1
|
Rodriguez-Thompson AM, Miller AB, Wade M, Meyer KN, Machlin L, Bonar AS, Patel KK, Giletta M, Hastings PD, Nock MK, Rudolph KD, Slavich GM, Prinstein MJ, Sheridan MA. Neural Correlates of the p Factor in Adolescence: Cognitive Control With and Without Enhanced Positive Affective Demands. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2024; 9:30-40. [PMID: 37062361 PMCID: PMC10576014 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent research has aimed to characterize processes underlying general liability toward psychopathology, termed the p factor. Given previous research linking the p factor with difficulties in both executive functioning and affective regulation, the present study investigated nonaffective and positive affective inhibition in the context of a sustained attention/inhibition paradigm in adolescents exhibiting mild to severe psychopathology. METHODS Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected during an integrated reward conditioning and go/no-go task in 138 adolescents assigned female at birth. We modeled the p factor using hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Positive affective inhibition was measured by examining responses to no-go stimuli with a history of reward conditioning. We examined associations between p factor scores and neural function and behavioral performance. RESULTS Consistent with nonaffective executive function as a primary risk factor, p factor scores were associated with worse behavioral performance and hypoactivation in the left superior frontal gyrus and middle frontal gyrus during response initiation (go trials). The p factor scores were additionally associated with increased error-related signaling in the temporal cortex during incorrect no-go trials. CONCLUSIONS During adolescence, a period characterized by heightened risk for emergent psychopathology, we observed unique associations between p factor scores and neural and behavioral indices of response initiation, which relies primarily on sustained attention. These findings suggest that shared variation in mental disorder categories is characterized in part by sustained attention deficits. While we did not find evidence that the p factor was associated with inhibition in this study, this observation is consistent with our hypothesis that the p factor would be related to nonaffective control processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaïs M Rodriguez-Thompson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Adam Bryant Miller
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Mental Health Risk and Resilience Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Mark Wade
- Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin N Meyer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Laura Machlin
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Adrienne S Bonar
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kinjal K Patel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matteo Giletta
- Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul D Hastings
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, California
| | - Matthew K Nock
- Psychology Department and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Karen D Rudolph
- Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
| | - George M Slavich
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mitchell J Prinstein
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Margaret A Sheridan
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bagautdinova J, Bourque J, Sydnor VJ, Cieslak M, Alexander-Bloch AF, Bertolero MA, Cook PA, Gur RE, Gur RC, Hu F, Larsen B, Moore TM, Radhakrishnan H, Roalf DR, Shinohara RT, Tapera TM, Zhao C, Sotiras A, Davatzikos C, Satterthwaite TD. Development of white matter fiber covariance networks supports executive function in youth. Cell Rep 2023; 42:113487. [PMID: 37995188 PMCID: PMC10795769 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
During adolescence, the brain undergoes extensive changes in white matter structure that support cognition. Data-driven approaches applied to cortical surface properties have led the field to understand brain development as a spatially and temporally coordinated mechanism that follows hierarchically organized gradients of change. Although white matter development also appears asynchronous, previous studies have relied largely on anatomical tract-based atlases, precluding a direct assessment of how white matter structure is spatially and temporally coordinated. Harnessing advances in diffusion modeling and machine learning, we identified 14 data-driven patterns of covarying white matter structure in a large sample of youth. Fiber covariance networks aligned with known major tracts, while also capturing distinct patterns of spatial covariance across distributed white matter locations. Most networks showed age-related increases in fiber network properties, which were also related to developmental changes in executive function. This study delineates data-driven patterns of white matter development that support cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joëlle Bagautdinova
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Josiane Bourque
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Valerie J Sydnor
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aaron F Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Maxwell A Bertolero
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Philip A Cook
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Fengling Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bart Larsen
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tyler M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamsanandini Radhakrishnan
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David R Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Russel T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tinashe M Tapera
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Chenying Zhao
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoy N, Lynch SJ, Waszczuk MA, Reppermund S, Mewton L. Transdiagnostic biomarkers of mental illness across the lifespan: A systematic review examining the genetic and neural correlates of latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology in the general population. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 155:105431. [PMID: 37898444 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review synthesizes evidence from research investigating the biological correlates of latent transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology (e.g., the p-factor, internalizing, externalizing) across the lifespan. Eligibility criteria captured genomic and neuroimaging studies investigating general and/or specific dimensions in general population samples across all age groups. MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for relevant studies published up to March 2023 and 46 studies were selected for inclusion. The results revealed several biological correlates consistently associated with transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology, including polygenic scores for ADHD and neuroticism, global surface area and global gray matter volume. Shared and unique associations between symptom dimensions are highlighted, as are potential age-specific differences in biological associations. Findings are interpreted with reference to key methodological differences across studies. The included studies provide compelling evidence that the general dimension of psychopathology reflects common underlying genetic and neurobiological vulnerabilities that are shared across diverse manifestations of mental illness. Substantive interpretations of general psychopathology in the context of genetic and neurobiological evidence are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hoy
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Samantha J Lynch
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada; Research Centre, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Monika A Waszczuk
- Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, United States
| | - Simone Reppermund
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Mewton
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Linkovski O, Moore TM, Argabright ST, Calkins ME, Gur RC, Gur RE, Barzilay R. Hoarding behavior and its association with mental health and functioning in a large youth sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2023:10.1007/s00787-023-02296-4. [PMID: 37728661 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-023-02296-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Hoarding behavior is prevalent in children and adolescents, yet clinicians do not routinely inquire about it and youth may not spontaneously report it due to stigma. It is unknown whether hoarding behavior, over and above obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS), is associated with major clinical factors in a general youth population. This observational study included N = 7054 youth who were not seeking help for mental health problems (ages 11-21, 54% female) and completed a structured interview that included evaluation of hoarding behavior and OCS, as a part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort between November 2009 and December 2011. We employed regression models with hoarding behavior and OCS (any/none) as independent variables, and continuous (linear regression) or binary (logistic regression) mental health measures as dependent variables. All models covaried for age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status. A total of 374 participants endorsed HB (5.3%), most of which reported additional OCS (n = 317). When accounting for OCS presence, hoarding behavior was associated with greater dimensional psychopathology burden (i.e., higher P-factor) (β = 0.19, p < .001), and with poorer functioning (i.e., lower score on the child global assessment scale) (β = - 0.07, p < .001). The results were consistent when modeling psychopathology using binary variables. The results remained significant in sensitivity analyses accounting for count of endorsed OCS and excluding participants who met criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder (n = 210). These results suggest that hoarding behavior among youth is associated with poorer mental health and functioning, independent of OCS. Brief hoarding-behavior assessments in clinical settings may prove useful given hoarding behavior's stigma and detrimental health associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Linkovski
- Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, 52900, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Tyler M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stirling T Argabright
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, CHOP, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Monica E Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, CHOP, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ran Barzilay
- Department of Psychiatry, Neurodevelopment and Psychosis Section, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 10th floor, Gates Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 34Th and Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Lifespan Brain Institute of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, CHOP, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoffmann MS, Moore TM, Axelrud LK, Tottenham N, Rohde LA, Milham MP, Satterthwaite TD, Salum GA. Harmonizing bifactor models of psychopathology between distinct assessment instruments: Reliability, measurement invariance, and authenticity. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2023; 32:e1959. [PMID: 36655616 PMCID: PMC10485343 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Model configuration is important for mental health data harmonization. We provide a method to investigate the performance of different bifactor model configurations to harmonize different instruments. METHODS We used data from six samples from the Reproducible Brain Charts initiative (N = 8,606, ages 5-22 years, 41.0% females). We harmonized items from two psychopathology instruments, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and GOASSESS, based on semantic content. We estimated bifactor models using confirmatory factor analysis, and calculated their model fit, factor reliability, between-instrument invariance, and authenticity (i.e., the correlation and factor score difference between the harmonized and original models). RESULTS Five out of 12 model configurations presented acceptable fit and were instrument-invariant. Correlations between the harmonized factor scores and the original full-item models were high for the p-factor (>0.89) and small to moderate (0.12-0.81) for the specific factors. 6.3%-50.9% of participants presented factor score differences between harmonized and original models higher than 0.5 z-score. CONCLUSIONS The CBCL-GOASSESS harmonization indicates that few models provide reliable specific factors and are instrument-invariant. Moreover, authenticity was high for the p-factor and moderate for specific factors. Future studies can use this framework to examine the impact of harmonizing instruments in psychiatric research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurício Scopel Hoffmann
- Department of NeuropsychiatryUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- Section on Negative Affect and Social ProcessesHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- Care Policy and Evaluation CentreLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
| | - Tyler Maxwell Moore
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Luiza Kvitko Axelrud
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- Section on Negative Affect and Social ProcessesHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
| | - Nim Tottenham
- Department of PsychologyColumbia UniversityNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Luis Augusto Rohde
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents (INCT‐CNPq)São PauloBrazil
- Department of Psychiatry and Legal MedicineUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
| | - Michael Peter Milham
- Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric ResearchOrangeburgNew YorkUSA
- Center for the Developing BrainChild Mind InstituteNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Giovanni Abrahão Salum
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- Section on Negative Affect and Social ProcessesHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents (INCT‐CNPq)São PauloBrazil
- Department of Psychiatry and Legal MedicineUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
- Center for the Developing BrainChild Mind InstituteNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong J, Hwang J, Lee JH. General psychopathology factor (p-factor) prediction using resting-state functional connectivity and a scanner-generalization neural network. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 158:114-125. [PMID: 36580867 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The general psychopathology factor (p-factor) represents shared variance across mental disorders based on psychopathologic symptoms. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study offers an unprecedented opportunity to investigate functional networks (FNs) from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) associated with the psychopathology of an adolescent cohort (n > 10,000). However, the heterogeneities associated with the use of multiple sites and multiple scanners in the ABCD Study need to be overcome to improve the prediction of the p-factor using fMRI. We proposed a scanner-generalization neural network (SGNN) to predict the individual p-factor by systematically reducing the scanner effect for resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). We included 6905 adolescents from 18 sites whose fMRI data were collected using either Siemens or GE scanners. The p-factor was estimated based on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) scores available in the ABCD study using exploratory factor analysis. We evaluated the Pearson's correlation coefficients (CCs) for p-factor prediction via leave-one/two-site-out cross-validation (LOSOCV/LTSOCV) and identified important FNs from the weight features (WFs) of the SGNN. The CCs were higher for the SGNN than for alternative models when using both LOSOCV (0.1631 ± 0.0673 for the SGNN vs. 0.1497 ± 0.0710 for kernel ridge regression [KRR]; p < 0.05 from a two-tailed paired t-test) and LTSOCV (0.1469 ± 0.0381 for the SGNN vs. 0.1394 ± 0.0359 for KRR; p = 0.01). It was found that (a) the default-mode and dorsal attention FNs were important for p-factor prediction, and (b) the intra-visual FN was important for scanner generalization. We demonstrated the efficacy of our novel SGNN model for p-factor prediction while simultaneously eliminating scanner-related confounding effects for RSFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinwoo Hong
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jundong Hwang
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Hwan Lee
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaminski A, You X, Flaharty K, Jeppsen C, Li S, Merchant JS, Berl MM, Kenworthy L, Vaidya CJ. Cingulate-Prefrontal Connectivity During Dynamic Cognitive Control Mediates Association Between p Factor and Adaptive Functioning in a Transdiagnostic Pediatric Sample. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:189-199. [PMID: 35868485 PMCID: PMC10152206 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Covariation among psychiatric symptoms is being actively pursued for transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology with predictive utility. A superordinate dimension, the p factor, reflects overall psychopathology burden and has support from genetic and neuroimaging correlates. However, the neurocognitive correlates that link an elevated p factor to maladaptive outcomes are unknown. We tested the mediating potential of dynamic adjustments in cognitive control rooted in functional connections anchored by the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) in a transdiagnostic pediatric sample. METHODS A multiple mediation model tested the association between the p factor (derived by principal component analysis of Child Behavior Checklist syndrome scales) and outcome measured with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II in 89 children ages 8 to 13 years (23 female) with a variety of primary neurodevelopmental diagnoses who underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a socioaffective Stroop-like task with eye gaze as distractor. Mediators included functional connectivity of frontoparietal- and salience network-affiliated dACC seeds during conflict adaptation. RESULTS Higher p factor scores were related to worse adaptive functioning. This effect was partially mediated by conflict adaptation-dependent functional connectivity between the frontoparietal network-affiliated dACC seed and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Post hoc follow-up indicated that the p factor was related to all Vineland Adaptive Behaviors Scale-II domains; the association was strongest for socialization followed by daily living skills and then communication. Mediation results remained significant for socialization only. CONCLUSIONS Higher psychopathology burden was associated with worse adaptive functioning in early adolescence. This association was mediated by weaker dACC-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity underlying modulation of cognitive control in response to contextual contingencies. Our results contribute to the identification of transdiagnostic and developmentally relevant neurocognitive endophenotypes of psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kaminski
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C..
