Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of a multi-cohort phase II clinical trial

Rapid Progress in Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma: An Updated Comprehensive Review

Despite rapid advances in treatment approaches of multiple myeloma (MM) over the last two decades via proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), their efficacies are limited. MM still remains incurable, and the majority of patients shortly relapse and eventually become refractory to existing therapies due to the genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic strategies with different mechanisms of action represents an unmet need to achieve a deep and highly durable response as well as to improve patient outcomes. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), belanatmab mafadotin, which targets B cell membrane antigen (BCMA) on plasma cells, was approved for the treatment of MM in 2020. To date, numerous immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, such as bispecific T cell engager (BiTE), the duobody adoptive cellular therapy using a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine, autologous chimeric antigen (CAR)-T cells, allogeneic CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, and checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of MM, and a variety of clinical trials are currently underway or are expected to be planned. In the future, the efficacy of combination approaches, as well as allogenic CAR-T or NK cell therapy, will be examined, and promising results may alter the treatment paradigm of MM. This is a comprehensive review with an update on the most recent clinical and preclinical advances with a focus on results from clinical trials in progress with BCMA-targeted immunotherapies and the development of other novel targets in MM. Future perspectives will also be discussed.

Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results of the Real-World "POWERFUL" Study

The “POWERFUL” multicenter, retrospective, and prospective study investigated the effectiveness of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM/LoDex) therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in routine care in Greece. Ninety-nine eligible adult patients treated with POM/LoDex according to the approved label after having received ≥2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, were consecutively enrolled between 16 November 2017 and 21 February 2019 in 18 hematology departments. Fifty patients (50.5%) started POM/LoDex as third-line treatment. During the treatment period (median: 8.3 months; range: 0.3–47.6 months), the median POM dose was 4 mg/day, and 31.3% of the patients received additional antimyeloma agents. The overall response rate was 32.3%. During a median follow-up period of 13.8 months (Kaplan–Meier estimate), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.4–14.4). The PFS was not significantly different between patients receiving POM/LoDex in the third versus later line of therapy, nor between patients receiving concomitant antimyeloma therapy versus POM/LoDEx doublet. During the prospective safety data collection period (median: 7.6 months) among patients with prospective follow-up (N = 75), POM-related adverse event incidence rate was 42.7% (serious: 18.7%; grade  ≥  3 hematological POM-related adverse events: 8.0%). Only neutropenia (13.3%) was reported at a frequency ≥10%. In conclusion, in this real-world study, POM/LoDex displayed a long PFS with no new safety signals emerging.

Next-generation immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that mainly affects elderly patients, with the median age of 69 years at the time of diagnosis. Despite the recent increase in the number of drugs used in the antimyeloma therapy, the disease remains incurable, with remissions and subsequent relapses. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs), known to have multiple mechanisms of actions, including direct anti-MM activity and immune-stimulatory properties, are currently the backbone in multidrug regimens. New generation IMIDs are recommended nowoby ESMO – lenalidomide is included in frontline therapy, while pomalidomide is accepted from the third line. Clinical trials proved lack of apparent cross-resistance between immunomodulatory agents, confirmed their high efficacy and acceptable safety profile in individuals with relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) refractory to proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide, even with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Also, triplet pomalidomide-based combinations with bortezomib, carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, daratumumab or elotuzumab were proved to be effective and safe in this group of patients. The most common adverse events of the new generation IMIDs are the following: hematological toxicity (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia), fatigue and, while administered with dexamethasone, infections. However, peripheral neuropathy, significantly limiting the use of first generation IMID - thalidomide, is much less frequently observed. Due to the increased risk of venous thromboembolism, thromboprophylaxis should be implemented in the whole course of IMID therapy. Data from real-life settings demonstrate that new generation IMIDs are a cost-effective treatment option in relapsed/ refractory myeloma. Currently, one drug program with the new IMIDs is available in Poland.

