Grading system for lymph vessel tumor emboli: significant outcome predictor for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who received neoadjuvant therapy

Residual pure intralymphatic carcinoma component only (lymphovascular tumor emboli without invasive carcinoma) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with poor outcome: Not pathologic complete response

Residual pure intralymphatic carcinoma (PIC) component only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is lymphovascular tumor emboli without invasive carcinoma and extremely rare form of residual tumor after NAC. Although several studies have been published, the prognostic influence of residual PIC component only had not been fully evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and the prognostic value of residual PIC component only. We reviewed the 251 patients with no residual invasive carcinoma in breast after NAC and found 12 patients with residual PIC component only after NAC. Five cases were triple negative, 6 were HER2 positive, and 1 was estrogen receptor positive and HER2 negative. The extent of PIC component ranged from 0.18 to 50.00 mm. The detailed microscopic PIC component findings did not significantly correlate with regional lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, or distant metastasis (p > 0.05). In multivariate survival analysis, the presence of lymph node metastasis and pretreatment ki-67 labeling index more than 50 % was statistically associated with greater risk of relapse [Cox proportional hazards ratio (HR) = 3.236, 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.461-7.280, p = 0.004; HR = 3.046, 95 % CI, 1.421-6.529, p = 0.004, respectively) and residual PIC component only tended to be associated with greater risk of relapse (HR = 2.378, 95 % CI, 0.853-6.631; p = 0.098), but not reached to statistically significance. In patients without lymph node metastasis, the presence of residual PIC component only was associated with worse disease-free survival (p = 0.004). Although the number of published studies still limited, residual residual PIC component only after NAC is associated with poor outcome, and it should not be considered as pathological complete response.

Pathologic evaluation of specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Current recommendations and challenges

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to optimize breast conservation surgery and is becoming a standard of care in a subset of breast cancer patients. An accurate pathologic assessment is crucial in guiding clinical decisions and subsequent management and prognosis. This review aims to summarize the most current literature, recommendations, and challenges in the pathologic evaluation of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Included are the most current definitions of the different types of tumor response, the underlying factors that can affect tumor response, how to assess lymph nodes, margins, and tumor markers post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as the different classification systems a pathologist can use to assess residual disease. In this era of de-escalation of surgical treatment, studies on imaging techniques to assess residual disease and avoid surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have also been done. However, at least for now, surgical treatment remains the preferred practice. As such, pathologists play an increasingly critical role in standardizing assessment of residual disease post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in optimizing the knowledge gained by this approach to breast cancer therapy.

The role of EMT and MET in cancer dissemination

Metastatic cancer cells are lethal. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that bolster the conversion from benign to malignant progression is key for treating these heterogeneous and resistant neoplasms. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a conserved cellular program that alters cell shape, adhesion and movement. The shift to a more mesenchymal-like phenotype can promote tumor cell intravasation of surrounding blood vessels and emigration to a new organ, yet may not be necessary for extravasation or colonization into that environment. Lymphatic dissemination, on the other hand, may not require EMT. This review presents emerging data on the modes by which tumor cells promote EMT/MET via microRNA and prepare the pre-metastatic niche via exosomes.

Pathology Considerations in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) originally reserved for the treatment of inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancers is currently offered to women with earlier-stage and operable breast carcinoma. NAT allows more women to be eligible for breast conservation surgery and provides an opportunity to assess the response of carcinomas to therapy. This review focuses on the predictors of therapeutic response in pretreatment tumor, evaluation of post-treatment breast and lymph node specimens and classification systems to evaluate degree of response to NAT.

Predictive value of pathological and immunohistochemical parameters for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma

Background/Objective

While several prognostic factors have been identified in breast carcinoma, the clinical outcome remains hard to predict for individual patients. Better predictive markers are needed to help guide difficult treatment decisions. Axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) is one of the most important prognostic determinants in breast carcinoma; however, the reasons why tumors vary in their capability to result in axillary metastasis remain unclear. Identifying breast carcinoma patients at risk for ALNM would improve treatment planning. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with ALNM in breast carcinoma, with particular emphasis on basal-like phenotype.

Methods

Breast carcinoma patients (n = 210) who underwent breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (level I and II) or modified radical mastectomy were included in this study. Pathological and immunohistochemical data including individual receptor/gene status was collected for analysis. The basal phenotype status was ascertained using the basal cytokeratin markers CK5, CK14, CK17 and EGFR.

Results

ALNM was found in 55% (n = 116) of the patients. On univariate analysis, multicentric disease, large tumor size (>2 cm), vascular and lymphatic invasion, epithelial hyperplasia, necrosis, in situ carcinoma and perineural invasion were associated with higher risk for ALNM, whereas CK5, CK14, EGFR positivity and basal-like tumor type were associated with lower risk. On multivariate analysis, CK5 positivity (OR 0.003, 95%CI 0.000-0.23, p = 0.009) and lymphatic/vascular invasion (OR 17.94, 95%CI 4.78-67.30, p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors.

Conclusions

Although the value of complete ALND has been questioned in invasive breast cancer patients, treatment decisions for breast carcinoma have been influenced by many parameters, including lymph node status. Since histopathologic characteristics and expression of biological markers varies among the same histologic subtypes of breast carcinoma, specific clinical and histopathologic features of the primary tumor and ALN status like sentinel node might be used to tailor the loco-regional and systemic treatment in different clinical settings.

p53 expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

The purpose of this study was to determine whether p53 protein expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming fibrotic foci is a significant outcome predictor, similar to p53 protein expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts not forming fibrotic foci, and whether the combined assessment of p53 expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci served as an important outcome predictor among 1039 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. We analyzed the outcome predictive power of the Allred score risk classification for p53 in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci using multivariate analyses with well-known clinicopathological factors. The Allred score risk classifications for p53 in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci were superior to the Allred scores for p53 in tumor-stromal fibroblasts not forming fibrotic foci alone for accurately predicting the tumor-related death of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma when examined using multivariate analyses. The Allred score risk classification for p53 in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci significantly increased the hazard rates for tumor recurrence and tumor-related death independent of the UICC pTNM stage in the multivariate analyses. These results indicated that the Allred score risk classification based on the combined assessment of p53 expression in tumor-stromal fibroblasts forming and not forming fibrotic foci is a very useful outcome predictor among patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.