| | - Xiaozhen You
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C
| | - Kathryn Flaharty
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C
| | - Charlotte Jeppsen
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C
| | - Sufang Li
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C
| | | | - Madison M Berl
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C
| | - Lauren Kenworthy
- Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C
| | - Chandan J Vaidya
- Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.; Children's Research Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, D.C..
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
David FS, Stein F, Andlauer TFM, Streit F, Witt SH, Herms S, Hoffmann P, Heilmann-Heimbach S, Opel N, Repple J, Jansen A, Nenadić I, Papiol S, Heilbronner U, Kalman JL, Schaupp SK, Senner F, Schulte EC, Falkai PG, Schulze TG, Dannlowski U, Kircher T, Rietschel M, Nöthen MM, Krug A, Forstner AJ. Genetic contributions to transdiagnostic symptom dimensions in patients with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res 2023; 252:161-171. [PMID: 36652833 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SZ) exhibit considerable phenotypic and genetic overlap. However, the contribution of genetic factors to their shared psychopathological symptom dimensions remains unclear. The present exploratory study investigated genetic contributions to the symptom dimensions "Depression", "Negative syndrome", "Positive formal thought disorder", "Paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome", and "Increased appetite" in a transdiagnostic subset of the German FOR2107 cohort (n = 1042 patients with MDD, BD, or SZ). As replication cohort, a subset of the German/Austrian PsyCourse study (n = 816 patients with MDD, BD, or SZ) was employed. First, the relationship between symptom dimensions and common variants associated with MDD, BD, and SZ was investigated via polygenic risk score (PRS) association analyses, with disorder-specific PRS as predictors and symptom dimensions as outcomes. In the FOR2107 study sample, PRS for BD and SZ were positively associated with "Positive formal thought disorder", the PRS for SZ was positively associated with "Paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome", and the PRS for BD was negatively associated with "Depression". The effects of PRS for SZ were replicated in PsyCourse. No significant associations were observed for the MDD PRS. Second, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed for the five symptom dimensions. No genome-wide significant associations and no replicable suggestive associations (p < 1e-6 in the GWAS) were identified. In summary, our results suggest that, similar to diagnostic categories, transdiagnostic psychiatric symptom dimensions are attributable to polygenic contributions with small effect sizes. Further studies in larger thoroughly phenotyped psychiatric cohorts are required to elucidate the genetic factors that shape psychopathological symptom dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike S David
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frederike Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Till F M Andlauer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Streit
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stephanie H Witt
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Center for Innovative Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Research, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Herms
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Nils Opel
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jonathan Repple
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Andreas Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Core-Facility Brainimaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sergi Papiol
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Urs Heilbronner
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Janos L Kalman
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabrina K Schaupp
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fanny Senner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva C Schulte
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter G Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas G Schulze
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics (IPPG), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marcella Rietschel
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Markus M Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Axel Krug
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andreas J Forstner
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, School of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Centre for Human Genetics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cui Z, Pines AR, Larsen B, Sydnor VJ, Li H, Adebimpe A, Alexander-Bloch AF, Bassett DS, Bertolero M, Calkins ME, Davatzikos C, Fair DA, Gur RC, Gur RE, Moore TM, Shanmugan S, Shinohara RT, Vogel JW, Xia CH, Fan Y, Satterthwaite TD. Linking Individual Differences in Personalized Functional Network Topography to Psychopathology in Youth. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 92:973-983. [PMID: 35927072 PMCID: PMC10040299 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The spatial layout of large-scale functional brain networks differs between individuals and is particularly variable in the association cortex, implicated in a broad range of psychiatric disorders. However, it remains unknown whether this variation in functional topography is related to major dimensions of psychopathology in youth. METHODS The authors studied 790 youths ages 8 to 23 years who had 27 minutes of high-quality functional magnetic resonance imaging data as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Four correlated dimensions were estimated using a confirmatory correlated traits factor analysis on 112 item-level clinical symptoms, and one overall psychopathology factor with 4 orthogonal dimensions were extracted using a confirmatory factor analysis. Spatially regularized nonnegative matrix factorization was used to identify 17 individual-specific functional networks for each participant. Partial least square regression with split-half cross-validation was conducted to evaluate to what extent the topography of personalized functional networks encodes major dimensions of psychopathology. RESULTS Personalized functional network topography significantly predicted unseen individuals' major dimensions of psychopathology, including fear, psychosis, externalizing, and anxious-misery. Reduced representation of association networks was among the most important features for the prediction of all 4 dimensions. Further analysis revealed that personalized functional network topography predicted overall psychopathology (r = 0.16, permutation testing p < .001), which drove prediction of the 4 correlated dimensions. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that individual differences in functional network topography in association networks is related to overall psychopathology in youth. Such results underscore the importance of considering functional neuroanatomy for personalized diagnostics and therapeutics in psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaixu Cui
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China.
| | - Adam R Pines
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bart Larsen
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Valerie J Sydnor
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hongming Li
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Azeez Adebimpe
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aaron F Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dani S Bassett
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico
| | - Max Bertolero
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Monica E Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Damien A Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, Institute of Child Development, College of Education and Human Development, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tyler M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sheila Shanmugan
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob W Vogel
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Cedric H Xia
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khosravi P, Zugman A, Amelio P, Winkler AM, Pine DS. Translating Big Data to Clinical Outcomes in Anxiety: Potential for Multimodal Integration. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2022; 24:841-851. [PMID: 36469202 PMCID: PMC9931491 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-022-01385-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW This review describes approaches to research on anxiety that attempt to link neural correlates to treatment response and novel therapies. The review emphasizes pediatric anxiety disorders since most anxiety disorders begin before adulthood. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature illustrates how current treatments for anxiety manifest diverse relations with a range of neural markers. While some studies demonstrate post-treatment normalization of markers in anxious individuals, others find persistence of group differences. For other markers, which show no pretreatment association with anxiety, the markers nevertheless distinguish treatment-responders from non-responders. Heightened error related negativity represents the risk marker discussed in the most depth; however, limitations in measures related to error responding necessitate multimodal and big-data approaches. Single risk markers show limits as correlates of treatment response. Large-scale, multimodal data analyzed with predictive models may illuminate additional risk markers related to anxiety disorder treatment outcomes. Such work may identify novel targets and eventually guide improvements in treatment response/outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parmis Khosravi
- Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda, USA.
| | - André Zugman
- Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda, USA
| | - Paia Amelio
- Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda, USA
| | - Anderson M Winkler
- Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda, USA
| | - Daniel S Pine
- Section on Development and Affective Neuroscience, Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Linking cerebellar functional gradients to transdiagnostic behavioral dimensions of psychopathology. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36:103176. [PMID: 36063759 PMCID: PMC9450332 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
High co-morbidity and substantial overlap across psychiatric disorders encourage a transition in psychiatry research from categorical to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. Converging evidence suggests that the cerebellum is involved in a wide range of cognitive functions and mental disorders. An important question thus centers on the extent to which cerebellar function can be linked to transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology. To address this question, we used a multivariate data-driven statistical technique (partial least squares) to identify latent dimensions linking human cerebellar connectome as assessed by functional MRI to a large set of clinical, cognitive, and trait measures across 198 participants, including healthy controls (n = 92) as well as patients diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 35), bipolar disorder (n = 36), and schizophrenia (n = 35). Macroscale spatial gradients of connectivity at voxel level were used to characterize cerebellar connectome properties, which provide a low-dimensional representation of cerebellar connectivity, i.e., a sensorimotor-supramodal hierarchical organization. This multivariate analysis revealed significant correlated patterns of cerebellar connectivity gradients and behavioral measures that could be represented into four latent dimensions: general psychopathology, impulsivity and mood, internalizing symptoms and executive dysfunction. Each dimension was associated with a unique spatial pattern of cerebellar connectivity gradients across all participants. Multiple control analyses and 10-fold cross-validation confirmed the robustness and generalizability of the yielded four dimensions. These findings highlight the relevance of cerebellar connectivity as a necessity for the study and classification of transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology and call on researcher to pay more attention to the role of cerebellum in the dimensions of psychopathology, not just within the cerebral cortex.