The evolving role of translocation t(11;14) in the biology, prognosis, and management of multiple myeloma

Cytogenetic changes in multiple myeloma (MM) have emerged as one of the most important prognostic factors. Translocations of chromosomes 4 and 14 [t(4;14)], chromosomes 14 and 16 [t(14;16)] and deletion of chromosome 17p [del(17p)] have been incorporated in the Revised International Staging System as a measure of adverse disease biology. Ongoing research is unveiling a complex genomic landscape in MM, with new cytogenetic abnormalities important for prognosis identified and the significance of known cytogenetic changes revisited. In studies conducted before the novel agent era, t(11;14) was shown to carry standard risk for patients with MM. Findings from more recent retrospective reviews have shown that t(11;14) is associated with intermediate outcomes in patients treated with novel agents as compared with patients who have standard- or high-risk cytogenetic aberrations. MM cells with t(11;14) have a unique biology, with relatively higher expression of the antiapoptotic protein BCL2 and lower expression of MCL1, in contrast to MM cells without this translocation. Translocation t(11;14) has emerged as the first predictive marker in MM, indicating susceptibility to BCL2 inhibition. Future studies will be needed to explore if the combination of novel agents with BCL2 inhibitors can improve the prognosis of patients with t(11;14). In this article, current data on the evolving role of t(11;14) in the biology, prognosis, and treatment of MM are reviewed.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: A Challenge to Develop Novel Targets

The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.

Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Disease Control with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

Background: We retrospectively analysed relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) patients treated with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (PomaD) either in real life, or previously enrolled in an interventional (STRATUS, MM-010) or currently enrolled in an observational study (MM-015) to provide further insights on safety and tolerability and clinical efficacy. Methods: Between July 2013 and July 2018, 76 RRMM patients (including 33 double refractory MM) received pomalidomide 4 mg daily given orally on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle, and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly (≤75 years) or 20 mg weekly for patients aged > 75 years. In nine patients a third agent was added to increase the response: Cyclophosphamide (in two fit patients) or clarithromycin (in seven frail patients). Patients received subcutaneous filgrastim as part of the prophylaxis regimen for neutropenia. Results: A median number of six (range 2–21) PomaD cycles were given. The regimen was well tolerated with grade 3–4 haematological and non-haematological adverse events in 39 (51%) and 25 (33%) patients, respectively. In patients who developed serious AE, pomalidomide dose reduction (11%, 14%) or definitive discontinuation (18%, 23%) were applied. All patients have been evaluated for response within the first two cycles. The disease control rate (DCR), i.e., those patients that had a response equal or better than stable disease (≥ SD), was high (89%), with 44% overall response rate (ORR) after six cycles. The achieved best responses were complete remission (CR, 5%), very good partial remission (VGPR, 4%), partial remission (PR, 35%), minimal response (MR, 7%), and stable disease (SD, 38%). After a median follow up of 19.6 months, median progression free survival was 9.4 months, and overall survival (OS) was 19.02 months. Univariate analysis showed that double refractory patients, or who received more than three previous lines had shorter PFS. At 18 months, regardless of the depth of response, patients with a disease control of at least six months, defined as maintenance of a best clinical and/or biochemical response to treatment for almost six months, had prolonged PFS (35.3% versus 20.6%, p = 0.0003) and OS (81.2% versus 15.9%, p < 0.0001) Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PomaD is a safe and well-tolerated regimen in real-life, associated with prolonged PFS and OS with acceptable toxicity. Moreover, Pd induced disease control in most intensively pre-treated patients and some of them achieved longer PFS than that obtained with the previous treatment.

Pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination with additional cyclophosphamide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (AMN001)-a trial by the Asian Myeloma Network

Pomalidomide is a third generation immunomodulatory drug which in combination with dexamethasone, has been shown to be active in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. However, the data in Asian patients remain limited. We conducted a prospective phase two clinical trial in major cancer centers in Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Hong Kong to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination (PomDex) +/− cyclophosphamide in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who failed lenalidomide and bortezomib. Patients were treated with pomalidomide (4 mg daily for 21 days every 4 weeks) and dexamethasone (40 mg weekly). If there is less than a minimal response after three cycles of PomDex, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² can be added (PomCyDex). A total of 136 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 9 and 10.8 months for the PomDex and PomCyDex group, respectively. The median OS was 16.3 months. This regimen appears to be active across age groups and prior lines of treatment. This combination was overall well tolerated with grade 3 and 4 adverse events of mainly cytopenias. PomDex is highly active and well-tolerated in Asian patients. The addition of cyclophosphamide can improve the response and outcomes further in patients with suboptimal response to PomDex.

