose therapy - a multicenter report by the Polish Myeloma Study Group

Salvage autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) constitutes a therapeutic option for a group of well-selected patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, if an insufficient number of stem cells were harvested and stored before the first auto-HSCT, stem cells need to be remobilized. Patients diagnosed with MM who following relapse after auto-HSCT, had remobilization and afterward, auto-HSCT with remobilized cells were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-three patients, 61% males, the median age 61 years, were included. With a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 2-year progression-free survival was 56.2%, non-relapse mortality 4.8%. The 2-year cumulative incidence of t-MDS was 4.9%. Factors important for the outcome were: the quality of response, previous radiotherapy, the time between the first and salvage auto-HSCT. To conclude, salvage auto-HSCT performed with cells procured after the previous auto-HSCT can be efficacious in relapsed MM, especially if a sufficiently long response had been obtained to the first auto-HSCT(s).

Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients relapsing after previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter report by the Polish Myeloma Study Group

BACKGROUND

Salvage autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) may be used to treat relapse of multiple myeloma occurring after previous autoHSCT. When insufficient number of hematopoietic stem cells was stored from the initial harvest, remobilization of stem cells is necessary.

PURPOSE

The analysis of stem cell remobilization after previous autoHSCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients, 60% males, median 59 years, were included. Median time interval between autoHSCT and remobilization was 42 months. The first remobilization was performed mostly after chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide (33%), cytarabine (43%), and etoposide (19%).

RESULTS

The first remobilization was successful in 67% patients. About 19% patients required plerixafor rescue, among whom it allowed for successful harvesting in 14%. Use of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and etoposide allowed for successful remobilization in 53%, 84%, and 55% patients, respectively. Patients treated with cytarabine had the highest yield of CD34+ cells (median 7.5 × 10⁶ /kg vs 5.8 and 2.4 for etoposide and cyclophosphamide, P = .001). Higher percentage of patients was able to collect ≥2 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg during one leukapheresis after cytarabine (76% vs 21% for cyclophosphamide vs 36% for etoposide, P = .001). Cytarabine use was associated with lower risk of remobilization failure OR = 0.217, P = .02. Toxicity comprised mostly hematological toxicity (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). One patient succumbed to septic shock.

CONCLUSION

Remobilization after previous autoHSCT is feasible only in a proportion of patients. Cytarabine is associated with the highest rate of successful mobilization and the highest yield of mobilized CD34+ cells. The toxicity requires careful surveillance of these patients.

Plerixafor-aided Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Support Subsequent High-dose Chemotherapy After a Prior Autologous Transplant

BACKGROUND

An appreciable proportion of patients in need of salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT) fail to mobilize adequate numbers of hematopoietic progenitors, and plerixafor is applied for that purpose. Limited data exist on remobilization of PBSCs in patients who have relapsed after prior HDC + PBSCT. Herein, we report on consecutive patients that had undergone successful prior single or tandem HDC for a variety of malignant neoplasms in our institution, and later required re-mobilization of PBSCs in order to support further HDC cycles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plerixafor was administered in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone, or after mobilizing chemotherapy. Five patients, 2 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, 1 multiple myeloma, 1 germ-cell tumor, and 1 Ewing sarcoma, having relapsed after prior HDC + PBSCT, were deemed candidates for further cycle(s) of PBSC-supported HDC. Plerixafor was applied in a "just-in-time" strategy after low CD34+ numbers were measured on the first day of anticipated hematopoietic stem cell collection (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, germ-cell tumor, and Ewing sarcoma), or pre-emptively in multiple myeloma.

RESULTS

Successful collection of adequate PBSCs was achieved in all patients, from 1.8 to 3.8 × 10⁶/kg after a median of 2 (range, 1-3) leukaphereses; 4 of 5 patients underwent subsequent HDC + PBSCT and engrafted after a median of 11 days (range, 9-55 days) and 25 days (range, 17-76 days) for neutrophils and platelets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor proved effective to mobilize adequate numbers of PBSCs in individual patients with relapsed malignancies after prior single or tandem HDC + PBSCT. These PBSCs could establish sustained multi-lineage hematopoietic engraftment without any sequelae.

Pre- and post-bone marrow harvest anaemia is associated with lower CD34+ stem cell collection, high harvest volume and female gender

BACKGROUND

Donor safety is paramount when performing bone marrow stem cell harvest. The incidence of full blood count (FBC) abnormalities among donors and variables associated with anaemia after marrow harvest are not well established.

AIMS

To describe the frequency of FBC abnormalities prior to bone marrow stem cell harvest and to identify variables associated with post harvest anaemia.

METHODS

Outcomes of 80 consecutive adult marrow harvests performed at our centre were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

FBC abnormalities were present in 28% of donors prior to marrow harvest with normocytic anaemia the most common abnormality in 13%. Reduced donor haemoglobin (Hb) was independently correlated with lower CD34+ cell count per kg of recipient body weight. Anaemia (Hb < 100 g/L) was seen in 20% of donors after harvest with median decrease in Hb of 19 g/L. Variables independently associated with anaemia after harvest included donor to recipient weight ratio (P = 0.011), high collection volume (P = 0.044) and female gender (P = 0.023). Total nucleated cell and CD34 concentration in the final collected product were associated with the inverse of harvested marrow volume (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-harvest anaemia should be corrected where possible particularly in female donors. Marrow collection volume should be minimised to reduce post-harvest anaemia, optimise CD34+ cell number and improve nucleated and stem cell concentrations in the harvest product.

Myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation can lead to successful postengraftment mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors to support planned subsequent cycle(s) of high-dose chemotherapy and autografting in a patient with relapsed germ-cell tumor

Salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) together with autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (ASCT) represents a curative treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumor. Usually, 2-3 cycles of HDC are administered with encouraging results, and a sizeable percentage of patients experience long-term survival. However, an appreciable number of patients fail to mobilize adequate numbers of HSCs, adequate to support more than one HDC cycle. There have been no data so far on remobilization of HSCs after prior autografting. We report a unique case with relapsed germ-cell tumor that had undergone the first cycle of HDC with myeloablative doses of carboplatin-etoposide, and HSCs were mobilized successfully in the early posthematopoietic engraftment period to support further cycles of HDC. Four weeks after the first ASCT, an identical second cycle of myeloablative HDC was administered and rescued successfully with the HSCs collected after engraftment following the previous HDC cycle. The present case report illustrates that HSCs can be mobilized successfully in the early postengraftment period after myeloablative doses of carboplatin-etoposide, and these cells can be applied as the sole source of hematopoietic rescue in planned sequential cycles of myeloablative HDC, leading to successful multilineage engraftment. Provided that more extensive experience is gathered in future studies in large numbers of patients, this strategy could prove helpful in patients who cannot initially collect sufficient HSC numbers, before the first autografting cycle, and are in need of sequential HDC+ASCT cycles. A detailed literature review is provided to highlight the uniqueness of the presented case.

Platelet Count before Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Is Associated with the Need for Plerixafor But Not with the Collection Result

BACKGROUND

A low platelet count before mobilization has recurrently been identified as risk factor for poor mobilization.

METHODS

To determine the relevance of this finding for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, including pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor in the case of poor mobilization, we retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing PBSC collection at our institution between January 2014 and December 2015 (n = 380).

RESULTS

In total, 99% of the patients (377/380) successfully collected a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight sufficient for a single transplant. Rescue or pre-emptive plerixafor was administered to 11% of the patients (42/380). No correlations between the platelet count before mobilization and the number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells or the CD34+ cell collection result were detected in the entire population or the subgroups according to diagnosis (newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, relapsed multiple myeloma, lymphoma, amyloid light-chain amyloidosis, sarcoma, or germ cell tumor). However, patients requiring pre-emptive or rescue plerixafor had a significantly lower platelet count before mobilization (217/nl vs. 245/nl; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

With the current state of the art PBSC mobilization strategies, the platelet count before mobilization was not associated with the CD34+ cell collection result but was associated with the need for pre-emptive or rescue application of plerixafor.

Plerixafor mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors to support further high-dose chemotherapy cycles in a patient with germ-cell tumor relapsing after previous tandem high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation: report of a case

Salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation represents a curative treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory germ-cell tumors (GCTs). However, an appreciable proportion of these fail to mobilize adequate numbers of hematopoietic progenitors; thus, plerixafor is applied for that purpose. Limited data exist on remobilization of HSCs after previous autografting. Here, we report a unique case that had undergone successful previous tandem HDC for relapsed GCT, and 1 year later required remobilization of HSCs to support two further cycles of HDC after subsequent multiple relapses and refractoriness requiring various salvage regimens. Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor showed its efficacy in mobilizing 6×10 CD34+/kg HSCs able to rescue two HDC cycles of carboplatin-etoposide, leading to stable hematopoietic engraftment. Plerixafor showed its potency to mobilize adequate numbers of HSCs in a patient with relapsed/refractory GCT after previous tandem HDC and autografting. The case is discussed in the context of HSC mobilization in patients who have undergone previous HDC and autografting and are deemed to have poor hematopoietic reserves, and a detailed literature review of this topic is provided.

Cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma patients: A subgroup analysis from the phase III trial ReLApsE

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of the efficiency and toxicity of cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM).

METHODS

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilized with high dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m² daily on days 1 and 2) and G-CSF plus pre-emptive/rescue plerixafor in RMM patients (first to third relapse) treated within the ReLApsE trial of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG).

RESULTS

Mobilization was initiated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) and G-CSF in 30 patients. Fifteen patients received additional pre-emptive/rescue administration of plerixafor. Stem cell collection was successful (≥2×10⁶ CD34+ cells per kg bw) in 77% (23/30 patients). Patients with prior high-dose melphalan collected a significantly lower median total number of PBSCs than patients without prior high-dose melphalan (3.3×10⁶ vs 17×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg bw). Toxicity of HD-CY was frequent with 12 serious adverse events (SAE) in 37% of patients (11/30 patients). Infections accounted for the majority of SAE reports. In two patients, SAEs were lethal (septic shock).

CONCLUSIONS

These data proof feasibility of PBSC collection at relapse but emphasize the importance of collection and storage of additional PBSC transplants during first-line treatment when mobilization is more efficient and less toxic.