Collapse
|
12
|
Feng C, Huang W, Xu K, Stewart JL, Camilleri JA, Yang X, Wei P, Gu R, Luo W, Eickhoff SB. Neural substrates of motivational dysfunction across neuropsychiatric conditions: Evidence from meta-analysis and lesion network mapping. Clin Psychol Rev 2022; 96:102189. [PMID: 35908312 PMCID: PMC9720091 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Motivational dysfunction constitutes one of the fundamental dimensions of psychopathology cutting across traditional diagnostic boundaries. However, it is unclear whether there is a common neural circuit responsible for motivational dysfunction across neuropsychiatric conditions. To address this issue, the current study combined a meta-analysis on psychiatric neuroimaging studies of reward/loss anticipation and consumption (4308 foci, 438 contrasts, 129 publications) with a lesion network mapping approach (105 lesion cases). Our meta-analysis identified transdiagnostic hypoactivation in the ventral striatum (VS) for clinical/at-risk conditions compared to controls during the anticipation of both reward and loss. Moreover, the VS subserves a key node in a distributed brain network which encompasses heterogeneous lesion locations causing motivation-related symptoms. These findings do not only provide the first meta-analytic evidence of shared neural alternations linked to anticipatory motivation-related deficits, but also shed novel light on the role of VS dysfunction in motivational impairments in terms of both network integration and psychological functions. Particularly, the current findings suggest that motivational dysfunction across neuropsychiatric conditions is rooted in disruptions of a common brain network anchored in the VS, which contributes to motivational salience processing rather than encoding positive incentive values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunliang Feng
- Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education (South China Normal University), Guangzhou, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China,Corresponding authors at: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. (C. Feng), (R. Gu)
| | - Wenhao Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, and School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China,Department of Decision Neuroscience and Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE), Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany
| | - Kangli Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | | | - Julia A. Camilleri
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ping Wei
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, and School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Ruolei Gu
- Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China,Corresponding authors at: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. (C. Feng), (R. Gu)
| | - Wenbo Luo
- Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China
| | - Simon B. Eickhoff
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon E. Grogans
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| | - Andrew S. Fox
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA,California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA
| | - Alexander J. Shackman
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.,Department of Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.,Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adebimpe A, Bertolero M, Dolui S, Cieslak M, Murtha K, Baller EB, Boeve B, Boxer A, Butler ER, Cook P, Colcombe S, Covitz S, Davatzikos C, Davila DG, Elliott MA, Flounders MW, Franco AR, Gur RE, Gur RC, Jaber B, McMillian C, Milham M, Mutsaerts HJMM, Oathes DJ, Olm CA, Phillips JS, Tackett W, Roalf DR, Rosen H, Tapera TM, Tisdall MD, Zhou D, Esteban O, Poldrack RA, Detre JA, Satterthwaite TD. ASLPrep: a platform for processing of arterial spin labeled MRI and quantification of regional brain perfusion. Nat Methods 2022; 19:683-686. [PMID: 35689029 PMCID: PMC10548890 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01458-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Arterial spin labeled (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary method for noninvasively measuring regional brain perfusion in humans. We introduce ASLPrep, a suite of software pipelines that ensure the reproducible and generalizable processing of ASL MRI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azeez Adebimpe
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maxwell Bertolero
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sudipto Dolui
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristin Murtha
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Erica B Baller
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bradley Boeve
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Adam Boxer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ellyn R Butler
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Phil Cook
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stan Colcombe
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Brain Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Diego G Davila
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark A Elliott
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew W Flounders
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexandre R Franco
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Brain Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Basma Jaber
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Corey McMillian
- Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Milham
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Brain Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Henk J M M Mutsaerts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Desmond J Oathes
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Brain Science, Translation, Innovation, and Modulation Center, Perelmann School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher A Olm
- Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Phillips
- Frontotemporal Degeneration Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Will Tackett
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David R Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Howard Rosen
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tinashe M Tapera
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M Dylan Tisdall
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dale Zhou
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Oscar Esteban
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - John A Detre
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dugré JR, Eickhoff SB, Potvin S. Meta-analytical transdiagnostic neural correlates in common pediatric psychiatric disorders. Sci Rep 2022; 12:4909. [PMID: 35318371 PMCID: PMC8941086 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08909-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decades, neuroimaging studies have attempted to unveil the neurobiological markers underlying pediatric psychiatric disorders. Yet, the vast majority of neuroimaging studies still focus on a single nosological category, which limit our understanding of the shared/specific neural correlates between these disorders. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the transdiagnostic neural correlates through a novel and data-driven meta-analytical method. A data-driven meta-analysis was carried out which grouped similar experiments’ topographic map together, irrespectively of nosological categories and task-characteristics. Then, activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis was performed on each group of experiments to extract spatially convergent brain regions. One hundred forty-seven experiments were retrieved (3124 cases compared to 3100 controls): 79 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 32 conduct/oppositional defiant disorder, 14 anxiety disorders, 22 major depressive disorders. Four significant groups of experiments were observed. Functional characterization suggested that these groups of aberrant brain regions may be implicated internally/externally directed processes, attentional control of affect, somato-motor and visual processes. Furthermore, despite that some differences in rates of studies involving major depressive disorders were noticed, nosological categories were evenly distributed between these four sets of regions. Our results may reflect transdiagnostic neural correlates of pediatric psychiatric disorders, but also underscore the importance of studying pediatric psychiatric disorders simultaneously rather than independently to examine differences between disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules R Dugré
- Research Center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7331 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC, H1N 3V2, Canada. .,Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7), Jülich, Germany.,Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stéphane Potvin
- Research Center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, 7331 Hochelaga, Montreal, QC, H1N 3V2, Canada. .,Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhou D, Lynn CW, Cui Z, Ciric R, Baum GL, Moore TM, Roalf DR, Detre JA, Gur RC, Gur RE, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS. Efficient coding in the economics of human brain connectomics. Netw Neurosci 2022; 6:234-274. [PMID: 36605887 PMCID: PMC9810280 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In systems neuroscience, most models posit that brain regions communicate information under constraints of efficiency. Yet, evidence for efficient communication in structural brain networks characterized by hierarchical organization and highly connected hubs remains sparse. The principle of efficient coding proposes that the brain transmits maximal information in a metabolically economical or compressed form to improve future behavior. To determine how structural connectivity supports efficient coding, we develop a theory specifying minimum rates of message transmission between brain regions to achieve an expected fidelity, and we test five predictions from the theory based on random walk communication dynamics. In doing so, we introduce the metric of compression efficiency, which quantifies the trade-off between lossy compression and transmission fidelity in structural networks. In a large sample of youth (n = 1,042; age 8-23 years), we analyze structural networks derived from diffusion-weighted imaging and metabolic expenditure operationalized using cerebral blood flow. We show that structural networks strike compression efficiency trade-offs consistent with theoretical predictions. We find that compression efficiency prioritizes fidelity with development, heightens when metabolic resources and myelination guide communication, explains advantages of hierarchical organization, links higher input fidelity to disproportionate areal expansion, and shows that hubs integrate information by lossy compression. Lastly, compression efficiency is predictive of behavior-beyond the conventional network efficiency metric-for cognitive domains including executive function, memory, complex reasoning, and social cognition. Our findings elucidate how macroscale connectivity supports efficient coding and serve to foreground communication processes that utilize random walk dynamics constrained by network connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Zhou
- Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher W. Lynn
- Initiative for the Theoretical Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA,Joseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Zaixu Cui
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rastko Ciric
- Department of Bioengineering, Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Graham L. Baum
- Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Tyler M. Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Penn-Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Lifespan Brain Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John A. Detre
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Penn-Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Lifespan Brain Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Penn-Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Lifespan Brain Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Penn-Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Lifespan Brain Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dani S. Bassett
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA,* Corresponding Author:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The P-factor and its genomic and neural equivalents: an integrated perspective. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27:38-48. [PMID: 33526822 PMCID: PMC8960404 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01031-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Different psychiatric disorders and symptoms are highly correlated in the general population. A general psychopathology factor (or "P-factor") has been proposed to efficiently describe this covariance of psychopathology. Recently, genetic and neuroimaging studies also derived general dimensions that reflect densely correlated genomic and neural effects on behaviour and psychopathology. While these three types of general dimensions show striking parallels, it is unknown how they are conceptually related. Here, we provide an overview of these three general dimensions, and suggest a unified interpretation of their nature and underlying mechanisms. We propose that the general dimensions reflect, in part, a combination of heritable 'environmental' factors, driven by a dense web of gene-environment correlations. This perspective calls for an update of the traditional endophenotype framework, and encourages methodological innovations to improve models of gene-brain-environment relationships in all their complexity. We propose concrete approaches, which by taking advantage of the richness of current large databases will help to better disentangle the complex nature of causal factors underlying psychopathology.