Contemporary patient-tailored treatment strategies against high risk and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Recurrence of disease due to chemotherapy drug resistance remains a major obstacle to a more successful survival outcome of multiple myeloma (MM). Overcoming drug resistance and salvaging patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) MM is an urgent and unmet medical need. Several new personalized treatment strategies have been developed against molecular targets to overcome this drug resistance. There are several targeted therapeutics with anti-MM activity in clinical pipeline, including inhibitors of anti-apoptotic proteins, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, fusion proteins, and various cell therapy platforms. For example, B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific CAR-T cell platforms showed promising activity in heavily pretreated R/R MM patients. Therefore, there is renewed hope for high-risk as well as R/R MM patients in the era of personalized medicine.

Tolerability and safety of real-world use of pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Pomalidomide (POM) is a second-generation immunomodulatory agent with proven efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) proven to be refractory to previous treatment with lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib. We herein conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 RRMM patients receiving POM to determine its tolerability and safety in the clinical setting. The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 58-84 years), and 85.7% of the patients were aged >70 years. The most frequent treatment dose was 3 mg/day. POM dose reductions were required in 54.5% (6/11) of the patients. The patient data were compared among three age groups (<70, 70-75 and >75 years) and there was only significant difference in daily POM treatment dose. The tolerability of POM must be confirmed, particularly in elderly patients. Dose reduction from 4 to 3 mg occurred during the second cycle in 83.3% (5/6) of the patients. It is important to determine the tolerability of POM in the early phases of treatment. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (64.3%), anemia (64.3%) and thrombocytopenia (57.1%). Although the median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 21.4% (3/14) of the patients with a performance status (PS) of 3 were administered only 1 treatment cycle. The tolerability of POM was low among patients with poor PS and an aggressive treatment introduction should be avoided. However, 21.4% (3/14) of the patients were able to continue treatment for >1 year and some patients received long-term therapy. POM does not require dose modification for renal function, and multiple capsule doses are available, which is an advantage of POM compared with LEN. POM may be administered to late-stage RRMM patients in a real-world clinical setting, but elderly patients or those with poor PS must be treated with caution. In this manner, the treatment options for RRMM patients may be expanded by assessing the tolerability and safety of POM.

CD26 is a potential therapeutic target by humanized monoclonal antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma

CD26, a 110-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on several tumor cells including malignant lymphoma, has been implicated in tumorigenesis: however, little is known regarding its role in multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, we identified CD26 expression on human osteoclasts (OCs) and demonstrated that humanized IgG₁ monoclonal antibody targeting CD26, huCD26mAb, inhibits human OC differentiation. Herein, we show that CD26 expression was present on plasma cells in the bone marrow tissues of MM patients. In vitro immunostaining studies revealed that although CD26 expression was low or absent on MM cell lines cultured alone, it was intensely and uniformly expressed on MM cell lines co-cultured with OCs. The augmented CD26 expression in MM cells was exploited to enhance anti-MM efficacy of huCD26mAb via a substantial increase in antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) but not complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Moreover, huCD26mAb in combination with novel agents synergistically enhanced huCD26mAb induced ADCC activity against CD26+ MM cells compared with each agent alone. huCD26mAb additionally reduced the ratio of the side population (SP) fraction in CD26+ MM cells by ADCC. Finally, huCD26mAb significantly reduced the MM tumor burden and OC formation in vivo. These results suggest that CD26 is a potential target molecule in MM and that huCD26mAb could act as a therapeutic agent.