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen H, Lu F, Guo X, Pang Y, He C, Han S, Duan X, Chen H. Dimensional Analysis of Atypical Functional Connectivity of Major Depression Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. Cereb Cortex 2021; 32:1307-1317. [PMID: 34416760 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Literatures have reported considerable heterogeneity with atypical functional connectivity (FC) pattern of psychiatric disorders. However, traditional statistical methods are hard to explore this heterogeneity pattern. We proposed a "brain dimension" method to describe the atypical FC patterns of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder (BD). The approach was firstly applied to a simulation dataset. It was then utilized to a real resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset of 47 individuals with major depressive disorder, 32 individuals with BD, and 52 well matched health controls. Our method showed a better ability to extract the FC dimensions than traditional methods. The results of the real dataset revealed atypical FC dimensions for major depressive disorder and BD. Especially, an atypical FC dimension which exhibited decreased FC strength of thalamus and basal ganglia was found with higher severity level of individuals with BD than the ones with major depressive disorder. This study provided a novel "brain dimension" method to view the atypical FC patterns of major depressive disorder and BD and revealed shared and specific atypical FC patterns between major depressive disorder and BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Chen
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China.,School of Life Science and Technology, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China.,School of Medicine, Guizhou University, Guizhou 550025, China
| | - Fengmei Lu
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China
| | - Xiaonan Guo
- School of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China.,Hebei Key Laboratory of Information Transmission and Signal Processing, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
| | - Yajing Pang
- Research Center for Intelligent Science and Engineering Technology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, PR China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Brain-Computer Interface Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, PR China
| | - Changchun He
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China.,School of Life Science and Technology, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China
| | - Shaoqiang Han
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, PR China
| | - Xujun Duan
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China.,School of Life Science and Technology, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China
| | - Huafu Chen
- The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China.,School of Life Science and Technology, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perkins ER, Joyner KJ, Patrick CJ, Bartholow BD, Latzman RD, DeYoung CG, Kotov R, Reininghaus U, Cooper SE, Afzali MH, Docherty AR, Dretsch MN, Eaton NR, Goghari VM, Haltigan JD, Krueger RF, Martin EA, Michelini G, Ruocco AC, Tackett JL, Venables NC, Waldman ID, Zald DH. Neurobiology and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology: progress toward ontogenetically informed and clinically useful nosology
. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 22:51-63. [PMID: 32699505 PMCID: PMC7365294 DOI: 10.31887/dcns.2020.22.1/eperkins] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is an empirical structural
model of psychological symptoms formulated to improve the reliability and
validity of clinical assessment. Neurobiology can inform assessments of early
risk and intervention strategies, and the HiTOP model has greater potential to
interface with neurobiological measures than traditional categorical diagnoses
given its enhanced reliability. However, one complication is that observed
biological correlates of clinical symptoms can reflect various factors, ranging
from dispositional risk to consequences of psychopathology. In this paper, we
argue that the HiTOP model provides an optimized framework for conducting
research on the biological correlates of psychopathology from an ontogenetic
perspective that distinguishes among indicators of liability, current symptoms,
and consequences of illness. Through this approach, neurobiological research can
contribute more effectively to identifying individuals at high dispositional
risk, indexing treatment-related gains, and monitoring the consequences of
mental illness, consistent with the aims of the HiTOP framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Perkins
- Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, US. Authors contributed equally to manuscript
| | - Keanan J Joyner
- Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, US. Authors contributed equally to manuscript
| | | | - Bruce D Bartholow
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, US
| | - Robert D Latzman
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, US
| | - Colin G DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
| | - Roman Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, US
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Samuel E Cooper
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas at Austin, Texas, US
| | | | - Anna R Docherty
- DDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, US
| | - Michael N Dretsch
- US Army Medical Research Directorate - West, Walter Reed Army Institute for Research, Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington, US
| | - Nicholas R Eaton
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, US
| | - Vina M Goghari
- Department of Psychology and Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John D Haltigan
- DDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert F Krueger
- DDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
| | - Elizabeth A Martin
- DDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, California, US
| | - Giorgia Michelini
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, US
| | - Anthony C Ruocco
- Department of Psychology and Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Tackett
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, US
| | - Noah C Venables
- DMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, US
| | - Irwin D Waldman
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, US
| | - David H Zald
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, US
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lynch SJ, Sunderland M, Newton NC, Chapman C. A systematic review of transdiagnostic risk and protective factors for general and specific psychopathology in young people. Clin Psychol Rev 2021; 87:102036. [PMID: 33992846 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A large body of research has emerged over the last decade examining empirical models of general and specific psychopathology, which take into account comorbidity among psychiatric disorders and enable investigation of risk and protective factors that are common across disorders. This systematic review presents findings from studies of empirical models of psychopathology and transdiagnostic risk and protective factors for psychopathology among young people (10-24 years). PsycInfo, Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception to November 2020, and 41 studies were identified that examined at least one risk or protective factor in relation to broad, empirically derived, psychopathology outcomes. Results revealed several biological (executive functioning deficits, earlier pubertal timing, genetic risk for ADHD and schizophrenia, reduced gray matter volume), socio-environmental (stressful life events, maternal depression) and psychological (low effortful control, high neuroticism, negative affectivity) transdiagnostic risk factors for broad psychopathology outcomes, including general psychopathology, internalising and externalising. Methodological complexities are discussed and recommendations for future studies of empirical models of psychopathology are presented. These results contribute to a growing body of support for transdiagnostic approaches to prevention and intervention for psychiatric disorders and highlight several promising avenues for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha J Lynch
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Matthew Sunderland
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicola C Newton
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cath Chapman
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stein F, Meller T, Brosch K, Schmitt S, Ringwald K, Pfarr JK, Meinert S, Thiel K, Lemke H, Waltemate L, Grotegerd D, Opel N, Jansen A, Nenadić I, Dannlowski U, Krug A, Kircher T. Psychopathological Syndromes Across Affective and Psychotic Disorders Correlate With Gray Matter Volumes. Schizophr Bull 2021; 47:1740-1750. [PMID: 33860786 PMCID: PMC8530386 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than a century of research on the neurobiological underpinnings of major psychiatric disorders (major depressive disorder [MDD], bipolar disorder [BD], schizophrenia [SZ], and schizoaffective disorder [SZA]) has been unable to identify diagnostic markers. An alternative approach is to study dimensional psychopathological syndromes that cut across categorical diagnoses. The aim of the current study was to identify gray matter volume (GMV) correlates of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions. METHODS We tested the association of 5 psychopathological factors with GMV using multiple regression models in a sample of N = 1069 patients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for MDD (n = 818), BD (n = 132), and SZ/SZA (n = 119). T1-weighted brain images were acquired with 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and preprocessed with CAT12. Interactions analyses (diagnosis × psychopathological factor) were performed to test whether local GMV associations were driven by DSM-IV diagnosis. We further tested syndrome specific regions of interest (ROIs). RESULTS Whole brain analysis showed a significant negative association of the positive formal thought disorder factor with GMV in the right middle frontal gyrus, the paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome in the right fusiform, and the left middle frontal gyri. ROI analyses further showed additional negative associations, including the negative syndrome with bilateral frontal opercula, positive formal thought disorder with the left amygdala-hippocampus complex, and the paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome with the left angular gyrus. None of the GMV associations interacted with DSM-IV diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS We found associations between psychopathological syndromes and regional GMV independent of diagnosis. Our findings open a new avenue for neurobiological research across disorders, using syndrome-based approaches rather than categorical diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039 Marburg, Germany; tel: +49-6421-58-63831, fax: +49-6421-58-68939, e-mail:
| | - Tina Meller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brosch
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Simon Schmitt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Kai Ringwald
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Julia Katharina Pfarr
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Meinert
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Katharina Thiel
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hannah Lemke
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Lena Waltemate
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Nils Opel
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Andreas Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Department of Psychiatry University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Axel Krug
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany,Center for Mind Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
This paper proposes a model for developmental psychopathology that is informed by recent research suggestive of a single model of mental health disorder (the p factor) and seeks to integrate the role of the wider social and cultural environment into our model, which has previously been more narrowly focused on the role of the immediate caregiving context. Informed by recently emerging thinking on the social and culturally driven nature of human cognitive development, the ways in which humans are primed to learn and communicate culture, and a mentalizing perspective on the highly intersubjective nature of our capacity for affect regulation and social functioning, we set out a cultural-developmental approach to psychopathology.
Collapse
|
23
|
Vanes LD, Dolan RJ. Transdiagnostic neuroimaging markers of psychiatric risk: A narrative review. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 30:102634. [PMID: 33780864 PMCID: PMC8022867 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We review the literature on neural correlates of a general psychopathology factor General psychopathology relates to structural and functional neurodevelopment Disrupted network connectivity maturation may underlie psychiatric vulnerability
Several decades of neuroimaging research in psychiatry have shed light on structural and functional neural abnormalities associated with individual psychiatric disorders. However, there is increasing evidence for substantial overlap in the patterns of neural dysfunction seen across disorders, suggesting that risk for psychiatric illness may be shared across diagnostic boundaries. Gaining insights on the existence of shared neural mechanisms which may transdiagnostically underlie psychopathology is important for psychiatric research in order to tease apart the unique and common aspects of different disorders, but also clinically, so as to help identify individuals early on who may be biologically vulnerable to psychiatric disorder in general. In this narrative review, we first evaluate recent studies investigating the functional and structural neural correlates of a general psychopathology factor, which is thought to reflect the shared variance across common mental health symptoms and therefore index psychiatric vulnerability. We then link insights from this research to existing meta-analytic evidence for shared patterns of neural dysfunction across categorical psychiatric disorders. We conclude by providing an integrative account of vulnerability to mental illness, whereby delayed or disrupted maturation of large-scale networks (particularly default-mode, executive, and sensorimotor networks), and more generally between-network connectivity, results in a compromised ability to integrate and switch between internally and externally focused tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy D Vanes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Raymond J Dolan
- Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Linke JO, Abend R, Kircanski K, Clayton M, Stavish C, Benson BE, Brotman MA, Renaud O, Smith SM, Nichols TE, Leibenluft E, Winkler AM, Pine DS. Shared and Anxiety-Specific Pediatric Psychopathology Dimensions Manifest Distributed Neural Correlates. Biol Psychiatry 2021; 89:579-587. [PMID: 33386133 PMCID: PMC7889729 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imaging research has not yet delivered reliable psychiatric biomarkers. One challenge, particularly among youth, is high comorbidity. This challenge might be met through canonical correlation analysis designed to model mutual dependencies between symptom dimensions and neural measures. We mapped the multivariate associations that intrinsic functional connectivity manifests with pediatric symptoms of anxiety, irritability, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as common, impactful, co-occurring problems. We evaluate the replicability of such latent dimensions in an independent sample. METHODS We obtained ratings of anxiety, irritability, and ADHD, and 10 minutes of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data, from two independent cohorts. Both cohorts (discovery: n = 182; replication: n = 326) included treatment-seeking youth with anxiety disorders, with disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, with ADHD, or without psychopathology. Functional connectivity was modeled as partial correlations among 216 brain areas. Using canonical correlation analysis and independent component analysis jointly we sought maximally correlated, maximally interpretable latent dimensions of brain connectivity and clinical symptoms. RESULTS We identified seven canonical variates in the discovery and five in the replication cohort. Of these canonical variates, three exhibited similarities across datasets: two variates consistently captured shared aspects of irritability, ADHD, and anxiety, while the third was specific to anxiety. Across cohorts, canonical variates did not relate to specific resting-state networks but comprised edges interconnecting established networks within and across both hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS Findings revealed two replicable types of clinical variates, one related to multiple symptom dimensions and a second relatively specific to anxiety. Both types involved a multitude of broadly distributed, weak brain connections as opposed to strong connections encompassing known resting-state networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia O Linke
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Rany Abend
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Katharina Kircanski
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michal Clayton
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Caitlin Stavish
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Brenda E Benson
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Melissa A Brotman
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Olivier Renaud
- Methodology and Data Analysis, Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Leibenluft
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Anderson M Winkler
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daniel S Pine
- Emotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Cicero DC, Conway CC, DeYoung CG, Eaton NR, Forbes MK, Hallquist MN, Latzman RD, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Ruggero CJ, Simms LJ, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Wright AGC. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2021; 17:83-108. [PMID: 33577350 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Traditional diagnostic systems went beyond empirical evidence on the structure of mental health. Consequently, these diagnoses do not depict psychopathology accurately, and their validity in research and utility in clinicalpractice are therefore limited. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) consortium proposed a model based on structural evidence. It addresses problems of diagnostic heterogeneity, comorbidity, and unreliability. We review the HiTOP model, supporting evidence, and conceptualization of psychopathology in this hierarchical dimensional framework. The system is not yet comprehensive, and we describe the processes for improving and expanding it. We summarize data on the ability of HiTOP to predict and explain etiology (genetic, environmental, and neurobiological), risk factors, outcomes, and treatment response. We describe progress in the development of HiTOP-based measures and in clinical implementation of the system. Finally, we review outstanding challenges and the research agenda. HiTOP is of practical utility already, and its ongoing development will produce a transformative map of psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Kotov
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA;
| | - Robert F Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - David Watson
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
| | - David C Cicero
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203, USA
| | | | - Colin G DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Nicholas R Eaton
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA;
| | - Miriam K Forbes
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales 2109, Australia
| | - Michael N Hallquist
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Robert D Latzman
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA
| | | | - Camilo J Ruggero
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203, USA
| | - Leonard J Simms
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA
| | - Irwin D Waldman
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
| | - Monika A Waszczuk
- Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois 60064, USA
| | - Aidan G C Wright
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lahey BB, Moore TM, Kaczkurkin AN, Zald DH. Hierarchical models of psychopathology: empirical support, implications, and remaining issues. World Psychiatry 2021; 20:57-63. [PMID: 33432749 PMCID: PMC7801849 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an ongoing revolution in psychology and psychiatry that will likely change how we conceptualize, study and treat psychological problems.- Many theorists now support viewing psychopathology as consisting of continuous dimensions rather than discrete diagnostic categories. Indeed, recent papers have proposed comprehensive taxonomies of psychopathology dimensions to replace the DSM and ICD taxonomies of categories. The proposed dimensional taxonomies, which portray psychopathology as hierarchically organized correlated dimensions, are now well supported at phenotypic levels. Multiple studies show that both a general factor of psychopathology at the top of the hierarchy and specific factors at lower levels predict different functional outcomes. Our analyses of data on a large representative sample of child and adolescent twins suggested the causal hypothesis that phenotypic correlations among dimensions of psychopathology are the result of many familial influences being pleiotropic. That is, most genetic variants and shared environmental factors are hypothesized to non-specifically influence risk for multiple rather than individual dimensions of psychopathology. In contrast, person-specific experiences tend to be related to individual dimensions. This hierarchical causal hypothesis has been supported by both large-scale family and molecular genetic studies. Current research focuses on three issues. First, the field has not settled on a preferred statistical model for studying the hierarchy of causes and phenotypes. Second, in spite of encouraging progress, the neurobiological correlates of the hierarchy of dimensions of psychopathology are only partially described. Third, although there are potentially important clinical implications of the hierarchical model, insufficient research has been conducted to date to rec-ommend evidence-based clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin B. Lahey
- Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Tyler M. Moore
- Neuropsychiatry Section, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | | | - David H. Zald
- Departments of Psychology and PsychiatryVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Watts AL, Lane SP, Bonifay W, Steinley D, Meyer FAC. Building theories on top of, and not independent of, statistical models: The case of the p-factor. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2021; 31:310-320. [PMID: 33510565 PMCID: PMC7839945 DOI: 10.1080/1047840x.2020.1853476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L. Watts
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Sean P. Lane
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Wes Bonifay
- Department of Education, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Douglas Steinley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cropley VL, Tian Y, Fernando K, Mansour L S, Pantelis C, Cocchi L, Zalesky A. Brain-Predicted Age Associates With Psychopathology Dimensions in Youths. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2020; 6:410-419. [PMID: 32981878 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate whether dimensional constructs of psychopathology relate to variation in patterns of brain development and to determine whether these constructs share common neurodevelopmental profiles. METHODS Psychiatric symptom ratings from 9312 youths (8-21 years old) from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort were parsed into 7 independent dimensions of clinical psychopathology representing conduct, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, attention, depression, bipolar, and psychosis symptoms. Using a subset of this cohort with structural magnetic resonance imaging (n = 1313), a normative model of brain morphology was established and the model was then applied to predict the age of youths with clinical symptoms. We investigated whether the deviation of brain-predicted age from true chronological age, called the brain age gap, explained individual variation in each psychopathology dimension. RESULTS Individual variation in the brain age gap significantly associated with clinical dimensions representing psychosis (t = 3.16, p = .0016), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (t = 2.5, p = .01), and general psychopathology (t = 4.08, p < .0001). Greater symptom severity along these dimensions was associated with brain morphology that appeared older than expected for typically developing youths of the same age. Psychopathology dimensions clustered into 2 modules based on shared brain loci where putative accelerated neurodevelopment was most prominent. Patterns of morphological development were accelerated in frontal cortices for depression, psychosis, and conduct symptoms (module 1), whereas acceleration was most evident in subcortex and insula for the remaining dimensions (module 2). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that increased brain age, particularly in frontal cortex and subcortical nuclei, underpins clinical psychosis and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youths. Psychopathology dimensions share common neural substrates, despite representing clinically independent symptom profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Cropley
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Ye Tian
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kavisha Fernando
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sina Mansour L
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christos Pantelis
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luca Cocchi
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tymofiyeva O, Zhou VX, Lee CM, Xu D, Hess CP, Yang TT. MRI Insights Into Adolescent Neurocircuitry-A Vision for the Future. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:237. [PMID: 32733218 PMCID: PMC7359264 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescence is the time of onset of many psychiatric disorders. Half of pediatric patients present with comorbid psychiatric disorders that complicate both their medical and psychiatric care. Currently, diagnosis and treatment decisions are based on symptoms. The field urgently needs brain-based diagnosis and personalized care. Neuroimaging can shed light on how aberrations in brain circuits might underlie psychiatric disorders and their development in adolescents. In this perspective article, we summarize recent MRI literature that provides insights into development of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. We specifically focus on studies of brain structural and functional connectivity. Ninety-six included studies demonstrate the potential of MRI to assess psychiatrically relevant constructs, diagnose psychiatric disorders, predict their development or predict response to treatment. Limitations of the included studies are discussed, and recommendations for future research are offered. We also present a vision for the role that neuroimaging may play in pediatrics and primary care in the future: a routine neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric imaging (NPPI) protocol for adolescent patients, which would include a 30-min brain scan, a quality control and safety read of the scan, followed by computer-based calculation of the structural and functional brain network metrics that can be compared to the normative data by the pediatrician. We also perform a cost-benefit analysis to support this vision and provide a roadmap of the steps required for this vision to be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Tymofiyeva
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Vivian X Zhou
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Chuan-Mei Lee
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Duan Xu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Christopher P Hess
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Tony T Yang
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li T, Wang L, Camilleri JA, Chen X, Li S, Stewart JL, Jiang Y, Eickhoff SB, Feng C. Mapping common grey matter volume deviation across child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020; 115:273-284. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
31
|
Kaczkurkin AN, Moore TM, Sotiras A, Xia CH, Shinohara RT, Satterthwaite TD. Approaches to Defining Common and Dissociable Neurobiological Deficits Associated With Psychopathology in Youth. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 88:51-62. [PMID: 32087950 PMCID: PMC7305976 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders show high rates of comorbidity and nonspecificity of presenting clinical symptoms, while demonstrating substantial heterogeneity within diagnostic categories. Notably, many of these psychiatric disorders first manifest in youth. We review progress and next steps in efforts to parse heterogeneity in psychiatric symptoms in youths by identifying abnormalities within neural circuits. To address this fundamental challenge in psychiatry, a number of methods have been proposed. We provide an overview of these methods, broadly organized into dimensional versus categorical approaches and single-view versus multiview approaches. Dimensional approaches including factor analysis and canonical correlation analysis aim to capture dimensional associations between psychopathology and brain measures across a continuous spectrum from health to disease. In contrast, categorical approaches, such as clustering and community detection, aim to identify subtypes of individuals within a class of symptoms or brain features. We highlight several studies that apply these methods to samples of youths and discuss issues to consider when using these approaches. Finally, we end by highlighting avenues for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyler M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Cedric Huchuan Xia
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Feczko E, Fair DA. Methods and Challenges for Assessing Heterogeneity. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 88:9-17. [PMID: 32386742 PMCID: PMC8404882 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The widely acknowledged homogeneity assumption limits progress in refining clinical diagnosis, understanding mechanisms, and developing new treatments for mental health disorders. This homogeneity assumption drives both a comorbidity and a heterogeneity problem, where two different approaches tackle the problems. One, a unifying approach, tackles the comorbidity problem by assuming that a single general psychopathology factor underlies multiple disorders. Another, a multifactorial approach, tackles the heterogeneity problem by assuming that disorders comprise multiple subtypes driven by multiple discrete factors. We show how each of these approaches can make useful contributions to mental health-related research and clinical practice. For example, the unifying approach can develop a rapid assessment tool that may be clinically valuable for triaging cases. The multifactorial approach can reveal subtypes that are differentially responsive to treatments and highlight distinct mechanisms leading to similar phenotypes. Because both approaches tackle different problems, both have different limitations. We describe the statistical frameworks that incorporate and adjudicate between both approaches (e.g., the bifactor model, normative modeling, and the functional random forest). Such frameworks can identify whether sets of disorders are more affected by heterogeneity or comorbidity. Therefore, future studies that incorporate such frameworks can provide further insight into the nature of psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Feczko
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Damien A Fair
- Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Latzman RD, DeYoung CG. Using empirically-derived dimensional phenotypes to accelerate clinical neuroscience: the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) framework. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020; 45:1083-1085. [PMID: 32109934 PMCID: PMC7235031 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-0639-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
34
|
McTeague LM, Rosenberg BM, Lopez JW, Carreon DM, Huemer J, Jiang Y, Chick CF, Eickhoff SB, Etkin A. Identification of Common Neural Circuit Disruptions in Emotional Processing Across Psychiatric Disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2020; 177:411-421. [PMID: 31964160 PMCID: PMC7280468 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18111271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disrupted emotional processing is a common feature of many psychiatric disorders. The authors investigated functional disruptions in neural circuitry underlying emotional processing across a range of tasks and across psychiatric disorders through a transdiagnostic quantitative meta-analysis of published neuroimaging data. METHODS A PubMed search was conducted for whole-brain functional neuroimaging findings published through May 2018 that compared activation during emotional processing tasks in patients with psychiatric disorders (including schizophrenia, bipolar or unipolar depression, anxiety, and substance use) to matched healthy control participants. Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses were conducted on peak voxel coordinates to identify spatial convergence. RESULTS The 298 experiments submitted to meta-analysis included 5,427 patients and 5,491 control participants. ALE across diagnoses and patterns of patient hyper- and hyporeactivity demonstrated abnormal activation in the amygdala, the hippocampal/parahippocampal gyri, the dorsomedial/pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus, and the fusiform gyri, as well as the medial and lateral dorsal and ventral prefrontal regions. ALE across disorders but considering directionality demonstrated patient hyperactivation in the amygdala and the hippocampal/parahippocampal gyri. Hypoactivation was found in the medial and lateral prefrontal regions, most pronounced during processing of unpleasant stimuli. More refined disorder-specific analyses suggested that these overall patterns were shared to varying degrees, with notable differences in patterns of hyper- and hypoactivation. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate a pattern of neurocircuit disruption across major psychiatric disorders in regions and networks key to adaptive emotional reactivity and regulation. More specifically, disruption corresponded prominently to the "salience" network, the ventral striatal/ventromedial prefrontal "reward" network, and the lateral orbitofrontal "nonreward" network. Consistent with the Research Domain Criteria initiative, these findings suggest that psychiatric illness may be productively formulated as dysfunction in transdiagnostic neurobehavioral phenotypes such as neurocircuit activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M McTeague
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Benjamin M Rosenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - James W Lopez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - David M Carreon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Julia Huemer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Christina F Chick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| | - Amit Etkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (McTeague, Lopez); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Rosenberg); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (Carreon, Huemer, Jiang, Chick, Etkin); and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine (Brain and Behavior, INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, and Institute for Systems Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (Eickhoff)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stein F, Lemmer G, Schmitt S, Brosch K, Meller T, Fischer E, Kraus C, Lenhard L, Köhnlein B, Murata H, Bäcker A, Müller M, Franz M, Förster K, Meinert S, Enneking V, Koch K, Grotegerd D, Nagels A, Nenadić I, Dannlowski U, Kircher T, Krug A. Factor analyses of multidimensional symptoms in a large group of patients with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2020; 218:38-47. [PMID: 32192794 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an ongoing discussion about which neurobiological correlates or symptoms separate the major psychoses (i.e. Major Depressive Disorder MDD, Bipolar Disorder BD, and Schizophrenia SZ). Psychopathological factor analyses within one of these disorders have resulted in models including one to five factors. Factor analyses across the major psychoses using a comprehensive set of psychopathological scales in the same patients are lacking. It is further unclear, whether hierarchical or unitarian models better summarize phenomena. METHOD Patients (n = 1182) who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD, BD, SZ or schizoaffective disorder were assessed with the SANS, SAPS, HAMA, HAM-D, and YMRS. The sample was split into two and analyzed using explorative and confirmatory factor analyses to extract psychopathological factors independent of diagnosis. RESULTS In the exploratory analysis of sample 1 (n = 593) we found 5 factors. The confirmatory analysis using sample 2 (n = 589) confirmed the 5-factor model (χ2 = 1287.842, df = 571, p < .0001: CFI = 0.932; RMSEA = 0.033). The 5-factors were depression, negative syndrome, positive formal thought disorder, paranoid-hallucinatory syndrome, and increased appetite. Increased appetite was not related to medication. None of the factors was specific for one diagnosis. Second order factor analysis revealed two higher order factors: negative/affective (I) and positive symptoms (II). CONCLUSION This is the first study delineating psychopathological factors in a large group of patients across the spectrum of affective and psychotic disorders. In future neurobiological studies, we should consider transdiagnostic syndromes besides the traditional diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Stein
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany.
| | - Gunnar Lemmer
- Institute of Psychology, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Simon Schmitt
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brosch
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Tina Meller
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Elena Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Cynthia Kraus
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Achim Bäcker
- Psychiatric Hospital Hephata, Schwalmstadt-Treysa, Germany
| | | | | | - Katharina Förster
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Susanne Meinert
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Verena Enneking
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Katharina Koch
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Dominik Grotegerd
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Arne Nagels
- Institute for Linguistics: General Linguistics, University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Axel Krug
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Germany; Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kaczkurkin AN, Sotiras A, Baller EB, Barzilay R, Calkins ME, Chand GB, Cui Z, Erus G, Fan Y, Gur RE, Gur RC, Moore TM, Roalf DR, Rosen AF, Ruparel K, Shinohara RT, Varol E, Wolf DH, Davatzikos C, Satterthwaite TD. Neurostructural Heterogeneity in Youths With Internalizing Symptoms. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 87:473-482. [PMID: 31690494 PMCID: PMC7007843 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internalizing disorders such as anxiety and depression are common psychiatric disorders that frequently begin in youth and exhibit marked heterogeneity in treatment response and clinical course. Given that symptom-based classification approaches do not align with underlying neurobiology, an alternative approach is to identify neurobiologically informed subtypes based on brain imaging data. METHODS We used a recently developed semisupervised machine learning method (HYDRA [heterogeneity through discriminative analysis]) to delineate patterns of neurobiological heterogeneity within youths with internalizing symptoms using structural data collected at 3T from a sample of 1141 youths. RESULTS Using volume and cortical thickness, cross-validation methods indicated 2 highly stable subtypes of internalizing youths (adjusted Rand index = 0.66; permutation-based false discovery rate p < .001). Subtype 1, defined by smaller brain volumes and reduced cortical thickness, was marked by impaired cognitive performance and higher levels of psychopathology than both subtype 2 and typically developing youths. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion images not considered during clustering, we found that subtype 1 also showed reduced amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations in frontolimbic regions at rest and reduced fractional anisotropy in several white matter tracts. In contrast, subtype 2 showed intact cognitive performance and greater volume, cortical thickness, and amplitudes during rest compared with subtype 1 and typically developing youths, despite still showing clinically significant levels of psychopathology. CONCLUSIONS We identified 2 subtypes of internalizing youths differentiated by abnormalities in brain structure, function, and white matter integrity, with one of the subtypes showing poorer functioning across multiple domains. Identification of biologically grounded internalizing subtypes may assist in targeting early interventions and assessing longitudinal prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia N. Kaczkurkin
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Erica B. Baller
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ran Barzilay
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Monica E. Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ganesh B. Chand
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Zaixu Cui
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Guray Erus
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Tyler M. Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adon F.G. Rosen
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kosha Ruparel
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Erdem Varol
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Statistics, Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Grossman Center for the Statistics of Mind, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
| | - Daniel H. Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xu B, Moradi M, Kuplicki R, Stewart JL, McKinney B, Sen S, Paulus MP. Machine Learning Analysis of Electronic Nose in a Transdiagnostic Community Sample With a Streamlined Data Collection Approach: No Links Between Volatile Organic Compounds and Psychiatric Symptoms. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:503248. [PMID: 33192639 PMCID: PMC7524957 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.503248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-intrusive, easy-to-use and pragmatic collection of biological processes is warranted to evaluate potential biomarkers of psychiatric symptoms. Prior work with relatively modest sample sizes suggests that under highly-controlled sampling conditions, volatile organic compounds extracted from the human breath (exhalome), often measured by an electronic nose ("e-nose"), may be related to physical and mental health. The present study utilized a streamlined data collection approach and attempted to replicate and extend prior e-nose links to mental health in a standard research setting within large transdiagnostic community dataset (N = 1207; 746 females; 18-61 years) who completed a screening visit at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research between 07/2016 and 05/2018. Factor analysis was used to obtain latent exhalome variables, and machine learning approaches were employed using these latent variables to predict three types of symptoms independent of each other (depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder) within separate training and a test sets. After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status, the best fitting algorithm produced by the training set accounted for nearly 0% of the test set's variance. In each case the standard error included the zero line, indicating that models were not predictive of clinical symptoms. Although some sample variance was predicted, findings did not generalize to out-of-sample data. Based on these findings, we conclude that the exhalome, as measured by the e-nose within a less-controlled environment than previously reported, is not able to provide clinically useful assessments of current depression, anxiety or substance use severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bohan Xu
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Computer Science, Tandy School of Computer Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Mahdi Moradi
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Computer Science, Tandy School of Computer Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Rayus Kuplicki
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Jennifer L Stewart
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Community Medicine, Oxley College of Health Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Brett McKinney
- Department of Computer Science, Tandy School of Computer Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Mathematics, College of Engineering & Natural Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Sandip Sen
- Department of Computer Science, Tandy School of Computer Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Martin P Paulus
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Community Medicine, Oxley College of Health Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaczkurkin AN, Park SS, Sotiras A, Moore TM, Calkins ME, Cieslak M, Rosen AF, Ciric R, Xia CH, Cui Z, Sharma A, Wolf DH, Ruparel K, Pine DS, Shinohara RT, Roalf DR, Gur RC, Davatzikos C, Gur RE, Satterthwaite TD. Evidence for Dissociable Linkage of Dimensions of Psychopathology to Brain Structure in Youths. Am J Psychiatry 2019; 176:1000-1009. [PMID: 31230463 PMCID: PMC6888993 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18070835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High comorbidity among psychiatric disorders suggests that they may share underlying neurobiological deficits. Abnormalities in cortical thickness and volume have been demonstrated in clinical samples of adults, but less is known when these structural differences emerge in youths. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between dimensions of psychopathology and brain structure. METHODS The authors studied 1,394 youths who underwent brain imaging as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Dimensions of psychopathology were constructed using a bifactor model of symptoms. Cortical thickness and volume were quantified using high-resolution 3-T MRI. Structural covariance networks were derived using nonnegative matrix factorization and analyzed using generalized additive models with penalized splines to capture both linear and nonlinear age-related effects. RESULTS Fear symptoms were associated with reduced cortical thickness in most networks, and overall psychopathology was associated with globally reduced gray matter volume across all networks. Structural covariance networks predicted psychopathology symptoms above and beyond demographic characteristics and cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest a dissociable relationship whereby fear is most strongly linked to reduced cortical thickness and overall psychopathology is most strongly linked to global reductions in gray matter volume. Such results have implications for understanding how abnormalities of brain development may be associated with divergent dimensions of psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia N. Kaczkurkin
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sophia Seonyeong Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Tyler M. Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Monica E. Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adon F.G. Rosen
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rastko Ciric
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Cedric Huchuan Xia
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Zaixu Cui
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Anup Sharma
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Daniel H. Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kosha Ruparel
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Daniel S. Pine
- Emotion and Development Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kebets V, Holmes AJ, Orban C, Tang S, Li J, Sun N, Kong R, Poldrack RA, Yeo BTT. Somatosensory-Motor Dysconnectivity Spans Multiple Transdiagnostic Dimensions of Psychopathology. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 86:779-791. [PMID: 31515054 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is considerable interest in a dimensional transdiagnostic approach to psychiatry. Most transdiagnostic studies have derived factors based only on clinical symptoms, which might miss possible links between psychopathology, cognitive processes, and personality traits. Furthermore, many psychiatric studies focus on higher-order association brain networks, thereby neglecting the potential influence of huge swaths of the brain. METHODS A multivariate data-driven approach (partial least squares) was used to identify latent components linking a large set of clinical, cognitive, and personality measures to whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns across 224 participants. The participants were either healthy (n = 110) or diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n = 40), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 37), schizophrenia (n = 29), or schizoaffective disorder (n = 8). In contrast to traditional case-control analyses, the diagnostic categories were not used in the partial least squares analysis but were helpful for interpreting the components. RESULTS Our analyses revealed three latent components corresponding to general psychopathology, cognitive dysfunction, and impulsivity. Each component was associated with a unique whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity signature and was shared across all participants. The components were robust across multiple control analyses and replicated using independent task functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the same participants. Strikingly, all three components featured connectivity alterations within the somatosensory-motor network and its connectivity with subcortical structures and cortical executive networks. CONCLUSIONS We identified three distinct dimensions with dissociable (but overlapping) whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity signatures across healthy individuals and individuals with psychiatric illness, providing potential intermediate phenotypes that span diagnostic categories. Our results suggest expanding the focus of psychiatric neuroscience beyond higher-order brain networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Kebets
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Avram J Holmes
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Csaba Orban
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Siyi Tang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jingwei Li
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nanbo Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ru Kong
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - B T Thomas Yeo
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Moore TM, Calkins ME, Satterthwaite TD, Roalf DR, Rosen AFG, Gur RC, Gur RE. Development of a computerized adaptive screening tool for overall psychopathology ("p"). J Psychiatr Res 2019; 116:26-33. [PMID: 31176109 PMCID: PMC6649661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A substantial body of work supports the existence of a general psychopathology factor ("p"). Psychometrically, this is important because it implies that there is a psychological phenomenon (overall psychopathology) that can be measured and potentially used in clinical research or treatment. The present study aimed to construct, calibrate, and begin to validate a computerized adaptive (CAT) screener for "p". In a large community sample (N = 4544; age 11-21), we modeled 114 clinical items using a bifactor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model and constructed a fully functional (and public) CAT for assessing "p" called the Overall mental illness (OMI) screener. In a random, non-overlapping sample (N = 1019) with extended phenotyping (neuroimaging) from the same community cohort, adaptive versions of the OMI screener (10-, 20-, and 40-item) were simulated and compared to the full 114-item test in their ability to predict demographic characteristics, common mental disorders, and brain parameters. The OMI screener performed almost as well as the full test, despite being only a small fraction of the length. For prediction of 13 mental disorders, the mid-length (20-item) adaptive version showed mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76, compared to 0.79 for the full version. For prediction of brain parameters, mean absolute standardized relationship was 0.06 for the 20-item adaptive version, compared to 0.07 for the full form. This brief, public tool may facilitate the rapid and accurate measurement of overall psychopathology in large-scale studies and in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Monica E Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - David R Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Adon F G Rosen
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; VISN4 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Moberget T, Alnæs D, Kaufmann T, Doan NT, Córdova-Palomera A, Norbom LB, Rokicki J, van der Meer D, Andreassen OA, Westlye LT. Cerebellar Gray Matter Volume Is Associated With Cognitive Function and Psychopathology in Adolescence. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 86:65-75. [PMID: 30850129 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence supports cerebellar involvement in mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. However, little is known about the cerebellum in developmental stages of these disorders. In particular, whether cerebellar morphology is associated with early expression of specific symptom domains remains unclear. METHODS We used machine learning to test whether cerebellar morphometric features could robustly predict general cognitive function and psychiatric symptoms in a large and well-characterized developmental community sample centered on adolescence (Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, n = 1401, age 8-23 years). RESULTS Cerebellar morphology was associated with both general cognitive function and general psychopathology (mean correlations between predicted and observed values: r = .20 and r = .13; p < .001). Analyses of specific symptom domains revealed significant associations with rates of norm-violating behavior (r = .17; p < .001) as well as psychosis (r = .12; p < .001) and anxiety (r = .09; p = .012) symptoms. In contrast, we observed no associations with attention deficits or depressive, manic, or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Crucially, across 52 brain-wide anatomical features, cerebellar features emerged as the most important for prediction of general psychopathology, psychotic symptoms, and norm-violating behavior. Moreover, the association between cerebellar volume and psychotic symptoms and, to a lesser extent, norm-violating behavior remained significant when adjusting for several potentially confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS The robust associations with psychiatric symptoms in the age range when these typically emerge highlight the cerebellum as a key brain structure in the development of severe mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torgeir Moberget
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Dag Alnæs
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tobias Kaufmann
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nhat Trung Doan
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aldo Córdova-Palomera
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Linn Bonaventure Norbom
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jaroslav Rokicki
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dennis van der Meer
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole A Andreassen
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars T Westlye
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Class QA, Van Hulle CA, Rathouz PJ, Applegate B, Zald DH, Lahey BB. Socioemotional dispositions of children and adolescents predict general and specific second-order factors of psychopathology in early adulthood: A 12-year prospective study. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY 2019; 128:574-584. [PMID: 31259570 DOI: 10.1037/abn0000433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
We previously hypothesized that the ubiquitous, but patterned correlations among all dimensions of psychopathology reflect a hierarchy of progressively more nonspecific causal influences, with a general factor of psychopathology-also dubbed the p factor-reflecting the most transdiagnostic causal influences. We further hypothesized that the general factor is a manifestation of individual differences in 1 or more trait-like dispositions, particularly negative emotionality, that are nonspecifically associated with risk for essentially every dimension of psychopathology. We tested the hypothesis that this and other dispositions measured in childhood/adolescence significantly predict general and specific second-order dimensions of psychopathology in early adulthood. The latent general factor of psychopathology itself was correlated over time from 10-17 to 23-31 years of age even though it was defined by different informants and different dimensions of symptoms. Using a measure of dispositions that minimizes item contamination with psychopathology symptoms, parent-rated negative emotionality in childhood and adolescence predicted the general factor of psychopathology based on self-reported symptoms in early adulthood, whereas parent-rated daring predicted the specific adult externalizing psychopathology factor after correction for multiple tests. In addition, youth-rated negative emotionality and daring predicted specific adult externalizing psychopathology. These results over a span of 12 years suggests that the general factor is relatively stable over time and that associations of dispositional traits with second-order dimensions of psychopathology are enduring, sometimes across informants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
43
|
Age-Normative Pathways of Striatal Connectivity Related to Clinical Symptoms in the General Population. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 85:966-976. [PMID: 30898336 PMCID: PMC6534442 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Altered striatal development contributes to core deficits in motor and inhibitory control, impulsivity, and inattention associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and may likewise play a role in deficient reward processing and emotion regulation in psychosis and depression. The maturation of striatal connectivity has not been well characterized, particularly as it relates to clinical symptomatology. METHODS Resting-state functional connectivity with striatal subdivisions was examined for 926 participants (8-22 years of age, 44% male) from the general population who had participated in two large cross-sectional studies. Developing circuits were identified and growth charting of age-related connections was performed to obtain individual scores reflecting relative neurodevelopmental attainment. Associations of clinical symptom scales (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, psychosis, depression, and general psychopathology) with the resulting striatal connectivity age-deviation scores were then tested using elastic net regression. RESULTS Linear and nonlinear developmental patterns occurred across 231 striatal age-related connections. Both unique and overlapping striatal age-related connections were associated with the four symptom domains. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder severity was related to age-advanced connectivity across several insula subregions, but to age-delayed connectivity with the nearby inferior frontal gyrus. Psychosis was associated with advanced connectivity with the medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal gyrus, while aberrant limbic connectivity predicted depression. The dorsal posterior insula, a region involved in pain processing, emerged as a strong contributor to general psychopathology as well as to each individual symptom domain. CONCLUSIONS Developmental striatal pathophysiology in the general population is consistent with dysfunctional circuitry commonly found in clinical populations. Atypical age-normative connectivity may thereby reflect aberrant neurodevelopmental processes that contribute to clinical risk.
Collapse
|
44
|
Conway CC, Forbes MK, Forbush KT, Fried EI, Hallquist MN, Kotov R, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Shackman AJ, Skodol AE, South SC, Sunderland M, Waszczuk MA, Zald DH, Afzali MH, Bornovalova MA, Carragher N, Docherty AR, Jonas KG, Krueger RF, Patalay P, Pincus AL, Tackett JL, Reininghaus U, Waldman ID, Wright AG, Zimmermann J, Bach B, Bagby RM, Chmielewski M, Cicero DC, Clark LA, Dalgleish T, DeYoung CG, Hopwood CJ, Ivanova MY, Latzman RD, Patrick CJ, Ruggero CJ, Samuel DB, Watson D, Eaton NR. A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 2019; 14:419-436. [PMID: 30844330 PMCID: PMC6497550 DOI: 10.1177/1745691618810696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
For more than a century, research on psychopathology has focused on categorical diagnoses. Although this work has produced major discoveries, growing evidence points to the superiority of a dimensional approach to the science of mental illness. Here we outline one such dimensional system-the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)-that is based on empirical patterns of co-occurrence among psychological symptoms. We highlight key ways in which this framework can advance mental-health research, and we provide some heuristics for using HiTOP to test theories of psychopathology. We then review emerging evidence that supports the value of a hierarchical, dimensional model of mental illness across diverse research areas in psychological science. These new data suggest that the HiTOP system has the potential to accelerate and improve research on mental-health problems as well as efforts to more effectively assess, prevent, and treat mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C. Conway
- Department of Psychological Sciences, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA
| | - Miriam K. Forbes
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Eiko I. Fried
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael N. Hallquist
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Roman Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Alexander J. Shackman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Andrew E. Skodol
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Susan C. South
- Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Matthew Sunderland
- NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Monika A. Waszczuk
- Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - David H. Zald
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Natacha Carragher
- Medical Education and Student Office, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna R. Docherty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Katherine G. Jonas
- Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Robert F. Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Aaron L. Pincus
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | | | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Aidan G.C. Wright
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Bo Bach
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - R. Michael Bagby
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - David C. Cicero
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, HI, USA
| | - Lee Anna Clark
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Tim Dalgleish
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
| | - Colin G. DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Masha Y. Ivanova
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Robert D. Latzman
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Camilo J. Ruggero
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
| | - Douglas B. Samuel
- Purdue University, Department of Psychological Sciences, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - David Watson
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Nicholas R. Eaton
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Salminen LE, Morey RA, Riedel BC, Jahanshad N, Dennis EL, Thompson PM. Adaptive Identification of Cortical and Subcortical Imaging Markers of Early Life Stress and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. J Neuroimaging 2019; 29:335-343. [PMID: 30714246 PMCID: PMC6571150 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a heterogeneous condition associated with a range of brain imaging abnormalities. Early life stress (ELS) contributes to this heterogeneity, but we do not know how a history of ELS influences traditionally defined brain signatures of PTSD. Here, we used a novel machine learning method - evolving partitions to improve classification (EPIC) - to identify shared and unique structural neuroimaging markers of ELS and PTSD in 97 combat-exposed military veterans. METHODS We used EPIC with repeated cross-validation (CV) to determine how combinations of cortical thickness, surface area, and subcortical brain volumes could contribute to classification of PTSD (n = 40) versus controls (n = 57), and classification of ELS within the PTSD (ELS+ n = 16; ELS- n = 24) and control groups (ELS+ n = 16; ELS- n = 41). Additional inputs included intracranial volume, age, sex, adult trauma, and depression. RESULTS On average, EPIC classified PTSD with 69% accuracy (SD = 5%), and ELS with 64% accuracy in the PTSD group (SD = 10%), and 62% accuracy in controls (SD = 6%). EPIC selected unique sets of individual features that classified each group with 75-85% accuracy in post hoc analyses; combinations of regions marginally improved classification from the individual atlas-defined brain regions. Across analyses, surface area in the right posterior cingulate was the only variable that was repeatedly selected as an important feature for classification of PTSD and ELS. CONCLUSIONS EPIC revealed unique patterns of features that distinguished PTSD and ELS in this sample of combat-exposed military veterans, which may represent distinct biotypes of stress-related neuropathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Salminen
- Imaging Genetics Center of the Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
| | - Rajendra A Morey
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Brandalyn C Riedel
- Imaging Genetics Center of the Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Neda Jahanshad
- Imaging Genetics Center of the Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
| | - Emily L Dennis
- Imaging Genetics Center of the Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Stanford Neurodevelopment, Affect, and Psychopathology Laboratory, Stanford, CA
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center of the Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cornblath EJ, Lydon-Staley DM, Bassett DS. Harnessing networks and machine learning in neuropsychiatric care. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 55:32-39. [PMID: 30641443 PMCID: PMC6839408 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The development of next-generation therapies for neuropsychiatric illness will likely rely on a precise and accurate understanding of human brain dynamics. Toward this end, researchers have focused on collecting large quantities of neuroimaging data. For simplicity, we will refer to large cross-sectional neuroimaging studies as broad studies and to intensive longitudinal studies as deep studies. Recent progress in identifying illness subtypes and predicting treatment response in neuropsychiatry has been supported by these study designs, along with methods bridging machine learning and network science. Such methods combine analytic power, interpretability, and direct connection to underlying theory in cognitive neuroscience. Ultimately, we propose a general framework for the treatment of neuropsychiatric illness relying on the findings from broad and deep studies combined with basic cognitive and physiologic measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli J Cornblath
- Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David M Lydon-Staley
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Danielle S Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Physics & Astronomy, School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hinton KE, Lahey BB, Villalta-Gil V, Meyer FAC, Burgess LL, Chodes LK, Applegate B, Van Hulle CA, Landman BA, Zald DH. White matter microstructure correlates of general and specific second-order factors of psychopathology. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22:101705. [PMID: 30753960 PMCID: PMC6369105 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Increasing data indicate that prevalent forms of psychopathology can be organized into second-order dimensions based on their correlations, including a general factor of psychopathology that explains the common variance among all disorders and specific second-order externalizing and internalizing factors. Nevertheless, most existing studies on the neural correlates of psychopathology employ case-control designs that treat diagnoses as independent categories, ignoring the highly correlated nature of psychopathology. Thus, for instance, although perturbations in white matter microstructure have been identified across a range of mental disorders, nearly all such studies used case-control designs, leaving it unclear whether observed relations reflect disorder-specific characteristics or transdiagnostic associations. Using a representative sample of 410 young adult twins oversampled for psychopathology risk, we tested the hypothesis that some previously observed relations between white matter microstructure properties in major tracts and specific disorders are related to second-order factors of psychopathology. We examined fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD). White matter correlates of all second-order factors were identified after controlling for multiple statistical tests, including the general factor (FA in the body of the corpus callosum), specific internalizing (AD in the fornix), and specific externalizing (AD in the splenium of the corpus callosum, sagittal stratum, anterior corona radiata, and internal capsule). These findings suggest that some features of white matter within specific tracts may be transdiagnostically associated multiple forms of psychopathology through second-order factors of psychopathology rather with than individual mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra E Hinton
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
| | - Benjamin B Lahey
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Victoria Villalta-Gil
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Francisco A C Meyer
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Leah L Burgess
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Laura K Chodes
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Brooks Applegate
- Department of Educational Leadership, Research and Technology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, United States
| | - Carol A Van Hulle
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Bennett A Landman
- School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - David H Zald
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
DeYoung CG, Krueger RF. Understanding Psychopathology: Cybernetics and Psychology on the Boundary between Order and Chaos. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/1047840x.2018.1513690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colin G. DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Robert F. Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
A powerful and efficient multivariate approach for voxel-level connectome-wide association studies. Neuroimage 2018; 188:628-641. [PMID: 30576851 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe an approach to multivariate analysis, termed structured kernel principal component regression (sKPCR), to identify associations in voxel-level connectomes using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data. This powerful and computationally efficient multivariate method can identify voxel-phenotype associations based on the whole-brain connectivity pattern of voxels, and it can detect linear and non-linear signals in both volume-based and surface-based rsfMRI data. For each voxel, sKPCR first extracts low-dimensional signals from the spatially smoothed connectivities by structured kernel principal component analysis, and then tests the voxel-phenotype associations by an adaptive regression model. The method's power is derived from appropriately modelling the spatial structure of the data when performing dimension reduction, and then adaptively choosing an optimal dimension for association testing using the adaptive regression strategy. Simulations based on real connectome data have shown that sKPCR can accurately control the false-positive rate and that it is more powerful than many state-of-the-art approaches, such as the connectivity-wise generalized linear model (GLM) approach, multivariate distance matrix regression (MDMR), adaptive sum of powered score (aSPU) test, and least-square kernel machine (LSKM). Moreover, since sKPCR can reduce the computational cost of non-parametric permutation tests, its computation speed is much faster. To demonstrate the utility of sKPCR for real data analysis, we have also compared sKPCR with the above methods based on the identification of voxel-wise differences between schizophrenic patients and healthy controls in four independent rsfMRI datasets. The results showed that sKPCR had better between-sites reproducibility and a larger proportion of overlap with existing schizophrenia meta-analysis findings. Code for our approach can be downloaded from https://github.com/weikanggong/sKPCR.
Collapse
|
50
|
Lin HY, Cocchi L, Zalesky A, Lv J, Perry A, Tseng WYI, Kundu P, Breakspear M, Gau SSF. Brain-behavior patterns define a dimensional biotype in medication-naïve adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychol Med 2018; 48:2399-2408. [PMID: 29409566 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718000028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood-onset attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults is clinically heterogeneous and commonly presents with different patterns of cognitive deficits. It is unclear if this clinical heterogeneity expresses a dimensional or categorical difference in ADHD. METHODS We first studied differences in functional connectivity in multi-echo resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) acquired from 80 medication-naïve adults with ADHD and 123 matched healthy controls. We then used canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to identify latent relationships between symptoms and patterns of altered functional connectivity (dimensional biotype) in patients. Clustering methods were implemented to test if the individual associations between resting-state brain connectivity and symptoms reflected a non-overlapping categorical biotype. RESULTS Adults with ADHD showed stronger functional connectivity compared to healthy controls, predominantly between the default-mode, cingulo-opercular and subcortical networks. CCA identified a single mode of brain-symptom co-variation, corresponding to an ADHD dimensional biotype. This dimensional biotype is characterized by a unique combination of altered connectivity correlating with symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity, inattention, and intelligence. Clustering analyses did not support the existence of distinct categorical biotypes of adult ADHD. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our data advance a novel finding that the reduced functional segregation between default-mode and cognitive control networks supports a clinically important dimensional biotype of childhood-onset adult ADHD. Despite the heterogeneity of its presentation, our work suggests that childhood-onset adult ADHD is a single disorder characterized by dimensional brain-symptom mediators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Yuan Lin
- Department of Psychiatry,National Taiwan University Hospital, and College of Medicine,Taipei,Taiwan
| | - Luca Cocchi
- Systems Neuroscience Group,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute,Brisbane, Queensland,Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
| | - Jinglei Lv
- Systems Neuroscience Group,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute,Brisbane, Queensland,Australia
| | - Alistair Perry
- Systems Neuroscience Group,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute,Brisbane, Queensland,Australia
| | - Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng
- Institute of Medical Device and Imaging,National Taiwan University College of Medicine,Taipei,Taiwan
| | - Prantik Kundu
- Departments of Radiology and Psychiatry,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,New York,NY,USA
| | - Michael Breakspear
- Systems Neuroscience Group,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute,Brisbane, Queensland,Australia
| | - Susan Shur-Fen Gau
- Department of Psychiatry,National Taiwan University Hospital, and College of Medicine,Taipei,Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|